It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Objective
Neuroserpin, a serine protease inhibitor, is recognized for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. Given the central role of inflammation and neurological involvement in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia, this study aimed to assess maternal serum neuroserpin levels in preeclamptic pregnancies and explore their association with disease severity.
Design
Prospective case-control study.
Setting
A tertiary referral center in Ankara, Türkiye.
Population
Singleton pregnant women with a diagnosis of preeclampsia (n = 44) and gestational age-matched normotensive pregnant women as controls (n = 44).
Methods
Participants were assigned to preeclampsia and control groups. Serum neuroserpin levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on the clinical severity of preeclampsia. Statistical analysis included group comparisons, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and correlation testing.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was maternal serum neuroserpin level. Secondary outcomes included obstetric and neonatal parameters such as gestational age at delivery, delivery mode, NICU admission, and Apgar scores.
Results
Serum neuroserpin levels were significantly reduced in the preeclampsia group compared to controls (p = 0.018). Within the preeclampsia cohort, patients with severe disease exhibited even lower neuroserpin concentrations than those with mild preeclampsia. ROC curve analysis determined a neuroserpin cutoff value of ≤ 22.95 ng/mL for identifying preeclampsia (AUC: 0.647, p = 0.013) and ≤ 14.7 ng/mL for severe preeclampsia (AUC: 0.740, p = 0.007).
Conclusion
Reduced maternal serum neuroserpin levels are associated with both the diagnosis and severity of preeclampsia. These findings highlight the potential role of neuroserpin in the disease’s inflammatory mechanisms and support its utility as a candidate biomarker in clinical prediction models.
Clinical trial registration
Not applicable
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer