1. Introduction
Adipose tissue, classically recognized as the primary energy reservoir, plays pivotal roles in maintaining metabolic homeostasis and thermoregulation [1]. Emerging evidence reveals its remarkable heterogeneity and metabolic plasticity, enabling dynamic adaptation to environmental stimuli through structural remodeling and functional metabolic reprogramming [2,3,4]. Central to this regulatory capacity are two antagonistic processes: lipogenesis and lipolysis. Lipogenesis encompasses the de novo synthesis of fatty acids (FAs) and subsequent triglyceride (TG) esterification within adipocytes, serving as a critical buffer against nutrient surplus [5,6]. Conversely, lipolysis mediates TG hydrolysis into free fatty acids (FFAs) and glycerol, mobilizing energy substrates for systemic utilization [7]. The β-oxidation pathway, a downstream process of lipolysis, subsequently catabolizes FFAs into acetyl-CoA through sequential enzymatic reactions. This multi-step degradation represents the rate-limiting phase of FA oxidation, generating substantial ATP yield while maintaining lipid homeostasis [8,9].
Adipose tissue orchestrates multilayered responses to cold exposure through its tripartite composition: energy-storing white adipose tissue (WAT), thermogenic brown adipose tissue (BAT), and the interconvertible beige adipose tissue. Cold stimulation induces WAT browning—a phenotypic transition characterized by lipid droplet multilocularization, enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis, and upregulated thermogenic gene expression (e.g., UCP1, PRDM16), especially in rodents [10,11,12]. Notably, porcine models exhibit cold-induced browning capacity despite lacking constitutive BAT. Under acute cold stress (4 °C, 10 h), subcutaneous white adipose tissue in piglets shows significant browning, with upregulation of browning marker genes UCP1, PRDM16, and C/EBPβ, as well as mitochondrial thermogenic genes CIDEa, UCP3, CKMT1, and PM20D1 [13]. Paradoxically, chronic cold adaptation (8 °C, 15 days) suppresses both browning markers and mitochondrial biogenesis [13]. The dichotomous responses to acute versus chronic cold exposure highlight the temporal heterogeneity of WAT adaptation to thermal challenge. Lipidomic analyses combined with transcriptomic profiling of adipose tissue from cold-stressed piglets demonstrate that cold exposure induces significant alterations in the content and composition of saturated fatty acids within subcutaneous adipose tissue [14]. In addition, these analyses reveal enhanced oxidative metabolism and energy mobilization potential in SAT under cold stress [14]. These findings underscore the temporal dynamics and metabolic flexibility of adipose tissue during thermal adaptation.
DHRS4 (NADP(H)-dependent retinol dehydrogenase/reductase 4), a member of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) superfamily, catalyzes sequential oxidation of retinol to retinaldehyde during all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) biosynthesis [15,16,17]. Beyond its canonical role in retinoid homeostasis, DHRS4 exhibits promiscuous carbonyl reductase activity toward diverse substrates, including ketosteroids and quinones [18]. Paradoxically, current research focuses predominantly on its antisense transcript DHRS4-AS1 in carcinogenesis [19,20,21,22], while its potential metabolic functions in adipose biology remain unexplored.
Herein, we delineate the cold-adaptive reprogramming of porcine subcutaneous WAT through integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk transcriptomic profiling. We identify a cold-induced thermogenic adipocyte subpopulation associated with unregulated DHRS4 expression, which coordinates enhanced fatty acid β-oxidation. Mechanistically, cold exposure attenuates CpG methylation at the DHRS4 promoter, enhancing its expression to potentiate thermogenic capacity. These findings elucidate an epigenetic–metabolic crosstalk in cold adaptation and propose DHRS4 as a translational target for improving porcine cold resistance, with implications for sustainable livestock production under cold stress.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
A cold stimulation test was conducted on 6–8-week-old male Erhualian piglets with similar body weights. Littermates were divided into a room temperature group (28 ± 0.5 °C) and a cold stimulation group (11 ± 0.5 °C), with 3 piglets per group. All animals were individually housed in cages with ad libitum access to food. The cold exposure trial lasted for one month. All processes involving animal experiments in this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University under NJAU. No20220317047.
2.2. Data Analysis of snRNA-Seq
Subcutaneous adipose tissue samples from the dorsal region was pooled within groups for snRNA-seq. Sequencing data are deposited at the China National Center for Bioinformation/Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession numbers GSA: CRA020162 and GSA: CRA020109. Data analysis was performed using the Omicsmart platform provided by Genedenovo Biotechnology.
2.3. Isolation of SVF and Differentiation of Preadipocytes
Subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested from the dorsal region of freshly slaughtered piglets. The tissue was finely minced using sterile scissors and subsequently digested with 0.1% Type I collagenase (Biosharp, BS163, Hefei, Anhui, China) in a shaking water bath at 37 °C for 1 h. Following the termination of digestion by adding an equal volume of complete culture medium, the digestate was filtered through a 100 μm nylon mesh. The filtrate was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The resulting cell pellet was resuspended in complete culture medium and seeded into T25 culture flasks, followed by incubation at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Once the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells or ISP4# cells (an immortalized porcine adipocyte cell line) [23] reached confluence and were contact-inhibited for 2 days, a differentiation induction medium (containing 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sangon, A606630, Shanghai, China), 125 μM indomethacin (Makclin, I811784, Shanghai, China), 1 μM dexamethasone (Sangon, A601187, Shanghai, China), 1 μg/mL insulin (Novolin R, Tianjin, China), 1 nM T3 (Makclin, T819947, Shanghai, China), and 1 μM rosiglitazone (Makclin, R832516, Shanghai, China) was added to induce differentiation for 4 days. Subsequently, the medium was replaced with maintenance medium (containing 1 μg/mL insulin, 1 nM T3 and 1 μM) for an additional 4 days.
2.4. Oil Red O Staining
The differentiated SVF cells or ISP4# cell line were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Servicebio, G4202, Wuhan, China) and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After fixation, the cells were washed three times with PBS. A freshly prepared Oil Red O working solution (Oil Red O/distilled water = 3:2) was added to cells, which were then incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Excess Oil Red O staining solution was removed by washing with PBS. Images were captured under a microscope, and then an equal volume of isopropanol was added to each well to extract the stain. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm using a microplate reader for quantitative analysis.
2.5. Construction of DHRS4 Cell Line
To construct the lentiviral overexpression plasmid, the coding sequence of DHRS4 (NM_214019) was cloned into the SmaI site of the pLVX-V5-IRES-neo vector using the 2 × Hieff Clone® Universal II Enzyme Premix (YEASEN, 10923ES, Shanghai, China) for homologous recombination. The primers used for DHRS4 cloning are listed in Supplementary Table S1. To generate lentiviral particles, the lentiviral construct was co-transfected with pM2D.G and psPAX2 into HEK293T cells. The lentivirus-containing medium was harvested, filtered, and concentrated at 48 and 72 h post-transfection. The immortalized preadipocyte cell line ISP4# was then incubated with the lentivirus (Servicebio, G1803, Wuhan, China) premixed with polybrene (10 μg/mL, Solarbio, H8761, Beijing, China) for 72 h. Positive cells were selected by adding 800 μg/mL G418 antibiotic (Beyotime, ST081, Shanghai, China) and subsequently expanded to meet experimental requirements.
2.6. Overexpression of DHRS4 in SVF Cells
The control vector pLVX-V5-IRES-neo and the DHRS4 overexpression vector pLVX-V5-DHRS4-IRES-neo were transfected into SVF cells according to the Lipofectamine 3000 transfection protocol (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). After the cells reached contact inhibition, they were induced to differentiate. Subsequently, the cells were collected for qPCR or Western blot analysis.
2.7. RNA Isolation and RT-qPCR
Total RNA was isolated from cells or tissues using TRIzol reagent (Accurate Biology, AG21101, Changsha, Hunan, China). For reverse transcription, 1 µg of RNA was used to synthesize cDNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Accurate Biology, AG11706, Hunan, China). RT-qPCR was performed on an ABI (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) instrument using SYBR qPCR Master Mix (YEASEN, 11184ES, Shanghai, China). Relative mRNA levels were calculated using the 2(−ΔΔCT) method, with RPLP0 serving as the internal reference gene for normalization. The sequences of the quantitative primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
2.8. Western Blotting
Proteins were extracted from tissues or cells using RIPA buffer (NCM Biotech, WB3100, Suzhou, China) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Beyotime, P1050, Shanghai, China). An enhanced chemiluminescence Western-blotting substrate (Biosharp, BL520B, Anhui, China) was used for visualization of the results. The following antibodies were employed to detect the target proteins: anti-Tubulin (Proteintech, 11224-1-AP, Wuhan, China), anti-DHRS4 (Proteintech, 15279-1-AP, Wuhan, China), anti-UCP3 (Abclonal, A23285, Wuhan, China), anti-PPARG (Proteintech, 16643-1-AP, Wuhan, China), anti-HSL, (Proteintech, 17333-1-AP, Wuhan, China), and anti-CPT1A (Proteintech, 15184-1-AP, Wuhan, China).
2.9. Analysis of DNA Methylation Levels in the Promoter Region of DHRS4
DNA was extracted from the subcutaneous adipose tissue of pigs in both the RT group and the Cold group. The extracted DNA was subsequently subjected to bisulfite conversion using a commercial kit (TIANGEN, DP215-02, Beijing, China). Methylation islands within the promoter region of DHRS4 were predicted using the online software MethPrimer (
2.10. Determination of Free Fatty Acids
Collect the cell culture medium from the control group and the DHRS4-overexpressing group in ISP4# cells. Prepare the free fatty acid detection working solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Beyotime, S0215S, Shanghai, China), and subsequently measure the samples at a wavelength of 570 nm.
2.11. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8.0 (GraphPad). Analysis between two groups was performed using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. Sample size has been indicated in each figure legend. The values are expressed as mean ± SEM. p-values are indicated as * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
3. Results
3.1. Subclusters of Adipocytes at Single-Cell Resolution
To characterize the heterogeneity of adipocytes in the subcutaneous adipose tissue of piglets, we conducted re-clustering analysis, identifying eight distinct adipocyte subpopulations (Figure 1A). The highly expressed genes in each cluster are presented in Figure 1B. Pseudotemporal differentiation trajectory analysis using Slingshot2 revealed three distinct differentiation trajectories among the adipocyte subpopulations. Cells in differentiation trajectory 1 differentiated into a population exhibiting robust antioxidant capacity and enhanced energy metabolism, marked by the high expression of genes, including LRP1B, OXR1, SLC36A2, PPARD, DHRS3, and LPGAT1. The cell subpopulation Adi3 in differentiation trajectory 2 differentiated into an insulin-sensitive cell population, characterized by high expression of genes, including EEF2K, MACROD1, and INSIG1. The cell subpopulation Adi6 in differentiation trajectory 3 predominantly differentiated into fibrotic adipocytes, exhibiting high expression of COL1A1, COL1A2, and FN1 (Figure 1B,C). Following cold exposure in piglets, the proportion of cells in the Adi0 and Adi5 subpopulations, which exhibit robust antioxidant capacity and enhanced energy metabolism, significantly increased (Figure 1D). We performed KEGG enrichment analysis on the upregulated differentially expressed genes in adipocyte subpopulations Adi0 and Adi5 following cold exposure. The results revealed significant enrichment in pathways associated with thermogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, and PPAR signaling (Figure 1E), indicating that the Adi0 and Adi5 subpopulations are thermogenesis-related adipocytes.
3.2. Upregulation of DHRS4 Expression Was Observed in the Cold-Exposed Group
To identify candidate genes associated with adaptive thermogenesis, we performed an integrated analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the adipocyte subpopulations Adi0 and Adi5, combined with DEGs derived from RNA-seq data of dorsal subcutaneous adipose tissue in cold-exposed piglets. A total of 16 DEGs were identified, among which DHRS4 was one of the significantly differentially expressed genes (Figure 2A). qPCR and Western blot analyses demonstrated that DHRS4 was significantly upregulated in the dorsal subcutaneous adipose tissue of cold-exposed piglets (Figure 2B,C). Furthermore, the expression pattern of DHRS4 during porcine adipocyte differentiation closely resembled that observed in murine brown adipocyte differentiation, showing a marked upregulation during the late differentiation stage (Figure 2D). These findings show that DHRS4 may play a critical role in the differentiation of thermogenic adipocytes.
3.3. DHRS4 Enhances Thermogenesis in ISP4# Cells by Upregulating Fatty Acid β-Oxidation
To investigate the function of DHRS4, we established a stable ISP4# cell line overexpressing DHRS4. The successful overexpression of DHRS4 was confirmed by qPCR and Western blot analysis (Figure 3A). Overexpression of DHRS4 significantly upregulated the expression of adipogenic markers ADIPOQ and CEBPA (Figure 3B). However, Oil Red O staining revealed that DHRS4 overexpression did not significantly alter lipid droplet accumulation in ISP4# cells (Figure 3C). To further explore the role of DHRS4 in thermogenesis, we analyzed the expression of thermogenesis-related marker genes using qPCR. The results demonstrated that DHRS4 overexpression significantly upregulated the expression of EBF2, TMEM26, and UCP3 in ISP4# cells (Figure 3D). Given the close association between fatty acid β-oxidation and adaptive thermogenesis, we examined the expression of key genes involved in fatty acid β-oxidation. Our findings indicated that DHRS4 overexpression significantly enhanced the expression of lipolysis-related genes (ATGL, HSL, MGLL) and fatty acid β-oxidation-related genes (CPT1A, CPT2, ACAA1, EHHADH, PPARA) in ISP4# cells (Figure 3E). Western blot analysis further revealed that DHRS4 overexpression significantly increased the protein level of CPT1A, while the levels of UCP3 and HSL exhibited an upward trend without reaching statistical significance. The protein level of PPARG remained unchanged (Figure 3F). Additionally, the FFA content in the culture medium of ISP4# cells were significantly elevated following DHRS4 overexpression (Figure 3G).
3.4. DHRS4 Promotes Thermogenesis in SVF via Fatty Acid β-Oxidation
To validate the thermogenic function of DHRS4, we overexpressed DHRS4 in porcine primary SVF cells and examined the expression of genes associated with adipocyte differentiation, thermogenesis, lipolysis, and fatty acid β-oxidation. Compared to the control group, DHRS4 overexpression significantly upregulated the expression of adipogenic markers (ADIPOQ, CEBPA, and PPARG) (Figure 4A). However, the quantification analysis of Oil Red O staining revealed no significant differences in lipid droplet accumulation between the groups (Figure 4B). Notably, the expression of beige adipocyte marker genes (TMEM26 and UCP3) was significantly elevated in the DHRS4 overexpression group (Figure 4C). Moreover, DHRS4 overexpression enhanced the expression of lipolysis-related genes (ATGL, HSL, MGLL) and fatty acid β-oxidation-related genes (CPT1A, CPT2, ACAA1, EHHADH, PPARA) in SVF cells (Figure 4D). Consistent with these findings, the protein levels of CPT1A, HSL, PPARG, and UCP3 were also significantly increased in the DHRS4 overexpression group (Figure 4E).
3.5. Cold Exposure Activates the Methylation of the DHRS4 Promoter Region
To elucidate the mechanism underlying DHRS4 activation under cold exposure, we predicted potential DNA methylation sites within the 2000 bp upstream region of the DHRS4 transcription start site. Our analysis identified a 273 bp CpG island located within the promoter region of DHRS4 (Figure 5A). Methylation-specific primers (MSP) and control primers were designed to amplify the CpG island in bisulfite-converted genomic DNA. The results demonstrated that the MSP primers successfully amplified the target fragment, whereas no amplification was detected with the control primers, thereby confirming the efficiency of bisulfite conversion (Figure 5B). Methylation levels were quantified using the MSR Calculate tool, revealing that the 23 CpG sites within the DHRS4 promoter region displayed significantly higher methylation levels in the room temperature group (10%) compared to the cold exposure group (0%) (Figure 5C).
4. Discussion
Our integrative multi-omics approach delineates a previously unrecognized epigenetic–metabolic axis through which cold stress primes porcine subcutaneous WAT for thermogenic adaptation. By coupling single-cell resolution with bulk transcriptomic profiling, we identified DHRS4 as a cold-responsive epigenetic rheostat coordinating β-oxidation enhancement. This finding bridges the critical knowledge gap between environmental sensing and adipose remodeling in large mammals. Our multi-omics dissection highlights the innovation of our approach in elucidating the complex regulatory networks underlying adipose tissue metabolic plasticity.
