It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Controlling credit risk is crucial for maintaining financial stability, and the role of geographic factors in this regard is a significant concern for scholars and policymakers. Drawing on the concept of information asymmetry, we developed a theoretical model to analyze how geographic factors influence credit risk. Our theoretical proposition suggests that the spatial organization of banks affects the efficiency of collecting and processing soft information, ultimately impacting the credit risk. To test this proposition, we collected microdata from Chinese commercial banks spanning the period from 2011 to 2022. Employing a mediating effect model, we empirically examined the relationship between spatial organizational structure and credit risk. Our results indicate that the distance between bank operations and functional distance impedes the collection and processing of soft information, thereby exacerbating credit risk in banks. The study focuses on examining how the spatial organizational structure of Chinese commercial banks affects credit risk. By analyzing geographic factors and information asymmetry, the study aims to understand how the organization of banks influences the collection and processing of soft information, which in turn impacts the credit risk. Furthermore, our analysis of the sample reveals that the mediating role of soft information varies between state-owned banks and joint-stock banks due to their distinct customer profiles. On the basis of these findings, we propose several policy recommendations, including a focus on enhancing the collection and processing of soft information, promoting the growth of locally based small and medium-sized banks, and reducing information barriers within bank hierarchies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xian 710061, China
2 Guangzhou Institute of International Finance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China
3 Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
4 Dongguan Securities Co., Ltd, Dongguan 523000, China
5 School of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Sichuan 610000, China
6 Guangdong Maoming Health Vocational College, Maoming 525000, China