It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Decision-making regarding surgical treatment of patients showing radiographic evidence of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) remains a challenge as there is no consensus on treatment in current literature. When medical evidence is unclear, understanding patient preferences becomes particularly important in deciding the optimal treatment for each patient. The purpose of this study was to measure the patient-determined importance of factors surrounding surgical treatment of FAIS in BHD. Patients aged 18–65 with hip pain and BHD (defined as lateral center edge angle 18–25 or Tonnis angle 10–15) morphology were given a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) focusing on attributes that differ between treatment options: Length of Hospital Stay, Major Complication Rate, Chance of Needing Reoperation within 2 Years and Time to Return to Regular Exercise. This DCE was used to calculate treatment preferences, relative attribute importance and preference weights. A total of 101 patients fully completed the DCE. The most important attribute (average importance weight, 95% CI) was Chance of Reoperation (60.16, 56.99–63.34), while the least important was Hospital Stay (6.57, 5.73–7.41). Only 6 Months to Resume Regular Exercise and 2% Chance of Reoperation (P < 0.05) significantly impacted treatment choice. When presented with fixed choice parameters, 50.5% of subjects preferred PAO and arthroscopy while 49.5% opted for arthroscopy alone. When no clear surgical treatment is indicated, patient preferences have an amplified role in patient decision-making. Our results confirm variation in attribute importance within treatments as well as treatment choice, highlighting the importance in understanding patient preferences in decision-making for FAIS in BHD. More patient-specific generalizable outcomes of surgical treatment options are needed in the literature.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center , 3475 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USA
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine , 450 Broadway, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of New Mexico , 2211 Lomas Blvd NE., Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
4 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center , 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center , 1611 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA