It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
In clear aligner treatment (CAT), closure of the premolar space is achieved by reducing aligner length. Posterior anchorage preparation is effective in preserving molar angulation; however, the resulting distal tipping can contribute to anterior anchorage loss. This study aims to identify an approach that balances anterior torque compensation with posterior anchorage preparation in CAT.
Methods
Two finite element models were developed to simulate en-masse incisor retraction using clear aligners (CAs). Model 1 simulated first premolar extraction cases, while Model 2 simulated second premolar extraction cases. In Step I, only distal tipping was applied to the posterior teeth as an anchorage preparation strategy. In Step II, a positive torque of 0.08 degrees was introduced to the incisors to simulate torque compensation in a single orthodontic step.
Results
In Model 1, the maxillary lateral incisor and mandibular central incisor tipped further lingually compared to cases without posterior anchorage preparation. The posterior terminal teeth showed a tendency to tip mesially in Step I, which was partially reduced with anterior torque compensation in Step II. In Model 2, all incisors had a stronger tendency to tip lingually in Step I. Molar anchorage control improved with incisor torque compensation of 0.08 degrees. Tipping was more pronounced in the maxillary arches compared to the mandibular arches. Posterior anchorage loss was greater in Model 2, while Model 1 showed more pronounced anchorage loss in anterior teeth.
Conclusions
Posterior anchorage preparation alone increases the risk of anterior anchorage loss. Combining this approach with incisor torque compensation helps distribute the anchorage burden more effectively. As an advanced approach, anterior and posterior anchorage management should be strategically coordinated and adapted to the number of orthodontic steps required in premolar extraction cases treated with CAs.
Clinical trial number
Not applicable.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer