It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Staff working in long-term care (LTC) homes frequently report experiencing moral distress related to lack of autonomy and not being able to provide quality care. Huddles have been used as a communication tool for many years in acute care settings to improve collaboration and safety culture. In LTC homes, huddles are implemented less often, despite evidence of their benefits in improving support and teamwork. In this pre-test post-test implementation study, huddles led by a nurse practitioner (NP) were introduced in a privately-owned not-for-profit LTC home with < 150 beds, located in a medium urban centre in Ontario, Canada. Objectives of the study were to 1) examine fidelity of huddle implementation; 2) examine the extent to which the huddles improved staff’ outcomes of moral distress, job satisfaction, and support provided by the NP estimated with Bayesian proportional odds model. A total of 48 huddles were carried out by the NP over 15 weeks. Huddles were most commonly attended by personal support workers (98%) and registered practical nurses (96%), with an average of 7 individuals per huddle. Topics most often addressed at huddles were related to resident care (46%) and staff concerns (34%). Strong statistical evidence of a reduction in overall moral distress was evident for staff attending the huddles, when compared to staff who did not (posterior probability =.9933). No changes in job satisfaction and support provided by the NP were observed. Introducing huddles in LTC homes may be effective at reducing moral distress experienced by staff.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 KITE Research Institute: Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-UHN , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
2 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network , Thornhill, Ontario , Canada
3 Toronto Rehabilitation Institute , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
4 Conestoga , Kitchener, Ontario , Canada
5 Ryerson University , Toronto, Ontario , Canada