It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
As Ethiopia expands cervical cancer screening services, it urgently needs information to develop appropriate post-screening diagnostic and treatment services for women with abnormal results. Quality cancer care requires extensive coordination among multidisciplinary provider teams. This study explores experiences coordinating care among providers at multiple levels of the cancer-care continuum in Ethiopia.
Methods
From February 2020 to January 2022, we conducted four focus group discussions (FGDs) and ten key-informant interviews with 34 purposively selected healthcare providers: health extension workers (HEWs) in communities; midwives and nurses at health centers; obstetrician-gynecologists at regional hospitals, and oncology nurses, oncologists, and pathologists at tertiary hospitals. FGDs and interviews were conducted in Amharic and audio-recorded. Audio transcripts were then simultaneously transcribed and translated into English for analysis. Investigators performed thematic analysis using inductive and deductive codes.
Results
We found four themes: resource scarcity, care centralization, lack of formal coordination mechanisms, and recommendations. Themes were dynamically connected by eight sub-themes. Providers valued teamwork and coordination. However, severe shortages of cancer specialists and high patient loads left little time for communication and hampered the formation of stable care teams. Facilities lacked formal coordination systems, such as patient navigators and case managers. The relative centralization of cancer care specialists and equipment in the capital exacerbated coordination problems. It impeded pre- and post-treatment care communication between tertiary and secondary facilities and caused secondary facilities to unnecessarily refer patients because they lacked the resources to treat them locally. Referral communication was unidirectional, with lower-level providers communicating regularly to higher-level facilities but rarely receiving feedback. The exception was regular, structured feedback from primary facilities to HEWs. Lower-level providers wanted to learn whether their referrals were appropriate or completed, and many used informal channels to gain this information. Respondents recommend decentralizing cancer care services, significantly increasing staff and equipment investments, and adding liaison staff at secondary hospitals to track and communicate patient progress and counsel patients for referral.
Conclusions
Our findings underscore the need to rapidly increase cancer specialist staff and regional cancer centers in Ethiopia and highlight the importance of developing robust coordination and feedback mechanisms at secondary and tertiary facilities.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer