It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study introduces a transferable Graph Neural Network (GNN)-based model for potential power prediction. By encoding the wind farm as a graph, the GNN captures complex spatial relationships and aggregates information from neighboring turbines. The model learns localized patterns (i.e., subgraphs) across multiple wind farms, enabling it to generalize and adapt to different wind farm layouts. Using Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data from two offshore wind farms, we evaluate three GNN-based models: a single-farm baseline, a transfer model trained on a source farm, and a multi-task model leveraging data from both farms. Our results demonstrate significant improvements in prediction accuracy. The GNN models achieve relative reductions in Mean Absolute Error (MAE) ranging from 23.3% to 32.4% and in Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) from 24.3% to 33.5%, compared to the power curve binning method. Furthermore, the wind-direction-frequency-weighted average of energy ratio prediction errors improves by 42.4% to 57.6%. The multi-task model, trained on data from both farms, emerged as the top performer, showcasing the benefits of multi-task learning in enhancing robustness and generalization. Importantly, even the transfer model, trained solely on data from the source farm, outperformed traditional methods when applied to an unseen wind farm. These findings highlight the potential of GNNs to advance power prediction accuracy, particularly for new installations with limited data, and suggest promising avenues for further exploration of multi-task learning in wind farm applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Acoustics & Vibration Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; Artificial Intelligence Lab Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium
2 Acoustics & Vibration Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium
3 Artificial Intelligence Lab Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium
4 Acoustics & Vibration Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium; Flanders Make @ VUB , Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Elsene, Belgium