Evaluation of Hepatitis C in 20 Years: A Turkish Experience

Abstract

Conclusion:

Although GT1 is still dominant in our country, GT3 and GT4 have been increasingly seen over the years, suggesting that the genotype distribution may change in the coming years due to uncontrolled migration and effective direct-acting antivirals.

Results:

1.166 patients whose HCV genotype was determined were evaluated. The mean age of the population is 52±14.75 years, 83.53% of all patients was infected with genotype 1 (GT1), 8.23% with GT3, 5.83% with GT2, 2.23% with GT4 and 0.17% of them with GT5. While the GT1 rate decreased in patients over the years, an increase was found in other GTs. GT1 and GT2 were more common in females (p<0.001); GT3 and GT4 were more dominant in males (p<0.001). The mean age of females was high in all genotypes. The mean age of GT3 was significantly lower than the other groups (p<0.001).

Methods:

Patients who were at the age of 18 and above and whose HCV-RNA was positive between January 2001 and January 2021 were evaluated.

Objective:

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still maintains its importance since it is one of the most important causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Our hospital, located in İstanbul, which is the 10^th most crowded city in the world, has a patient cohort where epidemiological change can be observed due to its deep-rooted history and serving people of different nations in terms of settlement. Main aim in this study is to evaluate the change in HCV epidemiology in our country over the years.

Introduction

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still maintains its importance since it is one of the most important causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, and there is limited access to effective treatment options (1). According to the 2016 global report of the World Health Organization (WHO), it has been reported that 71 million people worldwide are infected with HCV, causing 400,000 deaths annually (2). Although its incidence rate is decreasing in developed countries, a decrease in deaths due to liver disease is expected only in the next 20 years (3,4). Again, in this report, WHO has targeted the eradication of HCV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) until 2030.

Although the seroprevalence of HCV in Turkey is in the range of 0.6-1.6%; it is responsible for 25% of all liver cirrhosis, 25-30% of hepatocellular carcinoma and also 50% of liver transplantation cases (5-7).

HCV is a single strand RNA virus from theFlaviviridae family. There are regions in the genome structure that are both very well preserved and highly variable. According to sequencing, it has been found that there are 7 main genotypes and nearly 67 related subtypes (3). It is important to determine the genotype in collecting epidemiological data of HCV, shaping antiviral treatment, and predicting prognosis.

The distribution of HCV genotypes varies also geographically. Genotype 1 (GT1), genotype 2 (GT2) and genotype 3 (GT3), subgroup 1a, 1b, 2a and 3a are the most common ones worldwide. These genotypes are considered as infections acquired before safe blood transfusion and epidemic subtypes thought to be spread by IV drug users. Other species (GT4-GT7) are classified as endemic and are distributed in restricted areas (3,8,9).

In our globalizing world, changes are observed in the epidemiology of infectious diseases due to the changing conditions. Our hospital, located in Istanbul, which is the 10^th most crowded city in the world, has a patient cohort where epidemiological change can be observed due to its deep-rooted history and serving people of different nations in terms of settlement. Our aim in this study is to evaluate the change in HCV epidemiology in our country over the years.

Materials and Methods

In this retrospective, single-center observational study, patients who were at the age of 18 and above and admitted to the University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital between January 2001 and January 2021 and whose HCV-RNA was positive were evaluated were evaluated. The demographic characteristics, admission dates, race and HCV genotypes of the patients were obtained through the hospital information system and recorded in the prepared forms.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients diagnosed with HCV between January 2001 and January 2021,

2. Patients who were at the age of 18 and above,

3. Patients whose initial HCV RNA level was measured and genotype was studied were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who were under the age of 18,

2. Patients with undetectable initial HCV RNA or genotype, or both, for any kind of reason.

For HCV genotype determination, the Innolipa HCV II kit (Bayer Diagnostics, USA) was used between 2000-2010, and the HCV Genotype Plus Real-TM (Sacace Biotechnologies-Italy) kit between 2011-2020.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Software SPSS 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Chi-squared and Fisher’s Exact tests were used for qualitative variables. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for variables with non-normal distribution, which was determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparison of HCV RNA levels among genotypes was performed by Kruskal-Wallis test. p<0.001 was considered as statistically significant.

Our study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration Principles and the Ethics Committee Approval of the University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee on 19.03.2021-with the number 2776.

Results

Between January 2001 and January 2021, 1.166 patients whose HCV genotype was determined were evaluated. The mean age of the population is 52±14.75 years. When the general genotype distribution is examined, 83.53% (n=974) of all patients was infected with GT1, 8.23% (n=96) with GT3, 5.83% (n=68) with GT2, 2.23% (n=26) with GT4 and 0.17% (n=2) of them with GT5. In GT1 subgroup, 8.42% of patients was infected with undetermined subtype, 13.04% with GT1a and 78.54% with GT1b. In GT2 subgroup, 76.47% of patients was infected with undetermined subtype, 17.65% with GT2a and 5.88% with GT2c. In GT3 subtype, 62.5% of patients was infected with undetermined subtype, 36.46% with GT3a and 1.04% of them was infected with GT3b. GT5 was detected in 2 cases, all of them were subtyped as 5a. Evaluation of demographic and genotype distributions of our patients is shown in Table 1. While the GT1 rate decreased in our patients over the years, an increase was found in other GTs. Genotype distribution percentages over the years are shown in Graphic 1, and the distribution of genotypes by years is shown in Graphic 2. GT6 and GT7 were not detected in the study group. The infection caused by more than one genotype at a time was not detected in 2 people (1b/4 and 1b/2a). These cases were Syrian.

The study population consisted of 611 (52.4%) females, 555 (47.6%) males. There was a significant difference in the distribution of genotypes by gender. While GT1 and GT2 were more common in females (p<0.001), GT3 and GT4 were more dominant in males (p<0.001) (Table 2). The mean age of the population was 52±14.75 years, while the mean age of females was 54.2±4.07 years and the mean age of males was 48.55±6.42 years. The mean age of females was high in all genotypes. The mean age of GT3 was significantly lower than the other groups (p<0.001) (Table 2).

Discussion

Transfusion of uncontrolled blood and blood products, invasive procedures and intravenous (IV) drug use are effective in the transmission of HCV. In developed countries, after safe transfusion procedures, its incidence is increasing in IV drug users, even if it incidence is decreasing in overall. In a multi-center study from 2013, it was reported that the incidence of HCV infection gradually decreased with the transition to safe blood transfusion practices and the number of new cases remained constant due to the low rate of IV drug users in our society. Consistent with this high incidence before 1992, a higher prevalence of HCV has been reported in patients over 50 years of age. In our study, the mean age was 52 years old (4).

The distribution of HCV genotypes varies worldwide. It is responsible for 49.1% of GT1 adult infections worldwide. It is followed by GT3 (17.9%), GT4 (16.8), GT2 (11%), GT5 (2%) and GT6 (1.4%) (3).

GT1, the most prevalent genotype in developed countries, is also the most prevalent worldwide and respond well to the second generation direct‑acting antiviral (DAA) therapies with the viral eradication rates of >0% (10). In our study, the dominant genotype was GT1 (83.53%), followed by GT 3 (8.23%) and GT2 (5.83%). GT1 prevalence were reported between 62.4-95.3% in studies conducted in different regions of Turkey (11,12). The prevalence of GT1b, which is the most frequently observed genotype of the world (23.2-92.6%), was reported in Turkey with regional differences between 17.7% to 87%. Our study supports the general trend with a rate of 78.54% (10,11-13). Identifying previously unreported genotype “GT5” and showing relative increase of GT4 were probably caused by immigrants involved in our study group (Graphic 3).

It is known that social events such as wars and migrations play an important role in the epidemiological change of infectious diseases. GT3 is the second most common genotype, and it is the genotype that has spread among IV drug users, especially in Europe. In our previous study conducted between 2012-2019, the prevalence was 11.86% for GT3. In this study, the prevalence of GT3 was 8.23%, and two of our patients were IV drug user. In studies conducted in our country, the prevalence has been reported to be between 1.1-46%, and 0.6-71.6% from different regions in the world (10,11,14,15).

GT2 and GT4 are genotypes of African origin, and GT4 is thought to have spread iatrogenically, especially during the schistosomiasis vaccination applied in Egypt in the past, and spread to Europe due to the political relations of the countries and through frequent travels (16). In our country, it is known that it increased with the refugees coming after the Syrian civil war. In the study of Cirit et al. (17) evaluated the GTs of Syrian refugees, GT4 was found to be 48.2%. In our study, GT4 has been detected since 2009 at a rate of 2.23%. While the prevalence of GT2 is between 0.1% and 24.5% in the world, it is between 1.4-14.5% in studies conducted in our country and in our study, the prevalence was found to be 5.83% (13,18).

In the study, the low number of cases in 2020 is thought to be due to the low number of patients admitted due to the Coronavirus disease-2019 outbreak. It was observed that age and gender were effective in genotype distribution. While GT1 and GT2 were more common in females, GT3 was observed more frequently in males. In the study conducted by Karabulut et al. (19), GT1 and GT2 were observed with a higher rate in females (20).

In the GEHEP 2005 study conducted in Spain, while male gender is dominant over GT3 and GT4; female gender is dominant in GT1 and GT2 (21). Similar results were obtained in a study in which Western Europe, Russia and Israel regions were evaluated. It is thought that the prevalence in female gender is due to the fact that they are more exposed to childbirth and related invasive procedures and blood transfusion practices.

Study Limitations

Our study had limitations. Because of its retrospective nature, transmission routes, nationality, and diagnostic method (screening, presence of clinical findings), which could lead epidemiologically could not be obtained. In addition, DAAs, which were included in the scope of payment by the Social Security Institution in June 2016 in our country, are out of the scope for asylum seekers and foreign nationals, and these antivirals are not sold freely, but are distributed by the state. Since this patient group does not have a treatment opportunity, it is possible that their application will be reduced.

Conclusion

Although GT1 is still dominant in our country, GT3 and GT4 have been increasingly seen over the years, suggesting that the genotype distribution may change in the coming years due to uncontrolled migration and effective DAAs.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Our study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration Principles and the ethics committee approval of the University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee on 19.03.2021-with the number 2776.

Informed Consent: An informed consent obtained as written forms from all of our patients to publish.

Peer-review: Internally and externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions

Concept: N.D.S., İ.S., Design: N.D.S., İ.S., Data Collection or Processing: N.D.S., İ.S., Analysis or Interpretation: N.D.S., İ.S., Drafting Manuscript: N.D.S., İ.S., S.B., Critical Revision of Manuscript: N.D.S., İ.S., S.B., Final Approval and Accountability: N.D.S., İ.S., S.B., Technical and Material Support: N.D.S., S.B., Supervision: N.D.S., S.B., Writing: N.D.S., İ.S., S.B.

Conflict of Interest:No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

Shepard CW, Finelli L, Alter MJ. Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2005;5(9):558-567.

World Health Organization (WHO). GlobalHepatitis Report 2017. Geneva: WHO; 2017.

Petruzziello A, Marigliano S, Loquercio G, Cacciapuoti C. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes distribution: an epidemiological update in Europe. Infect Agent Cancer 2016;11:53.

Razavi H, Elkhoury AC, Elbasha E, Estes C, Pasini K, Poynard T, et al. Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden and cost in the United States. Hepatology 2013;57(6):2164-2170.

Tosun S, Bal&#305;k &#304;, Tabak F, Salto&#287;lu N, &Ouml;rmeci N, &#350;encan &#304;, et al. Evaluation of risk factors associated with HBsAg and Anti-HCV seropositivity: results of a nationwide population-based epidemiological survey study in Turkey. Mediterr J Infect Microb Antimicrob 2018;7:34.

Tozun N, Ozdogan O, Cakaloglu Y, Idilman R, Karasu Z, Akarca U, et al. Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections and risk factors in Turkey: a fieldwork TURHEP study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2015;21(11):1020-1026.

T&uuml;rkiye Viral Hepatit &Ouml;nleme ve Kontrol Program&#305; (2018) Sa&#287;l&#305;k Bakanl&#305;&#287;&#305; Yay&#305;n No:1102, Ankara. Eri&#351;im Adresi: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/Bulasici-hastaliklar db/duyurular/Turkiye_Viral_Hepatit_Onleme_ve_Kontrol_Programi/Turkiye_Viral_Hepatit_Onleme_ve_Kontrol_Programi_TR.pdf. Accessed: 12 June 2019

Daw MA, El-Bouzedi AA, Ahmed MO, Dau AA, Agnan MM, Drah AM. Geographic integration of hepatitis C virus: A global threat. World J Virol 2016;5(4):170-182.

Smith DB, Bukh J, Kuiken C, Muerhoff AS, Rice CM, Stapleton JT, et al. Expanded classification of hepatitis C virus into 7 genotypes and 67 subtypes: updated criteria and genotype assignment web resource. Hepatology 2014;59(1):318-327.

Messina JP, Humphreys I, Flaxman A, Brown A, Cooke GS, Pybus OG, et al. Global distribution and prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes. Hepatology 2015;61(1):77-87.

Kayman T, Karak&uuml;k&ccedil;&uuml; &Ccedil;, Karaman A, G&ouml;z&uuml;tok F. Genotypic distribution of hepatitis C virus infection in Kayseri region. Turk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2012;42(1):21-26.

Akta&#351; O, &Ouml;zbek A, Ayd&#305;n H, &Ouml;zk&uuml;lekci MB. Distribution of HCV genotypes in patients of with chronic hepatitis C in the Eastern Anatolia region. Viral Hepatitis Journal 2014;20(3):91-94.

Us T, Kasifoglu N, Aslan FG, Aslan M, Akgun Y, Durmaz G. The distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in the Eskisehir Region of Turkey. J Clin Anal Med 2017;8(2):88-91.

Sari ND, Karata&#351; A, &#304;nc&#305; A, Y&ouml;r&uuml;k G. Evaluation of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype Distribution in Domestic and Foreign Patients. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2020;40(2):148-153.

Caliskan A, Kirisci O, Ozkaya E, Ozden S, Tumer S, Caglar S, et al. Distribution and predominance of genotype 3 in hepatitis C virus carriers in the province of kahramanmaras, Turkey. Hepat Mon 2015;15(4):e25142.

Welzel TM, Bhardwaj N, Hedskog C, Chodavarapu K, Camus G, McNally J, et al. Global epidemiology of HCV subtypes and resistance-associated substitutions evaluated by sequencing-based subtype analyses. J Hepatol 2017;67(2):224-236.

Cirit OS, Uzala M&#305;zrakl&#305; A, Vurupalmaz Y, G&uuml;m&uuml;&#351; HH, &Ouml;zturhan H, Bar&#305;&#351; A. Genotyping distribution of hepatitis C virus in &#350;anl&#305;urfa province and effect of Syrian patients. Viral Hepat J 2019;25(2):62-66.

Borcak D, &Ccedil;a&#287;&#305;r &Uuml;, Yal&ccedil;&#305;ner A. Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes and their association with serum alanine aminotransferases and quantitive serum HCV RNA levels. Ankem Derg 2015;29(1):36-40.

Karabulut N, Alacam S, Yolcu A, Onel M, Agacfidan A. Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Istanbul, Turkey. Indian J Med Microbiol 2018;36(2):192-196.

Kartashev V, D&ouml;ring M, Nieto L, Coletta E, Kaiser R, Sierra S. HCV EuResist Study group. New findings in HCV genotype distribution in selected West European, Russian and Israeli regions. J Clin Virol 2016;81:82-89.

Aguilera A, Navarro D, Rodr&iacute;guez-Frias F, Viciana I, Mart&iacute;nez-Sapi&ntilde;a AM, Rodr&iacute;guez MJ, et al. Prevalence and distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Spain during the 2000-2015 period (the GEHEP 005 study). J Viral Hepat 2017;24(9):725-732.&nbsp;