1. Introduction
Fungal pathogens have emerged as a crucial threat to public health with an annual incidence of 6.5 million infections and 3.8 million deaths [1,2]. Despite the availability of three major classes of antifungal drugs (polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins) to treat systemic fungal infections [3,4,5], drug resistance remains a great challenge, and the course of treatment can be complex. Increasing attention has been focused on novel antifungal chemicals against hazardous fungal pathogens to alleviate the intensifying burden of diseases. Aspergillus fumigatus, one of the crucial opportunistic pathogens, is responsible for invasive aspergillosis in humans and animals (e.g., birds) through inhaling spores in the environment [6,7]. A. fumigatus can cause various severe diseases (e.g., chronic pulmonary aspergillosis, otitis externa, Aspergillus endocarditis, and cutaneous aspergillosis) in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients [7]. Demethylation inhibitors, which target fungal cytochrome P450 enzymes, are widely used in both clinical and agricultural settings. However, cross-resistance between them has been demonstrated, leading to resistance to triazole which is the first-line antifungal drugs used to treat aspergillosis [8,9]. Given the high mortality rate and increasing antifungal resistance exhibited by A. fumigatus, there is an urgent need to discover novel antifungal agents and optimize clinical therapeutic strategies [10].
The discovery of bioactive molecules derived from natural products has made great contributions to the development of drugs for various purposes [11,12]. For example, amphotericin B, isolated from soil-dwelling Streptomyces nodosus, exhibits broad-spectrum efficacy and has been reserved as a last line of defense in clinic [13,14]. Subsequently, based on the active scaffold and antifungal mechanism, the derivatives were carried out with better selectivity and renal-sparing characteristics [15,16]. However, the discovery of natural products with antimicrobial activity is often achieved through microbial interactions. In recent years, fluorescent pseudomonads have received increasing attention as a biocontrol product in agriculture owing to their properties in controlling plant diseases caused by fungal and bacterial pathogens [17,18,19,20,21]. Further studies revealed that 2,4-diacetylchloroglucoside (DAPG) produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens has proved to be an important molecule in killing soil-borne plant pathogens including bacteria, fungi, and others [22]. The broad-spectrum activity and biocompatible property made DAPG a promising antimicrobial molecule. Similarly, the skin also provides a home for a variety of commensal microbiota, and interactions between microbiota on the skin are ubiquitous [23]. In a recent study, the commensal Staphylococcus lugdunensis on the skin was found to inhibit the growth of pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus by producing a novel thiazolidine-containing cyclic peptide [24]. Therefore, the discovery and modification of natural products based on microbiota interactions presents a promising approach for further research.
In this study, we obtained a novel phloroglucinol derivative 2,4-diproylphloroglucinol (DPPG) with modified acyl groups at the positions of C2 and C6, which exhibited broad-spectrum activity against clinically important fungi (e.g., Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.). Specifically, DPPG inhibited hyphal growth and spore germination of A. fumigatus in a dose-dependent manner, which exerted the antifungal property via membrane perturbation and content leakage. In addition, DPPG also showed therapeutic efficacy against A. fumigatus in Galleria mellonella model. Our study demonstrates that DPPG is a potent chemical scaffold against fungal pathogens.
2. Results
2.1. Distribution of DAPG Biosynthetic Clusters in Skin
To characterize the colonization dynamics and metabolism changes of microbiota on the skin surface under healthy and diseased states, we analyzed the levels of bacteria containing DAPG biosynthetic clusters and found differences between healthy and diseased skin. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the levels of bacteria containing the DAPG biosynthetic clusters in immunosuppressed skin diseases (e.g., diabetic foot infections and squamous cell carcinoma) (p < 0.001). The average percentage reduction was 20.1‰ in both diabetic foot infections squamous cell carcinoma compared with the healthy skin group (Figure 1). The results suggest that DAPG not only plays an important role against plant pathogens but also has the potential to contribute to skin health. Therefore, we hypothesize that DAPG may also possess the ability to antagonize human fungal pathogens.
2.2. In Vitro Antifungal Activity of DAPG and DPPG
According to the hypothesis above, we tested the antifungal activity of DAPG against a variety of Candida spp. (C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei) and Aspergillus spp. (A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger, and A. terrestris) strains. As shown in Table 1, the activity of DAPG was weak with Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MIC) exceeding 128 μg/mL. It has been reported that the length of acyl chain at the positions of C2 and C6 and the position of the phenolic hydroxyl groups could influence the antimicrobial activity [25,26]. Based on the previous study, we synthesized the derivative DPPG and attempted to explore the antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi (e.g., Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.) affecting humans to broaden its application. The MICs of DPPG were evaluated and presented in Table 1, respectively. We found that DPPG exhibited notable activity against Candida spp. with MIC values of 16–128 μg/mL and against Aspergillus spp. with MIC values of 16–64 μg/mL (Supplementary Table S1). Hence, it suggests that the derivative DPPG enhances the antifungal activity and broadens the antifungal spectrum (Figure 2).
2.3. Inhibitory Effect on Hyphal Growth of DPPG
To further characterize the inhibitory effect of DPPG in Aspergillus spp. in different physiological states, we measured hyphal growth and spore germination under the treatment of DPPG, respectively. DPPG significantly inhibited the spread of fungal mycelium and densified the mycelium accompanied with pigmentation reduction in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3a). Meanwhile, DPPG at 32 μg/mL dramatically reduced most of the hyphal growth (Figure 3b), with diameters reduced from 32 cm to 23 cm. These observations indicate that DPPG possesses a potent anti-hyphal activity against Aspergillus spp.
2.4. Inhibitory Effect on Spore Germination of DPPG
Radial growth and germination of aspergilli at 37 °C have been associated with pathogenicity [27]. Next, we also determined spore germination based on conducting imaging and colony-forming unit (CFU) measurement under the treatment with sub-inhibitory concentrations of DPPG. DPPG inhibited fungal spore germination in a dose-dependent manner, leading to a reduction of approximately two orders of magnitude in the number of viable fungi on the plates (Figure 4a). Meanwhile, the decrease in optical density suggested that DPPG inhibited spore germinating to hyphae (Figure 4b). It can also be seen that the growth of branched hyphae decreased with rising DPPG concentration. Almost no hyphae were produced after treatment with DPPG at 32 μg/mL (Figure 4c). These results manifest that DPPG has a good inhibitory effect on spore germination in A. fumigatus.
2.5. Membrane-Targeting Property of DPPG
The antifungal properties of DPPG encouraged us to unravel its antifungal mechanism. Synergy study can be suggestive of potential antimicrobial mechanisms. To further assess the potency of DPPG in combination with clinical antifungal agents, we conducted a checkerboard test in combination with a collection of antifungal drugs against A. fumigatus ATCC 96918. DPPG manifested the addictive effect with terbinafine, clotrimazole, itraconazole, and ciclopirox with the Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) index ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 (Figure 5a). Given that addictive effect is found in membrane-targeting agents, we speculated that DPPG had an analogous mechanism with aforesaid antifungal agents. To test this hypothesis, we determined the membrane integrity of A. fumigatus under DPPG treatment. The absence of fluorescence enhancement of PI stain suggested that DPPG did not perforate the membrane or disrupt fungal membranes, thereby altering their permeability (Figure 5b). Nevertheless, when treated with DPPG at concentrations ranging from 0 μg/mL to 64 μg/mL, a predominant increase in absorbance at 260 nm and 280 nm was observed within 5 min (Figure 5c,d), denoting the rapid release of intracellular nucleic acids and proteins. These results suggest that there is obvious perturbation on the membrane inflicted by DPPG other than direct pore formation.
To further validate the membrane-targeting mechanism, we determined the physicochemical properties of membrane by measuring the generalized polarization (GP) values of Laurdan-labeled fungi, which were used to evaluate changes in membrane phase properties [28]. Compared to the positive control treated with 1% Triton X-100, the GP value suddenly increased by 0.155 after about 2 min of incubation, suggesting that DPPG possessed a rigidifying effect on fungal membrane (Figure 5e). Finally, we found that DPPG interacted with the fatty acid chains of phosphatidylethanolamine through hydrophobic interaction, providing preliminary evidence that DPPG may cause membrane perturbation by interacting with phospholipids (Supplementary Figure S3).
We also explored the accumulation of ROS during the process of DPPG treatment. To clarify whether inhibitory effect is also directly caused by ROS damage, we determined ROS accumulation using DCFH-DA-labeled fungi (Figure 5f). This demonstrated that DPPG did not accumulate ROS within 1.5 h, unlike conventional antifungal drugs reported in the literature [29].
2.6. In Vivo Antifungal Activity of DPPG in G. mellonella Model
The antifungal performance and relatively low toxicity [25] of DPPG prompted us to figure out the preliminary therapeutic effect in G. mellonella. In this model, G. mellonella was infected with A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 and then treated with PBS, DPPG, and amphotericin B (Figure 6a). As shown in Figure 6b, two out of eight PBS-treated larvae survived; however, the larvae still remained alive after being treated with DPPG and amphotericin B. These results suggest that DPPG (10 mg/kg) has a therapeutic effect comparable to that of amphotericin B (10 mg/kg) in G. mellonella.
3. Discussion
Secondary metabolites derived from Pseudomonas fluorescens strains in the plant rhizosphere, especially the antifungal DAPG, have been well studied [26,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Recent studies have also proved its antifungal properties against yeast species [37,38,39]. The structural modification of natural products to obtain novel molecules with higher activity is an important strategy to explore antifungal compounds. Based on the approach of chemical synthesis, we obtained the novel derivative DPPG, which has exhibited robust antibacterial activity against gram-positive bacteria [25]. Therefore, we explored the promising antifungal activity of DPPG to give rise to a broad-spectrum derivative effective against potential pathogens. Our study reveals that DPPG possesses a wide range of activity against Aspergillus spp. including multiple clinical isolates. Furthermore, our results provide evidence that DPPG inhibits hyphal growth and spore germination in a dose-dependent manner. Further, antifungal activity of DPPG is exerted through membrane perturbation and cellular content leakage. In addition, DPPG does not induce ROS accumulation to kill the fungi, representing an inhibitory characteristic that is different from that of conventional antifungal drugs. Moreover, the therapeutic efficacy against A. fumigatus is also demonstrated in the G. mellonella infection model.
The surface of human and animal skin is colonized by a diverse milieu of microorganisms. It is worth noting that the skin is also a reservoir for colonization by Candida auris and Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Entobacter species (ESKAPE) pathogens and their associated antimicrobial-resistance genes in a recent study [40]. At the same time, a proportion of cutaneous microbiotas have been observed to produce molecules capable of inhibiting the colonization of other organisms and modulating their behavior [41]. Therefore, it is imperative to understand the interactions between microbial communities, such as the previously mentioned P. fluorescens with pathogenic bacteria and fungi in the plant rhizosphere, which may facilitate the exploration of novel antimicrobial compounds. In our research, we found an important natural metabolite DAPG produced by skin bacterial microbiota that decreased significantly in diseased skin, especially immunosuppression related disease. This finding indicated that DAPG may play a pivotal role in skin microbiota. Notwithstanding the fact that the activity of DAPG against human pathogenic fungi was found to be minimal, the structural modification of DAPG, as previously demonstrated in our study, exhibited noteworthy antifungal properties against Aspergillus app. This finding provides a solid foundation for the subsequent development of antimicrobial compounds.
As an airborne opportunistic fungal pathogen, A. fumigatus may lead to invasive aspergillosis by inhaling spores into the lungs [42]. The physical characteristics (e.g., small size, melanin, and negatively charged cell wall) allow conidia to attach to distal respiratory tract. Also, the thermotolerance property facilitates the growth of conidia in the respiratory tracts of mammals or birds, leading to germinate for invasion [43]. Meanwhile, radial growth and germination rates of aspergilli at 37 °C are associated with pathogenicity [27]. Consequently, antifungal molecules that can inhibit both spore germination and hyphal growth held considerable promise for clinical applications. In our study, the phloroglucinol derivative DPPG exerted an inhibitory effect on both processes against A. fumigatus in vitro. DPPG at 32 μg/mL exhibited nearly complete inhibition of spore germination in addition to substantial inhibition of hyphal growth. This observation signifies the potential for further investigation of antifungal mechanism.
Recent studies have illuminated the antifungal activity of DPPG against plant fungal pathogens (e.g., Botrytis cinerea and Monilinia fructicola) [44], whereas the activity and mechanism against human pathogenic fungi remain unexplored. Consequently, we conducted a tentative study on the inhibitory effect and preliminary mechanisms to enrich antifungal chemical skeleton library. DPPG has been reported to block electron transfer in S. aureus by competing with menaquinone (MK) and thus binding to NDH-2 of electron transport chain located in the membrane [25]. In humans and fungi, coenzyme Q (ubiquinone or CoQ) acts as a quinone in the electron transport chain [45]. The negative result (Figure S2) indicated the different targets of DPPG in A. fumigatus and inspired us to investigate other alternative mechanisms. In our study, we also found that DPPG does not induce the ROS accumulation in A. fumigatus, which is consistent with a previous study in S. aureus [25]. Recent studies have proved that reactive oxidant species (ROS) in fungal cells will form in response to the trigger of various types of environmental stress as well as antifungal agents [29]. It is generally accepted that the increment of ROS accumulation arising from antifungal drugs (e.g., polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins) is correlated with fungicidal effect leading to cellular macromolecule damage [29] and it might explain the low rate of resistance to antifungal drugs [46]. Our results reveals a different phenotype compared to conventional antifungal drugs encouraging further exploration of possible mechanisms of this type of molecule without ROS accumulation in the future. However, an important direction for future research is to determine the physiological changes and mode of action within the fungal cell. The mechanism after which the compounds penetrate the fungal membrane also needs to be explored in depth. In addition, modified compounds with enhanced antifungal activity should be designed based on the promising inhibitory effect.
In conclusion, we find that DPPG exhibits a promising antifungal effect against fungal pathogens and preliminarily investigates its mechanism of disrupting membrane homeostasis and content leakage. Our study presents that DPPG is a potent chemical scaffold against torturous pathogens.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials and Chemicals
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 culture medium and Tween 20 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), 4-Morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS), amphotericin B, terbinafine, clotrimazole, ciclopirox, itraconazole, and nystatin were purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Potato dextrose agar (PDA) and Sabouraud agar (SDA) were purchased from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Laurdan and propidium iodide were purchased from MedChemExpress Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Triton X-100 and 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) were purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
4.2. Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Analysis
We analyzed 4292 shotgun metagenomes samples including healthy skin group and 13 pathological cohorts, using an adapted Daniel Dar et al. pipeline [47]. Quality-filtered reads were processed through DIAMOND (v0.9.14) (-k 1 mode) against a BGC reference database, discarding matches with <80% amino acid identity. Gene abundances were normalized by length (reads/kb), with BGC scores derived from median gene values per cluster. DAPG-specific scores were aggregated across homologous BGCs, then normalized against a bacterial biomass index calculated from 16 conserved marker genes. Final relative abundance represented the ratio of aggregated DAPG-BGC scores to total bacterial biomass. Statistical analysis was performed by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
4.3. Fungal Strains and Culture Conditions
A. fumigatus ATCC 96918, A. flavus ATCC 11492, C. albicans ATCC 10231, and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were obtained from Guangdong Microbial Culture Collection Center (GDMCC) in China. C. krusei CGMCC 2.3984 was obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC). Other fungal strains were isolated from patients in hospital. All strains were cultured in SDA medium at 30 °C under standard conditions.
4.4. Synthesis of the Derivative DPPG
The synthesis procedure was referred to the previous study [25] of our lab. In short, we added phloroglucinol to a solution of alkyl chloride and mesylate acid at 0 °C and heated the reaction to 80 °C with stirring for 5 h. After that, the solution was poured into ice water and simultaneously extracted with ethyl acetate. The extraction was then rinsed with NaHCO3 and vacuum-dried with anhydrous Na2SO4. With assistance of column chromatography, we purified the crude product with dichloromethane/MeOH (100:1, v/v). Finally, the phloroglucinol analogs DPPG was obtained. The NMR spectrum of DPPG is provided in Figure S1.
4.5. Preparation of Spore Suspension
Aspergillus spp. was incubated on SDA medium at 30 °C for three days until good sporulation was obtained. Then, suspension was collected by covering colonies with 0.85% saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and gently scraping the colonies with a pipette. The mixture of hyphal fragments and conidia was allowed to settle for 15 min at room temperature and then the suspensions were transferred to a sterile tube.
4.6. Antimicrobial-Susceptibility Test
The broth microdilution assay was referred to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M38-A2, Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi [48]. In brief, we first prepared dilutions of DPPG stock solution with cultural medium (RPMI 1640 buffered with 0.165 mol/L MOPS) and inoculated 100 μL solutions. Good sporulation was induced on PDA medium at 35 °C for 72 h. Conidia were then collected with approximately 3 mL of 0.85% saline containing 0.1% Tween 20. The mixture was left to settle for 20 min, after which the suspensions were transferred to tubes. The density was adjusted to an absorbance of 0.09–0.13 at 530 nm. We then diluted the suspension in the RPMI 1640 culture medium at a ratio of 1:50 (0.4 × 104 to 5 × 104 CFU/mL) and inoculated each well with 100 μL of the solutions. Also, C. krusei ATCC 6258 was utilized as quality control in this experiment. Experiments were performed in triplicate. The broth microdilution tray was incubated at 35 °C for 46–50 h. The MIC was interpreted as the lowest concentration of compounds that prevented a reduction in growth of approximately 90% or more compared to the drug-free wells.
4.7. Checkerboard Assay
Firstly, 100 μL of RPMI 1640 culture medium was added to a 96-well plate. To prepare the diluted compounds, antifungal drugs (amphotericin B, terbinafine, clotrimazole, ciclopirox, itraconazole, and nystatin) were added in a row and subsequently diluted along the vertical axis. Then, DPPG was added in the first column and then diluted. To prepare inoculum, A. fumigatus was incubated in the PDA medium at 35 °C for 3 d and spores were collected with 0.85% saline containing 0.1% Tween 20. After adjusting the absorbance, the 1:50 inoculum dilutions were prepared in RPMI 1640 culture medium and were twofold at approximately 0.4 × 104 to 5 × 104 CFU/mL. Finally, 100 μL of spore suspension was added except negative control. After incubation for 46–50 h at 35 °C, the MICs were interpreted.
The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index was calculated in accordance with the following formula:
FIC index (FICI) = MICab/MICa + MICba/MICb = FICa + FICb(1)
MICa and MICb are the MICs of compound a and b, respectively; MICab is the MIC of compound a in combination with compound b; MICba is the MIC of compound b in combination with compound a. FICI ≤ 0.5: synergistic effect; 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1: additive effect; 1 < FICI ≤ 4: indifference effect; FICI > 4: antagonism effect.
4.8. Hyphal Growth Assay
Hyphal growth of A. fumigatus and A. flavus was determined under a variety of concentrations of DPPG treatments. Briefly, mycelial blocks of 6 mm diameter were collected, and spores were removed as far as possible. The blocks were clung closely on the center of PDA medium containing DPPG (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 4 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 24 μg/mL, 28 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, 40 μg/mL, 48 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) and incubated at 30 °C for five days. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Colony diameters were assessed using the criss-cross method [49].
4.9. Spore Germination Assay
Spore germination of A. fumigatus was measured according to a previous study [50] with minor modifications. Succinctly, we resuspended the spore solutions in RPMI 1640 culture medium containing DPPG (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) and incubated them at 35 °C for 24 h. Spore germination was observed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (400 × magnification, Leica TCs SP8 Multiphoton Microscope, Mannheim, Germany). Meanwhile, 100 μL of resuspended spores was also incubated in SDA medium containing DPPG (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) for mycelial counting.
4.10. Membrane Integrity Assays
The effect of fungal membrane integrity was detected using PI staining referring to a previous study [51]. In a few words, spores of A. fumigatus were collected and diluted to A530 = 0.13. Then, spores were washed with PBS buffer after incubation at 37 °C for 24 h. A PI probe (final concentration of 30 µM) was added and stained for 30 min. DPPG solutions (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) were added, and fluorescence (Ex/Em = 535 nm/615 nm) was measured using a microplate reader (TECAN Infinite M Plex, Mennedorf, Switzerland) within 1.5 h at 37 °C. A total of 0.1% Triton X-100 was used as a positive control.
4.11. Cytoplasmic Content Leakage Test
According to the described method [52] with partial modification, we incubated A. fumigatus on SDA medium for good germination and collected spores for 24 h at 37 °C. DPPG solutions (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) were added into the medium, and 100 μL of the suspensions was collected for measurement of A260 and A280, respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
4.12. ROS Measurement
ROS accumulation was detected using DCFH-DA with a slight modification of the reference method [52]. Spores of A. fumigatus were collected as described above and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, spores were washed with PBS buffer. DCFH-DA (final concentration of 10 µM) was added and stained for 30 min. A total of 50 µg/mL of Rosup was used as a positive control. DPPG (final concentrations of 0 μg/mL, 8 μg/mL, 16 μg/mL, 32 μg/mL, and 64 μg/mL) were added, fluorescence values (Ex/Em = 488 nm/525 nm) were measured with a microplate reader (TECAN Infinite M Plex, Mennedorf, Switzerland) within 1.5 h at 37 °C.
4.13. G. Mellonella Infection Model
The therapeutic efficacy of DPPG in G. mellonella was evaluated with reference to a previous study [25,53]. The larvae of G. mellonella (280 mg per larvae) were pre-incubated at room temperature in advance, after which they were divided into three groups (eight larvae per group). A total of 10 μL of A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 (2.5 × 105 CFUs) spores were injected into the right posterior prolegs. After 1 h post-infection, the larvae were injected with amphotericin B (10 mg/kg), DPPG (10 mg/kg) and PBS solution into the left posterior prolegs. The number of alive larvae was recorded and assessed as the survival rate of G. mellonella every 24 h at 37 °C.
4.14. Molecular Docking
Molecular docking study was performed to predict the binding of membrane lipids (ergosterol and phosphatidylethanolamine) with DPPG by the CDDOCKER module using Discovery Studio 2019 Client (v19.1.0.18287). The structures of fungal membrane lipids referred to a previous study [54].
4.15. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and one-way ANOVA was used to calculate significant differences. Data were calculated as mean ± standard deviation of each response variable. p < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference. Biosynthetic clusters of bacteria were analyzed using the MIBiG database.
Conceptualization, L.W. and K.Z.; methodology, L.W.; software, L.W., H.G. and H.F.; validation, L.W., J.H., Q.L. and M.S.; formal analysis, L.W.; investigation, L.W.; resources, L.W. and Q.L.; data curation, L.W.; writing—original draft preparation, L.W.; writing—review and editing, L.W., J.H., Q.L., Y.H., M.S. and K.Z.; visualization, L.W.; supervision, K.Z.; project administration, K.Z. and Y.H.; funding acquisition, K.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
All data are contained within this article.
We thank Hui Wang (Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China) for the clinical strains of Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
| DPPG | 2,4-diproylphloroglucinol |
| DAPG | 2,4-diacetylchloroglucoside |
| RPMI | Roswell Park Memorial Institute |
| MOPS | 4-Morpholinepropanesulfonic acid |
| PBS | phosphate buffered saline |
| PDA | potato dextrose agar |
| SDA | sabouraud agar |
| DCFH-DA | 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate |
| PI | propidium iodide |
| ROS | reactive oxidant species |
| CLSI | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute |
| FIC | fractional inhibitory concentration |
| MIC | minimum inhibitory concentration |
| CFU | colony-forming unit |
| GP | generalized polarization |
| BGC | biosynthetic gene cluster |
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 Distribution of the levels of bacteria containing the DAPG biosynthetic clusters across various disease conditions and healthy skin, with the number of samples (n) indicated for each condition.
Figure 2 The antifungal activity and detailed reaction equation of DAPG and DPPG.
Figure 3 In vitro anti-hyphal effect of DPPG against A. fumigatus and A. flavus. (a) The hyphal growth inhibition of A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 and A. flavus ATCC 11492 incubated at 30 °C on PDA medium for five days. (b) Changes in colony diameters of A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 and A. flavus ATCC 11492 incubated at 30 °C on PDA medium for five days. The presented data are depicted as means ± deviation (SD). Data represent two biological replicates.
Figure 4 The inhibition of spore germination of DPPG against A. fumigatus. (a) The viable fungus number in the SDA medium containing DPPG at 37 °C. (b) The optical density at 600 nm after DPPG treatment. (c) Imaging of A. fumigatus spore germination at 37 °C in RPMI1640 culture medium. The presented data are depicted as means ± deviation (SD). Data represent two biological replicates.
Figure 5 The membrane-targeting property of DPPG. (a) Drug interactions of DPPG with a collection of antifungal drugs against A. fumigatus. Synergy effect is defined as a FICI ≤ 0.5, addictive effect is defined as a 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1. (b) Membrane permeability of A. fumigatus after treatment of DPPG in 1 h using propidium iodide. 1% Triton X-100 was used as the positive control. (c,d) Release of cytoplasmic contents absorbing at 260 nm and 280 nm in A. fumigatus. The presented data are depicted as means ± deviation (SD). Data represent two biological replicates. (e) Membrane fluidity of A. fumigatus after treatment of DPPG. 1% Triton X-100 was used as the positive control. (f) ROS accumulation of A. fumigatus after DPPG treatment. Rosup at 50 µg/mL was used as the positive control. A p-value of “ns” means not significant, suggesting no meaningful difference between groups.
Figure 6 G. mellonella infection model. (a) Schematic diagram of in vivo antifungal activity using G. mellonella model. (b) Survival rates of G. mellonella larva infected with A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 conidia (2.5 × 105 CFUs) after application of PBS, DPPG (10 mg/kg) or amphotericin B (10 mg/kg). n = 8 biologically independent animals.
Antifungal activity of DAPG and DPPG against Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp.
| Strains | Origin | MIC 1 (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DAPG | DPPG | ||
| A. fumigatus ATCC 96918 | Standard strain | >128 | 32 |
| A. fumigatus CAUF136 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 32 |
| A. flavus ATCC 11492 | Standard strain | >128 | 64 |
| A. flavus CAUF135 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 32 |
| A. niger CAUF137 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 16 |
| A. niger CAUF140 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 32 |
| A. terrestris CAUF138 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 16 |
| A. terrestris CAUF139 | Human, respiratory infection | >128 | 16 |
| C. albicans ATCC 10231 | Standard strain | >128 | 64 |
| C. albicans CAUF1 | Human, urinary tract infection | >128 | 128 |
| C. albicans CAUF3 | Human, intestinal infection | >128 | 128 |
| C. tropicalis CAUF2 | Human, urinary tract infection | >128 | 64 |
| C. tropicalis CAUF5 | Human, intestinal infection | >128 | 64 |
| C. krusei ATCC 6258 | Standard strain | >128 | 16 |
| C. krusei CGMCC 2.3984 | Standard strain | >128 | 32 |
1 MICs are interpreted as the lowest concentration of compounds that prevents approximately 90% or more reduction in growth compared to the drug-free wells.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
1. Denning, D.W. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet. Infect. Dis.; 2024; 24, pp. e428-e438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00692-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38224705]
2. Casalini, G. The WHO fungal priority pathogens list: A crucial reappraisal to review the prioritisation. Lancet Microbe; 2024; 5, pp. 717-724. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00042-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38608682]
3. William, E.D. Introduction to Antifungal Drugs. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2000; 30, pp. 653-657.
4. Perfect, J. The antifungal pipeline: A reality check. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.; 2017; 16, pp. 603-616. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.46] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28496146]
5. Al, M.O. FDA-approved antibacterials and echinocandins. Antibiotics; 2025; 14, 166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14020166]
6. Debergh, H.; Becker, P.; Vercammen, F.; Lagrou, K.; Haesendonck, R.; Saegerman, C.; Packeu, A. Pulmonary aspergillosis in Humboldt penguins–susceptibility patterns and molecular epidemiology of clinical and environmental Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from a Belgian zoo, 2017–2022. Antibiotics; 2023; 12, 584. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12030584]
7. Arastehfar, A.; Carvalho, A.; Houbraken, J.; Lombardi, L.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Jenks, J.; Rivero-Menendez, O.; Aljohani, R.; Jacobsen, I.; Berman, J.
8. Hollomon, D. Does agricultural use of azole fungicides contribute to resistance in the human pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus?. Pest. Manag. Sci.; 2017; 73, pp. 1987-1993. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4607]
9. Jenks, J.D.; Mehta, S.R.; Hoenigl, M. Broad spectrum triazoles for invasive mould infections in adults: Which drug and when?. Med. Mycol.; 2019; 57, pp. S168-S178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myy052]
10. Snelders, E.; Camps, S.M.; Karawajczyk, A. Triazole fungicides can induce cross-resistance to medical triazoles in Aspergillus fumigatus. PLoS ONE; 2012; 7, e31801. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031801]
11. Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal discovery. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.; 2022; 69, 102198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2022.102198] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36037637]
12. Calderone, R.; Sun, N.; Gay, A.F.; Groutas, W.; Weerawarna, P.; Prasad, S.; Alex, D.; Li, D. Antifungal drug discovery: The process and outcomes. Future Microbiol.; 2014; 9, pp. 791-805. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.32]
13. Cavassin, F.B.; Baú-Carneiro, J.L.; Vilas-Boas, R.R.; Queiroz-Telles, F. Sixty years of amphotericin B: An overview of the main antifungal agent used to treat invasive fungal infections. Infect. Dis. Ther.; 2021; 10, pp. 115-147. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00382-7]
14. Salama, E.A.; Elgammal, Y.; Utturkar, S.M.; Lanman, N.A.; Hazbun, T.R.; Seleem, M.N. Overcoming amphotericin B resistance in Candida auris using the antiemetic drug rolapitant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.; 2024; 68, e00556-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00556-24]
15. Maji, A.; Soutar, C.P.; Zhang, J.; Lewandowska, A.; Uno, B.E.; Yan, S.; Shelke, Y.; Murhade, G.; Nimerovsky, E.; Borcik, C.G.
16. Omelchuk, O.; Bychkova, E.; Efimova, S.; Grammatikova, N.; Zatonsky, G.; Dezhenkova, L.; Solovieva, S.; Ostroumova, O.; Tevyashova, A.; Shchekotikhin, A. Mono-N-alkylation of amphotericin B and nystatin A1 and its amides: Effect on the in vitro activity, cytotoxicity and permeabilization of model membranes. Antibiotics; 2024; 13, 1177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121177]
17. Haas, D.; Défago, G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2005; 3, pp. 307-319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129]
18. Mohammed, A.F.; Oloyede, A.R.; Odeseye, A.O. Biological control of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum using Pseudomonas species isolated from the rhizosphere of tomato plants. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot.; 2020; 53, pp. 1-6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03235408.2020.1715756]
19. Sharifi-Tehrani, A.; Zala, M.; Natsch, A.; Moënne-Loccoz, Y.; Défago, G. Biocontrol of soil-borne fungal plant diseases by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent pseudomonads with different restriction profiles of amplified 16S rDNA. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.; 1998; 104, pp. 631-643. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008672104562]
20. De Souza, J.T.; Arnould, C.; Deulvot, C.; Lemanceau, P.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V.; Raaijmakers, J.M. Effect of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol on Pythium: Cellular responses and variation in sensitivity among propagules and species. Phytopathology; 2003; 93, pp. 966-975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.8.966]
21. Marchand, P.A.; Weller, D.M.; Bonsall, R.F. Convenient synthesis of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol a natural antibiotic involved in the control of take-all disease of wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2000; 48, pp. 1882-1887. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf9907135] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10820109]
22. Suresh, P.; Varathraju, G.; Shanmugaiah, V.; Almaary, K.S.; Elbadawi, Y.B.; Mubarak, A. Partial purification and characterization of 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol producing Pseudomonas fluorescens VSMKU3054 against bacterial wilt disease of tomato. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci.; 2021; 28, pp. 2155-2167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.02.073] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33911932]
23. Findley, K.; Oh, J.; Yang, J.; Conlan, S.; Deming, C.; Meyer, J.A.; Schoenfeld, D.; Nomicos, E.; Park, M.; Kong, H.H.
24. Zipperer, A.; Konnerth, M.C.; Laux, C.; Berscheid, A.; Janek, D.; Weidenmaier, C.; Burian, M.; Schilling, N.A.; Slavetinsky, C.; Marschal, M.
25. Li, Q.; Feng, H.; Tian, Q.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, X.; He, Y.-X.; Zhu, K. Discovery of antibacterial diketones against gram-positive bacteria. Cell Chem. Biol.; 2024; 31, pp. 1874-1884.e6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.06.017]
26. Maurya, S.; Thakur, R.; Vighnesh, R.; Suresh, S.; Dang, A.; Raj, D.; Srivastava, S. Eco-friendly management of plant pathogens through secondary metabolites released by Fluorescent Pseudomonads. J. Pure. Appl. Microbiol.; 2024; 18, pp. 1471-1488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.18.3.40]
27. Dagenais, T.R.; Keller, N.P. Pathogenesis of Aspergillus fumigatus in invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.; 2009; 22, pp. 447-465. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00055-08]
28. Harris, F.M.; Best, K.B.; Bell, J.D. Use of laurdan fluorescence intensity and polarization to distinguish between changes in membrane fluidity and phospholipid order. Biochim. Biophys. Acta; 2002; 1565, pp. 123-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00514-X]
29. Gonzalez-Jimenez, I.; Perlin, D.S.; Shor, E. Reactive oxidant species induced by antifungal drugs: Identity, origins, functions, and connection to stress-induced cell death. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.; 2023; 13, 1276406. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1276406]
30. Stepanov, A.A.; Shulaev, N.A.; Vasilchenko, A.S. The ecological strategy determines the response of fungi to stress: A study of the 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol activity against Aspergillus and Fusarium species. J. Basic Microbiol.; 2025; 65, e2400334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202400334]
31. Stepanov, A.A.; Vasilchenko, A.V.; Vasilchenko, A.S. Subinhibitory effects of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol on filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Appl. Microbiol.; 2023; 134, lxad294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxad294]
32. Han, P.; Liu, T.; Zheng, Y.; Song, R.; Nan, T.; Yang, X.; Huang, L.; Yuan, Y. A mycorrhizal bacteria strain isolated from Polyporus umbellatus exhibits broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Front. Plant. Sci.; 2022; 13, 954160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.954160]
33. Janki, K.P.; Patel, G.A. Engineered production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol in the diazotrophic endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas sp. WS5 and its beneficial effect in multiple plant-pathogen systems. Appl. Soil Ecol.; 2018; 124, pp. 34-44.
34. Nowak-Thompson, B.; Gould, S.J.; Kraus, J.; Loper, J.E. Production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol by the biocontrol agent Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf-5. Can. J. Microbiol.; 1994; 40, pp. 1064-1066. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m94-168]
35. Islam, M.T.; Fukushi, Y. Growth inhibition and excessive branching in Aphanomyces cochlioides induced by 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol is linked to disruption of filamentous actin cytoskeleton in the hyphae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2010; 26, pp. 1163-1170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0284-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24026919]
36. Gleeson, O.; O’Gara, F.; Morrissey, J.P. The Pseudomonas fluorescens secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol impairs mitochondrial function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek; 2010; 97, pp. 261-273. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10482-009-9407-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20091224]
37. Kwak, Y.S.; Han, S.; Thomashow, L.S.; Rice, J.T.; Paulitz, T.C.; Kim, D.; Weller, D.M. Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome-wide mutant screen for sensitivity to 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol, an antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2011; 77, pp. 1770-1776. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02151-10]
38. Stepanov, A.A.; Poshvina, D.V.; Vasilchenko, A.S. 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol Modulates Candida albicans Virulence. J. Fungi; 2022; 8, 1018. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof8101018]
39. Troppens, D.M.; Dmitriev, R.I.; Papkovsky, D.B.; O’Gara, F.; Morrissey, J.P. Genome-wide investigation of cellular targets and mode of action of the antifungal bacterial metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res.; 2013; 13, pp. 322-334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12037]
40. Proctor, D.M.; Sansom, S.E.; Deming, C.; Conlan, S.; Blaustein, R.A.; Atkins, T.K.; Program, N.C.S.; Mullikin, J.; Thomas, J.; Young, A.
41. Byrd, A.; Belkaid, Y.; Segre, J. The human skin microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.; 2018; 16, pp. 143-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2017.157] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332945]
42. Mousavi, B.; Hedayati, M.T.; Hedayati, N.; Ilkit, M.; Syedmousavi, S. Aspergillus species in indoor environments and their possible occupational and public health hazards. Curr. Med. Mycol.; 2016; 2, pp. 36-42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.cmm.2.1.36] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28681011]
43. Brakhage, A.A.; Langfelder, K. Menacing mold: The molecular biology of Aspergillus fumigatus. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.; 2002; 56, pp. 433-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160625]
44. Jing, C.-X.; Hu, Y.-M.; Jin, Y.-R.; Li, A.-P.; Wang, R.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Wu, Z.; Yan, X.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-J.; Liang, H.-J.
45. Awad, A.M.; Bradley, M.C.; Fernández-Del-Río, L.; Nag, A.; Tsui, H.S.; Clarke, C.F. Coenzyme Q10 deficiencies: Pathways in yeast and humans. Essays Biochem.; 2018; 62, pp. 361-376.
46. Mesa-Arango, A.C.; Trevijano-Contador, N.; Román, E.; Sánchez-Fresneda, R.; Casas, C.; Herrero, E.; Argüelles, J.C.; Pla, J.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Zaragoza, O. The production of reactive oxygen species is a universal action mechanism of Amphotericin B against pathogenic yeasts and contributes to the fungicidal effect of this drug. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.; 2014; 58, pp. 6627-6638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.03570-14]
47. Dar, D.; Thomashow, L.S.; Weller, D.M.; Newman, D.K. Global landscape of phenazine biosynthesis and biodegradation reveals species-specific colonization patterns in agricultural soils and crop microbiomes. Elife; 2020; 9, e59726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.59726]
48. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M38-A2 Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi: Approved Standard; 2nd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008.
49. Yu, M.; Yu, J.; Pan, X.; Cao, H.; Song, T.; Liu, Y. Farnesol inhibits growth and development of Ustilaginoidea virens. New Plant Prot.; 2024; 1, e17. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npp2.17]
50. Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Yang, Z.; Xiong, X.; Song, Q.; Li, B.; Zou, H.; Zhang, L.; Liu, T. Antifungal Effect of Oregano Essential Oil Against Penicillium expansum on Pyrus sinkiangensis. J. Fungi; 2024; 10, 752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof10110752]
51. Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, M.; Zhu, K.; Shen, J. A rhein-based derivative targets Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics; 2024; 13, 882. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090882]
52. Ji, D.; Chen, T.; Ma, D.; Liu, J.; Xu, Y.; Tian, S. Inhibitory effects of methyl thujate on mycelial growth of Botrytis cinerea and possible mechanisms. Postharvest. Biol. Technol.; 2018; 142, pp. 46-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.04.003]
53. Marena, G.D.; Thomaz, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Taborda, C.P. Galleria mellonella as an invertebrate model for studying fungal infections. J. Fungi; 2025; 11, 157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof11020157] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39997451]
54. Cassilly, C.D.; Reynolds, T.B. PS, It’s complicated: The roles of phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in the pathogenesis of Candida albicans and other microbial pathogens. J. Fungi; 2018; 4, 28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29461490]
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
1 National Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health and Safety, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; [email protected] (L.W.); [email protected] (J.H.); [email protected] (Q.L.); [email protected] (M.S.)
2 Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Cell Activities and Stress Adaptations, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; [email protected] (H.F.); [email protected] (H.G.); [email protected] (Y.H.)