It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective
To design and evaluate the model combining ISOBAR communication tool with case teaching method, and to explore its influence on the nursing handover level, clinical work ability, nursing teaching quality and nurses’ satisfaction of pediatric resident nurses.
Methods
A total of 84 pediatric resident nurses were selected by random sampling and divided into the experimental group (n = 40) and the control group (n = 44). The experimental group implemented the ISOBAR combined with case teaching method, while the control group adopted the traditional lecture method combined with case teaching method. After 2 months of pediatric standardized training, the nursing handover level was evaluated by the Nursing Assessment of Shift Report (NASR) scale, the clinical nursing ability was evaluated by the pediatric and hospital-wide standardized training assessment results, the teaching satisfaction and willingness to continue in nursing work were evaluated by a 10-point satisfaction questionnaire, and the incidence of nursing adverse events in the two groups was recorded.
Results
The experimental group was significantly better than the control group in dimensions (including patient safety assurance, patient participation promotion, enhancement of nurses’ supervision, cooperation and responsibility) and the total score of the NASR scale (P < 0.05). The experimental group also had significantly higher scores in the pediatric and hospital-wide standardized training assessment results and willingness to continue in nursing work (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of nursing adverse events and teaching satisfaction between the two groups.
Conclusion
The combination of ISOBAR and case teaching method effectively improves the nursing handover level and clinical nursing ability of resident nurses, and increases their willingness to continue in nursing work. Simple to implement, this model is well worth further promotion.
Clinical trial registration number
Not applicable, as the study is not a trial.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer