It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Over recent decades, many Western countries have added market incentives to their health systems. In a system of managed competition, health insurers are supposed to be prudent purchasers of health care on behalf of their enrollees. They can contract healthcare providers selectively. Enrollees who choose a health insurance policy with restrictive conditions, will have to make a co-payment if they consult a non-contracted provider. If the co-payment is unexpected, it may cause a problem for the enrollee. This study aims to gain insight into enrollees’ awareness of the conditions of such health insurance policies in the Netherlands.
Methods
In August 2020, an online questionnaire was sent out via health insurers to enrollees with restrictive health plans. In total 13,588 enrollees responded. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed on various outcome measures relating to enrollees’ awareness of the restrictive conditions.
Results
One fifth (19%) of the respondents appeared to be totally unfamiliar with the policy conditions. Men, younger people, people with a low level of education, a lower income, a poorer health status, and non-care users were found to be less familiar with the conditions (p = 0.00 for all). 62% who wanted to visit a healthcare provider whose care was not fully reimbursed, still went to that provider. Of those who had to pay extra because hospital care was not fully reimbursed, 62% did not know this in advance and 30% indicated that paying extra was a serious problem.
Conclusions
Not all enrollees who choose a policy with restrictive conditions are aware of the consequences of receiving care from a non-contracted provider. There seems room for improving the information provision, in particular for people with a low income and people with a poorer health status, as these groups more often reported unawareness about having to pay extra and more often faced financial problems.
Key messages
• Not all enrollees are well informed about their policy with restrictive conditions.
• Selective contracting does not always affect enrollees’ choice of a healthcare provider.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
2 NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands; Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands