Keywords:
Lichen, Anticancer, Metabolomics, HeLa, P. caroliniana
Abstract
Purpose: Lichens are well-known as a source of pharmacologically active compounds. This includes anticancer compounds which have biomass constraints including using traditional techniques of lichen bioprospecting. This current study reports the use of cutting-edge metabolomics and a computational approach to discover anticancer biomarkers from Indonesian lichens.
Methods: Seven lichen crude extracts were evaluated against cervical cell lines HeLa using a MTT assay and secondary metabolites were profiled and recorded via a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) protocol. A multivariate analysis orthogonal partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was employed to determine anticancer biomarker of the lichens. A structure-based computational study against the HeLa cancer cell related protein targets (BCL-2 (4MAN), AKT-1 (4GV1), MCL-1 (5FDO), and BRAF (SVAM)) was used to determine the most potent biomarker.
Results:Jhe MTT assessment indicated the seven lichens possessed strong, medium and weak cytotoxicity. Multivariate analysis showed an OPLS-DA score plot with distinct separation among the strong, medium and weak cytotoxic groups. The biplot OPLS-DA and GC-MS analysis proposed 13 compounds of Parmelia caroliniana and 12 compounds of Physcia cf. millegrana as anticancer biomarker candidates. Docking experiments revealed 6-amino-3,4,7-triphenylpyrido[2',3':4,5]thieno[2,3-c]pyridazine 4 from P. caroliniana to possess the highest binding affinity against BCL-2 (4MAN), AKT-1 (4GV1), MCL-1 (5FDO), and BRAF (5VAM) proteins with affinity energy values of-1 0.0, -11.6, -1 0.4, -12.6, respectively. Conclusion: The study successfully revealed compound 4 as the anticancer biomarker against HeLa cell cancer of P. caroliniana in which can be further explored through in vitro and in vivo studies. Further, the metabolomic protocol established can be adapted as a tool for biomarker discoveries from other medicinal plants.
Introduction
Cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease with a total of 662301 cases resulting in 348874 deaths in 2022.1 Complications and side effects of currently available therapeutic agents demand new strategies for the development of new treatments, including the discovery of new anticancer agents with less side effects and minimal cost.2 Natural products are known as the source for 60% of the currently available anticancer drugs and these include bleomycin sulfate and topotecan hydrochloride, both natural product derivates used in cervical cancer treatment.3 A diversity of organisms have been subjected to anti cervical cancer bioprospecting including the cosmopolitan composite organism, the lichens, which have been used traditionally to treat cancer within numerous cultures around the world.4 Numerous lichen secondary metabolites have been isolated and evaluated for their bioactivities against an array of malignant cell lines.5
However, lichen bioprospecting remains a challenging task due to its limited biomass availability.6 This restraint traditional bioassay guided phytochemical investigation unsuitable. Therefore, a new mean metabolomic approach is necessary as this requires a relatively small amount of sample.7 In this study, a multivariate technique, orthogonal partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was adopted to identify bioactive compounds from selected lichen species which are responsible for their cytotoxicity against HeLa cell line. An in-silico study
was performed to confirm the anticancer biomarkers.
Material and Method
Lichen collection and extraction
Seven foliose lichen samples were collected from East Java, Indonesia including Parmelia aurulenta Tuck, from Jember district, Parmelia caroliniana Nyl. from Pasuruan district, Parmelia cetrata Ach., Parmelia dilatata Vain., Cladonia scabriuscula (Duby) Leight, Candelaria fibrosa (Fr.) Mull. Arg., and Physcia cf. millegrana Degel. from Bondowoso district. Samples were stored and labelled at the Drug Utilisation and Discovery Research Group (DUDRG), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Jember, Indonesia. Dried lichen samples were ground in the presence of liquid nitrogen and were then extracted with methanol followed by vacuum drying to produce crude methanol extracts.
Anticancer bioassay
Cytotoxicity was measured using a standard MTT assay8 HeLa (ATCC CRM-CCL-2) cells were treated with serial concentrations of lichen extracts (1024, 512, 256, 128, 64, 32 ug/mL).
Metabolomics experiment
Metabolomic profiles were generated based on a standard gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) protocol developed by Lisec at al.9 Compound annotation was generated from spectral data comparison against the mass spectra library, NIST version 2.2. Metabolomicstu dies were conducted usingthe multivariate analysis software SIMCA by MKS UMETRICS. The data used comprised of the x-axis representing the area at a specific retention time with the y-axis defining the lichen species. Chromatograms were pre-processed to produce 58 binned data and the lichens were classified into 3 groups based on cytotoxicity (IC values). Multivariate analysis was performed using the OPLS-DA method.
Computational study
Biomarker candidates were investigated using AutoDock Vina vl.2.3 on the HeLa related protein targets BCL-2 (PDBID:4MAN),MCL-1 (PDBID: 5FDO),AKT-l (PDB ID: 4GV1) and BRAF (PDB ID: 5VAM) with respective positive controls, 1Y1, 5X2, OXZ and 92J. Molecular energy minimisation and format conversion into pdbqt were performed using ChemBio and MGLTools software 1.5.7., respectively. The best docking conformations were imported and their interactions were evaluated using BIO VIA Discovery Visualizer v21.1.0.20298.
Results and Discussion
Lichen secondary metabolites were extracted from seven foliose lichen species using methanol with molecule derivatisation conducted using N-methyl trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) to enable robust molecular detection in the GC-MS. The cytotoxicity bioassay indicated HeLa cell lines to possess various sensitivities against the seven-lichens with P. millegrana showing the highest activity (Table 1).
A multivariate analysis using OPLS-DA produced good separation between the classified groups as depicted in both 2D score plots (Figure 1). The least active groups (red) including C. fibrosa, P. cetrata and P. dilatata were all gathered in the left quadrant with the medium (blue dots) and active groups (green dots) in the right quadrant (Figure 2, top). Further analysis based on a biplot diagram, an overlayed score and loading plot, displayed a distinct distribution of loading plot (yellow dots, represents the retention time generated from GC-MS chromatogram) around P. caroliniana and P. millegrana plots (Figure 2, bottom). This biplot analysis facilitated in determining important variables (retention time) which contribute to the anticancer activity of P. caroliniana (13.5-13.99; 20.5-20,99; 30-30.49 min) and P. millegrana (7.5-7.99; 8.5-8.99; 11.5-11.99; 13.5-13.99; 16-16.49; 18-18.49; 19.5 min). GC-MS compound annotation led to molecular identification of 13 secondary metabolites of P. caroliniana and 12 secondary metabolites of P. millegrana which correlated to cytotoxicity.
The in-silico investigation on 25 compounds of P millegrana and P caroliniana generated from OPLSDA multivariate analysis was performed using a docking approach with proteins related to cervical cancer, B-cell lymphoma-2 protein (BCL-2, PDB ID: 4MAN), alpha kinase threonin-1 protein (AKT-1, PDB ID: 4GV1), myeloid cell leukemia-1 protein (MCL-1, PDB ID: 5FDO), and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog Bl protein (BRAF, PDB ID: 5VAM) (Table 2). The docking experiment revealed 12 metabolites of P. millegrana to possess insignificant binding energy towards all four proteins compared to the binding affinity of corresponding endogenous ligands. In contrast, compounds 1-7 of P caroliniana showed binding affinities comparative to the endogenous ligands that bind 4GV1, 5FDO and 5VAM proteins. None of the secondary metabolites produced significant interactions against the BCL-2 (4MAN) protein.
The high binding affinity of compound 4 against
AKT-1 (4GV1) resulted from n and conventional hydrogen bond interactions with amino acid residues (Figure 3A). Compound 4 also showed n, van der Waals and conventional hydrogen bonds against MCL-1 protein (5FDO) (Figure 3B). In addition, n binding was responsible for the interaction between compound 4 and BRAF protein (5VAM) (Figure 3C). Overall these interactions and the molecular size of compound 4 followed Lipinskis rule, thus providing reasonable values for pharmacokinetic parameters in drug development.10
Conclusion
The study successfully determined secondary metabolites of P. caroliniana and P. millegrana to have significant cytotoxicity contributions based on OPLS-DA analysis. Computational approaches suggested compound 4 of P. caroliniana as a biomarker compound responsible for the cytotoxicity against HeLa-cell protein marker. This straightforward protocol can be applied in biomarker discovery in other medicinal plants without excessive phytochemical experiments.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support of University of Jember through internal research grant.
Authors' Contribution
Conceptualization: Ari Satia Nugraha.
Methodology: Ari Satia Nugraha.
Data curation: Chintya Permata Zahky Sukrisno Putri, Dinar Mutia
Rani, Banun Kusumawardani.
Formal analysis: Chintya Permata Zahky Sukrisno Putri, Dinar
Mutia Rani, Anang Kurnia, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Investigation: Chintya Permata Zahky Sukrisno Putri, Dinar Mutia
Rani, Banun Kusumawardani, Ludmilla Fitri Untari, Anang Kurnia,
Ari Satia Nugraha.
Software: Ari Satia Nugraha, Anang Kurnia.
Supervision: Paul A. Keller, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Validation: Anang Kurnia, Paul A. Keller, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Visualization: Chintya Permata Zahky Sukrisno Putri, Dinar Mutia
Rani, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Funding acquisition: Ari Satia Nugraha.
Writing-original draft: Chintya Permata Zahky Sukrisno Putri,
Dinar Mutia Rani, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Writing-review & editing: Paul A. Keller, Ari Satia Nugraha.
Competing Interests
None.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Funding
The research is funded by University Jember through international cooperation research grant with contract no. 3148/UN25.3.1/ LT/2024.
References
1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today [Internet]. IARC; 2024. Available from: https://gco.iarc.who.int/today. Accessed
October 14, 2024.
2. Thapa N, Maharjan M, Xiong Y, Jiang D, Nguyen TP, Petrini MA, et al. Impact of cervical cancer on quality of life of women in Hubei, China. 5c; Rep 2018;8(1):11993. doi: 10.1038/S41598-018-30506-6
3. Newman DJ, Cragg CM. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. 1 Nat Prod 2020;83(3):770-803. doi: 10.102 Vacs. jnatprod.9b01285
4. Nugraha AS, LamTH, Wongso H, Firli LN, Keller PA. Lichens: a source of anticancer drugs. In: Das AK, Sharma A, Kathuria D, Ansari MJ, Bhardwaj G, eds. Chemistry, Biology and Pharmacology of Lichen. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2024. p. 193-229. doi: 10.1002/9781394190706.ch14
5. Solarova Z, Liskova A, Samec M, Kubatka P, Biisselberg D, Solar P. Anticancer potential of lichens'secondary metabolites. B;omo/ecu/es2020;10(1):87. doi: 10.3390/biom10010087
6. Oksanen I. Ecological and biotechnological aspects of lichens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006;73(4):723-34. doi: 1 0.1 007/ S00253-006-0611-3
7. Santiago KAA, Edrada-Ebel R, Dela Cruz TEE, Cheow YL, Ting ASY. Biodiscovery of potential antibacterial diagnostic metabolites from the endolichenic fungus Xylaria venustula using LC-MS-based metabolomics. Biology (Basel) 2021 ;1 0(3):1 91. doi: 1 0.3390/biology1 00301 91
8. Stevigny C, Block S, De Pauw-Cillet MC, de Hoffmann E, Llabres C, Adjakidje V, et al. Cytotoxic aporphine alkaloids from Cassytha filiformis. Planta Med2002;68(11):1 042-4. doi:
1 0.1 055/S-2002-35651
9. Lisec J, Schauer N, Kopka J, Willmitzer L, Fernie AR. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat Protoc2006;1 (1 ):387-96. doi: 1 0.1 038/ nprot.2006.59
1 0. Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experiments and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001 ;46(1 -3):3-26. doi: 1 0.1 01 6/s01 69-409x(00)00129-0
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction Cervical cancer is a life-threatening disease with a total of 662301 cases resulting in 348874 deaths in 2022.1 Complications and side effects of currently available therapeutic agents demand new strategies for the development of new treatments, including the discovery of new anticancer agents with less side effects and minimal cost.2 Natural products are known as the source for 60% of the currently available anticancer drugs and these include bleomycin sulfate and topotecan hydrochloride, both natural product derivates used in cervical cancer treatment.3 A diversity of organisms have been subjected to anti cervical cancer bioprospecting including the cosmopolitan composite organism, the lichens, which have been used traditionally to treat cancer within numerous cultures around the world.4 Numerous lichen secondary metabolites have been isolated and evaluated for their bioactivities against an array of malignant cell lines.5 However, lichen bioprospecting remains a challenging task due to its limited biomass availability.6 This restraint traditional bioassay guided phytochemical investigation unsuitable. [...]a new mean metabolomic approach is necessary as this requires a relatively small amount of sample.7 In this study, a multivariate technique, orthogonal partial least-squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was adopted to identify bioactive compounds from selected lichen species which are responsible for their cytotoxicity against HeLa cell line. [...]analysis based on a biplot diagram, an overlayed score and loading plot, displayed a distinct distribution of loading plot (yellow dots, represents the retention time generated from GC-MS chromatogram) around P. caroliniana and P. millegrana plots (Figure 2, bottom). The in-silico investigation on 25 compounds of P millegrana and P caroliniana generated from OPLSDA multivariate analysis was performed using a docking approach with proteins related to cervical cancer, B-cell lymphoma-2 protein (BCL-2, PDB ID: 4MAN), alpha kinase threonin-1 protein (AKT-1, PDB ID: 4GV1), myeloid cell leukemia-1 protein (MCL-1, PDB ID: 5FDO), and V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog Bl protein (BRAF, PDB ID: 5VAM) (Table 2). Overall these interactions and the molecular size of compound 4 followed Lipinskis rule, thus providing reasonable values for pharmacokinetic parameters in drug development.10 Conclusion The study successfully determined secondary metabolites of P. caroliniana and P. millegrana to have significant cytotoxicity contributions based on OPLS-DA analysis.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Drug Utilisation and Discovery Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia 68121
2 Department of Tropical Biology, Faculty of Biology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
3 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jember, Jawa Timur 68121, Indonesia