Abstract

Healthcare debriefing is a cognitively demanding conversation after a simulation or clinical experience that promotes reflection, underpinned by psychological safety and attention to learner needs. The process of debriefing requires mental processing that engages both “fast” or unconscious thinking and “slow” intentional thinking to be able to navigate the conversation. “Fast” thinking has the potential to surface cognitive biases that impact reflection and may negatively influence debriefer behaviors, debriefing strategies, and debriefing foundations. As a result, negative cognitive biases risk undermining learning outcomes from debriefing conversations. As the use of healthcare simulation is expanding, the need for faculty development specific to the roles bias plays is imperative. In this article, we hope to build awareness about common cognitive biases that may present in debriefing conversations so debriefers have the chance to begin the hard work of identifying and attending to their potential detrimental impacts.

Details

Title
When common cognitive biases impact debriefing conversations
Author
Meguerdichian, Michael J; Trottier, Dana George; Campbell-Taylor, Kimberly; Bentley, Suzanne; Bryant, Kellie; Kolbe, Michaela; Grant, Vincent; Cheng, Adam
Pages
1-8
Section
Advancing Simulation Practice
Publication year
2024
Publication date
2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
e-ISSN
20590628
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3201592488
Copyright
© 2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.