Cu(OTf)2-catalyzed multicomponent reactions

Introduction

Copper has gained a relevant role in organic synthesis as an alternative to precious metals due to its low toxicity, ease of handling, high catalytic activity, and cost-effectiveness [1–2]. In recent years, Cu(OTf)₂ has significantly emerged among copper catalysts because it can act as a precursor to triflic acid in addition to a powerful copper-catalytic effect. Indeed, Cu(OTf)₂ has proven to be an excellent surrogate for triflic acid compared with other metal triflates because it is inexpensive and exhibits high activity with low toxicity [3–7].

Multicomponent reactions are one of the most effective methods to assemble multiple reagents, thus facilitating access to the target molecules more quickly, due to atom/step economy, short reaction times, and eco-friendly benefits. Combining multicomponent reactions with transition-metal catalysts provides synthetic tools even more advantageously. Copper has also become very interesting in this field, mainly in processes aimed at synthesizing heterocyclic compounds. Among the various catalysts, Cu(OTf)₂ stands out in heterocyclic synthesis and ring transformations due to its dual activity as a metal catalyst as well as a Lewis acid [8–11]. However, in many cases, the role of copper is not clear and both activities often work synergistically. In all other cases, copper’s activity is due to the coordination/complexation with unsaturated systems, but it is rarely possible to exclude its action also as Lewis acid. Confirming this dual activity, it should be noted that copper triflate can rarely be replaced by other copper salts or complexes to obtain the same results. In general, catalyst switching does not work with copper triflate, thus supporting its unique behavior or reactivity properties. The ambiguity related to the role of Cu(OTf)₂ is particularly relevant for cycloaddition reactions, where it is even more difficult to justify the activation of the copper species as a Lewis acid or metal catalyst [12–14].

The reaction mechanism involved can be ionic or radical (Figure 1). The latter is typically operative when the reaction is carried out under oxidative conditions, usually in the presence of O₂ and TEMPO, involving the formation of radical species through single-electron transfer (SET) from a copper catalyst to a precursor. Subsequent addition to multiple C–C bonds generates extended carbon radicals capable of giving further functionalization.

Figure 1

Plausible general catalytic activation for ionic or radical mechanisms.

Regarding the ionic mechanism, the key step generally comprises the complexation with the unsaturated substrate leading to activation of the alkenyl/alkynyl moiety towards a nucleophilic attack. In some cases, activation of a carbonyl group by the copper catalyst to facilitate nucleophilic attack has also been reported. Moreover, both activations can be operative simultaneously. Since copper shows affinity either for multiple C–C bonds or polar functional groups, it seems the ideal tool for this type of reaction.

Review

Three-component reactions

Several three-component procedures have been successfully carried out using Cu(OTf)₂ as a catalyst. These processes have been exploited mainly to access nitrogen compounds endowed with various structures, in a faster and more sustainable way than reactions conducted step by step.

Providing acyclic compounds

A three-component Strecker-type condensation of aromatic aldehydes, amines, and cyanides under mild reaction conditions furnishes α-aminonitriles 1 in good to high yields (Scheme 1) [15]. The reaction failed only in the case of acetophenone. Among various Lewis acids, only Cu(OTf)₂ in combination with TMSCN was effective or a valuable alternative was the use of acetone cyanohydrin combined with a catalytic amount of TEA (5 mol %). The mechanism involves the formation of an imine facilitating the addition of the nitrile group.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of α-aminonitriles 1.

Among the known processes, a particular Mannich-type reaction was realized in water in the presence of a dendritic 2,2’-bipyridine ligand 2 and Cu(OTf)₂ (Scheme 2) [16]. The hydrophobic ligand surrounding the metal revealed to be essential for the organic synthesis in water, thus increasing the reaction yields.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of β-amino ketone or β-amino ester derivatives 3.

The Mannich reaction with aromatic aldehydes and cyclic amines was performed efficiently on 2-naphthol, by using SiO₂-supported copper triflate under solvent-free conditions, without an additional co-catalyst or additive (Scheme 3) [17].

Scheme 3

Synthesis of 1-(α-aminoalkyl)-2-naphthol derivatives 4.

The treatment of stoichiometric amounts of arylaldehydes, secondary aliphatic or aromatic amines and thiols in the presence of catalytic Cu(OTf)₂ (1 mol %) in aqueous media was proven to be a sustainable procedure to access thioaminals 5, avoiding high temperatures and/or hazardous reagents required by classical conditions (Scheme 4) [18].

Scheme 4

Synthesis of thioaminals 5.

The 1,2-difunctionalization of alkenes carried out with carbazates (N-aminocarbamates) and (hetero)arene nucleophiles or amines exploiting N-(tert-butyl)-N-fluoro-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)benzenesulfonamide (NFBS) as intermolecular hydrogen-atom-transfer reagent results in alkylarylation processes (Scheme 5) [19]. The reaction proceeds through an initial single-electron transfer from NFBS assisted by the active copper species, followed by intermolecular hydrogen-atom transfer from the carbazate. The nitrogen radical intermediate I thus formed is decomposed into the acyl or alkyl radical intermediates II and III, respectively. The latter interacts with the alkene generating an alkyl radical IV that converts to the cationic intermediate V by single-electron oxidation by the Cu(II) species. Finally, the attack of the nucleophile leads to the desired products 6. Starting from aryl carbazates, intermediate II, adds directly to the alkene, then reacts with the nucleophile to afford product 7.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of aryl- or amine-containing alkanes 6 and 7.

The regioselective 1,2-difunctionalization of allyl alcohol has been developed as a three-component cascade reaction using arenes and sulfonamides as nucleophiles to achieve arylation/hydroamination processes. The reaction involves a Friedel–Crafts alkylation of the arene followed by hydroamination (Scheme 6) [5]. The mechanism plausibly starts with the in situ formation of triflic acid from Cu(OTf)₂ which leads to protonation of the oxygen atom of the alcohol with generation of the activated allyl alcohol. This latter gives the allyl carbenium ion VI through the loss of a molecule of water, then undergoes a Friedel–Crafts alkylation by attack of the aromatic partner. The outcome of the reaction proceeds through a Markovnikov protonation of the allylated arene VII by triflic acid, which generates the carbocation intermediate VIII. At this stage, the amido–copper complex IX selectively attacks the intermediate providing the 1-aryl-2-sulfonamidopropane 8. This procedure is a valuable alternative to a similar approach for the synthesis of amphetamine derivatives 9 from allyl carbamates that requires excess of Cu(OTf)₂ [6].

Scheme 6

Synthesis of 1-aryl-2-sulfonamidopropanes 8.

Three-component coupling of amines, aldehydes or ketones, and terminal alkynes catalyzed by Cu(OTf)₂ is a fruitful tool for the production of α-substituted propargylamines 10 (Scheme 7) [20]. The reaction involves the alkynylation of the corresponding imines formed in situ and provides higher yields than the two-step reactions. The addition of Na₂SO₄ facilitates the formation of the products, while MgSO₄ or molecular sieves were found to be irrelevant to the reaction rate. It should be noted that this three-component process is promoted by the specific combination of Cu(II) with the triflate counteranion.

Scheme 7

Synthesis of α-substituted propargylamines 10.

The use of a carbamate among the substrates instead of the amine allowed the synthesis of propargylcarbamates 11. This reaction, effective only for the aromatic aldehydes, did not require other co-catalysts or ligands (Scheme 8) [21].

Scheme 8

Synthesis of N-propargylcarbamates 11.

Three-component reactions of alkynes, alkyltrifluoroborates and sulfur dioxide afforded vinyl sulfones with excellent regio- and stereoselectivity (Scheme 9) [22]. The authors used DABCO(SO₂)₂ to generate sulfur dioxide, and visible light irradiation and the mandatory presence of a photocatalyst for this transformation suggested a radical mechanism. The inhibition of the reaction in the presence of TEMPO confirmed this hypothesis. The copper catalyst assisted in the addition step of the alkylsulfonyl radical X to the alkyne. The presence of 2-iodopropane as additive improved the yields. The role was unclear, but it might facilitate the conversion of the alkyltrifluoroborate into its corresponding alkyl radical.

Scheme 9

Synthesis of (E)-vinyl sulfones 12.

o-Halo-substituted aryl selenides and sulfides 13 can be achieved by a three-component coupling reaction performed with an aryne precursor, potassium halides and electrophilic chalcogen species as reactants, in the presence of Cu(OTf)₂ (Scheme 10) [23]. Under these conditions the reaction between aryl thiosulfonates with arynes to give sulfones is competitive. Cu(OTf)₂ is essential to remove the sulfinate anions in the reaction medium, avoiding side reactions arising from their attack to the electrophilic arynes. The so-obtained products are susceptible of Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, allowing the formation of C–C and C–N bonds in the o-position of the aryl chalcogen compounds.

Scheme 10

Synthesis of o-halo-substituted aryl chalcogenides 13.

α-Aminophosphonates 14 were the result of a one-pot condensation of an aldehyde, a primary amine and phosphite P(OMe)₃ with copper triflate acting as Lewis acid. Electron-poor and electron-rich aromatic aldehydes gave good results, whereas aliphatic aldehydes gave moderate yields (Scheme 11) [24].

Scheme 11

Synthesis of α-aminophosphonates 14.

The asymmetric conjugate addition of dialkylzinc and benzaldehyde to unsaturated carbonyls under copper catalysis in the presence of optically pure phosphanes was realized with high diastereo- and enantioselectivities (Scheme 12) [25].

Scheme 12

Synthesis of unsaturated furanones and pyranones 15–17.

Providing cyclic compounds

For more than a century, Biginelli's reaction has been known as an effective tool for the construction of dihydropyrimidines through a three-component process by condensation in an acidic medium of an aldehyde, urea and a 1,3-dicarbonyl compound [26–27]. In these reactions, the use of catalytic Cu(OTf)₂ proved to be an excellent triflate surrogate, also revealing a remarkable reuse activity. The first example of a Biginelli reaction carried out with Cu(OTf)₂ catalysis was reported by Sudalai and co-workers in 2003 (Scheme 13) [28]. Working in acetonitrile at room temperature, very high yields were obtained with recycling of the catalyst with negligible loss of activity. The reaction is successful also by operating it in ethanol as a solvent under microwave irradiation [29]. More recently, the Biginelli reaction was carried out starting from salicylaldehyde providing hydroxyphenyl-substituted dihydropyrimidines 18 [30]. Subsequently, the regioselective oxidation of the dihydropyrimidine ring in the presence of CAN allowed the formation of new pyrimidinone derivatives 19.

Scheme 13

Synthesis of substituted dihydropyrimidines 18.

The efficacy of Cu(OTf)₂ as a catalyst in three-component processes was also demonstrated in three-component reactions involving alkynes, amines and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes to obtain 1,4-dihydropyridines 20 (Scheme 14) [31]. By using terminal alkynes, 2,6-unsubstituted products were achieved. Concerning the mechanism, it is plausible to assume as the key step for ring formation an aza-Diels–Alder reaction between the alkyne and the imine generated by dehydration between the aldehyde and aniline. The catalyst promotes the formation of the imine XI, while the high regioselectivity is ascribable to the favored orientation between the electron-rich nitrogen of the diene and the electron-poor carbon of the alkyne.

Scheme 14

Regioselective synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines 20.

A different one-pot procedure affording tetrahydropyridines was developed employing two molecules of aromatic aldehydes, ethyl acetoacetate and two molecules of aniline. The copper triflate catalyst acts in the initial formation of imine XII and enamine XIII, reacting each other in a mechanism that involved two Mannich-type reactions (Scheme 15) [32].

Scheme 15

Synthesis of tetrahydropyridines 21.

Activation of terminal alkynes with Cu(OTf)₂ is the key step for the preparation of furoquinoxalines 22 from o-phenylenediamine and ethyl glyoxylate (Scheme 16) [33]. The reaction, which occurs with formation of C–C, C–N and C–O bonds, involves a nucleophilic addition of the activated alkyne XIV to the in situ-generated iminium ion XV, followed by cyclization to form a quinoxalin-2-one intermediate XVI. A subsequent 5-endo-dig cyclization involving the triple bond furnishes the furo-ring and the final oxidation affords the tricyclic product 22.

Scheme 16

Synthesis of furoquinoxalines 22.

Substituted quinolines 23 were obtained in a convenient solvent-free multicomponent reaction starting from electron-rich or electron-poor anilines, alkyl or arylaldehydes and terminal alkynes, performing the coupling with copper triflate as catalyst, without ligand, co-catalyst or other additives. The reaction involved the formation of the imine XVII followed by alkynylation to propargylamine XVIII, cyclization, and oxidation to quinoline 23 (Scheme 17) [34].

Scheme 17

Synthesis of 2,4-substituted quinolines 23.

