Long-chain fatty acyl CoA synthetase 4 expression in pancreatic cancer: a marker for malignant lesions and prognostic indicator for recurrence

Abstract

Background

Long-chain fatty acyl CoA synthetase 4 (ACSL4) is crucial for lipid metabolism, primarily catalyzing the formation of 12–20 carbon chain fatty acids. ACSL4 is upregulated in various cancers and linked to aggressive behavior and poor survival. A bioinformatics study showing ACSL4 upregulation in pancreatic cancer. However, utility for actual pathological diagnosis and clinical significance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) are unexplored. This study aimed to investigate ACSL4 expression in PDAC and IPMN, and evaluate its clinical implications.

Methods

We examined ACSL4 expression using immunohistochemistry in 165 patients with PDAC and IPMN. Differences in ACSL4 expression between malignant and benign lesions were evaluated using the Pearson χ2 test. The association between ACSL4 expression, pathological parameters, and survival was assessed through Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses in 96 patients with invasive cancer.

Results

Compared to normal pancreatic ducts, low-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm, and intraductal papillary mucinous adenoma (IPMA) (3.3%, 3.4%, and 2.7%, respectively), ACSL4 expression was significantly higher in invasive PDAC, noninvasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC), and invasive IPMC (77%, 86.7%, and 93.9%, respectively). In invasive cancers, low ACSL4 expression was associated with a higher frequency of lymphovascular invasion and recurrence and shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.006). Additionally, low ACSL4 expression was an independent prognostic factor for shorter disease-free survival in multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR = 2.409, 95% CI: 1.121–5.180, P = 0.024).

Conclusion

ACSL4 expression helps differentiate cancerous from precancerous lesions in pancreatic cancer, but low expression is linked to a higher frequency of lymphovascular invasion and shorter disease-free survival in invasive cases. Due to the limited sample size and broad confidence intervals, the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution and require validation in larger, independent cohorts.