The hypomethylation-mediated DHRS4 activation observed at chr7: 75, 257, 594-75, 255, 495 (GCF_000003025.6, Sus scrofa 11.1) in our study echoes evolutionarily conserved epigenetic mechanisms in murine adaptive thermogenesis. Preconception cold exposure reduces CpG methylation in paternal sperm (89.5% to 87.5%), conferring offspring with enhanced brown adipogenesis, neurogenesis, and cold tolerance through transgenerational epigenetic inheritance [24]. A recent integrated analysis of DNA methylomes and transcriptomes from BAT of male C57BL/6J mice exposed to thermoneutral (28.8 °C), mild cold (22 °C), or severe cold (8 °C) conditions revealed temperature-dependent hypomethylation inversely correlated with gene expression thermogenic gene expression [25]. Notably, cold exposure markedly reduces methylation of the Vaspin gene (encoding a serine protease inhibitor with anti-diabetic and anti-obesity properties) in BAT [26], collectively supporting epigenetic regulation as an evolutionarily conserved strategy for adipose thermogenesis.
Retinol metabolism exerts pleiotropic effects on adipogenesis through isoform-specific mechanisms. Retinol-binding proteins (RBPs), essential carriers for retinol transport, act as metabolic modulators. Overexpression of RBP7 in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes promotes differentiation and triglyceride accumulation via upregulation of PPARγ, FABP4, C/EBPα, and AdipoQ, whereas RBP7 deficiency inhibits adipogenesis—a phenotype rescued by retinoic acid (RA) [27]. Conversely, ectopic RBP4 expression reduces adipocyte size and inguinal fat deposition in mice [28], while RBP4 suppresses porcine preadipocyte differentiation by attenuating insulin signaling [29]. Retinol dehydrogenase 10 (RDH10), the rate-limiting enzyme in RA biosynthesis, finetunes lipid metabolism through RA biosynthesis, as evidenced by RDH10 deficiency elevates CD36 expression (a key free fatty acid receptor) via RA depletion [30]. Building on this regulatory framework, our study demonstrates that DHRS4 enhances adipocyte β-oxidation to potentiate thermogenesis. Given its dual roles in retinoid metabolism and carbonyl reduction, we propose two non-exclusive mechanisms: (1) DHRS4-driven RA production may activate PPARα/RXR heterodimers, thereby upregulating β-oxidation genes (CPT1a, CPT2, ACAA1; Figure 3E), which in turn promotes the expression of thermogenic genes (UCP3, EBF2, TMEM26; Figure 3D); (2) NADPH flux during retinol reduction by DHRS4 may counteract cold-induced oxidative stress. While establishing the DHRS4-β-oxidation axis, critical questions emerge from these findings: (1) How do its catalytic and putative non-enzymatic functions coordinate?? (2) Is this mechanism depot-specific (subcutaneous vs. visceral adipose tissue)? These findings advance our understanding of adipose thermoregulation, yet further investigations are warranted to dissect the multifunctional roles of DHRS4.
Beyond porcine thermoregulation, our work illuminates an evolutionary paradigm where retrograde signals from environmental stressors (e.g., cold) converge on epigenetic–metabolic interfaces to drive adipose adaptation—a mechanism potentially relevant to human metabolic disorders exacerbated by chronic “thermal stress” in modern lifestyles. This conceptual framework suggests that understanding the interplay between environmental cues and epigenetic regulation could reveal novel therapeutic targets for cold counteraction.
While this study provides novel insights into porcine adipose adaptation, certain limitations should be noted. First, the sample size (n = 3 per group), may reduce statistical power for low-effect-size phenotypes. Second, while multi-omics convergence compensated for sample limitations in high-resolution analyses, techniques like Western blotting and qPCR inherently require larger cohorts for subtle effects. Future studies should employ longitudinal designs with staggered sampling to meet higher-precision statistical demands. Crucially, our findings lay the groundwork for validating identified biomarkers (e.g., DHRS4) in commercial pig populations under real-world cold stress.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we explored the adaptive mechanisms of adipose tissue in response to cold stress using a porcine model, focusing on the epigenetic regulation of metabolic reprogramming in large mammals lacking classical BAT. Through integrated single-nucleus RNA sequencing and transcriptomic analyses of subWAT, we identified a thermogenic adipocyte subpopulation that emerges under cold stress, characterized by the upregulation of DHRS4 expression. Mechanistically, cold exposure induced hypomethylation at the DHRS4 promoter locus, enhancing its transcriptional activity and promoting fatty acid β-oxidation, alongside increased thermogenic capacity. These findings establish DHRS4 as a critical epigenetic–metabolic switch that governs cold adaptation in swine. Our results not only advance the understanding of adipose tissue plasticity in large mammals but also highlight DHRS4 as a potential target for improving cold resistance in swine production systems, offering valuable insights for mitigating the adverse effects of cold stress on livestock health and productivity.
Conceptualization, X.M. and L.Z.; methodology, X.M.; validation, formal analysis, investigation, X.M., Z.Y., and M.L.; resources, investigation, W.W.; data curation, L.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.M.; writing—review and editing, J.C. and L.Z.; funding acquisition, J.C.; project administration, J.C. and L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University (protocol code: NJAU. No20220317047, date: 17 March 2022).
Not applicable.
Data are contained within the article.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 (A) UMAP of adipocytes subpopulations. (B) Bubble chart showing scaled average expression of adipocytes subpopulations-enriched marker genes. (C) The trajectory inference and state information of adipocytes subpopulations. Each dot represents a single cell. (D) The fraction of each adipocyte’s subpopulation in dorsal subWAT from the RT group and the Cold group. (E) The top 20 enrichment pathways revealed by KEGG enrichment analysis of upregulated differentially expressed genes in Adi0, Adi5 subpopulations. The red font color indicates metabolic pathways related to thermogenesis.
Figure 2 (A) I. Venn diagram showing the overlapping genes that DEGs of Adi0 and Adi5 subpopulations significantly upregulated and RNA-seq of dorsal subWAT. (B,C) qPCR and Western Blotanalysis of DHRS4 expression in dorsal subWAT at the RT group and the Cold group. (D) Expression patterns of DHRS4 during the differentiation of SVF Cells and mouse Brown Adipocytes. ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3 (A) Detection of DHRS4 overexpression efficiency in ISP4# cells. (B) qPCR analysis of adipogenic differentiation marker genes following DHRS4 overexpression in ISP4# cells at differentiation day 8. (C) Oil Red O staining of ISP4# cells following DHRS4 overexpression at differentiation day 8. (D,E) qPCR analysis of genes related to thermogenesis, lipolysis, and fatty acid β-oxidation following DHRS4 overexpression in ISP4# cells at differentiation day 8. (F) Western blot analysis of HSL, CPT1A, PPARG, UCP3, and DHRS4 expression levels in ISP4# cells overexpressing DHRS4 at differentiation day 8. (G) Free fatty acid (FFA) content in culture medium of ISP4# cells overexpressing DHRS4 at differentiation day 8. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4 (A) Detection of DHRS4 overexpression efficiency and qPCR analysis of adipogenic differentiation marker genes following DHRS4 overexpression in SVF cells at differentiation day 8. (B) Oil Red O Staining of SVF cells following DHRS4 overexpression at differentiation day 8. (C,D) qPCR analysis of genes related to thermogenesis, lipolysis, and fatty acid β-oxidation following DHRS4 overexpression in SVF cells at differentiation day 8. (E) Western blot analysis of HSL, CPT1A, PPARG, UCP3, and DHRS4 expression levels in SVF cells overexpressing DHRS4 at differentiation day 8. * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 5 (A) Prediction of CpG Islands in the DHRS4 promoter using MethPrimer software (
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at
1. Luo, L.; Liu, M. Adipose tissue in control of metabolism. J. Endocrinol.; 2016; 231, pp. R77-R99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1530/JOE-16-0211] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27935822]
2. Villarroya, F.; Cereijo, R.; Villarroya, J.; Giralt, M. Brown adipose tissue as a secretory organ. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.; 2017; 13, pp. 26-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.136] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27616452]
3. Chouchani, E.T.; Kajimura, S. Metabolic adaptation and maladaptation in adipose tissue. Nat. Metab.; 2019; 1, pp. 189-200. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42255-018-0021-8]
4. Sakers, A.; De Siqueira, M.K.; Seale, P.; Villanueva, C.J. Adipose-tissue plasticity in health and disease. Cell; 2022; 185, pp. 419-446. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.016]
5. Song, Z.; Xiaoli, A.M.; Yang, F. Regulation and Metabolic Significance of De Novo Lipogenesis in Adipose Tissues. Nutrients; 2018; 10, 1383. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10101383] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30274245]
6. Jeon, Y.G.; Kim, Y.Y.; Lee, G.; Kim, J.B. Physiological and pathological roles of lipogenesis. Nat. Metab.; 2023; 5, pp. 735-759. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42255-023-00786-y]
7. Cho, C.H.; Patel, S.; Rajbhandari, P. Adipose tissue lipid metabolism: Lipolysis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.; 2023; 83, 102114. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2023.102114]
8. Houten, S.M.; Violante, S.; Ventura, F.V.; Wanders, R.J. The Biochemistry and Physiology of Mitochondrial Fatty Acid β-Oxidation and Its Genetic Disorders. Annu. Rev. Physiol.; 2016; 78, pp. 23-44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105045]
9. Adeva-Andany, M.M.; Carneiro-Freire, N.; Seco-Filgueira, M.; Fernández-Fernández, C.; Mouriño-Bayolo, D. Mitochondrial β-oxidation of saturated fatty acids in humans. Mitochondrion; 2019; 46, pp. 73-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mito.2018.02.009]
10. Sepa-Kishi, D.M.; Jani, S.; Da Eira, D.; Ceddia, R.B. Cold acclimation enhances UCP1 content, lipolysis, and triacylglycerol resynthesis, but not mitochondrial uncoupling and fat oxidation, in rat white adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.; 2019; 316, pp. C365-C376. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00122.2018]
11. Sadler, D.G.; Treas, L.; Sikes, J.D.; Porter, C. A modest change in housing temperature alters whole body energy expenditure and adipocyte thermogenic capacity in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.; 2022; 323, pp. E517-E528. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00079.2022] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36351253]
12. Valdivia, L.F.G.; Castro, É.; Eichler, R.; Moreno, M.F.; de Sousa, É.; Jardim, G.F.R.; Peixoto, Á.S.; Moraes, M.N.; Castrucci, A.M.L.; Nedergaard, J.
13. Gao, Y.; Qimuge, N.R.; Qin, J.; Cai, R.; Li, X.; Chu, G.Y.; Pang, W.J.; Yang, G.S. Acute and chronic cold exposure differentially affects the browning of porcine white adipose tissue. Animal; 2018; 12, pp. 1435-1441. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117002981]
14. Zhou, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wang, L.; Ling, D.; Nong, Q.; Xie, J.; Zhu, X.; Shan, T. Cold Exposure Induces Depot-Specific Alterations in Fatty Acid Composition and Transcriptional Profile in Adipose Tissues of Pigs. Front. Endocrinol.; 2022; 13, 827523. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.827523]
15. Huang, D.Y.; Ichikawa, Y. Purification and characterization of a novel cytosolic NADP(H)-dependent retinol oxidoreductase from rabbit liver. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 1997; 1338, pp. 47-59. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(96)00183-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9074615]
16. Su, Z.; Li, R.; Song, X.; Liu, G.; Li, Y.; Chang, X.; Li, C.; Huang, D. Identification of a novel isoform of DHRS4 protein with a nuclear localization signal. Gene; 2012; 494, pp. 161-167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.033]
17. Matsunaga, T.; Endo, S.; Maeda, S.; Ishikura, S.; Tajima, K.; Tanaka, N.; Nakamura, K.T.; Imamura, Y.; Hara, A. Characterization of human DHRS4: An inducible short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase enzyme with 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.; 2008; 477, pp. 339-347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2008.06.002]
18. Endo, S.; Maeda, S.; Matsunaga, T.; Dhagat, U.; El-Kabbani, O.; Tanaka, N.; Nakamura, K.T.; Tajima, K.; Hara, A. Molecular determinants for the stereospecific reduction of 3-ketosteroids and reactivity towards all-trans-retinal of a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (DHRS4). Arch. Biochem. Biophys.; 2009; 481, pp. 183-190. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2008.11.014]
19. Xiao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Q.; Guo, C.; Chen, Z.; Lai, C. DHRS4-AS1 regulate gastric cancer apoptosis and cell proliferation by destabilizing DHX9 and inhibited the association between DHX9 and ILF3. Cancer Cell Int.; 2023; 23, 304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03151-x]
20. Zhou, Y.; Li, K.; Zou, X.; Hua, Z.; Wang, H.; Bian, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, F.; Dai, T. LncRNA DHRS4-AS1 ameliorates hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing proliferation and promoting apoptosis via miR-522-3p/SOCS5 axis. Bioengineered; 2021; 12, pp. 10862-10877. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1994719]
21. Xu, S.; Zheng, X.; Wu, H.; You, X.; Wu, J.; Zhou, H.; Wu, J.; Liu, Q.; Ye, R.Q. Feasibility study of lncRNA DHRS4-AS1 sponge miR-222-3p in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Endokrynol. Pol.; 2024; 75, pp. 494-500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5603/ep.99456] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39376175]
22. Wang, C.; Wang, G.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Ren, M.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Yu, Y.; Liu, J.; Cai, L.
23. Cheng, Y.M.; Hong, P.C.; Song, M.M.; Zhu, H.N.; Qin, J.; Zhang, Z.D.; Chen, H.; Ma, X.Z.; Tian, M.Y.; Zhu, W.Y.
24. Sun, W.; Dong, H.; Becker, A.S.; Dapito, D.H.; Modica, S.; Grandl, G.; Opitz, L.; Efthymiou, V.; Straub, L.G.; Sarker, G.
25. Taylor, B.C.; Steinthal, L.H.; Dias, M.; Yalamanchili, H.K.; Ochsner, S.A.; Zapata, G.E.; Mehta, N.R.; McKenna, N.J.; Young, N.L.; Nuotio-Antar, A.M. Histone proteoform analysis reveals epigenetic changes in adult mouse brown adipose tissue in response to cold stress. Epigenet. Chromatin; 2024; 17, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-024-00536-8]
26. Weiner, J.; Rohde, K.; Krause, K.; Zieger, K.; Klöting, N.; Kralisch, S.; Kovacs, P.; Stumvoll, M.; Blüher, M.; Böttcher, Y.
27. Kim, D.H.; Ahn, J.; Suh, Y.; Ziouzenkova, O.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, K. Retinol Binding Protein 7 Promotes Adipogenesis in vitro and Regulates Expression of Genes Involved in Retinol Metabolism. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2022; 10, 876031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.876031] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35493071]
28. Cheng, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Zheng, J.; Lu, H.; Shi, X.; Yang, G. Ectopic expression of RBP4 impairs the insulin pathway and inguinal fat deposition in mice. J. Physiol. Biochem.; 2014; 70, pp. 479-486. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13105-014-0326-3]
29. Cheng, J.; Song, Z.Y.; Pu, L.; Yang, H.; Zheng, J.M.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Shi, X.E.; Yang, G.S. Retinol binding protein 4 affects the adipogenesis of porcine preadipocytes through insulin signaling pathways. Biochem. Cell Biol.; 2013; 91, pp. 236-243. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/bcb-2012-0112]
30. Wu, Y.; Huang, T.; Li, X.; Shen, C.; Ren, H.; Wang, H.; Wu, T.; Fu, X.; Deng, S.; Feng, Z.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Adipose tissue exhibits remarkable plasticity in adapting to thermal stress, yet the epigenetic mechanisms coordinating metabolic reprogramming in large mammals—particularly in livestock species lacking classical brown adipose tissue (BAT) such as swine—remain elusive. Using a porcine cold exposure model, we investigated adipose adaptation mechanisms through integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk transcriptomic analyses of subcutaneous adipose tissue (subWAT). We identified a cold-induced thermogenic adipocyte subpopulation, characterized by upregulated DHRS4 expression. Mechanistically, cold exposure induced hypomethylation at the DHRS4 promoter locus, enhancing its expression to potentiate fatty acid β-oxidation, accompanied by thermogenic capacity upregulation. Our findings establish DHRS4 as an epigenetic–metabolic switch governing cold adaptation and a potential target for improving cold resistance in swine production systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer