It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
The emergence and spread of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors threatens vector control efforts. The use of spatial repellent products (SR) containing volatile insecticides such as transfluthrin offer a promising complementary strategy to current vector control tools. Here, we employed whole transcriptome analysis to investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying reduced behavioral sensitivity to transfluthrin in two pyrethroid-resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. Using a high-throughput screening system (HITSS), we evaluated 600 mosquitoes across three populations (Bungoma field population, the insecticide-resistant Pimperena lab strain, and the susceptible Kisumu lab strain), categorizing them as responders or non-responders based on their SR avoidance behavior. Non-responders exhibited significantly reduced repellency (spatial activity index < 0.1) at standard transfluthrin concentrations (0.0025 μg/ml).
Results
RNA sequencing of pooled samples (n = 10 mosquitoes per pool, three replicates per condition) revealed distinct transcriptional profiles between responders and non-responders. The cytochrome P450 gene CYP12F12 showed significant overexpression (FC = 36.6389, p < 0.001) in Bungoma non-responders, suggesting its potential role in transfluthrin metabolism. Additionally, we observed population-specific distributions of voltage-gated sodium channel mutations, with fixation of kdr L995F in Pimperena non-responders and elevated frequency (80–100%) of kdr L995S in Bungoma non-responders.
Conclusions
These findings provide the first molecular evidence linking both metabolic and target-site mechanisms to reduced behavioral sensitivity to transfluthrin in malaria vectors. The co-occurrence of CYP12F12 overexpression and kdr mutations suggests multiple resistance mechanisms may affect spatial repellent efficacy, highlighting the need for resistance monitoring in spatial repellent deployment strategies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer