Synthesis of Diversely Substituted Diethyl (Pyrrolidin-2-Yl)Phosphonates

Abstract

Imidazoline I₂ receptors (I₂-IR) are untapped therapeutic targets lacking a structural description. Although the levels of I₂-IR are dysregulated in a plethora of illnesses, the arsenal of ligands that can modulate I₂-IR is limited. In this framework, we have reported several new structural families embodying the iminophosphonate functional group that have an excellent affinity and selectivity for I₂-IR, and selected members have demonstrated relevant pharmacological properties in murine models of neurodegeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Starting with these iminophosphonates, we continued to exploit their high degree of functionalization through a short and efficient synthesis to access unprecedented 2,3-di, 2,2,3-tri, 2,3,4-tri, and 2,2,3,4-tetrasubstituted diethyl (pyrrolidine-2-yl) phosphonates. The stereochemistry of the new compounds was unequivocally characterized by X-ray crystallographic analyses. Two selected compounds with structural features shared with the starting products were pharmacologically evaluated, allowing us to deduce the required key structural motifs for biologically active aminophosphonate derivatives.

1. Introduction

We have previously reported that the reaction of diethyl isocyanomethylphosphonates and N-substituted maleimides in the presence of a catalytic amount of AgOAc underwent diastereoselective [3+2]cyclocondensation, leading to bicyclic α-iminophosphonates [1]. These new structures revealed bioactivity, showing a high affinity and selectivity for imidazoline I₂ receptors (I₂-IR) [2,3,4], being the first modulators of these receptors lacking an imidazole/imidazoline nucleus [1]. I₂-IR are undescribed from the structural point of view, but have been validated as therapeutic targets, with the first-in-class I₂-IR ligand, CR4056, progressing in a clinical phase II, multisite, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial for knee osteoarthritis patients (Figure 1) [5]. Also, [¹¹C] BU99008, identified as an I₂-IR ligand, is a clinical candidate in phase I for Positron Emission Tomography diagnostics in patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Figure 1) [6].

Within our new non-imidazoline I₂-IR ligands, a selected bicyclic α-iminophosphonate endowed with excellent affinity upon I₂-IR, (1RS,3aSR,6aSR)-5-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)-4,6-dioxo-1-phenyl-1,3a,4,5,6,6a-hexahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1-phosphonate (named B06), ameliorated the cognitive decline, improved the behavior, and restored the relevant hallmarks of two murine models, namely, the senescence-accelerated, mouse-prone 8 (SAMP8) and the familial AD (5xFAD) [7,8]. We initiated the exploration of the chemical opportunities of the highly functionalized, bicyclic α-iminophosphonates by the reduction and addition of nucleophiles to the imine functional group, resulting in structurally new I₂-IR ligands. The treatment, performed with selected members of the new families, named B06red and BIN05, recovered the transgenic AD Caenorhabditis elegans model to the vehicle group (Scheme 1) [9].

More recently, we reported that the treatment with NaOH of bicyclic α-iminophosphonates caused the opening of the imide-containing ring, followed by subsequent decarboxylation. The selected diethyl (2RS,3RS)-3-((3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)carbamoyl)-2-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-yl)phosphonate (named PIP01, 1e), endowed with optimal ADME-Tox and anti-inflammatory properties, was chosen for treating the murine SAMP8 model and a capsaicin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity model, revealing neuroprotective and analgesic properties (Scheme 1) [10,11].

Encouraged by the synthetic opportunities that bicyclic α-iminophosphonates offer, herein, we report the reduction of the α-iminophosphonate functional group, resulting in (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonates. Azaheterocyclic phosphonates have been pointed out as remarkable entities due to their biological activity [12], and pyrrolidine is the most frequent five-membered, nonaromatic nitrogen heterocycle ring found in US FDA-approved drugs [13,14]. Thus, the reduction in the previously reported (3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-yl)phosphonates allowed the synthesis of 3-amido-substituted (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonates (Scheme 1, general structure I) [15]. Additionally, the opening of the imide functional group prevented decarboxylation, which resulted in diversely 3,4-substituted (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonates (Scheme 1, general structure II). Therefore, the α-iminophosphonate [16] functional group was transformed into the α-aminophosphonate [17,18], which is recognized as the phosphonic analogue of α-aminoesters and the bioisoster of α-aminoacids [19]. α-Aminophosphonates show interesting potential utility as chiral building blocks for constructing peptidomimetic structures that can be found in antibiotic, anticancer, and antifungal therapeutic agents, and they are endowed with remarkable capabilities as enzyme inhibitors or receptor ligands in pathological conditions related to α-amino acid metabolism [20,21,22,23]. The biological properties of α-aminophosphonates are mostly associated with the tetrahedral configuration of the substituents surrounding the phosphorus atom, which mimic the high-energy transition state involved in the peptide bond’s hydrolysis.

The new compounds have a ubiquitous (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonate nucleus (phosphoproline), the phosphonic counterpart of the outstanding heterocycle proline [24,25,26]. The relative stereochemistry of the different substituents of the newly prepared compounds was unequivocally determined after X-ray crystallographic analyses of two representative monocrystals and by the comparison of the ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra data with the other members of the family. Considering the localization of the I₂-IR in the CNS [27] and our interest in addressing neurodegenerative diseases, we assessed the ability of two representative compounds to cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) by performing a parallel artificial membrane assay (PAMPA), and we determined their pharmacological profile through competition binding studies in human brain tissues with the selective radioligand of the I₂-IR, [³H]2-[(2-benzofuranyl)-2-imidazoline] ([³H]-2-BFI).

2. Results and Discussion

The starting bicyclic iminophosphonates (Scheme 2a and Scheme 3a) were prepared by the diastereoselective [3+2]cycloaddition reaction of diethyl isocyanomethylphosphonate, diethyl α-methylisocyanomethylphosphonate or diethyl α-phenylisocyanomethylphosphonate and an N-substituted maleimide, following procedures described by us (Scheme 2a) [1]. Following our previously reported procedure, the opening/descarboxylation of the imide containing ring was performed by the treatment of the bicyclic derivatives with a solution of NaOH 0.05 M in a 2:1 mixture of THF/H₂O, leading to (3-phenylcarbamoyl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-yl)phosphonate derivatives (Scheme 2a) [11]. First, we carried out the reduction of the imine functional group of the starting compounds 1a and 1b with a hydrogen atom in the α-phosphonate position. The hydrogenation of 1a, at atmospheric pressure using Pd/C 20% as a catalyst in EtOH, EtOAc, THF, CH₂Cl₂ or CH₃CN, was unsuccessful. When more drastic conditions were employed, and the reaction was conducted at pressure (300 psi) in isopropanol, the reduction of the imine group took place to give 2a in a 90% yield. In a similar manner, the hydrogenation of 1b gave compound 2b in a 49% yield (Scheme 2b). These reaction conditions did not allow the transformation of the counterparts, 1c–1g, embodying a substituent in the α-phosphonate position. However, the reduction of 1c–1g with NaBH₃CN in CH₃CN after stirring for 2 h at room temperature led to a residue that, after treatment with EtOH^.HCl (1.25 M), conducted to the hydrochlorides of compounds 2c–2g [28].

In detail, quaternary α-aminophosphonates, with an α-methyl substituent, 2c, and with an α-phenyl substituent [29], 2d, 2e, 2f and 2g, were obtained with 71%, 89%, 93%, 65% and 53% yields, respectively (Scheme 2c). The relative configurations of the substituents in the 2- and 3-positions of the pyrrolidine ring were confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis of a monocrystal of compound 2d (see Section 3.2). The 2α-phenylsubstituent and the 3-carboxamido substituents showed a cis relationship, as described in the starting materials, confirming that the reduction proceeds without modifying the relative configuration (Scheme 2d).

With the aim of confirming that the stereochemistry in all the new compounds is the same as that unequivocally determined in 2d (Scheme 2d), we compared the ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectra of the different members of the family. In all the compounds 2a–2g, H-3 has a coupling constant of 10.5–13.5 Hz with the phosphorous atom, and a coupling constant of 7.5–8.0 Hz with the H-4. In the ¹³C NMR spectra of the α-monosubstituted derivatives 2a and 2b, it can be observed that C-2, 58.0–58.5 ppm, has a coupling constant of 165.0 Hz, and for the α-substituted-2-phosphorylpyrrolidines 2d, 2e, 2f, and 2g, C-2, 72.0–74.0 ppm, has a coupling constant of 149.5–150.0 Hz. The shield for C-2 and C-5 is in accordance with the proposed relative stereochemistry (Table 1).

Figure 2 summarizes the representative coupling constants in the ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectra of 2a–2g, considering the multiplicity due to the phosphorous atom in the phosphonic ester substituent.

Then, we took up the challenge to access diversely substituted (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonates maintaining the substituent in the 4 position. Thus, the opening of the imide group from bicyclic iminophosphonates 3a–3e was induced easily by the filtration of a solution of the product in MeOH through a Dowex MarathonA resin [30], although the desired product was unstable due to the tautomeric imine–enamine equilibrium (Scheme 3, intermediates in grey). Therefore, once the imide was opened, the reduction reaction was performed straightforwardly without the isolation of the intermediates by a hydrogenation reaction using PtO₂ as a catalyst at rt. In this manner, the compounds 4a, 4b and 4c were synthesized in 55, 63 and 25% yields, respectively, and compounds 4d and 4e in 50 and 56% yields, respectively (Scheme 3a). To elucidate the relative stereochemistry of new trisubstituted (4a, 4b and, 4c) and tetrasubstituted (4d and 4e) pyrrolidine-2-phosphonates, it was necessary to synthetize a derivative containing a heavy atom. Therefore, compound 5 was accessed, after the reductive amination reaction of 4a and 4-bromobenzaldehyde with NaBH₃CN in MeOH catalyzed by AcOH at rt for 2 h, in a 77% yield (Scheme 3b). The X-ray crystallographic analysis of 5 revealed that the 2-phosphonate ester substituent and the 2-carboxamido group retain the trans configuration of the starting materials. The 4-ester substituent adopts a trans relationship with the 3-carboxamido group, probably due to the protonation occurring in the course of the imine–enamine equilibrium, yielding the most favorable face and avoiding 3,4-steric hindrance (Scheme 3c).

The relative configuration in the three stereocenters of the new compounds depicted in Scheme 3b was confirmed by comparison of their ¹H and ¹³C-NMR spectra with the compound 5. Apart from the coincident shield of the different peaks, it is remarkable that in the ¹³C NMR spectra of compounds 4a, 4b and 4c, with a hydrogen atom in the α-position, the C-5 appears at 58.0–59.0 ppm with a coupling constant of 162.0–164.0 Hz, and when a phenyl group is present in the α-position, 4d and 4e, the C-5 appears at 68.0–69.0 ppm, with a coupling constant of 158.0–159.0 Hz. It can be observed that the carbon atoms near to the phosphonate group show the expected coupling constants. In particular, the C2 appears at 52.1–56.6 ppm with a coupling constant of 10.5–13.5 Hz, with the exception of 4d and 4e at 49.0 ppm and with a coupling constant lower than 7.0 Hz, while the C-3 at 44.0–48.0 ppm has a 7.5–8.0 Hz coupling constant in all the new compounds (Table 2).

Figure 3 shows representative coupling constants in the ¹³C-NMR spectra of 4a–4e, considering the multiplicity due to the phosphorous atom in the phosphonic ester substituent.

For the sake of comparison with our previous biological studies (Scheme 1), we selected compounds 2e (Scheme 2c) and 4e (Scheme 3a) with the substituents R = Ph and R’ = 3-Cl,4-FPh.

First of all, and taking into account the need to have molecules with a good capacity to permeate the BBB for modulating I₂-IR, the in vitro permeability (Pe) of 2e and 4e was determined by using the PAMPA-BBB assay. Both compounds are predicted to achieve high BBB penetration (Pe > 5.030 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹) with values of Pe = 14.6 ± 0.4 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹ for 2e and Pe = 14.35 ± 0.6 × 10⁻⁶ cm s⁻¹ for 4e.

I₂-IRs are described as non-adrenergic receptors for imidazolines; therefore, the pharmacological profiles of 2e and 4e were evaluated considering both affinity for I₂-IR and selectivity versus the α₂-adrenergic receptor (α₂-AR) [31]. The affinity for I₂-IR was assessed through competition binding studies against the selective I₂-IR radioligand [³H]2-BFI. The selectivity versus the α₂-AR was evaluated through competition studies using the selective radioligand [³H]RX821002 (2-methoxyidazoxan). The studies were performed in membranes from a post-mortem human frontal cortex, a brain area that shows a significant density of I₂-IR and α₂-AR. The inhibition constant (K_i) for each compound was obtained and is expressed as the corresponding pK_i. The selectivity for these two receptors was expressed by the I₂/α₂ index, calculated as the antilogarithm of the ratio between pK_i values for I₂-IR and pK_i values for α₂-AR.

To determine the impacts that the structural modifications in the new compounds selected, 2e and 4e, have in the affinity/selectivity data, we considered the values already published by us on the clinical candidates CR4056 and BU99008 [32,33], as well as B06, B06red, BIN05 and PIP01 (1e) [1,9,11]. The affinity of these compounds for I₂-IR is better described with a biphasic curve, except for PIP01 (1e). The clinical candidates CR4056 and BU99008 were endowed with a pK_iH I₂ = 7.72 ± 0.31 (29% occupancy), pK_iL I₂ = 5.45 ± 0.15 (Table 3, entry 1), pK_iH I₂ = 6.89 ± 0.21 (51% occupancy) and pK_iL I₂ = 3.82 ± 0.30 (Table 3, entry 2), respectively. Next, the members of the new families evaluated that embodied an α-phenyl phosphonate substituent and a 3-Cl, 4-Fphenyl substituent in the nitrogen atom were B06, with pK_iH I₂ = 8.61 ± 0.28 (37% occupancy) and pK_iL I₂ = 4.29 ± 0.20 (Table 3, entry 3), B06red, which showed an outstanding value fitted into two sites with a pK_iH of 9.81 ± 0.21 and a 50% occupancy, and without selectivity versus α₂-AR (Table 3, entry 4), and BIN05, with an affinity that fitted into a two-fold curve with values within the same range (pK_iH 8.18 and pK_iL 3.56) of the affinity value for B06, but with a lower occupancy of the high-affine site (21% vs. 37% for B06) and a lack of selectivity upon α₂-AR (Table 3, entry 5). The opening of the imide-containing ring in compound PIP01 (1e) involved a remarkable benefit by increasing the affinity to pK_i 9.98 ± 0.74, but again without I₂/α₂ selectivity (Table 3, entry 6). The two selected new compounds 2e and 4e share common structural features with the outstanding PIP01 (1e) because they are monocyclic phosphonates, substituted in the α-phoshonate position by a phenyl group and by a p-fluor atom and a m-chlorine atom in the N-phenyl group. However, these coincidences did not overcome the deleterious effect on the pK_i value shown by the reduction of the imino into the amino functional group in 2e. Note that the reduction of the imino group combined with the presence of a methyl ester group in the C3, 4e, gave an interesting affinity value (pK_i 7.99 ± 0.39) and a very good I₂/α₂ selectivity (58,884) (Figure 4).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemistry

3.1.1. General Information

Reagents, solvents and starting products were acquired from commercial sources. The evaporation of solvents was accomplished with a rotary evaporator. The reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using silica gel (60 F₂₅₄) plates. Compounds were visualized by UV irradiation and/or spraying with 1% aqueous KMnO₄. Flash column chromatography was performed on the Biotage^® Isolera™ Prime chromatograph equipped with a UV detector with normal Silica Gel Columns (SNAP KP-Sil, silica gel 60 Å 35–70 μm) with the indicated solvent system. Melting points were measured in MFB 59510M Gallenkamp instruments (Loughborough, UK). IR spectra were derived in a spectrophotometer Nicolet Avantar 320 FTR-IR (Elsichrom, Knivsta, Sweden) or in a Spectrum Two FT-IR Spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Springfield, IL, USA), and only noteworthy IR absorptions (cm⁻¹) are listed. NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl₃ or CD₃OD at 400 MHz (¹H) and 100.6 MHz (¹³C) in a Varian Mercury 400 MHz or Bruker Avance Neo 400 MHz (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), and chemical shifts are reported in δ values downfield from TMS or relative to residual solvent (7.26 ppm and 77.0 ppm for CDCl₃, 3.31 ppm and 49.0 ppm for CD₃OD) as an internal standard. Data are reported in the following manner: chemical shift, multiplicity, coupling constant (J) in hertz (Hz), integrated intensity and assignment (when possible). Multiplicities are reported using the following abbreviations: s, singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublets; ddd, doublet of doublets of doublets; dddd, doublet of doublets of doublet of doublets; t, triplet; dtd, doublet of triplet of doublets; m, multiplet; c. s., complex signal; br s, broad signal; app, apparent. Assignments and stereochemical determinations are given only when they are derived from definitive two-dimensional NMR experiments (g-HSQC-COSY). The accurate mass analyses were carried out using a LC/MSD-TOF spectrophotometer. The elemental analyses were carried out in a Flash 1112 series Thermofinnigan elemental microanalyzator (A5) to determine C, H, and N.

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Reduction of 1a and 1b

Here, 20% Pd/C was added to a solution of 1a and 1b in 2-propanol and the mixture was stirred under hydrogen atmosphere pressure (300 psi) at room temperature overnight. Then, the crude mixture was filtered through Celite^® and the solvent was evaporated to afford the products 2a and 2b.

Diethyl (2RS,3RS)-3-(phenylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-2-phosphonate (2a). Following the general procedure, 20% Pd/C (22 mg), 1a (108 mg, 0.33 mmol) and 2-propanol (15 mL) gave 2a (97 mg, 90%) as a yellowish oil. IR (NaCl) 3262, 2980, 2931, 1685, 1551, 1233, 1028, 968, 791, 756, 693 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.31 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.38 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.06 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.19–2.29 (c.s., 2H, H-4 and NH), 2.99–3.12 (c.s., 2H, H-5), 3.26 (ddd, J = 24.0, 16.0, 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-3), 3.63 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, H-2) 4.10–4.30 (m, 4H, CH₂CH₃), 7.06 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.27 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.62 (m, 2H, ArH), 9.44 (br s, 1H, NH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.4 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 31.2 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, C-4), 47.5 (d, J = 2.0 Hz C-3), 48.4 (d, J = 9.0 Hz C-5), 57.8 (d, J = 165.0 Hz, C-2), 62.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.1 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 119.5 (2CHAr), 123.7 (CHAr), 128.8 (2CHAr), 138.7 (C-ipso), 170.9 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, CO). MS-EI m/z 326 M⁺ (16), 205 (9), 189 (100), 150 (12), 93 (29), 70 (50). HRMS C₁₅H₂₄N₂O₄P [M + H]⁺ 327.1466; found, 327.1468.

Diethyl (2RS,3RS)-3-(cyclohexylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-2-phosphonate (2b). Following the general procedure, 20% Pd/C (22 mg), 1b (108 mg, 0.33 mmol) and 2-propanol (15 mL) gave 2b (53 mg, 49%) as a white solid after column chromatography (CH₂Cl₂/MeOH 95:5). IR (NaCl) 3293, 2931, 2855, 1649, 1547, 1234, 1056, 966, 891, 790 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.13–1.23 (m, 3H, CH₂cycl), 1.30–1.41 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.34 (t, J = 7.0, Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.35 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.59 (m, 1H, CH₂cycl), 1.69–1.73 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.86–1.90 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.97 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.13–2.22 (c.s., 2H, H-4 and NH), 2.91–3.07 (c.s., 3H, CHcycl and H-5), 3.46 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.75 (m, 1H, H-3), 4.13–4.25 (m, 4H, CH₂CH₃), 6.56 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, NH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.4 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 24.7 (2CH₂cycl), 25.5 (CH₂cycl) 30.9 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, C-4), 32.8 (CH₂cycl), 32.9 (CH₂cycl), 46.6 (CHcycl), 48.2 (C-5), 48.4 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, C-3), 58.5 (d, J = 165.0 Hz, C-2), 62.6 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 62.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 171.7 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CO). MS-EI m/z 332 M⁺ (11), 195 (100), 178 (15), 150 (15), 111 (7), 96 (10), 83 (13), 70 (62). HRMS C₁₅H₃₀N₂O₄P [M + H]⁺ 333.1944; found, 333.1938.

3.1.3. General Procedure for the Reduction of 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f and 1g

To a solution of CH₃CN and H₂O, 1-pyrroline 1c, 1d, 1e, 1f and 1g (0.1 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. Then, NaBH₃CN (0.2 mmol) and AcOH were added, and the mixture was stirred for 1h at rt. The solvent was evaporated, EtOAc was added to the residue and the resulting solution was washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO₃. The organic phase was dried and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was suspended in CH₂Cl₂, a solution of HCl·EtOH 1.25 M was added, and the resulting precipitated solid was collected by filtration to yield 2c, 2d, 2e, 2f and 2g.

Diethyl (2RS,3RS)-2-methyl-3-(phenylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-2-phosphonate hydrochloride (2c). Following the general procedure, 1c (15 mg, 0.04 mmol), CH₃CN (0.4 mL), H₂O (20 μL), NaBH₃CN (6 mg, 0.09 mmol) and AcOH (20 μL) gave 2c (11 mg, 71%) as a colorless oil. IR (NaCl) 2981, 1686, 1600, 1547, 1443, 1389, 1311, 1249, 1020, 756, 693 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 1.41 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.43 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.68 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 3H, CH₃), 2.43–2.53 (c.s., 2H, H-4), 3.48 (ddd, J = 11.2, 8.4, 6.8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.58 (ddd, J = 13.6, 7.6, 6.0 Hz, 1H, H-3), 3.69 (ddd, J = 11.2, 8.4, 6.8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 4.29–4.39 (m, 4H, CH₂CH₃), 7.13 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.30–7.35 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.56–7.61 (m, 2H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 15.2 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 15.3 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 15.5 (CH₃), 27.8 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, C-4), 45.2 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C-5), 48.8 (C-3), 64.4 (d, J = 159.0 Hz, C-2), 64.7 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 65.1 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 119.9 (2CHAr), 124.4 (CHAr), 128.5 (2CHAr), 137.7 (C-ipso), 168.1 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, CO). HRMS C₁₆H₂₆N₂O₄P [M + H]⁺ 341.1625; found, 341.1625.

Diethyl (2RS,3SR)-2-phenyl-3-phenylcarbamoylpyrrolidine-2-phosphonate hydrochloride (2d). Following the general procedure, 1d (100 mg, 0.25 mmol), CH₃CN (2.5 mL), H₂O (125 μL), NaBH₃CN (31 mg, 0.5 mmol) and AcOH (125 μL) gave 2d (98 mg, 89%) as a white solid. M.p. 132–134 °C. IR (NaCl) 3434, 3049, 2979, 1681, 1552, 1254, 1056, 977, 795, 759, 698, 573, 543 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 1.14 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.34 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.42 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.83 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.53 (m, 1H, CH₂CH₃), 3.81–3.89 (c.s., 3H, H-5 and CH₂CH₃), 4.09–4.19 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 4.32 (dd, J = 10.8, 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-3) 7.04 (dt, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.18–7.22 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.30–7.33 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.38–7.50 (m, 6H, ArH and NH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 15.0 (CH₂CH₃), 15.1 (CH₂CH₃), 28.3 (C-4), 45.8 (C-5), 49.9 (C-3), 64.7 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 65.7 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 72.8 (d, J = 149.5 Hz, C-2), 120.0 (2CHAr), 124.3 (CHAr), 126.6 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.3 (2CHAr), 128.6 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.9 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, CHAr) 132.6 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, C-ipso), 137.4 (C-ipso), 170.3 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, CO). MS-EI m/z 402 M⁺ (0.6), 264 (100), 172 (77), 144 (86), 117 (53), 93 (76), 69 (87), 41 (33). Anal. Cald. for C₂₁H₂₈ClN₂O₄P: C, 57.47; H, 6.43; N, 6.38. Found: C, 57.08; H, 6.44; N, 6.40%.

Diethyl (2RS,3SR)-3-(3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)carbamoyl)-2-phenylpyrrolidine-2-phosphonate hydrochloride (2e). Following the general procedure, 1e (56 mg, 0.12 mmol), CH₃CN (1.2 mL), H₂O (60 μL), NaBH₃CN (15 mg, 0.25 mmol) and AcOH (60 μL) gave 2e (31 mg, 53%) as a white solid. M.p. 115–116 °C. IR (NaCl) 3460, 2978, 2929, 1684, 1500, 1230, 1052, 1021, 978, 750, 700, 565, 525 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 1.14 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.34 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.43 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.83 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.54 (m, 1H, CH₂CH₃), 3.79–3.91 (c.s., 3H, H-5 and CH₂CH₃), 4.09–4.20 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 4.30 (dd, J = 10.4, 7.6 Hz, 1H, H-3) 7.11 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.24 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.40–7.46 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.58 (dd, J = 6.5, 2.5 Hz, 1H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 15.0 (CH₂CH₃), 15.1 (CH₂CH₃), 28.2 (C-4), 45.8 (C-5), 50.0 (C-3), 64.8 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 65.8 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 72.7 (d, J = 150.0 Hz, C-2), 116.1 (d, J = 22.5 Hz, CHAr), 119.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CHAr), 121.7 (CHAr), 121.8 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, C-ipso), 126.6 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.6 (CHAr), 128.7 (CHAr), 129.0 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, CHAr), 132.5 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, C-ipso), 134.5 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C-ipso), 154.6 (d, J = 245.5 Hz, C-ipso), 170.4 (d, J = 17.5 Hz, CO). MS-EI m/z 454 M⁺ (0.5), 358 (12), 317 (100), 213 (36), 172 (60), 144 (66), 117 (47), 83 (29), 69 (77). HRMS C₂₁H₂₅ClFN₂O₄P [M + H]⁺ 454.1224; found, 454.1226.

Diethyl ((2RS,3SR)-2-phenyl-3-((4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)carbamoyl)pyrrolidin-2-yl)phosphonate (2f). Following the general procedure, 1f (15 mg, 0.04 mmol), CH₃CN (0.4 mL), H₂O (20 μL), NaBH₃CN (6 mg, 0.09 mmol) and AcOH (20 μL) gave 2f (11 mg, 71%) as a colorless oil. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 1.14 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.37 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.49 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.84 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.38–3.62 (m, 1H, CH₂CH₃), 3.74–3.98 (c.s., 3H, H-5 and CH₂CH₃), 4.05–4.24 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 4.28 (dd, J = 10.5, 7.5 Hz, 1H, H-3), 7.30–7.39 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.40–7.45 (m, 2H, 2ArH), 7.45–7.50 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.50–7.57 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.76 (m, 1H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 16.4 (CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (CH₂CH₃), 29.7 (C-4), 47.2 (C-5), 51.6 (C-3), 66.2 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 67.2 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 74.2 (d, J = 149.5 Hz, C-2), 117.6 (CHAr), 122.0 (CHAr), 124.3 (CHAr), 127.9 (2CHAr), 128.0 (q, J = 272.5 Hz, CF₃),130.1 (2CHAr), 130.5 (C-ipso), 130.8 (2CHAr), 132.1 (q, J = 32.5 Hz, CCF₃), 139.8 (C-ipso), 172.1 (d, J = 18.0 Hz, CO).

Diethyl (2RS,3SR)-3-cyclohexylcarbamoyl-2-phenylpyrrolidine-2-phosphonate hydrochloride (2g). Following the general procedure, 1g (83 mg, 0.20 mmol), CH₃CN (2.0 mL), H₂O (100 μL), NaBH₃CN (25 mg, 0.40 mmol) and AcOH (100 μL) gave 2g (83 mg, 93%) as a white solid. M.p. 172 °C. IR (NaCl) 3425, 2931, 2855, 1659, 1552, 1242, 1052, 982, 751, 699, 668, 552 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₃OD) δ 0.98 (m, 1H, CH₂cycl), 1.26 (t, J = 7.0, Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.17–1.36 (m, 5H, CH₂cycl), 1.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.54–1.61 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.70–1.74 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 2.25 (m, 1H, H-4), 2.73 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.35 (m, 1H, CHcycl), 3.52 (m, 1H, CH₂CH₃), 3.77–3.88 (c.s., 3H, CH₂CH₃ and H-5), 4.06–4.17 (c.s., 3H, CH₂CH₃ and H-3), 7.40–7.49 (m, 5H, ArH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 15.0 (CH₂CH₃), 15.1 (CH₂CH₃), 24.4 (CH₂cycl), 24.5 (CH₂cycl), 25.1 (CH₂cycl) 28.1 (C-4), 31.9 (CH₂cycl), 32.0 (CH₂cycl), 45.9 (C-5), 48.0 (CHcycl), 49.1 (C-3), 64.7 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 65.7 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 72.5 (d, J = 149.5 Hz, C-2), 126.8 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.4 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.8 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, CHAr), 132.6 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, C-ipso), 170.8 (d, J = 17.0 Hz, CO). MS-EI m/z; 408 M⁺ (1), 270 (76), 172 (10), 144 (100), 117 (19), 86 (17), 69 (19). HRMS C₂₁H₃₄N₂O₄P [M + H]⁺ 409.2261; found, 409.2251.

3.1.4. General Procedure for the Treatment with Resin and Hydrogenation of 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, and 3e

Bicyclic iminophosphonates 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d and 3e were passed through a Dowex Marathon-A^® resin with MeOH (50 mL). Then, the solvent was evaporated, and the resulting oil was dissolved in AcOH. PtO₂ was added (10% for compound 4a, and 20% for compounds 4b, 4c, 4d and 4e) and the suspension was vigorously stirred under hydrogen atmosphere at rt for 1 day (compound 4a) and for 2 days (compounds 4b, 4c, 4d and 4e). The catalyst was removed by filtration with Celite^® and the solvent was evaporated to afford a residue, which was purified by column chromatography.

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5SR)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-4-(phenylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (4a). Following the general procedure, 3a (200 mg, 0.57 mmol), MeOH (50.0 mL), AcOH (3.0 mL), PtO₂ (13 mg, 0.06 mmol) gave 4a (121 mg, 55%) as a colorless oil, after flash column chromatography (AcOEt/Cyclohexane, SNAP 10 g). IR (NaCl) 3299, 2981, 1734, 1685, 1444, 1229, 1027, 971, 794, 757, 693 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.34 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.40 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.18 (brs, 1H, NH), 3.22–3.33 (c.s., 2H, H-2), 2.53–3.67 (c.s., 3H, H-3, H-4 and H-5), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 4.18–4.32 (m, 4H,CH₂CH₃), 7.08 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.28–7.32 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.58 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, ArH), 9.37 (s, 1H, NH),¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.3 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 48.2 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, C-3), 51.2 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, C-4), 52.1 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, C-2), 52.3 (OCH₃), 58.9 (d, J = 163.0 Hz, C-5), 63.0 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.5 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 119.5 (2CHAr), 123.9 (CHAr), 128.9 (2CHAr), 138.4 (C-ipso), 168.7 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, CO), 173.8 (CO). MS-EI m/z 384 M⁺ (27), 247 (100), 204 (33), 187 (24), 154 (23), 126 (31), 93 (29), 68 (53). HRMS C₁₇H₂₆N₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 385.1539; found, 385.1523.

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5SR)-4-((3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)carbamoyl)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (4b). Following the general procedure, 3b (198 mg, 0.48 mmol), MeOH (50.0 mL), AcOH (3.0 mL), PtO₂ (11 mg, 0.05 mmol) gave 4b (130 mg, 63%) as a colorless oil, after flash column chromatography (AcOEt/Hexane). IR (NaCl) 3274, 2985, 1719, 1685, 1501, 1395, 1227, 1024, 975, 819, 758 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.34 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.41 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.62 (br s, 1H, NH), 3.25 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.31 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.48–3.65 (c.s., 3H, H-3, H-4 and H-5), 3.73 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 4.17–4.24 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 4.28–4.33 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 7.06 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.43 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.79 (dd, J = 7.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 9.75 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H, NH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.3 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 47.6 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, C-3), 51.1 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, C-4), 52.1 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, C-2), 52.4 (OCH₃), 58.8 (d, J = 162.0 Hz, C-5), 63.3 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 116.4 (d, J = 22.0 Hz, CHAr), 119.0 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, CHAr), 121.0 (d, J = 18.0 Hz, CHAr), 121.5 (CAr), 135.1 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, C-ipso), 154.5 (d, J = 245.5 Hz, C-ipso), 168.6 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, CO), 173.8 (CO). MS-EI m/z 436 M⁺ (23), 405 (29), 299 (100), 239 (30), 204 (37), 154 (40), 126 (56), 94 (22), 68 (82). HRMS C₁₇H₂₄ClFN₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 437.1059; found, 437.1039.

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5SR)-4-(cyclohexylcarbamoyl)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (4c). Following the general procedure, 3c (129 mg, 0.36 mmol), MeOH (50.0 mL), AcOH (3.0 mL), PtO₂ (8 mg, 0.04 mmol) gave 4c (35 mg, 25%) as a colorless oil, after column chromatography (AcOEt/MeOH 99:1 to AcOEt/MeOH 98:2). IR (NaCl) 3286, 2931, 1735, 1653, 1449, 1235, 1028, 969, 753 cm⁻¹. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.16–1.25 (m, 3H, CH₂cycl), 1.31–1.38 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.35 (t, J = 7.0, Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.36 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.58 (m, 1H, CH₂cycl), 1.68–1.73 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 1.85–1.89 (m, 2H, CH₂cycl), 2.19 (br s, 1H, NH), 3.19–3.28 (c.s., 2H, H-2), 3.34 (ddd, J = 19.2, 8.0, 6.8 Hz, H-4), 3.45 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.51 (m, 1H, CHcycl), 3.74 (m 1H, H-3), 3.70 (OCH₃), 4.14–4.26 (m, 4H, CH₂CH₃), 6.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, NH). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.4 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 24.6 (2CH₂cycl), 25.5 (CH₂cycl), 32.7 (CH₂cycl), 32.8 (CH₂cycl), 48.4 (CHcycl), 48.5 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, C-3), 50.0 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, C-4), 51.9 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, C-2), 52.1 (OCH₃), 59.0 (d, J = 164.0 Hz, C-5), 62.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.2 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 169.6 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, CO), 173.8 (CO). MS-EI m/z 390 M⁺ (15), 253 (100), 236 (15), 204 (12), 154 (18), 128 (18), 83 (12), 68 (40). HRMS C₁₇H₃₂N₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 391.1997; found, 391.1992.

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5RS)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-phenyl-4-(phenylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (4d). Following the general procedure, 3d (103 mg, 0.24 mmol), MeOH (50.0 mL), AcOH (3.0 mL), PtO₂ (11 mg, 0.05 mmol) gave 4d (55 mg, 50%) as a colorless oil, after column chromatography (AcOEt/Hexane 6:4). IR (NaCl) 3275, 3058, 2982, 1733, 1694, 1552, 1444, 1220, 1050, 968, 793, 754, 695, 571 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.08 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.45 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.65 (br s, 1H, NH), 3.31 (t, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.62–3.81 (c.s., 3H, H-2, H-3 and CH₂CH₃), 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.95–4.05 (c.s., 2H, H-4 and CH₂CH₃), 4.29–4.38 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 7.03 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.19–7.25 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.35–7.37 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.67–7.70 (m, 2H, ArH), 9.47 (br s, 1H, NH); ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.1 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 46.2 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, C-3), 49.2 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, C-2), 52.3 (OCH₃), 57.2 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, C-4), 63.7 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 64.2 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 68.7 (d, J = 158.0 Hz, C-5), 119.8 (2CHAr), 123.8 (CHAr), 127.2 (2CHAr), 128.1 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, CHAr), 128.3 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.6 (2CHAr), 136.9 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, C-ipso), 138.0 (C-ipso), 166.4 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, CO), 173.4 (CO); MS-EI m/z 460 M⁺ (0.7), 323 (100), 230 (17), 202 (30), 160 (45), 144 (71), 127 (44), 93 (36); HRMS C₂₃H₃₀N₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 461.1847; found, 461.1836.

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5RS)-4-((3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl)carbamoyl)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-5-phenylpyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (4e). Following the general procedure, 3e (100 mg, 0.21 mmol), MeOH (50.0 mL), AcOH (3.0 mL), PtO₂ (10 mg, 0.04 mmol) gave 4e (60 mg, 56%) as a yellowish oil, after flash column chromatography with Biotage (AcOEt/Hexane, SNAP 10 g). IR (NaCl) 3260, 3059, 2983, 1736, 1692, 1500, 1223, 1051, 969, 814, 753, 701 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.10 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.46 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.63 (br s, 1H, NH), 3.29 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.64–3.70 (c.s., 2H, H-2 and H-3), 3.72 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.80 (m, 1H, CH₂CH₃), 3.94–4-07 (c.s., 2H, H-4 and CH₂CH₃), 4.30–4.40 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 6.95 (t, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.17–7.27 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.53 (dd, J = 7.0, 3.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.64–7.67 (m, 2H, ArH), 9.74 (br s, 1H, NH); ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.1 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 45.7 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, C-3), 49.3 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, C-2), 52.3 (OCH₃), 57.2 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, C-4), 63.9 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 64.3 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 68.4 (d, J = 159.0 Hz, C-5), 116.3 (d, J = 22.0 Hz, CHAr), 119.3 (d. J = 6.5 Hz, 2CHAr), 120.7 (d, J = 18.5 Hz, C-ipso), 121.8 (CHAr), 127.2 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2CHAr), 128.2 (CHAr), 128.3 (CHAr), 134.7 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C-ipso), 137.0 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, C-ipso), 154.5 (d, J = 245.0 Hz, C-ipso), 166.4 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, CO), 173.2 (CO); MS-EI m/z 512 M⁺ (0.4), 375 (85), 315 (14), 230 (21), 202 (48), 170 (38), 144 (100), 127 (63), 83 (23); HRMS C₂₃H₂₈ClFN₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 513.1365; found, 513.1352.

3.1.5. Reductive Amination Reaction

Methyl (3RS,4SR,5SR)-1-(4-bromobenzyl)-5-(diethoxyphosphoryl)-4-(phenylcarbamoyl)pyrrolidine-3-carboxylate (5). To a solution of 4a (20 mg, 0.05 mmol) in dry MeOH (0.5 mL) were added NaBH₃CN (7 mg, 0.11 mmol), AcOH (17 μL) and 4-bromobenzaldehyde (14 mg, 0.07 mmol) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Additional portions of NaBH₃CN (4 mg, 0.06 mmol) and 4-bromobenzaldehyde (7 mg, 0.03 mmol) were added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. The solvent was evaporated, EtOAc was added to the residue and the resulting solution was washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO₃. The organic phase was dried over Na₂SO₄, filtered and concentrated to afford 5 (22 mg, 77%), as colorless crystals, after column chromatography (AcOEt/Hexane 1:1). IR (NaCl) 3305, 2925, 1738, 1688, 1601, 1552, 1444, 1251, 1024, 974, 756, 693 cm⁻¹; ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 1.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 1.37 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH₂CH₃), 2.72 (dd, J = 10.4, 7.2 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.23 (dd, J = 7.6, 2.5 Hz, 1H, H-5), 3.27 (dd, J = 10.8, 5.6 Hz, 1H, H-2), 3.45 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H, CH₂Ph), 3.68 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.71 (s, 3H, OCH₃), 3.81 (m, 1H, H-4), 4.09–4.21 (m, 3H, CH₂CH₃ and CH₂Ph), 4.24–4.34 (m, 2H, CH₂CH₃), 7.09 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.20 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.29–7.34 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.43–7.46 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.55–7.58 (m, 2H, ArH), 9.18 (s, 1H, NH); ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz) δ 16.4 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 16.5 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 44.2 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, C-3), 49.9 (C-4), 52.3 (OCH₃), 56.6 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, C-2), 58.8 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, CH₂Ph), 62.9 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.8 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, CH₂CH₃), 63.9 (d, J = 169.5 Hz, C-5), 119.5 (2CHAr), 121.0 (C-ipso), 124.1 (CHAr), 128.9 (2CHAr), 130.2 (2CHAr), 131.5 (2CHAr), 137.3 (C-ipso), 138.2 (C-ipso), 168.8 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, CO), 173.3 (CO); MS-EI m/z 552 M⁺ (1),417 (100), 383 (12), 322 (13), 296 (21), 264 (12), 236 (19), 171 (83), 90 (19); HRMS C₂₄H₃₁BrN₂O₆P [M + H]⁺ 553.1099; found, 553.1098.

3.2. X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of PIPred02, CPP06

Crystals of 2d and 5 were obtained from the slow evaporation of methanol solutions. The single-crystal X-ray diffraction data sets were collected at 294 K up to a max 2ϑ of ca. 57° and 50°, respectively, on a Bruker Smart APEX II diffractometer, using monochromatic MoKα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å and 0.3° separation between frames. Data integration was performed using SAINT V6.45A and SORTAV in the diffractometer package [34]. The crystal and collection data and structural refinement parameters are given in Tables S1–S10. The structures were solved by direct methods using SHELXT-2014 and Fourier’s difference methods [35], and refined by least squares on F2 using SHELXL-2014/7 inside the WinGX program environment [36]. Anisotropic displacement parameters were used for non-H atoms (Tables S4 and S9) and the H-atoms were positioned in calculated positions and refined by riding on their parent atoms. Atom coordinates are given in Tables S2 and S7 and bond distances and angles in Tables S3 and S8. Hydrogen bonds are detailed in Tables S5 and S10.

Here, 2d crystallized in the orthorhombic Pca21 space group as chloride (Ortep representation in Scheme 2). Two independent groups constitute the asymmetric unit (A and B). Both pyrrolidinium rings present a twisted conformation on C2-C3 (in A) and on C22-C23 (in B), while the phenyl groups are flat. The stereocenters C2 and C3 exhibit chiralities R and S, respectively (in A). The other molecule shows opposed chirality, S and R for C22 and C23, respectively (in B). So, although the space group is chiral, as well as the crystal, as is clearly shown by the Flack parameter (0.07 (7)), the two molecules being of opposed chirality indicates that this chiral crystal has a racemic composition (!). Molecules of the same type are concatenated along the a axis, either through O1···N1’ (+)···Cl1 (-)···N7 (in A) or O4···N21’ (+)···Cl2 (-)···N27 (in B) hydrogen bonds (Table S5 of the 2d tables), where the protonated N1’ (+) and N21’ (+), respectively, correspond to the neighboring molecule in the (100) direction. So, molecules pack in separated chains, of either A or B type.

Compound 5 crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group (Ortep in Scheme 3). Two independent molecules constitute the asymmetric unit (C and D). The pyrrolidine rings present twisted conformations on C3-C4 (in C) and on C13-C14 (in D), while the phenyl groups are flat. The stereocenters C3, C4, and C5 exhibit chiralities R, S, and S, respectively (in C); similarly, in the other molecule, C13, C14 and C15 show the same chirality scheme, R, S, and S, respectively (in D). The crystal is racemic, even if both molecules have the same chirality, because of the centrosymmetry of the space group. Molecules are packed in dimers through the N2···O7 and N6···O1 hydrogen bonds (see Table S10 for 5). So, the asymmetric unit consists of a C:::D dimer.

Crystallographic data for the reported structures has been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as a supplementary publication, CCDC No.2442162 (for 2d), and CCDC No. 2442161 (for 5). Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK. Fax: þ44 1223 336 033.

Email: [email protected]. Web page: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk (8 April 2025).

3.3. Binding Studies

3.3.1. Preparation of Cellular Membranes

Human brain samples were obtained via autopsy in the Basque Institute of Legal Medicine, Bilbao, Spain. Samples from the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann’s area 9) were dissected at the time of autopsy and immediately stored at −70 °C until assay. The study was developed in compliance with policies of research and ethical review boards for postmortem brain studies.

To obtain cellular membranes (P2 fraction), the different samples were homogenized using an ultraturrax in 10 volumes of homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 5 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4). The crude homogenate was centrifuged for 5 min at 1000× g (4 °C) and the supernatant was centrifuged again for 10 min at 40,000× g (4 °C). The resultant pellet was washed twice in 5 volumes of homogenization buffer and recentrifuged in similar conditions. Protein content was measured according to the method of Bradford using BSA as standard.

3.3.2. Competition Binding Assays

The pharmacological activity of the compounds was evaluated through competition binding studies against the I₂-IR selective radioligand [³H]2-BFI or the α₂-adrenergic receptor selective radioligand [³H]RX821002. Specific binding was measured in 0.25 mL aliquots (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) containing 100 µg of membranes, which were incubated in 96-well plates either with [³H]2-BFI (2 nM) for 45 min at 25 °C or with [³H]RX821002 (1 nM) for 30 min at 25 °C, in the absence or presence of the competing compounds (10⁻¹² to 10⁻³ M, 10 concentrations).

Incubations were terminated by separating free ligand from bound ligand by rapid filtration under vacuum (1450 Filter Mate Harvester, PerkinElmer) through GF/C glass fiber filters. The filters were then rinsed three times with 300 μL of binding buffer, air-dried (120 min), and assessed for radioactivity by liquid scintillation spectrometry using a MicroBeta TriLux counter (PerkinElmer). Specific binding was determined and plotted as a function of the compound concentration. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of idazoxan (10⁻⁵ M), a compound with well-established affinity for I₂-IR and α₂-adrenergic receptors, in [³H]2-BFI and [³H]RX821002 assays. To obtain the inhibition constant (K_i), analyses of competition experiments were performed by nonlinear regression using the GraphPad Prism program. K_i values were normalized to pK_i values. I₂-IR/α₂-AR selectivity index was calculated as the antilogarithm of the difference between pK_i values for I₂-IR and pK_i values for α₂-AR.

4. Conclusions

To sum up, we have proposed a new method for accessing diversely substituted phosphoprolines, a key heterocyclic nucleous endowed with huge biological potential, by the description of a methodology that permits the synthesis of 2,2,3-trisubtituted and 2,2,3,3-tetrasubstituted (pyrrolidine-2-yl)phosphonates. The new compounds were characterized from the stereochemical point of view by X-ray crystallography analysis. Two selected compounds, 2e and 4e, that share structural moieties, the 3Cl,4-FPh substituent in the nitrogen atom and the α-phenylphosphonate, with the I₂-IR ligands previously reported by us showed good in vitro BBB penetration. While the structural modifications in 2e proved deleterious for the affinity with I₂-IR, the presence of the methyl ester functional group in the 4 position in 4e contributed to a compound that did not outperform the previous I₂-IR ligands proposed by us, but which had affinity and selectivity values for I₂-IR in the range of clinical candidates CR4056 and BU99008 in human tissues. Therefore, 4e has emerged as a promising compound for further pharmacological studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.E.; methodology, A.B. and S.A.; synthesis, A.B. and S.A.; data curation, A.B., S.A., I.M.-A., L.F.C. and A.L.-R.; supporting information preparation, A.L.-R.; X-ray crystallography, E.M.; PAMPA_BBB studies, B.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.L.-R. and C.E.; writing—review and editing, A.L.-R. and C.E.; supervision, C.E.; funding acquisition, L.F.C. and C.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank staff members of the Basque Institute of Legal Medicine for their cooperation. We kindly acknowledge Olga Vázquez for the English revision of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ADME-Tox, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity; α₂-AR, α₂-adrenergic receptor; CH₃CN, acetonitrile; EtOH, ethanol; EtOAc, ethyl acetate; HRMS, high-resolution mass spectrometry; MeOH, methanol; NaBH₃CN, sodium borohydride; NMR, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance; PAMPA, parallel artificial membrane permeability assay; rt, room temperature; SAMP8, senescence accelerated mouse-prone 8; NaOH, sodium hydroxide; THF, tetrahydrofurane.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figures, Schemes and Tables

Figure 1 I₂-IR ligands CR4056 and BU99008, with the imidazole/imidazoline nucleus in color.

Figure 2 Representative coupling constants (Hz): ¹H-P (blue), ¹H-¹H (pink) and ¹³C-P (green).

Figure 3 Representative coupling constants (Hz) ¹³C-P (green).

Figure 4 Structure of the four previously reported compounds B06, B06red, BIN05 and PIP01 (1e) and the two selected compounds, 2e and 4e, evaluated in this paper as I₂-IR ligands. Highlighted in blue is the α-phenyliminophosphonate moiety, and highlighted in orange is the α-phenylaminophosphonate moiety and in grey the monocycles.

Table 1

Significant ¹H and ¹³C-NMR data (ppm, multiplicity and coupling constants, Hz) of new compounds 2a–2g.

	1H-NMR Data						13C-NMR Data
Comp.	H2	H3	H4	H4	H5	H5	C2	C3	C4	C5
2a	3.63t 17.5	3.26ddd 224.0, 16.0, 8.0	2.06m 3	2.19–2.29c.s. 4	2.99–3.12c.s.		57.8d 5165.0	47.5d2.0	31.2d7.0	48.4d9.0
2b	3.46t7.5	3.75m	1.97m	2.13–2.22c.s.	2.91–3.07c.s.		58.5d165.0	48.2	30.9d6.5	48.4d9.5
2c	-	3.58ddd13.6, 7.6, 6.0	2.43–2.53c.s.		3.48ddd11.2, 8.4, 6.8	3.69ddd11.2, 8.4, 6.8	64.4d159.0	48.8	27.8d4.0	45.2d3.0
2d	-	4.32dd 610.8, 7.6	2.42m	2.83m	3.81–3.89c.s.		72.8d149.5	49.9	28.3	45.8
2e	-	4.30dd10.4, 7.6	2.43m	2.83m	3.79–3.91c.s.		72.7d150.0	50.0	28.2	45.8
2f	-	4.28dd10.5, 7.5	2.49m	2.84m	3.74–3.98c.s.		74.2d149.5	51.6	29.7	47.2
2g	-	4.06–4.17c.s.	2.25m	2.73m	3.77–3.88c.s.		72.5d149.5	49.1	28.1	45.9

¹ t = triplet; ² ddd = doublet of doublets of doublets; ³ m = multiplet; ⁴ c.s. = complex signal; ⁵ d = doublet and ⁶ dd = doublet of doublets.

Table 2

Significant ¹H and ¹³C-NMR data (ppm, multiplicity and coupling constants, Hz) of new compounds 4a–4e and 5.

	1H-NMR Data					13C-NMR Data
Comp.	H2	H2	H3	H4	H5	C2	C3	C4	C5
4a	3.22–3.33c.s. 1		2.53–3.67c.s.	2.53–3.67c.s.	2.53–3.67c.s.	52.1d 211.5	48.2d7.5	51.2d2.5	58.9d163.0
4b	3.25m 3	3.31m	3.48–3.65c.s.	3.48–3.65c.s.	3.48–3.65c.s.	52.1d12.0	47.6d8.0	51.1d2.2	58.8d162.0
4c	3.19–3.28c.s.		3.74m	3.34ddd 419.0, 8.0, 6.8	3.45d8.8	51.9d10.5	48.5d7.0	50.0d2.0	59.0d164.0
4d	3.31t 59.5	3.62–3.81c.s.	3.62–3.81c.s.	3.95–4.05c.s.	-	49.2d7.0	46.2d7.5	57.2d4.0	68.7d158.0
4e	3.29m	3.64–3.70c.s.	3.64–3.70c.s.	3.94–4.07c.s.	-	49.3d7.0	45.7d7.5	57.2d3.5	68.4d159.0
5	2.72dd 610.4, 7.2	3.27dd10.8, 5.6	3.68m	3.81m	3.23dd7.6, 2.5	56.6d13.5	44.2d7.5	49.9	63.9d169.5

¹ c.s. = complex signal; ² d = doublet; ³ m = multiplet; ⁴ ddd = doublet of doublets of doublets; ⁵ t = triplet and ⁶ dd = doublet of doublets.

Table 3

I₂-IR and α₂-AR binding affinities (pK_i) of two clinical candidates CR4056 and BU99008, and four previously reported compounds, B06, B06red, BIN05 and PIP01 (1e), and new compounds 2e and 4e. Table adapted from reference [11].

Entry	Compd.	[3H]-2-BFI, I2 One Siteb I2 Two Sites H/L; (pKiH/pKiL)High Affinity Site %	[3H]RX821002, α2	SelectivityI2/α2 a
1	CR4056 c	7.72 ± 0.31/5.45 ± 0.1529 ± 6	2.65 ± 1.24	117,490
2	BU99008 c	6.89 ± 0.21/3.82 ± 0.3051 ± 6	4.37 ± 0.17	331
3	B06 c	8.56 ± 0.328.61 ± 0.28/4.29 ± 0.2037 ± 4	6.27 ± 0.56	195
4	B06red d	6.88 ± 0.299.81 ± 0.21/< 350 ± 4	6.66 ± 0.49	1.7
5	BIN05 d	3.89 ± 0.198.18 ± 0.43/3.56 ± 0.2221 ± 3	5.51 ± 0.24	-
6	PIP01 c (1e)	9.98 ± 0.74	9.43 ± 0.22	3
7	2e	4.16 ± 0.15	4.07 ± 0.20	1.2
8	4e	7.99 ± 0.39	3.22 ± 0.15	58,884

^a Selectivity I₂-IR/α₂-AR expressed as the antilog (pK_i I₂-IR pK_i α₂-AR). ^b The best fit of the data for CR4056, BU99008, B06, B06red and BIN05 was to a two-site binding model of binding with high pK_i (pK_iH) and low pK_i (pK_iL) affinities for both binding sites, respectively. ^c Values published in [11]. ^d Values published in [9].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30092078/s1, ¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR spectra of new compounds, X-ray crystallographic data for 2d and 5, in vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Permeation Assay, Molecular Formula Strings (SMILES). Ref. [37] is cited in the Supplementary Materials.

References

1. Abás, S.; Rodríguez-Arévalo, S.; Bagán, A.; Griñán-Ferré, C.; Vasilopoulou, F.; Brocos-Mosquera, I.; Muguruza, C.; Pérez, B.; Molins, E.; Luque, F.J. . Bicyclic α-Iminophosphonates as High Affinity Imidazoline I2 Receptor Ligands for Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Med. Chem.; 2020; 63, pp. 3610-3633. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02080] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150414]

2. Li, J.X. Imidazoline I2 Receptors: An Update. Pharmacol. Ther.; 2017; 178, pp. 48-56. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.03.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322973]

3. Bousquet, P.; Hudson, A.; García-Sevilla, J.A.; Li, J.X. Imidazoline Receptor System: The Past, the Present, and the Future. Pharmacol. Rev.; 2020; 72, pp. 50-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.118.016311] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819014]

4. Dardonville, C.; Rozas, I. Imidazoline Binding Sites and Their Ligands: An Overview of the Different Chemical Structures. Med. Res. Rev.; 2004; 24, pp. 639-661. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/med.20007]

5. Rovati, L.C.; Brambilla, N.; Blicharski, T.; Connell, J.; Vitalini, C.; Bonazzi, A.; Giacovelli, G.; Girolami, F.; D’Amato, M. Efficacy and Safety of the First-in-Class Imidazoline-2 Receptor Ligand CR4056 in Pain from Knee Osteoarthritis and Disease Phenotypes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Trial. Osteoarthr. Cartil.; 2020; 28, pp. 22-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.09.002]

6. Wilson, H.; Dervenoulas, G.; Pagano, G.; Tyacke, R.J.; Polychronis, S.; Myers, J.; Gunn, R.N.; Rabiner, E.A.; Nutt, D.; Politis, M. Imidazoline 2 Binding Sites Reflecting Astroglia Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease: An in Vivo 11C-BU99008 PET Study. Brain; 2019; 142, pp. 3116-3128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz260]

7. Hernández-Hernández, E.; Ledesma-Corvi, S.; Yáñez-Gómez, F.; Garau, C.; Gálvez-Melero, L.; Bagán, A.; Escolano, C.; García-Fuster, M.J. Sex Differences in the Antidepressant-like Response and Molecular Events Induced by the Imidazoline-2 Receptor Agonist CR4056 in Rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.; 2023; 223, 73527. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173527]

8. Vasilopoulou, F.; Griñán-Ferré, C.; Rodríguez-Arévalo, S.; Bagán, A.; Abás, S.; Escolano, C.; Pallàs, M. I2 Imidazoline Receptor Modulation Protects Aged SAMP8 Mice against Cognitive Decline by Suppressing the Calcineurin Pathway. Geroscience; 2021; 43, pp. 965-983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11357-020-00281-2]

9. Bagán, A.; Abás, S.; Palà-Pujadas, J.; Irisarri, A.; Griñán-Ferré, C.; Pallàs, M.; Muneta-Arrate, I.; Muguruza, C.; Callado, L.F.; Pérez, B. . Exploring the Reactivity of Bicyclic α-Iminophosphonates to Access New Imidazoline I2 Receptor Ligands. Bioorg. Chem.; 2024; 142, 106935. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106935]

10. Li, J.X.; Zhang, Y. Imidazoline I2 Receptors: Target for New Analgesics?. Eur. J. Pharmacol.; 2011; 658, pp. 49-56. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2011.02.038]

11. Bagán, A.; López-Ruiz, A.; Abás, S.; Ruiz-Cantero, M.C.; Vasilopoulou, F.; Taboada-Jara, T.; Griñán-Ferré, C.; Pallàs, M.; Muguruza, C.; Diez-Alarcia, R. . Discovery of (3-Phenylcarbamoyl-3,4-Dihydro-2H-Pyrrol-2-Yl)Phosphonates as Imidazoline I2 Receptor Ligands with Anti-Alzheimer and Analgesic Properties. J. Med. Chem.; 2025; 68, pp. 2551-2573. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.4c01644] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39818939]

12. Mayorquín-Torres, M.C.; Simoens, A.; Bonneure, E.; Stevens, C.V. Synthetic Methods for Azaheterocyclic Phosphonates and Their Biological Activity: An Update 2004–2024. Chem. Rev.; 2024; 124, pp. 7907-7975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00090] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38809666]

13. Vitaku, E.; Smith, D.T.; Njardarson, J.T. Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles among U.S. FDA Approved Pharmaceuticals. J. Med. Chem.; 2014; 57, pp. 10257-10274. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm501100b] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25255204]

14. Smolobochkin, A.; Gazizov, A.; Appazov, N.; Sinyashin, O.; Burilov, A. Progress in the Stereoselective Synthesis Methods of Pyrrolidine-Containing Drugs and Their Precursors. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2024; 25, 11158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms252011158]

15. Głowacka, I.E.; Hartwich, A.; Rozpara, I.; Piotrowska, D.G. Synthesis of Functionalized Diethyl (Pyrrolidin-2-Yl)Phosphonate and Diethyl (5-Oxopyrrolidin-2-Yl)Phosphonate. Molecules; 2021; 26, 3160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113160]

16. Maestro, A.; de Marigorta, E.M.; Palacios, F.; Vicario, J. α-Iminophosphonates: Useful Intermediates for Enantioselective Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonates. Asian J. Org. Chem.; 2020; 9, pp. 538-548. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.202000039]

17. Ordóñez, M.; Rojas-Cabrera, H.; Cativiela, C. An Overview of Stereoselective Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonic Acids and Derivatives. Tetrahedron; 2009; 65, pp. 17-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2008.09.083]

18. Varga, P.R.; Keglevich, G. The Last Decade of Optically Active α-Aminophosphonates. Molecules; 2023; 28, 6150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28166150]

19. Elliott, T.S.; Slowey, A.; Ye, Y.; Conway, S.J. The Use of Phosphate Bioisosteres in Medicinal Chemistry and Chemical Biology. Med. Chem. Comm.; 2012; 3, pp. 735-751. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2md20079a]

20. Gluza, K.; Kafarski, P. Transition State Analogues of Enzymatic Reaction as Potential Drugs. Drug Discovery; InTech: London, UK, 2013; pp. 325-372. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5772/52504]

21. Orsini, F.; Sello, G.; Sisti, M. Aminophosphonic Acids and Derivatives. Synthesis and Biological Applications. Curr. Med. Chem.; 2010; 17, pp. 264-289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986710790149729]

22. Amira, A.; Aouf, Z.; K’tir, H.; Chemam, Y.; Ghodbane, R.; Zerrouki, R.; Aouf, N.E. Recent Advances in the Synthesis of α-Aminophosphonates: A Review. ChemistrySelect; 2021; 6, pp. 6137-6149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.202101360]

23. Mucha, A.; Kafarski, P.; Berlicki, Ł. Remarkable Potential of the α-Aminophosphonate/Phosphinate Structural Motif in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem.; 2011; 54, pp. 5955-5980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm200587f]

24. Moonen, K.; Laureyn, I.; Stevens, C.V. Synthetic Methods for Azaheterocyclic Phosphonates and Their Biological Activity. Chem. Rev.; 2004; 104, pp. 6177-6215. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr030451c] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15584699]

25. Gazizov, A.S.; Smolobochkin, A.V.; Turmanov, R.A.; Pudovik, M.A.; Burilov, A.R.; Sinyashin, O.G. Synthesis of Phosphaproline Derivatives: A Short Overview. Synthesis; 2019; 51, pp. 3397-3409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1611891]

26. Smolobochkin, A.V.; Gazizov, A.S.; Turmanov, R.A.; Abdullaeva, D.S.; Burilov, A.R.; Pudovik, M.A. N-Phosphorylated Pyrrolidines: An Overview of Synthetic Approaches. Synthesis; 2020; 52, pp. 2162-2170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1690889]

27. Ruggiero, D.A.; Regunathan, S.; Wang, H.; Milner, T.A.; Reis, D.J. Immunocytochemical Localization of an Imidazoline Receptor Protein in the Central Nervous System. Brain Res.; 1998; 780, pp. 270-293. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01203-1]

28. When the Crude of the Reduction Was Purified Without Treatment with EtOH.HCl (1.25 M) the Product n That Resulted of the Elimination of the Phosphonate Was Isolated. See Supporting Information for Details and NMR Spectra. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/41534 (accessed on 29 April 2025).

29. Ordóñez, M.; Sayago, F.J.; Cativiela, C. Synthesis of Quaternary α-Aminophosphonic Acids. Tetrahedron; 2012; 68, pp. 6369-6412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2012.05.008]

30. Alix, A.; Lalli, C.; Retailleau, P.; Masson, G. Highly Enantioselective Electrophilic α-Bromination of Enecarbamates: Chiral Phosphoric Acid and Calcium Phosphate Salt Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2012; 134, pp. 10389-10392. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja304095z]

31. Bousquet, P.; Feldman, J.; Schwartz, J. Central Cardiovascular Effects of Alpha Adrenergic Drugs: Differences between Catecholamines and Imidazolines. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.; 1984; 230, pp. 232-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3565(25)21405-7]

32. Giordani, A.; Mandelli, S.; Verpilio, I.; Zanzola, S.; Tarchino, F.; Castelli, G.; Piepoli, T.; Mazzari, S.; Makovec, F.; Rovati, L.C. 6-1H-Imidazo-Quinazoline and Quinolines Derivatives, New Potent Analgesics and Anti-Inflammatory Agents. U.S. Patent; US8193353B2, 5 June 2012.

33. Tyacke, R.J.; Fisher, A.; Robinson, E.S.J.; Grundt, P.; Turner, E.M.; Husbands, S.M.; Hudson, A.L.; Parker, C.A.; Nutt, D.J. Evaluation and Initial in Vitro and Ex Vivo Characterization of the Potential Positron Emission Tomography Ligand, BU99008 (2-(4,5-Dihydro-1H-Imidazol-2-Yl)-1- Methyl-1H-Indole), for the Imidazoline 2 Binding Site. Synapse; 2012; 66, pp. 542-551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/syn.21541]

34. Blessing, R.H. An Empirical Correction for Absorption Anisotropy. Acta Crystallogr. A; 1995; 51, pp. 33-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108767394005726] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7702794]

35. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXT-Integrated Space-Group and Crystal-Structure Determination. Acta Crystallogr.; 2015; 71, pp. 3-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2053273314026370] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25537383]

36. Farrugia, L.J. WinGX and ORTEP for Windows: An Update. J. Appl. Crystallogr.; 2012; 45, pp. 849-854. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889812029111]

37. Di, L.; Kerns, E.H.; Fan, K.; McConnell, O.J.; CarTer, G.T. High throughput artificial membrane permeability assay for blood-brain barrier. Eur. J. Med.Chem.; 2003; 38, pp. 223-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0223-5234(03)00012-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12667689]