It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Stage II adult-acquired flatfoot (AAF) could be effectively treated by Hintermann (H) and Evans (E) lateral column lengthening (LCL) calcaneal osteotomies. This retrospective cohort study was aimed to compare the post-surgical outcome of this two osteotomies used in Chinese patients.
Methods
Of 114 eligible patients (149 feet) with Stage II AAF admitted from October 2018 to October 2022, 92 feet treated by Hintermann osteotomy and 57 feet treated by Evans osteotomy were observed in 2-year follow-up. Pre-surgical and post-surgical radiographic parameters, clinic scores and degenerative changes of related joints were collected and analyzed.
Result
Pitch angle, Meary’s angle, Naviculocuboidal (NC) overlap (%), Medial arch sagittal (MAS) angle, Talocalcaneal (TC) angle, Talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, Talus–second metatarsal (T-2MT) angle were significantly corrected by both H-LCL and E-LCL osteotomies (P <.05). The clinic scores of AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society) score, SF-36 (Short-Form 36-item Health Survey), Pain-NRS (Numerical Rating Scale), and UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles activity score) after surgery showed significant improvement for the patient in both groups. Comparing between the two groups, no significant differences were found regarding to radiographic parameters, clinic scores or degenerative changes. However, degenerative changes of calcaneocuboidal (CC) joint were found in 6 cases (6.5%) in H-LCL group and 17 cases (29.8%) in E-LCL group. Degenerative changes of subtalar joint were found in 6 cases (6.5%) in H-LCL group and 17 cases (24.6%) in E-LCL group. One case developed complication of osteotomy nonunion, and one case underwent secondary arthrodesis in E-LCL group.
Conclusion
Both H-LCL and E-LCL osteotomies give rise to an outstanding radiographic correction and a significant enhancement of clinic scores in flatfoot deformity. Compared to E-LCL, H-LCL tends to protect the subtalar joint for Chinese patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer