It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness of Culturally Adapted Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CA-CBT) compared to standard CBT in alleviating depression in college students.
Methods
A randomized trial was conducted on college students with mild to moderate depression. The CA-CBT group (21 students) received a group CA-CBT intervention incorporating idioms, while the standard CBT group (20 students) received a standard group-based CBT intervention. Both group interventions were conducted once a week, with each session lasting one and a half hours, for a total duration of eight weeks. Eighteen students from the standard CBT group and 12 from the CA-CBT group completed the trial. Depressive symptoms, cognitive distortions, emotional regulation, and CBT understanding were assessed at baseline, week five, post-treatment, and three months after post-treatment using validated scales. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, t-tests, and chi-square tests via SPSS 26.0.
Results
The repeated measures ANOVA results for the pre-treatment and post-treatment showed a significant interaction effect of time and intervention and a significant main effect of time for the sleep disturbance factor of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. However, only the main effect of time was significant for all other variables. T-tests indicated that the CA-CBT group had significantly lower Hamilton scores at follow-up compared to the standard CBT group. Meanwhile, the standard CBT group had significantly better CBT understanding post-treatment. Except for the above two items, no other significant difference were found by T-test.
Conclusions
Compared with standard CBT, the CA-CBT group that incorporates idioms is beneficial for college students with depressive symptoms to continue to achieve relief for a certain period of time after the end of treatment. Specifically, this relief may be reflected in the improvement of sleep problems. However, CA-CBT did not better improve participants’ emotion regulation, understanding of cognitive behavioral therapy, or reduction of cognitive distortions.At the same time, the CA-CBT group did not perform better than the standard CBT group in terms of dropout rate, treatment satisfaction, recommendation, and re-use rate.
Trial registration
The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2300074752||http://www.chictr.org.cn/) on August 15, 2023.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer