It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder affecting patients’ quality of life (QoL). The Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ‑39) is a widely used instrument for assessing health‑related QoL in PD, but it has not been validated for Arabic‑speaking populations. This pilot study aims to validate the Arabic version of the PDQ‑39 in the Arab context, specifically among Tunisian patients. A total of 433 patients diagnosed with PD, recruited from four regional hospitals in Tunisia, were selected for the study. Eligible participants were those aged 50 years and older, diagnosed with PD for at least one year, and able to understand and complete the PDQ‑39 questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered through structured interviews conducted by trained healthcare professionals to ensure clarity and comprehension. We conducted both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to examine the factorial structure. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. The EFA revealed eight factors with eigenvalues above 1, and the CFA demonstrated a good model fit (CFI = 1.12, RMSEA = 0.08). The PDQ‑39 showed strong internal consistency (α = 0.763 to 0.923) and good convergent and discriminant validity. Our findings support the use of the Arabic PDQ‑39 as a reliable tool for assessing QoL in Tunisian PD patients, with potential for broader application across Arabic‑speaking populations.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Sociological Research Group on Contemporary Societies (GRESCO), University of Limoges, Limoges, France; Department of Education, Higher Institute of Sport, and Physical Education of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia; Laboratoire the Maghreb Arabe, Universite de Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia; Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
2 Department of Education, Higher Institute of Sport, and Physical Education of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia
3 Université de Mohamed Cherif Messadia, Souk Ahras, Algeria
4 Laboratoire the Maghreb Arabe, Universite de Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia; Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
5 University of Al-Aqsa, Gaza, Palestine
6 College of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Wasit, Kut, Iraq
7 Hereditary Metabolic Diseases Laboratory (LR12SP02), Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia
8 Sociological Research Group on Contemporary Societies (GRESCO), University of Limoges, Limoges, France
9 Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC), Doha, Qatar
10 Department of Education, Higher Institute of Sport, and Physical Education of Gafsa, University of Gafsa, Gafsa, Tunisia; Laboratoire the Maghreb Arabe, Universite de Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia; Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia