Introduction
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip™ implantation is a percutaneous technique that achieves mitral valve repair by approximating the mitral leaflets, effectively reducing significant symptomatic mitral regurgitation in selected patients [1]. The procedure is performed with a catheter inserted through the femoral vein, reaching the left side of the heart, and attaching the clip to the leaking portions of the mitral valve [2]. TEER is a widely used percutaneous approach worldwide [3,4] and has been applied clinically since 2003 [5]. Although surgery is effective, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in the presence of advanced age or significant comorbidity. TEER is an effective treatment option for patients with significant mitral regurgitation who are considered high-risk for surgery, as it offers a lower risk of thromboembolism and infection, demonstrates favorable durability, and may improve survival in patients who are unsuitable for surgical intervention [6]. Stroke is a well-known complication of many surgical procedures. However, the association of stroke with outcomes of TEER procedure in patients has not been adequately reported in the literature. We took detailed consideration of all the comorbidities in the patients. We conducted a study to depict the impact of stroke on readmissions in 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days, as well as outcomes after TEER.
Materials and methods
Study design and population
This is a retrospective cohort study derived from the National Readmission Database (NRD) sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) as a part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). The NRD provides national information on hospital readmissions and is the largest all-payer and uninsured patient readmissions database in the United States. We queried the NRD (2016 to 2020) and identified patients admitted for TEER using the International Classification Disease, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10 CM) (Appendices A-D). Patients were categorized into two sub-groups: those with stroke and those without stroke. Stroke was defined as an event occurring within 30 days following the TEER procedure.
Baseline characteristics
Comprehensive data on patients' medical history were collected, including cerebrovascular events (stroke), coagulopathy, congestive heart failure (CHF), prior myocardial infarction (MI), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), valvular heart disease, liver disease, lymphoma, electrolyte imbalances, metastatic cancer, paralysis, psychiatric disorders, pulmonary circulatory disorders, non-metastatic solid tumors, obesity, unintentional weight loss, and substance use such as smoking, alcohol, and drug consumption. Additionally, chronic comorbid conditions, including diabetes (with and without complications), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and depression, were evaluated. Previous cardiovascular procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), were also considered in the analysis.
Study outcomes
The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of post-procedural stroke on outcomes and readmissions in patients who underwent the TEER procedure. Patients with a prior history of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) were identified based on documented medical records, and a history of stroke was defined as any prior ischemic or hemorrhagic event before TEER. Additionally, stroke events were categorized based on established classifications, including transient ischemic attack (TIA), major or minor stroke, and functional outcomes such as disability status. The major outcomes assessed during index hospitalization were in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), heart failure, stroke, MI, the requirement for mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).
Statistical analysis
Pearson’s chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and a t-test was used for continuous variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cardiovascular outcomes were assessed between both cohorts at index admission and readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days. Stata v.17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for analysis.
Results
Baseline demographics and comorbidities
We identified a total of 28,997 patients who underwent TEER with MitraClip™ between January 11, 2016, and December 31, 2020, from an unweighted sample using the NRD. Of these, 97 (0.58%) patients were diagnosed with new onset acute stroke/CVA. We compared our study’s primary and secondary outcomes among TEER patients admitted with and without acute CVA. Patients with acute CVA were relatively younger (mean age 76 years vs. 77 years) and had relatively higher weekend admissions (10% vs. 4%) and same-day transfers (14.5% vs. 2.8%). In addition, hypertension (79%), hyperlipidemia (63%), history of nicotine use (21%), and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (22%) were the most common comorbidities in the study population admitted with acute CVA. Baseline demographics and comorbidities are described in Tables 1, 2 and Figure 1.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics for the study groups
TEER without stroke, N (%) | TEER with stroke, N (%) | p-Value | Chi-square value | F-value | |
Mean age ± SD | 77.6 ± 10 | 76.7 ± 12 | - | - | - |
Female | 13,232 (45) | 57 (58) | 0.08 | 5.16 | 2.94 |
Rehab transfer | 0.25 | 2.12 | 1.35 | ||
No rehab transfer | 28,735 (99) | 95 (98) | |||
Rehab transfer | 165 (0.6) | 2 (2) | |||
State resident status | 0.96 | 0.005 | 0.001 | ||
Non-resident | 2,786 (10) | 10 (10.3) | |||
Resident | 26,113 (90) | 87 (89.7) | |||
Same day event | <0.000 | 60.78 | 11.38 | ||
Not a transfer or same-day event | 27,449 (95) | 76 (78) | |||
Same-day 1 discharge involved | 823 (2.8) | 14 (14.5) | |||
Same-day 2 discharges involved | 306 (1) | 1 (0.01) | |||
Same-day 3 discharges involved | 147 (0.5) | 3 (0.3) | |||
Same-day 4 discharges involved | 174 (0.6) | 3 (3) | |||
Median household income | 0.7279 | 2.31 | 0.42 | ||
0-25th percentile | 6,309 (22) | 26 (26) | |||
26-50th percentile | 7,343 (26) | 20 (20) | |||
51-75th percentile | 7,775 (27) | 29 (30) | |||
76-100th percentile | 7,147 (25) | 21 (21) | |||
Hospital bed size | 0.4753 | 5.11 | 0.64 | ||
Small | 1,176 (4) | 0 (0) | |||
Medium | 5,939 (21) | 16 (16) | |||
Large | 21,784 (75) | 82 (84) | |||
Control/ownership of the hospital | <0.000 | 13.32 | 4.20 | ||
Government, nonfederal | 2,365 (80) | 18 (19) | |||
Private, non-profit | 23,119 (80) | 73 (75) | |||
Private, invest own | 3,416 (12) | 6 (6) | |||
Urban-rural hospital designation | 0.7288 | 3.71 | 0.21 | ||
Large metropolitan | 20,022 (69) | 59 (60) | |||
Small metropolitan | 8,737 (30) | 39 (39) | |||
Micropolitan | 137 (0.4) | 0 (0) | |||
Teaching status of urban hospitals | 0.8198 | 1.12 | 0.08 | ||
Metropolitan non-teaching | 2,733 (9.5) | 6 (6.6) | |||
Metropolitan teaching | 26,027 (90) | 91 (93) | |||
Metropolitan teaching | 139 (0.5) | 0 (0) | |||
Admission day | <0.000 | 8.25 | 2.77 | ||
Monday-Friday | 27,761 (96) | 88 (90) | |||
Saturday-Sunday | 1,139 (4) | 9 (10) | |||
Primary expected healthcare cost payer | 0.6516 | 6.94 | 0.65 | ||
Medicare | 25,221 (87) | 79 (81) | |||
Medicaid | 700 (2.4) | 4 (4.5) | |||
Private | 2,456 (8.5) | 14 (14.5) | |||
Self-pay | 126 (0.4) | 0 (0) | |||
No charge | 16 (0.05) | 0 (0) | |||
Other | 369 (1.2) | 0 (0) |
Table 2
Baseline comorbidities for the study groups
MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary interventions; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea
Comorbidities | TEER without stroke, N (%) | TEER with stroke, N (%) | p-Value | Chi-square value | F- value | |
Smoker | 9,835 (34) | 20 (21) | 0.05 | 6.37 | 3.82 | |
Prior MI | 4,733 (16) | 21 (22) | 0.33 | 1.76 | 0.93 | |
Prior PCI | 5,153 (17.8) | 7 (7.7) | 0.04 | 5.85 | 4.12 | |
Prior CABG | 6,092 (21) | 12 (13) | 0.17 | 3.53 | 1.91 | |
OSA | 3,791 (13) | 9 (9.5) | 0.373 | 0.98 | 0.79 | |
Pulmonary disease | 6,283 (22) | 7 (7.2) | 0.006 | 10.0 | 7.5 | |
Immunocompromised | 5 (0.0) | 0 (0) | 0.9212 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
Hypothyroidism | 5,088 (18) | 12 (12) | 0.263 | 1.7 | 1.25 | |
Anemia | 1,426 (4.9) | 9 (9.3) | 0.1124 | 3.5 | 2.52 | |
Pneumonia | 628 (22) | 6 (6) | 0.0381 | 5.7 | 4.30 | |
Liver disease | 488 (1.7) | 2 (1.9) | 0.9 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
Hypertension | 20,247 (70) | 77 (79) | 0.13 | 3.25 | 2.25 | |
Hyperlipidemia | 17,582 (61) | 61 (63) | 0.78 | 0.14 | 0.07 | |
Obesity | 3,218 (11) | 10 (10) | 0.8 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
Figure 1
Baseline comorbidities in MitraClip patients
HLD, hyperlipidemia; MI, myocardial infarction; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PNA, pneumonia
In-hospital complications
Complications for TEER patients with and without acute CVA are outlined in Tables 3, 4.
Table 3
Outcomes in TEER patients with versus without stroke (unmatched)
TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events
Outcomes | TEER without stroke (%) | TEER with stroke (%) | p-Value |
Died during hospitalization | 2.1 | 23.1 | <0.001 |
Acute kidney injury | 15.1 | 51.2 | <0.001 |
Heart failure | 83.3 | 85.8 | 0.656 |
Myocardial infarction | 1.7 | 14.7 | <0.001 |
MCS | 2.3 | 11.9 | <0.001 |
MACCE | 6.7 | 100 | <0.001 |
Post-procedural bleeding | 1.6 | 5.1 | 0.015 |
Cardiac tamponade | 0.5 | 2.6 | 0.007 |
Table 4
Outcomes in TEER patients with versus without stroke (propensity-matched outcomes)
TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair; SCA, sudden cardiac arrest; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; MACE, major adverse cardiac events
Outcomes | TEER without stroke (%) | TEER with stroke (%) | p-Value |
In-hospital mortality | 1.7 | 22.4 | 0.001 |
Acute kidney injury | 19 | 52 | <0.000 |
Heart failure | 79 | 86 | 0.33 |
Myocardial infarction | 0 | 13.8 | 0.003 |
Post-procedure bleeding | 0 | 6.9 | 0.042 |
SCA | 5.2 | 27.6 | 0.001 |
MCS | 0 | 10.3 | 0.012 |
MACE | 5.2 | 100 | <0.000 |
Cardiac tamponade | 0 | 3.5 | 0.15 |
Cardiogenic shock | 3.5 | 24 | 0.001 |
As compared to patients without acute CVA, TEER patients admitted with acute CVA had higher inpatient mortality (23.1% vs. 2.1 % p=0.000), had AKI (51.2% vs. 15.1% p=0.000), had acute MI (14.7% vs. 1.7% p=0.000), required more MCS (11.9% vs. 2.3% p=0.000), had post-procedural bleeding (5.1% vs. 1.6% p=0.015), and developed more cardiac tamponade (2.6% vs. 0.5% p=0.007). In contrast, there was no significant difference in CHF between two patient populations.
Crude outcomes on univariate regression analysis
TEER patients admitted with acute CVA compared to the patients without acute CVA had significantly higher odds of unadjusted in-hospital mortality (unadjusted OR [uOR] 14, 95% CI 6.7- 30, p<0.001), AKI (uOR 5.89, 95% CI 3.3-10, p<0.001), acute MI (uOR 9.8, 95% CI 3.9-24, p<0.001), post-procedural bleeding (uOR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2-9.5, p=0.002), sudden cardiac arrest (uOR 8.1, 95% CI 4.3-15, p<0.001), and cardiac tamponade (uOR 5.6, 95% CI 1.4-23, p=0.02) (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Univariate Cox regression analysis of the clinical outcome in patients with stroke who underwent TEER procedure
AKI, acute kidney injury; MI, myocardial infarction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; NAE, net adverse events; TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
In contrast, the two groups had no statistically significant difference regarding MCS and CHF (Table 5).
Table 5
Comparison of outcomes in TEER patients with versus without stroke (univariate regression analysis)
OR, odds ratio, LCI, lower confidence interval; UCI, upper confidence interval; SCA, sudden cardiac arrest; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
Outcomes of univariate regression analysis | OR | LCI | UCI | p-Value |
In-hospital mortality | 14 | 6.7 | 30 | <0.001 |
Acute kidney injury | 5.89 | 3.3 | 10 | <0.001 |
Heart failure | 1.2 | 0.5 | 3 | 0.657 |
Myocardial infarction | 9.8 | 3.9 | 24 | <0.001 |
Post-procedure bleeding | 3.4 | 1.2 | 9.5 | 0.02 |
SCA | 8.1 | 4.3 | 15 | <0.001 |
MCS | 5.9 | 2 | 16 | 0.087 |
MACE | 1 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0 |
Cardiac tamponade | 5.6 | 1.4 | 23 | 0.02 |
Multivariate regression analysis and propensity-matched cohort
On multivariate regression analysis, TEER patients admitted with acute CVA compared to the patients without acute CVA had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 12.5, 95% CI 5.8-26, p<0.001), AKI (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10, p<0.001), post-procedural bleeding (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.3, p=0.03), acute MI (OR 8.2, 95% CI 3.3 -19.9, p<0.001), and MCS (OR 4.6, 95% CI 1.3-16, p=0.002) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of the clinical outcome in patients with stroke who underwent TEER procedure
AKI, acute kidney injury; MI, myocardial infarction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; NAE, net adverse events; TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding cardiac tamponade and CHF (Table 6).
Table 6
Comparison of outcomes in TEER patients with versus without stroke (multivariate regression analysis)
OR, odds ratio; LCI, lower confidence interval; UCI, upper confidence interval; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
Outcomes of multivariate regression analysis | OR | LCI | UCI | p-Value |
In-hospital mortality | 12.5 | 5.8 | 26 | <0.001 |
Acute kidney injury | 5.4 | 2.7 | 10 | <0.001 |
Heart failure | 0.87 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 0.8 |
Post-procedure bleeding | 3.2 | 1.1 | 9.3 | 0.03 |
Myocardial infarction | 8.2 | 3.3 | 19.9 | <0.001 |
MCS | 4.6 | 1.3 | 16 | 0.02 |
Cardiac tamponade | 4.3 | 0.96 | 19 | 0.057 |
Similarly, after propensity matching, the TEER group with acute CVA had higher AKI (52% vs. 19%, P = 0.000). After propensity matching, outcomes with frequencies <10 and percentages <1% were excluded from the final analysis (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Comparison of MitraClip TEER procedure outcome in patients with and without ischemic stroke
AKI, acute kidney injury; MI, myocardial infarction; MCS, mechanical circulatory support; NAE, net adverse events; SCA, sudden cardiac arrest; TEER, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair
Discussion
Over the last two decades, there has been significant progress with innovations in structural cardiac interventions. The tremendous success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was followed by TEER with MitraClip™ implantation, which was first approved in 2013 by the FDA with a new indication approved in 2019 [7,8].
TEER can increase the risk of stroke due to multiple factors. Potential factors include the transseptal puncture (TSP) technique, periprocedural emboli from acute thrombus, and hydrophilic polymer coating of the device, air, valve, or atrial tissue [9]. The TSP technique was developed by Ross, Braunwald, and Marrow in 1959 to allow direct measurement of left atrial pressure [10]. It has been widely used now for many structural cardiac interventions [11]. TSP typically heals within six months [12]. Patients can be at increased risk for the time being for stroke because of interatrial shunt. In the last three decades, the use of lubricious (hydrophilic and/or hydrophobic) polymer-coated devices has increased significantly by interventional physicians and vascular surgeons to access and treat a wider range of pathologies procedures, with TEER being one of them [13]. One of the drawbacks of these polymer coatings is the separation of the polymer coat during an interventional procedure. The hydrophilic polymer coating can adsorb water and become less slippery in an aqueous environment, leading to an increased risk of emboli [13]. Many studies have shown the risk of embolization from endovascular procedures including TAVR and strategies to reduce the same [14-19]. Approaches and techniques have been developed to decrease the risk of stroke after TEER. A cerebral protection device (CPD) is a device used during endovascular procedures to reduce the risk of embolization during these procedures. It has been used for structural and endovascular procedures such as TAVR and ventricular tachycardia ablations [20-23].
In a study on the histology of debris captured by CPDs during transcatheter valve-in-valve (VIV) implantation, transcatheter VIV was associated with the release of debris, and most debris comprised atrial and ventricular passage of transcatheter heart valve [24]. Catheter-based mitral valve interventions i.e., TEER, is a similar procedure where a device (clip) is used instead of a new valve; hence, this risk continues to be a threat if proper CPD is not used, which has been described in studies as well [25-27]. Initial studies and case reports have also shown the benefits of using CPDs such as Sentinel in mitral valve intervention [26,28-30].
TEER has achieved significant success in structural valvular interventions following the advancements made in TAVR, with the knowledge gained from TAVR playing a crucial role in its development and refinement. The increased risk of stroke associated with TAVR has been extensively studied, highlighting the role of hydrophilic coatings on endovascular devices, valvular manipulation, and other multifactorial mechanisms [31]. Several studies describe the role of different CPDs during TAVR procedures in clinical practice in preventing strokes [20,22,23,32]. However, their implementation in TEER remains limited, with a notable lack of supporting data.
Risk stratification
Independent factors affecting poor outcomes have been studied, and scores such as MitraScore have been developed and validated for risk stratification for patients undergoing TEER [33]. This score does not reflect the direct association with stroke though. Though the CHA2DS2-VASc score has been shown to be predictive for TAVR and TEER, the accuracy of this has been questioned [33,34]. Zweck et al. developed the MITRALITY score using machine learning to increase the accuracy of overall risk stratification [35]. Further real-world data from the implementation of these scores will help understand the reproducibility and reliability of these scores for risk stratification.
Implementation of our data
In our study, we tried to highlight the adverse clinical outcomes including significantly higher in-hospital mortality, the prevalence of AKI, MI, post-procedural bleeding, cardiac tamponade, and MCS requirements, as well as increased readmissions, length of stay (LOS), and healthcare burden among the patients who developed stroke after TEER compared to those who did not develop stroke. These comorbidities and factors should be taken into consideration while selecting patients for TEER who already have a higher risk of developing stroke otherwise. Using these data, patient risk stratification should be optimized by incorporating specific clinical parameters before proceeding with TEER to reduce the incidence of post-procedural stroke. Key parameters to consider include left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral regurgitation severity, renal function, atrial fibrillation status, and prior cerebrovascular events. Establishing appropriate cutoff values for these parameters can aid in better patient selection and procedural planning. Our study highlights the value of strategies for periprocedural risk reduction of stroke in terms of patient outcomes, as well as cost-effectiveness.
Limitations
This study is subject to several limitations inherent to the use of the NRD, including the reliance on administrative coding, which may introduce misclassification or underreporting of conditions. The NRD can give information about the index for TEER, but it does not provide information on how many total TEER procedures they underwent during the same or different hospitalization. The NRD also does not provide any information on periprocedural complications or if any measures of stroke prevention were used. From the NRD, we get information about whether the patients had concomitant comorbidities, but it cannot be said how controlled it was in terms of medical management. Patient compliance can be a major contributing factor as well, which was not known in our study. Because the information for medication was not available, it was not possible to comment on how many of the patients were on any anticoagulation or antiplatelets. Finally, as a retrospective observational study, causal relationships cannot be established, and residual confounding may persist despite statistical adjustments.
Conclusions
Patients with acute CVA undergoing TEER had significantly worse in-hospital outcomes, including higher mortality and complication rates such as AKI, MI, bleeding, and MCS use. Stroke after TEER can be detrimental in terms of overall outcomes, quality of life, readmissions, LOS, and healthcare burden. Our study and data will help stratify the risk of stroke and create new scores to predict the risk of stroke among patients undergoing TEER. It will also help decide on aggressive strategies used peri-procedurally while keeping cost-effectiveness into consideration as well. Further clinical trials are needed to better understand the risk factors associated with the development of stroke among patients undergoing TEER.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2025, Patel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Introduction
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) procedure for the repair of significant symptomatic mitral regurgitation has become increasingly popular in recent years. Stroke is a well-known complication of many surgical procedures. However, the association of stroke on outcomes of TEER in patients has not been adequately reported in the literature.
Methods
We queried the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2020 using ICD-10 codes to identify the patients admitted for TEER. The patients were divided into two groups: patients with stroke and patients without stroke. Outcomes were assessed between two cohorts at index admissions and readmissions due to stroke.
Results
A total of 16,719 patients were admitted for TEER procedure, and 97 patients were diagnosed with new onset acute stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA). The most common comorbidities in the study population admitted with acute CVA were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, history of nicotine use, and coronary artery disease. On multivariate regression analysis, patients admitted with acute CVA compared to the patients without acute CVA had significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, post-procedural bleeding, acute myocardial infarction, and mechanical circulatory support.
Conclusion
Patients in the acute CVA group had higher rates of readmissions, mean length of stay in the hospital, and higher healthcare burden.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Internal Medicine, Saint Michael's Medical Center, Newark, USA
2 Internal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
3 Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
4 Internal Medicine, Bahria University Medical and Dental College, Karachi, PAK
5 Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
6 Internal Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
7 Internal Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas School of Medicine, Las Vegas, USA
8 Internal Medicine, New York Medical College/Landmark Medical Center, Woonsocket, USA
9 Cardiology, Wayne State University Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, USA