Three component oxidative annulation to obtain cyclic ether-fused tetrahydroquinolines 24 has been reported starting from secondary anilines, cyclic ethers and paraformaldehyde (Scheme 18) [35]. In addition to Cu(OTf)₂ as a catalyst, the most effective reaction conditions required a substoichiometric amount of p-nitrobenzoic acid as an additive. Some control experiments support a mechanism whose key intermediates are the formation of the iminium ion XIX, originated from aniline with formaldehyde which serves as the C1 building block, and the generation of the cyclic α,β-unsaturated ethers XX by Cu(OTf)₂-catalyzed dehydrogenation of the corresponding saturated compounds. Subsequent nucleophilic addition of the cyclic vinyl ether to the iminium salt generates an intermediate XXI susceptible of intramolecular electrophilic attack to give a tricyclic structure XXII. The final deprotonation provides the desired product 24.

Scheme 18

Synthesis of cyclic ether-fused tetrahydroquinolines 24.

The multicomponent reaction was also fruitful to obtain 1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 25 starting from 2-alkynylbenzaldehydes, primary amines and allylic or benzyl bromide, in the presence of zinc and using the combination of Mg(ClO₄)₂/Cu(OTf)₂ as catalyst. The use of a mixture THF/DCE 1:20 as solvent was mandatory, because THF was crucial for the formation of the organozinc reagent (Scheme 19) [36].

Scheme 19

Practical route for 1,2-dihydroisoquinolines 25.

Spiro-2,3-dihydroquinazolinones 26 were formed exploiting a one-pot multicomponent reaction, using isatoic anhydride, ketones and primary amines. The isolation of the amide intermediate XXIII obtained by the copper-catalyzed reaction between the anhydride and the amine suggested the subsequent reaction with the ketone to give an imine intermediate XXIV. This latter can undergo intramolecular nucleophilic attack affording the quinazolinone derivative 26 (Scheme 20) [37].

Scheme 20

Synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives 26.

Polysubstituted pyrroles 27 were obtained in a cascade process by using α-diazoketones, nitroalkenes and primary amines, in the presence of air as oxidant. The mechanism involved the formation of α-ketocarbene XXVI from α-diazoketone, able to react with the amine affording imine XXV after copper-catalyzed oxidative dehydrogenation. The subsequent [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction with the nitroalkene produces the pyrrolidine XXVII, which then aromatizes by extrusion of HNO₂ (Scheme 21) [38].

Scheme 21

Synthesis of polysubstituted pyrroles 27.

Substituted pyrrolidines 30 were achieved in an enantioselective form starting from amino acid esters, electron-poor olefins and 4-substituted-2-picolinaldehydes or 4-methylthiazole-2-carboxaldehyde as chelating agent, in the presence of copper triflate and the chiral diamine ligand 28. The stereoselectivity was directed by the formation of a proposed catalyst complex 29 involving two molecules of Schiff base (Scheme 22) [39].

Scheme 22

Enantioselective synthesis of polysubstituted pyrrolidines 30 directed by the copper complex 29.

The three-component annulation of aldehydes, hydrazines and alkenes with Cu(OTf)₂ (20 mol %) in CH₂Cl₂ at reflux is a useful tool to access substituted 4,5-dihydropyrazoles 31 (Scheme 23) [40]. The products reasonably result from a Mannich/cyclization/oxidative transformation of the substrates in which Cu(OTf)₂ is involved in more steps. The reaction begins with a nucleophilic attack of hydrazine on the aldehyde, activated by the copper salt, to give the corresponding hydrazone XXVIII. Subsequently, the formation of a Mannich-type intermediate XXIX was hypothesized by interaction between the hydrazone and the alkene mediated by Cu(OTf)₂ coordination, which favors the approach of the reaction centers. It is again a metal coordination that activates the C–C double bond towards an intramolecular reaction to give the tetrahydropyrazole XXX via formation of a C–N bond. The final oxidation in air gives the 4,5-dihydropyrazole 31.

Scheme 23

Synthesis of 4,5-dihydropyrazoles 31.

Cu(OTf)₂ is also capable of promoting the three-component cascade cyclization of 2-formylbenzonitriles, alkyl aryl ketones, and diaryliodonium salts to afford 2-arylisoindolinones 32 (Scheme 24) [41]. It is conceivable that the reaction starts with the formation of an N-arylnitrilium cation XXXI that, after hydrolysis, reacts with an enol species activated by the copper catalyst, affording the final product. The same research group reported an extension of this study by starting from arylacetylenes instead of arylketones [42].

Scheme 24

Synthesis of 2 arylisoindolinones 32.

Imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivatives 33 can be achieved by Cu(OTf)₂-catalyzed multicomponent reactions starting from different reagents. In a first approach proposed by Meshram and co-workers, pyridin-2-one, O-tosylhydroxylamine and acetophenone treated in an ionic liquid assembled through the cascade formation of three C–N bonds to give the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffold 33 (Scheme 25) [43]. The reaction is facilitated under microwave irradiation and can be extended to the preparation of an imidazo-fused (benzo)thiazole skeleton 34 starting from (benzo)thiazol-2-ones instead of pyridin-2-ones. Moreover, the Cu(OTf)₂ in [bmim]BF₄ can be recovered and reused for multiple processes. The key step of the mechanism is the attack of the protonated pyridin-2-one to the copper-complex of the enamine XXXII resulting from the reaction between acetophenone and O-tosylhydroxylamine, which occurs with elimination of TsOH. The so-obtained imino–copper complex XXXIII gives rise to an intramolecular C–N bond formation releasing Cu(OTf)₂. The final bicyclic product 33 arises from isomerization and water elimination.

Scheme 25

Synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines 33.

Recently, Singh's research group developed a cascade process to access imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines-linked isoxazoles 35. Isoxazole carbaldehydes treated with 2-aminopyridines and isonitriles in the presence of catalytic amounts of Cu(OTf)₂ lead to the formation of the products through formation of one C–C bond and three C–N bonds (Scheme 26) [44]. The same procedure allows a more general scope, giving access to imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine, imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine and imidazo[2,1-b]thiazole derivatives. From the mechanistic point of view, it is expected that the reaction proceeds via formation of an imine XXXIV between isoxazole carbaldehyde, activated by the copper salt, and 2-aminoazine, which in turn undergoes a non-concerted [4 + 1] cycloaddition involving isonitrile to give the imidazole ring of intermediate XXXV. Finally, the final product 35 is yielded via a 1,3-hydride shift.

Scheme 26

Synthesis of isoxazole-linked imidazo[1,2-a]azines 35.

The reaction between diazo derivatives, nitriles, and azodicarboxylates catalyzed by Cu(OTf)₂ is an efficient synthetic method to obtain 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole derivatives 36 (Scheme 27) [45]. The reaction proceeds via a [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between azodicarboxylates and nitrile ylides XXXVI as 1,3-dipoles. The latter are generated from diazoalkanes under the coordination of the copper catalyst to form a carbenoid species that undergoes nucleophilic attack of the nitriles. This transformation has demonstrated high tolerance to functional groups and runs, under mild conditions, with electron-poor diazo derivatives such as 2-diazoacetate, 2-diazoacetonitrile, 2-diazo-1,1,1-trifluoromethane, diazoamide, and diazophosphonate.

Scheme 27

Synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-triazoles 36.

Condensation of 2-naphthol, aromatic aldehydes and acyclic 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds catalyzed by copper triflate under ultrasound irradiation allowed the one-pot formation of 1H-benzo[f]chromen-2-yl(phenyl)methanones (naphthopyranes) 37. The comparison with conventional method showed better yields and shorter reaction times. The suggested reaction mechanism showed the formation of an ortho-quinone methide intermediate XXXVII formed through nucleophilic attack of the 2-naphthol to the aldehyde followed by reaction with 1,3-dicarbonyl compound coordinated by the copper. The subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the oxygen to the enol and water elimination resulted in the final product 37 (Scheme 28) [46].

Scheme 28

Synthesis of naphthopyrans 37.

Analogously, benzo[g]chromene derivatives 38 were achieved starting from 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dione, aromatic aldehydes and malononitrile with copper triflate as catalyst and ultrasonic irradiation (Scheme 29) [47].

Scheme 29

Synthesis of benzo[g]chromene derivatives 38.

Naphthalene-annulated 2-aminothiazoles 39 were prepared exploiting the multicomponent reaction by using aminonaphthalenes, CS₂ and secondary amines. The mechanism involved the Ullmann-type coupling of the bromo(amino)naphthalene with the dithiocarbamate salt followed by intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the naphthalene amino group to the C=S bond. The subsequent elimination of H₂S afforded the final product (Scheme 30) [48].

Scheme 30

Synthesis of naphthalene annulated 2-aminothiazoles 39, piperazinyl-thiazoloquinolines 40 and thiazolocoumarins 41.

Analogously, piperazinylthiazoloquinolines 40 and thiazolocoumarins 41 were obtained using piperazine or piperidine, CS₂ and substituted quinolines or coumarins [49].

The synthesis of furo[3,4-b]pyrazolo[4,3-f]quinolinones 42 was achieved via the one-pot reaction of tetronic acid, 5-aminoindazole and arylaldehydes under copper catalysis and ultrasonic irradiation, in acetonitrile as solvent. The mechanism involves a Knoevenagel condensation between the tetronic acid and the arylaldehyde as first step, followed by a Michael-type addition of 5-aminoindazole to afford the first coupling product XXXVIII. The subsequent intramolecular amination and dehydration then leads to the final product (Scheme 31) [50].

Scheme 31

Synthesis of furo[3,4-b]pyrazolo[4,3-f]quinolinones 42.

Polycyclic spiroindoline-3,4’-pyrano[3,2-b]pyran-4-ones 43 were synthesized exploiting the three-component reaction of isatin, 5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)-4H-pyran-4-one (i.e. kojic acid) and malononitriles or cyanoacetates (Scheme 32) [51]. Compared to other Lewis acids, Cu(OTf)₂ proved to be the best. Mechanistically, the process begins with a Knoevenagel-type condensation between isatin and the cyano derivative, yielding a 3-alkylidene-substituted oxindole XXXIX that, after coordination with Cu(OTf)₂, is able to react with the enolic form of kojic acid to generate the C-alkylated intermediate XL. Subsequent intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the enolic hydroxy group to the copper-activated cyano group, results in a spiro-cyclized intermediate XLI that affords the final product by deprotonation and loss of the copper species.

Scheme 32

Synthesis of spiroindoline-3,4’-pyrano[3,2-b]pyran-4-ones 43.

Four-component reactions

Two different four-component procedures catalyzed by Cu(OTf)₂ are reported in the literature, both to access 1,2,3-triazole derivatives. The first one is a cascade reaction for the preparation of α-alkoxy-N-alkyltriazoles 44 that was developed starting from aliphatic aldehydes, alcohols, TMSN₃ as azide source and alkynes (Scheme 33) [52]. The reaction occurs under mild conditions in acetonitrile at room temperature but is inhibited when using aromatic aldehydes and phenols. The mechanism involves the reaction of the azide with the hemiacetal XLII generated in situ from the aldehydes and alcohols, followed by coupling with the alkynes to form the triazole ring. Both, copper triflate and copper metal are essential for the success of the reaction.

Scheme 33

Synthesis of N-(α-alkoxy)alkyl-1,2,3-triazoles 44.

On the other hand, 4-(α-tetrasubstituted)alkyl-1,2,3-triazoles 45 can be obtained by a two-step reaction of cyclohexanone, amines, silylacetylene, and aryl or alkyl azides in the presence of copper(II) catalysts (Scheme 34) [53]. In a first step, there is the formation of a propargylamine derivative XLIII, followed by silyl deprotection and azide cycloaddition resulting in the triazole product. The presence of Cu(OTf)₂ as the catalyst, sodium ascorbate as a mild reductant and TBAF to deprotect the alkyne moiety are crucial in the cycloaddition step.

Scheme 34

Synthesis of 4-(α-tetrasubstituted)alkyl-1,2,3-triazoles 45.

Conclusion

In this review the developments on the multicomponent synthesis of acyclic and heteropolycyclic systems under copper(II) triflate catalysis are reported. Using alkenes and alkynes as substrates, various types of reactions were considered, including hydroamination, condensation, cross-coupling, C–H functionalization, cycloaddition, aza-Diels–Alder, also in regio- and stereoselective processes. The interest for these strategies arises from the cost-effectiveness as one-pot processes, the ease of application and the great efficiency when directed to the synthesis of biologically active compounds.

References

1 Aneeja, T; Neetha, M; Afsina, C M A; Anilkumar, G. RSC Adv; 2020; 10, pp. 34429-34458. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra06518h] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514395]

2 Chemler, S R. Beilstein J Org Chem; 2015; 11, pp. 2252-2253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.244] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26664648]

3 Tschan, M J-L; Thomas, C M; Strub, H; Carpentier, J-F. Adv Synth Catal; 2009; 351, 14-15 pp. 2496-2504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.200800750]

4 Rosenfeld, D C; Shekhar, S; Takemiya, A; Utsunomiya, M; Hartwig, J F. Org Lett; 2006; 8, pp. 4179-4182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol061174+] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16956181]

5 Loro, C; Papis, M; Foschi, F; Broggini, G; Poli, G; Oble, J. J Org Chem; 2023; 88, pp. 13995-14003. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.3c01536] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37747795]

6 Loro, C; Oble, J; Foschi, F; Papis, M; Beccalli, E M; Giofrè, S; Poli, G; Broggini, G. Org Chem Front; 2022; 9, pp. 1711-1718. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2qo00114d]

7 Taylor, J G; Whittall, N; Hii, K K (Mimi). Chem Commun; 2005; 40 pp. 5103-5105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b509933a]

8 Hertweck, C. J Prakt Chem; 2000; 342, pp. 316-321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-3897(200003)342:3<316::aid-prac316>3.3.co;2-j]

9 Chemler, S R. J Organomet Chem; 2011; 696, pp. 150-158. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2010.08.041] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21379363]

10 Rao, W; Kothandaraman, P; Koh, C B; Chan, P W H. Adv Synth Catal; 2010; 352, pp. 2521-2530. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201000450]

11 Ton, T M U; Himawan, F; Chang, J W W; Chan, P W H. Chem – Eur J; 2012; 18, pp. 12020-12027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201201219] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22890890]

12 Ghorai, M K; Ghosh, K; Das, K. Tetrahedron Lett; 2006; 47, pp. 5399-5403. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.05.059]

13 Asao, N; Kasahara, T; Yamamoto, Y. Angew Chem, Int Ed; 2003; 42, 30 pp. 3504-3506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200351390]

14 Motornov, V A; Tabolin, A A; Nelyubina, Y V; Nenajdenko, V G; Ioffe, S L. Org Biomol Chem; 2021; 19, pp. 3413-3427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1ob00146a] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33899878]

15 Paraskar, A S; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron Lett; 2006; 47, pp. 5759-5762. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.06.008]

16 Muraki, T; Fujita, K-i; Terakado, D. Synlett; 2006; pp. 2646-2648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-951479]

17 Dindulkar, S D; Puranik, V G; Jeong, Y T. Tetrahedron Lett; 2012; 53, pp. 4376-4380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.06.022]

18 Cavaca, L A S; Gomes, R F A; Afonso, C A M. Molecules; 2022; 27, 1673 [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051673] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35268774]

19 Cheng, C; Chen, D; Li, Y; Xiang, J-N; Li, J-H. Org Chem Front; 2023; 10, pp. 943-950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2qo01580c]

20 Meyet, C E; Pierce, C J; Larsen, C H. Org Lett; 2012; 14, pp. 964-967. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol2029492] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22260170]

21 Dou, X-Y; Shuai, Q; He, L-N; Li, C-J. Adv Synth Catal; 2010; 352, pp. 2437-2440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201000379]

22 Liu, T; Ding, Y; Fan, X; Wu, J. Org Chem Front; 2018; 5, pp. 3153-3157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8qo00965a]

23 Mindner, J; Rombach, S; Werz, D B. Org Lett; 2024; 26, pp. 2124-2128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c00498] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38427809]

24 Paraskar, A S; Sudalai, A. ARKIVOC; 2006; x pp. 183-189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ark.5550190.0007.a21]

25 Brown, M K; Degrado, S J; Hoveyda, A H. Angew Chem, Int Ed; 2005; 44, pp. 5306-5310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501251]

26 Biginelli, P. Gazz Chim Ital; 1893; 23, 360

27 Tron, G C; Minassi, A; Appendino, G. Eur J Org Chem; 2011; pp. 5541-5550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201100661]

28 Paraskar, A S; Dewkar, G K; Sudalai, A. Tetrahedron Lett; 2003; 44, pp. 3305-3308. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0040-4039(03)00619-1]

29 Pasunooti, K K; Chai, H; Jensen, C N; Gorityala, B K; Wang, S; Liu, X-W. Tetrahedron Lett; 2011; 52, pp. 80-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.10.150]

30 Huseynzada, A E; Jelch, C; Akhundzada, H V N; Soudani, S; Ben Nasr, C; Israyilova, A; Doria, F; Hasanova, U A; Khankishiyeva, R F; Freccero, M. RSC Adv; 2021; 11, 11 pp. 6312-6329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10255e] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35423136]

31 Li, S; Yang, Q; Wang, J. Tetrahedron Lett; 2016; 57, pp. 4500-4504. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2016.08.085]

32 Patil, K N; Mane, R A; Jadhav, S B; Mane, M M; Helavi, V B. Chem Data Collect; 2019; 21, 100233 [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2019.100233]

33 Naresh, G; Kant, R; Narender, T. Org Lett; 2014; 16, pp. 4528-4531. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol502072k] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25115644]

34 Meyet, C E; Larsen, C H. J Org Chem; 2014; 79, pp. 9835-9841. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo5015883] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25229642]

35 Duan, P; Sun, J; Zhu, Z; Zhang, M. Org Biomol Chem; 2023; 21, pp. 397-401. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ob02066a] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36524713]

36 Gao, K; Wu, J. J Org Chem; 2007; 72, pp. 8611-8613. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo7016839] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919003]

37 Zhu, X; Kang, S R; Xia, L; Lee, J; Basavegowda, N; Lee, Y R. Mol Diversity; 2015; 19, pp. 67-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11030-014-9557-z]

38 Hong, D; Zhu, Y; Li, Y; Lin, X; Lu, P; Wang, Y. Org Lett; 2011; 13, pp. 4668-4671. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ol201891r] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21830767]

39 Chaulagain, M R; Felten, A E; Gilbert, K; Aron, Z D. J Org Chem; 2013; 78, 18 pp. 9471-9476. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo401015y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23952564]

40 Wu, Q; Liu, P; Pan, Y-m; Xu, Y-l; Wang, H-s. RSC Adv; 2012; 2, 27 pp. 10167-10170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21106h]

41 Liu, L; Bai, S-H; Li, Y; Ding, X-D; Liu, Q; Li, J. Adv Synth Catal; 2018; 360, pp. 1617-1621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201701580]

42 Li, Y; Li, Y; Fei, H; Kong, R; Yu, Z; He, L. J Chem Res; 2022; 46, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17475198211063799]

43 Kumar, G S; Ragini, S P; Kumar, A S; Meshram, H M. RSC Adv; 2015; 5, pp. 51576-51580. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5ra09025c]

44 Singh, D; Sharma, S; Thakur, R K; Vaishali,; Nain, S; Jyoti,; Malakar, C C; Singh, V. Tetrahedron; 2024; 152, 133809 [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2023.133809]

45 Cai, B-G; Li, Q; Xuan, J. Green Synth Catal; 2024; 5, pp. 191-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gresc.2023.01.007]

46 Zeleke, T Y; Turhan, K; Turgut, Z. Am Chem Sci J; 2016; 13, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.9734/acsj/2016/24655]

47 Perumal, M; Sengodu, P; Venkatesan, S; Srinivasan, R; Paramsivam, M. ChemistrySelect; 2017; 2, pp. 5068-5072. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/slct.201700170]

48 Majumdar, K C; Nirupam, D; Ghosh, D; Ponra, S; Roy, B. Synthesis; 2012; 44, pp. 87-92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1289608]

49 Patel, R V; Patel, J K; Nile, S H; Park, S W. Arch Pharm (Weinheim, Ger); 2013; 346, pp. 221-231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ardp.201200383]

50 Damavandi, S; Sandaroos, R; Mohammadi, A. Heterocycl Commun; 2013; 19, pp. 105-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hc-2011-0086]

51 Parthasarathy, K; Praveen, C; Balachandran, C; Senthil kumar, P; Ignacimuthu, S; Perumal, P T. Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2013; 23, 9 pp. 2708-2713. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.086] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522833]

52 Yadav, J S; Subba Reddy, B V; Madhusudhan Reddy, G; Rehana Anjum, S. Tetrahedron Lett; 2009; 50, pp. 6029-6031. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.08.027]

53 Palchak, Z L; Nguyen, P T; Larsen, C H. Beilstein J Org Chem; 2015; 11, pp. 1425-1433. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.154] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26425198]