It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Despite the improvements in genomic and pathological techniques to identify renal cell carcinoma (RCC), 2-6% of all patients with RCC cannot be classified into a particular subgroup, thus called “unclassified” RCC (uRCC). Ascertaining the genomic profile of those patients may help select proper treatment and find novel targets.
Methods
The American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) database v15.0 was used to select patients with RCC by using the OncoTree codes. All included patients were divided into four groups based on the most frequent subtypes of RCC: clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC), chromophobe RCC (chRCC), and uRCC. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was additionally used to assess corresponding oncogenic signaling pathways. We employed the chi-squared test to compare categorical variables and applied the Benjamini-Hochberg correction to calculate Q-values, thereby controlling the false discovery rate.
Results
Overall, 1,990 tumor samples from 1,888 patients were evaluated. uRCC was observed in 184 patients (9.7%), whereas most had ccRCC (n=1339, 70.9%), followed by pRCC (n=224, 11.9%) and chRCC (n=141, 7.5%). Age distribution at sample sequencing was comparable between uRCC and other RCC subtypes (P>0.05). The proportion of female patients with uRCC was higher at 38.4%, compared to 26.5% in ccRCC (Q=0.002) and 16.3% in pRCC (Q<0.001), yet was comparable to chRCC at 48.6% (Q=0.210). The prevalence of uRCC was also greater among black patients, accounting for 8.6% vs. 2.1% in ccRCC (Q=0.001). Among patients with uRCC (n=224), the most common genomic alterations (GAs) were detected in NF2 (15.8%), SETD2 (15.8%), TP53 (13.9%), TERT (13.4%), and VHL (11.8%). NF2 alterations were also more prevalent in patients with uRCC than in patients with ccRCC (1.8%, Q<0.001), chRCC (0.7%, Q<0.001), and pRCC (5.8%, Q=0.058). Notably, median overall survival (OS) was poorer in uRCC patients with altered NF2 (n=29) than in those with unaltered NF2 (n=155, 30.7 vs. 87.1 months, p=0.058). Of patients with uRCC, 135 (72.5%) samples were from primary tumors and 39 (20.9%) from metastatic sites, with no difference in GA frequencies between the two. CDKN2A and CDKN2B were the most frequent co-mutated genes in uRCC (Q<0.001), followed by VHL and BAP1 (Q<0.001), and SETD2 and PBRM1 (Q=0.023). GAs in uRCC were primarily observed in pathways related to TP53 (42.8%), cell cycle (33.3%), PI3K (23.5%), and HIPPO (7.7%).
Frequent Genomic Alterations in uRCC (n=184,%) | |
---|---|
NF2 | 29 (15.85%) |
SETD2 | 29 (15.85%) |
TP53 | 26 (13.98%) |
TERT | 24 (13.48%) |
VHL | 22 (11.89%) |
BAP1 | 21 (11.48%) |
PBRM1 | 14 (7.82%) |
MTOR | 13 (7.10%) |
FAT1 | 12 (6.90%) |
Conclusions
uRCC exhibited a unique genomic profile distinct from other common RCC subtypes. Notably, NF2 alterations were frequent and correlated with a poorer prognosis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, USA
2 Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA
3 Department Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston, MA, USA
4 Yale Cancer Center , New Haven, CT, USA
5 The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, MA, USA
6 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
7 Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine , Ankara, TURKEY
8 Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven, CT, USA