It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
With the rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as the primary treatment option for metastatic RCC, investigating the role of T cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a critical component of understanding both treatment response and resistance. Prior efforts, including single-cell transcriptomic approaches, have provided an important landscape of T cell transcriptional phenotypes. However, these immuno-profiling efforts require validation through functional interrogation of the TME to facilitate the development of novel immunomodulatory therapies. Thus, we established a patient derived tumor model (PDTM) system to directly assess the effect of inhibitory immune interactions on T cell function and anti-tumor activity in the RCC TME. In this initial proof-of-concept study, we evaluated T cell activation in the RCC TME using the PDTM system.
Methods
Fresh tumor samples were obtained from surgical resections of RCC at Yale-New Haven Hospital. The tumor was minced to ~1-3 mm³ pieces and suspended in an air-liquid interface system, consisting of tumor fragments embedded in a collagen matrix on an insert with a semi-permeable membrane, exposed to culture media. The tumor fragment and matrix suspension were carefully pipetted onto the Millicell insert, which served as the top layer. The PDTM setup includes an inner dish containing the bottom gel layer and the tissue-containing top layer. To complete the assembly, 1.5 ml of DMEM media with or without an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (aCD3mAb) and 500 nM of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (aPD1mAb) was added to the outer dish surrounding the insert.
Results
We successfully optimized PDTM experimental workflows for culture, dissociation, and analysis using immunohistochemistry (IHC), flow cytometry (FCM), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and IHC showed that the TME cellular architecture and immune cell composition was broadly preserved during the three day experimental period. Using FCM to analyze the dissociated tumor samples, we identified well-preserved CA9+ tumor cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations, CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, CD56+ natural killer cells, CD20+ B cells, and CD14+CD11b+ myeloid subsets including monocytes and CD163-/+macrophages. Among the T cells, we detected PD1+, LAG3+, TIM3+, and TIGIT+ cells. For dose-response analysis of aCD3mAb, we observed that stimulation with 0.025 ng/mL aCD3mAb for T cells from healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) yielded significant but non-saturating levels of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production as quantified by ELISA. We tested the effect of the anti-PD-1 antibody on PDTM under the low-dose of aCD3mAb, and importantly, found that treatment of the PDTM with aPD1mAb resulted in more activated CD8 T cells and higher IFN-γ production than the control samples.
Conclusions
Through optimization of assays evaluating T cell cytokine production, we were able to assess multiple axes of T-cell function in the RCC TME. This study revealed that our PDTM system preserves the RCC TME for functional interrogation. Furthermore, our system for assessing T cell phenotype and cytokine production successfully demonstrated the activity of PD-1 blockade ex vivo. Taken together, this novel ex vivo PDTM system has extensive applications in the study of RCC, including assessing the impact of ICIs on T cell function.
DOD CDMRP Funding: yes
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Center of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
2 Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
3 AstraZeneca , Gaithersburg, MD, USA
4 Department of Dermatology, Pathology, and Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
5 Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
6 Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA