The association between the quality and quantity of carbohydrate intake and the size, depth, and Wagner grade of diabetic foot ulcers in patients with type 2 diabetes

Abstract

Aims

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between carbohydrate quantity and quality and the size, depth, and Wagner grade of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Methods

The study was conducted on 300 participants with DFUs at the Diabetes Clinic of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Dietary intake was assessed using three 24-hour dietary recalls. Anthropometric measurements, physical activity levels, and socioeconomic factors were evaluated. The location, Wagner grade, length, width, and depth of the diabetic foot ulcer, were assessed by reviewing the patient’s medical records and utilizing the information recorded therein.

Results

The findings indicated that out of all the carbohydrate indices examined, only the ratio of whole grain to total grain intake had a significant association with the length of the diabetic foot ulcer. Specifically, participants who consumed lower amounts of whole grain had larger diabetic foot ulcers compared to those with higher whole grain intake (0.85 Vs 0.54, P_value= 0.04). This relationship remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounding factors such as age, gender, total energy intake, smoking, physical activity, good shoe condition, and BMI (0.71 Vs 0.52, P_value = 0.03).

Conclusion

The findings emphasize the significant role of whole grain intake in the healing process of DFUs. However, further research with larger sample sizes is needed to investigate the impact of other carbohydrate indices.

Introduction

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a significant complication that arises due to neurological abnormalities and varying degrees of peripheral vascular abnormalities in the lower limbs [1,2]. A substantial number of diabetic patients, ranging from 9.1 to 26.1 million, develop diabetic foot ulcers annually [3]. Diabetic foot ulcers and their complications have a significant negative impact. They diminish both physical and mental quality of life. These ulcers also increase the risk of infections, recurrent ulcers, lower limb amputations, and even higher mortality rates. Moreover, these complications impose substantial financial burdens due to the need for frequent and prolonged hospitalizations [4–11].

Wound healing is influenced by several factors, including wound site infection, poor glycemic control, and developing nephropathy, also vasculopathy. The nutritional status of patients plays a critical role in the wound healing process [12–15]. Alongside these factors, insulin resistance is recognized as an important contributor to the pathogenesis and healing of ulcers [16], The type and amount of carbohydrates in someone’s diet can impact their glycemic control and insulin resistance. These factors play a crucial role in the context of wound healing [17,18]. Dietary fiber, has been recognized for its potential benefits in glycemic control. Studies have shown that higher dietary fiber intake is associated with improved glycemic control, and lower risk of developing diabetes complications such as insulin resistance [19,20]. Besides, the ratio of whole grains to total grains consumed has been suggested as an important measure of the quality of carbohydrate intake. A higher ratio indicates a healthier dietary pattern [21]. Moreover, glycemic load, a measure that takes into account both the quality and quantity of dietary carbohydrates, has been implicated in glycemic control and the development of diabetes complications. Diets with a high glycemic load, which cause rapid increases in blood glucose levels after meals, have been linked to poorer glycemic control, insulin resistance, and an elevated risk of other diabetes-related complications [22]. Despite the recognized impact of dietary factors on wound healing, the specific relationship between dietary composition, such as glycemic load, and characteristics of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) - including size, depth, and Wagner grade - has not been extensively studied. Understanding these associations is crucial for developing targeted dietary interventions and optimizing management strategies for individuals with DFUs. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the association of dietary composition, particularly carbohydrate and fiber ratios, with the size, depth, and Wagner grade of DFUs in patients with type 2 diabetes. By exploring these associations, we aim to shed light on the potential influence of dietary factors on DFU characteristics. Furthermore, finding significant relationships between dietary composition, glycemic load, and characteristics of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) could help develop evidence-based dietary recommendations specifically tailored for individuals with DFUs or at risk of developing them.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

The present cross-sectional study was conducted from 2022 until 2023 on patients with diabetic foot ulcers at the Diabetes Research Center affiliated by the Research Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, which is part of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Nutrition Faculty Ethics Committee at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, following the Helsinki Declaration (identification number: IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1401.544). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Accounting for a 5% type I error rate and 80% power, and considering the size and depth of the diabetic foot ulcers as the key variables, the required sample size for this cross-sectional study was calculated to be 300 individuals using the proposed formula [23–28]:

Convenience sampling was employed. In this study, individuals who met the following criteria were included: having type 2 diabetes for at least 2 years documented in the patient’s medical record, aged between 25 and 65 years, and the presence of a diabetic foot ulcer. Individuals with the following conditions were excluded from the study: having incomplete medical records, being pregnant or lactating, and adherence to a specific dietary regimen. Regarding to rechecking, those with reported energy intake of <800 or >4200 kcal/d were excluded. All study participants provided written consent after being fully informed about the study. Informed consent for all illiterate participants was obtained from their legal guardians.

Anthropometric assessment

Weight was measured using a digital scale with an accuracy of 100 grams from Seca, Hamburg, Germany, while participants wearing minimal clothing and no shoes. Height was measured following a standard protocol using a wall stadiometer with an accuracy of 0.1 cm. The body mass index (BMI) was then calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms (kg) by the square of the height in meters (m²).

Physical activity

It was evaluated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form (IPAQ-SF) [29]. The assessment involved determining the level of physical activity, with metabolic equivalent-hours per day (MET-h per day) used as the unit of measurement for expressing this value.

Socioeconomic status

Data on socioeconomic status was obtained using a Persian socioeconomic questionnaire that had been validated. The questionnaire included various indicators such as income, residential area, family size, educational level, ownership of vehicles (including type and quantity, if applicable), real estate ownership or tenancy, and the number of bedrooms [30,31].

Assessment of dietary intake

Dietary intake assessment in the present study was conducted using three 24-hour dietary recalls. To gather nutritional data from the study participants, researchers conducted face-to-face interviews. In these interviews, individuals were asked to report their food and beverage consumption from the previous day, including details such as the type of items, ingredients, timing of meals, and number of meals. The 24-hour dietary recalls obtained were reviewed immediately by the researcher to address any potential discrepancies or clarifications with the study participants. Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls were collected from two non-consecutive weekdays and one weekend day. All reported food items were converted to grams per day and entered into the Nutritionist IV software (N-Squared Computing, Version 4.0, Cincinnati, OH, USA), where energy and nutrient intakes were calculated for each individual [32].

Assessment of the quality and quantity of carbohydrates

The carbohydrate content of the patients’ diet was calculated as a percentage of daily calorie intake and grams per day. The Carbohydrate Quality Index (CQI) was used as an indicator of carbohydrate quality in the diet. It includes the total dietary fiber intake (grams per day), glycemic load, ratio of whole grain carbohydrates to total grain carbohydrates, and the ratio of carbohydrates in solid foods to total carbohydrates (solid carbohydrates + liquid carbohydrates) [21,33]. Liquid carbohydrates include sweetened beverages and fruit juices, while the carbohydrate content of the remaining carbohydrate-based food items was considered to be in the form of solid carbohydrates.[34]. The values related to the glycemic index were extracted from the book “Glycemic Index Indicators” written by Dr. Talaban, the glycemic index table of foods from Australia, and a published article in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. For foods that were not listed in the tables, the average of similar foods that were available was calculated. For each individual, the GI values from food items were multiplied by the carbohydrate intake (in grams) from that food item, and then summed to obtain the GL. By including the glycemic index value, carbohydrate, and fiber content of each consumed food item over the course of a day, the daily glycemic index of the dietary intake was obtained [21,35–43].

1. Σ (GI × available carbohydrate)/total available carbohydrate)

2. (available carbohydrate = total carbohydrate – total fiber)

3. The glycemic load (GL) of the dietary intake was also calculated using the following method:

4. (total GI ×total available carbohydrate)/ 100

Assessment of diabetic foot ulcers

The trained physician and nurse reported the information related to the foot ulcers based on the IWGDF (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot) guidelines in the patients’ medical records [44]. Then, we extracted the information from the patients’ medical records. Information about the patients’ HbA1c was extracted from the reports recorded in the patients’ medical records. The Wagner-Meggitt system was used to classify the severity of foot wounds [45]. The location, infection, length, width, and depth of the diabetic foot ulcer, were assessed by reviewing the patient’s medical records and utilizing the information recorded therein. The presence of neuropathy was evaluated in both feet using a 10-gram monofilament test at 10 specific sites [46,47]. Patients were then classified into three categories based on their sensitivity to the monofilament: those with normal sensation at more than 8 sites, those with reduced sensation at 4–7 sites, and those with absent sensation at fewer than 3 sites [48,49]. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was detected through the use of the ankle-brachial index (ABI). The ABI was calculated as the ratio of the highest systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to the highest systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery [50,51]. Participants were categorized into two groups based on their ABI values: those with an ABI < 0.90 were classified as the “Low ABI Group,” indicating the presence of PAD, while those with an ABI ≥ 0.90 were classified as the “Normal ABI Group,” indicating normal arterial function. In addition, those with an ABI value of 1.3 or higher, indicated a noncompressible calcified vessel [50,52,53]. All these measurements and examinations were performed by the physician and nurse based on IWGDF.

Statistical analysis

We divided the participants into categories based on tertiles of their dietary fiber and glycemic load (GL) values. For continuous variables, such as the length, width, and depth of diabetic foot ulcer, we used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare general characteristics. For categorical variables, we employed Pearson’s chi-square test. ANOVA was utilized to determine the means of length, width, and depth of diabetic foot ulcer across tertiles of dietary fiber and GL. Additionally, we conducted an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to assess the significance of foot ulcer indices across tertiles of carbohydrate intake, while taking into account covariates such as age, sex, and daily energy intake. Logistic regression was utilized to calculate the multivariable adjusted odds ratio for foot ulcer indices across tertiles of carbohydrate intake. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), version 26, developed by SPSS, Inc. in Chicago, IL. A significance level of p < 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.

Results

General characteristics are indicated across the tertiles of carbohydrate intake “Table 1”. The lowest tertile corresponds to the least amount, while the highest tertile represents the highest intake. Each tertile of carbohydrate intake consists of 100 participants. The mean age of participants was significantly higher in T1 compared to T3 (62.1 vs 57.5, P = 0.005). Additionally, a higher proportion of men had foot ulcers in the third tertile compared to the first tertile (P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the third tertile, significantly more patients were smokers compared to the first tertile. However, all other demographic characteristics did not show significant differences between T1 and T3. However, there was one exception. In relation to the absence of monofilament sensation, a higher percentage of individuals with greater carbohydrate intake exhibited neuropathy, which was statistically borderline significant (P = 0.058).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Dietary intakes are outlined in “Table 2”. Patients who consumed higher amounts of carbohydrates also had higher energy intake, significantly more fiber, and greater consumption of vitamins B1, C, E, and phosphorus compared to those with the lowest carbohydrate intake.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

The foot ulcer indices did not show any statistically significant differences among the tertiles of carbohydrate intake and whole grain/total grain, except for one measure “Tables 3 and 4”. The mean ulcer width was slightly lower in individuals who had a higher ratio of whole grains to total grains. This difference was statistically marginally significant (P = 0.06). As the ratio of carbohydrate from solid food to total carbohydrate increased, the length of the diabetic foot ulcer also increased, but it was not statistically significant “Table 4”. Participants with a greater size of diabetic foot ulcer had lower fiber intake but higher glycemic load, however it was not statistically substantial “Table 5”.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Among all the carbohydrate quality indices and quantity of carbohydrate intake examined “Tables 6–8”, the results revealed that only the whole grain to total grain ratio significantly influenced the length of the diabetic foot ulcer. Comparing participants with the lowest consumption of whole grain to those with the highest intake, the former group had a larger length of the ulcer. This relationship remained significant even after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, gender, total energy intake, smoking, physical activity, good shoe condition, HbA1c, neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), infection and BMI “Table 8”.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Discussion

We found that a higher ratio of whole grain to total grain intake was associated with a smaller diabetic foot ulcer length. The findings suggest that individuals of older age may tend to consume lower amounts of carbohydrates. Furthermore, a significant association was observed between gender and carbohydrate intake, with a higher proportion of men consuming greater amounts compared to women. This finding supports the notion that gender can be a potential risk factor for diabetic ulcers and poor glycemic control in men, which is consistent with previous research [54–56]. Additionally, a higher proportion of smokers were found in the third tertile (T3) of carbohydrate intake, indicating a potential relationship between smoking habits and higher carbohydrate consumption. This finding supports previous studies that have identified smoking as a risk factor for diabetic foot ulcers [57–59]. In addition, a meta-analysis revealed that smokers are likely to have lower levels of circulating vitamin D than non-smokers [60]. Besides, it was indicated in another meta-analysis that severe vitamin D deficiency is significantly related to an increased risk of DFU [61]. Another way to explain this is that insulin resistance can be influenced not only by excessive carbohydrate intake, particularly from low-quality sources, but also by smoking status, with both current and former smokers exhibiting higher levels of insulin resistance compared to non-smokers. [62–64]. Furthermore; individuals with greater carbohydrate consumption tend to have a higher overall energy intake and an increased intake of essential nutrients. However, we did not identify a significant relationship between glycemic load, fiber, and the quantity of carbohydrate consumed with the size, depth or Wagner grade of the diabetic foot ulcer. Numerous studies have explored the impact of nutrition on diabetes outcomes in adults [65–71]. However, this finding contrasts with previous studies that have shown a positive association between glycemic control and factors relevant to the management of diabetic foot ulcers [19,22,72]. There are several potential reasons why we did not observe these associations in our study. Firstly, variations in study design, sample characteristics, and methodologies for assessing dietary factors may contribute to the observed discrepancies. Secondly, the duration of diabetes and overall glycemic control of the participants may have influenced the results. It is possible that participants with better glycemic control or shorter durations of diabetes had smaller or less severe diabetic foot ulcers. This could have weakened the associations between the foot ulcers and factors like glycemic load, fiber intake, and total carbohydrate consumption. Additionally, the development of diabetic foot ulcers is a complex process involving multiple factors beyond glycemic control and dietary factors alone. Factors such as vascular disease, neuropathy, and foot care practices also play significant roles in the development and progression of diabetic foot ulcers [73–76]. The interplay of these factors might have overshadowed the direct associations we hypothesized. Our finding indicates that a higher ratio of whole grains to total grains is associated with smaller diabetic foot ulcers. This highlights the potential benefits of incorporating more whole grains into the diet of individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. Whole grains may possess protective properties that contribute to improved wound healing. Whole grains are rich in beneficial nutrients, including vitamins, minerals, antioxidants, and phytochemicals. These nutrients work synergistically to support optimal metabolic functioning and may help improve insulin sensitivity, which is essential for maintaining blood sugar levels within a healthy range [77,78]. In addition, whole grains are a source of prebiotics that promote the growth of beneficial gut bacteria. A healthy gut microbiota has been associated with improved glucose metabolism and better glycemic control [79–82]. Moreover, whole grains tend to be more filling and satisfying compared to refined grains. The increased satiety provided by whole grains can help regulate appetite, prevent overeating, and support weight management [83]. Gut microbes have the ability to generate metabolites like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) through the fermentation of fiber and other phenolic compounds found in whole grains (WGs) [84]. These SCFAs have been demonstrated to stimulate the production of hormones related to appetite, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 and peptide YY [85–87]. Plus, whole grains, which contain high levels of viscous and fermentable fiber like β-glucan, have been proven to delay gastric emptying and extend the release of cholecystokinin when consumed with a meal containing fat [84,88,89]. This effect potentially contributes to an increased sense of fullness or satiety. Maintaining a healthy weight is crucial for glycemic control, as excess body weight is associated with insulin resistance and elevated blood sugar levels [90].

Strengths and limitations

Our study is the first to comprehensively evaluate both the quality and quantity of carbohydrate intake in patients with diabetes suffering from diabetic foot ulcers. We considered different indices for the quality of carbohydrates, such as glycemic load, fiber intake, and the whole grain to total grain ratio. Additionally, adjusting for potential confounders such as age, gender, energy intake, smoking, physical activity, shoe condition, neuropathy, PAD, HbA1c, and BMI strengthens the validity of the observed associations.

However, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, the cross-sectional design of the study limits the ability to establish causal relationships between carbohydrate intake and diabetic foot ulcer characteristics. Longitudinal studies are needed to further elucidate the temporal associations and potential mechanisms involved. Secondly, we evaluated dietary intakes using 24-hour dietary recalls. However, this method is prone to recall bias, affecting both the identification of consumed foods and the quantification of portion sizes. To mitigate this type of error, we gathered the dietary data through the use of highly-trained interviewers. Additionally, to reduce this error, we used three 24-hour dietary recalls, which according to the study published in 2016, three 24-hour dietary recalls can accurately estimate usual intake [91]. While we attempted to control the results for the main diabetes-related medications such as insulin, and metformin, as well as for wound care interventions like debridement, shoe and sock status, offloading, we did not control for all medications. However, in a trial the authors acknowledged that some patients were receiving antibiotic treatment, without any signs of infection. The use of antibiotics may have introduced a potential confounding factor. But their analysis indicated it did not significantly impact the study’s outcomes. Specifically, the multivariate analysis did not find a significant association between antibiotic treatments and wound healing. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis revealed no substantial differences in healing rates or duration between patients who were taking antibiotics at the start of the study and those who were not [92].

Lastly, the study did not explore the potential influence of inflammation and comorbidities on the observed associations, which should be considered in future investigations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the associations between carbohydrate intake and diabetic foot ulcer characteristics among individuals with type 2 diabetes. The findings highlight the importance of considering both the quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake, specifically increasing whole grain intake in relation to diabetic foot ulcer characteristics. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and investigate the underlying mechanisms. This could ultimately contribute to the development of targeted dietary interventions for individuals with diabetic foot ulcers in the context of type 2 diabetes.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Supporting information.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323537.s001

(XLSX)

References

1. 1. Aalaa M, Malazy OT, Sanjari M, Peimani M, Mohajeri-Tehrani M. Nurses’ role in diabetic foot prevention and care; a review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11(1):24. pmid:23497582

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

2. 2. Sueki H, Furukawa N, Higo N, Akiyama M, Batchelor J, Iijima M. Association of verrucous skin lesions and skin ulcers on the feet in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004;29(3):247–53. pmid:15115503

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

3. 3. Orlando G, Reeves ND, Boulton AJM, Ireland A, Federici G, Federici A, et al. Sedentary behaviour is an independent predictor of diabetic foot ulcer development: An 8-year prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;177:108877. pmid:34058300

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

4. 4. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367–75. pmid:28614678

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

5. 5. Walsh JW, Hoffstad OJ, Sullivan MO, Margolis DJ. Association of diabetic foot ulcer and death in a population-based cohort from the United Kingdom. Diabet Med. 2016;33(11):1493–8. pmid:26666583

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

6. 6. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(1):18–25. pmid:17093942

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

7. 7. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJG, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132–73. pmid:22619242

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

8. 8. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell J, Boulton AJM. Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1435–8. pmid:12716801

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

9. 9. Iversen MM, Tell GS, Riise T, Hanestad BR, Østbye T, Graue M, et al. History of foot ulcer increases mortality among individuals with diabetes: ten-year follow-up of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2193–9. pmid:19729524

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

10. 10. Barshes NR, Sigireddi M, Wrobel JS, Mahankali A, Robbins JM, Kougias P, et al. The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2013;4:10.3402/dfa.v4i0.21847. pmid:24130936

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

11. 11. Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM. Guest editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford; 2007. p. 286–7.

12. 12. Lauwers P, Hendriks JMH, Van Bouwel S, Verrijken A, Van Dessel K, Van Gils C, et al. Malnutrition according to the 2018 GLIM criteria is highly prevalent in people with a diabetic foot ulcer but does not affect outcome. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;43:335–41. pmid:34024537

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

13. 13. Baltzis D, Eleftheriadou I, Veves A. Pathogenesis and treatment of impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus: new insights. Adv Ther. 2014;31(8):817–36. pmid:25069580

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

14. 14. Sharp A, Clark J. Diabetes and its impact on wound healing. 2011.

15. 15. Molnar JA, Vlad LG, Gumus T. Nutrition and Chronic Wounds: Improving Clinical Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3 Suppl):71S–81S. pmid:27556777

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

16. 16. Karadurmus N, Sahin M, Tasci C, Naharci I, Ozturk C, Ilbasmis S, et al. Potential benefits of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on atherosclerosis and glycaemic control in patients with diabetic foot. Endokrynol Pol. 2010;61(3):275–9. pmid:20602302

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

17. 17. Lovejoy JC. The influence of dietary fat on insulin resistance. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2(5):435–40. pmid:12643169

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

18. 18. McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Saltzman E, Wilson PWF, Jacques PF. Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(2):538–46. pmid:14747241

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

19. 19. Fujii H, Iwase M, Ohkuma T, Ogata-Kaizu S, Ide H, Kikuchi Y, et al. Impact of dietary fiber intake on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry. Nutr J. 2013;12:159. pmid:24330576

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

20. 20. Mao T, Huang F, Zhu X, Wei D, Chen L. Effects of dietary fiber on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Functional Foods. 2021;82:104500.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

21. 21. Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Zazpe I, Santiago S, Toledo E, Barbería-Latasa M, Martínez-González MÁ. Association of carbohydrate quality and all-cause mortality in the SUN Project: A prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):2364–72. pmid:33190989

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

22. 22. Chiavaroli L, Lee D, Ahmed A, Cheung A, Khan T, Blanco S. Effect of low glycaemic index or load dietary patterns on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;374.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

23. 23. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley; 1981.

24. 24. Gehan EA. Clinical trials in cancer research. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;32:31–48.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

25. 25. Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):453–8. pmid:12954688

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

26. 26. Freeman LC. Kish: SURVEY SAMPLING (Book Review). Social Forces. 1966;45(1):132.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

27. 27. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607–10.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

28. 28. Snedecor G, William G. Statistical methods/george w. Snedecor and william g Cochran. 1989:84–6.

29. 29. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. pmid:12900694

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

30. 30. Saraf-Bank S, Haghighatdoost F, Esmaillzadeh A, Larijani B, Azadbakht L. Adherence to Healthy Eating Index-2010 is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and its features among Iranian adult women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71(3):425–30. pmid:27677367

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

31. 31. Garmaroudi GR, Moradi A. Socio-economic status in Iran: a study of measurement index. Payesh. 2010;9(2):137–44.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

32. 32. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press. 2012.

33. 33. Sawicki CM, Lichtenstein AH, Rogers GT, Jacques PF, Ma J, Saltzman E, et al. Comparison of Indices of Carbohydrate Quality and Food Sources of Dietary Fiber on Longitudinal Changes in Waist Circumference in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):997. pmid:33808767

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

34. 34. Santiago S, Zazpe I, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sánchez-Tainta A, Sayón-Orea C, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, et al. Carbohydrate quality, weight change and incident obesity in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN Project. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):297–302. pmid:25226822

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

35. 35. Azadbakht L, Mohammadifard N, Akhavanzanjani M, Taheri M, Golshahi J, Haghighatdoost F. The association between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and diet quality indices in Iranian adults: results from Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2016;67(2):161–9. pmid:26915989

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

36. 36. Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Rosner BA, Willett WC. A prospective study of dietary carbohydrate quantity and quality in relation to risk of ovulatory infertility. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(1):78–86. pmid:17882137

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

37. 37. Hosseini E, Lachat C, Mohammadifard N, Sarrafzadegan N, Kolsteren P. Associations of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with glucose intolerance in Iranian adults. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2013;34(2):89–94.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

38. 38. Wolever TMS, Yang M, Zeng XY, Atkinson F, Brand-Miller JC. Food glycemic index, as given in glycemic index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1306–12. pmid:16762941

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

39. 39. Taleban F, Esmaeili M. Glycemic index of Iranian foods: Guideline for diabetic and hyperlipidemic patients. Tehran: National Nutrition and Food Technology of Iran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science. 1999.

40. 40. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2281–3. pmid:18835944

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

41. 41. Brand-Miller J, Colagiuri S, Barclay A, Foster-Powell K. The new glucose revolution for diabetes: the definitive guide to managing diabetes and prediabetes using the glycemic index. Hachette UK; 2007.

42. 42. Bulló M, Papandreou C, Ruiz-Canela M, Guasch-Ferré M, Li J, Hernández-Alonso P, et al. Plasma Metabolomic Profiles of Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Carbohydrate Quality Index in the PREDIMED Study. J Nutr. 2021;151(1):50–8. pmid:33296468

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

43. 43. Haghighatdoost F, Azadbakht L, Keshteli AH, Feinle-Bisset C, Daghaghzadeh H, Afshar H, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and common psychological disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(1):201–9. pmid:26607943

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

44. 44. MonteiroSoares M, Russell D, Boyko E, Jeffcoate W, Mills J, Morbach S. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36:e3273.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

45. 45. Shah P, Inturi R, Anne D, Jadhav D, Viswambharan V, Khadilkar R, et al. Wagner’s Classification as a Tool for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Our Observations at a Suburban Teaching Hospital. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21501. pmid:35223277

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

46. 46. Feng Y, Schlösser FJ, Sumpio BE. The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(3):675–82, 682.e1. pmid:19595541

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

47. 47. Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, et al. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45(5 Suppl):S1–66. pmid:17280936

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

48. 48. Naemi R, Chockalingam N, Lutale JK, Abbas ZG. Can a combination of lifestyle and clinical characteristics explain the presence of foot ulcer in patients with diabetes? J Diabetes Complications. 2019;33(6):437–44. pmid:31005476

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

49. 49. Clayton W Jr, Elasy TA. A Review of the Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment of Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Diabetes. 2009;27(2):52–8.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

50. 50. Hinchliffe RJ, Forsythe RO, Apelqvist J, Boyko EJ, Fitridge R, Hong JP, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3276. pmid:31958217

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

51. 51. Banik PC, Barua L, Moniruzzaman M, Mondal R, Zaman F, Ali L. Risk of diabetic foot ulcer and its associated factors among Bangladeshi subjects: a multicentric cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034058. pmid:32114471

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

52. 52. Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Hinchliffe RJ, Lipsky BA, et al. Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. pmid:32176447

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

53. 53. Khan TH, Farooqui FA, Niazi K. Critical review of the ankle brachial index. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4(2):101–6.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

54. 54. Vanherwegen A-S, Lauwers P, Lavens A, Doggen K, Dirinck E, Initiative for Quality Improvement and Epidemiology in multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Clinics (IQED-Foot) Study Group. Sex differences in diabetic foot ulcer severity and outcome in Belgium. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281886. pmid:36795662

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

55. 55. Rossaneis M, Haddad M, Mathias Ta, Marcon S. Differences in foot self-care and lifestyle between men and women with diabetes mellitus. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2016;24.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

56. 56. Yu MK, Lyles CR, Bent-Shaw LA, Young BA. Sex disparities in diabetes process of care measures and self-care in high-risk patients. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:575814. pmid:23671877

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

57. 57. Rossboth S, Lechleitner M, Oberaigner W. Risk factors for diabetic foot complications in type 2 diabetes-A systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;4(1):e00175. pmid:33532615

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

58. 58. Xia N, Morteza A, Yang F, Cao H, Wang A. Review of the role of cigarette smoking in diabetic foot. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(2):202–15. pmid:30300476

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

59. 59. Fu X-L, Ding H, Miao W-W, Chen H-L. Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Diabetic Foot Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018:1534734618809583. pmid:30461329

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

60. 60. Yang L, Zhao H, Liu K, Wang Y, Liu Q, Sun T, et al. Smoking behavior and circulating vitamin D levels in adults: A meta-analysis. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(10):5820–32. pmid:34646549

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

61. 61. Dai J, Jiang C, Chen H, Chai Y. Vitamin D and diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Diabetes. 2019;9(1):8. pmid:30858355

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

62. 62. Barazzoni R, Deutz NEP, Biolo G, Bischoff S, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, et al. Carbohydrates and insulin resistance in clinical nutrition: Recommendations from the ESPEN expert group. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(2):355–63. pmid:27686693

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

63. 63. Morimoto N, Kasuga C, Tanaka A, Kamachi K, Ai M, Urayama KY, et al. Association between dietary fibre:carbohydrate intake ratio and insulin resistance in Japanese adults without type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(6):620–8. pmid:29553029

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

64. 64. Cho SH, Jeong SH, Shin J, Park S, Jang S-I. Short-term smoking increases the risk of insulin resistance. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3550. pmid:35241770

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

65. 65. Dyńka D, Kowalcze K, Ambrozkiewicz F, Paziewska A. Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of the Meta-Analyses and Clinical Trials. Nutrients. 2023;15(3):500. pmid:36771207

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

66. 66. Yang X, Zhou J, Shao H, Huang B, Kang X, Wu R, et al. Effect of an Intermittent Calorie-restricted Diet on Type 2 Diabetes Remission: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(6):1415–24. pmid:36515429

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

67. 67. Hashimoto Y, Takahashi F, Okamura T, Hamaguchi M, Fukui M. Diet, exercise, and pharmacotherapy for sarcopenia in people with diabetes. Metabolism. 2023;144:155585. pmid:37156410

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

68. 68. O’Hearn M, Lara-Castor L, Cudhea F, Miller V, Reedy J, Shi P, et al. Incident type 2 diabetes attributable to suboptimal diet in 184 countries. Nat Med. 2023;29(4):982–95. pmid:37069363

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

69. 69. López GE, Batis C, González C, Chávez M, Cortés-Valencia A, López-Ridaura R, et al. EAT-Lancet Healthy Reference Diet score and diabetes incidence in a cohort of Mexican women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023;77(3):348–55. pmid:36471166

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

70. 70. Chen L, Liu B, Ren L, Du H, Fei C, Qian C, et al. High-fiber diet ameliorates gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood in type 2 diabetes patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1069954. pmid:36794003

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

71. 71. Seyedmahalleh M, Montazer M, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, Azadbakht L. The effect of zinc supplementation on lipid profiles in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr. 2023.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

72. 72. Farvid MS, Homayouni F, Shokoohi M, Fallah A, Farvid MS. Glycemic index, glycemic load and their association with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(4):459–63. pmid:24549029

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

73. 73. Tresierra-Ayala MÁ, García Rojas A. Association between peripheral arterial disease and diabetic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Medicina Universitaria. 2017;19(76):123–6.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

74. 74. Tecilazich F, Veves A. Role of peripheral neuropathy in the development of foot ulceration and impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus. Nutritional and Therapeutic Interventions for Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Elsevier; 2018. p. 95–104.

75. 75. Lim JZM, Ng NSL, Thomas C. Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J R Soc Med. 2017;110(3):104–9. pmid:28116957

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

76. 76. Hirpha N, Tatiparthi R, Mulugeta T. Diabetic foot self-care practices among adult diabetic patients: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020:4779–86.

* View Article

* Google Scholar

77. 77. Zhu Y, Sang S. Phytochemicals in whole grain wheat and their health-promoting effects. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(7):10.1002/mnfr.201600852. pmid:28155258

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

78. 78. Călinoiu LF, Vodnar DC. Whole Grains and Phenolic Acids: A Review on Bioactivity, Functionality, Health Benefits and Bioavailability. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1615. pmid:30388881

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

79. 79. Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, Wu G, Lam YY, Wang X, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359(6380):1151–6. pmid:29590046

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

80. 80. Müller M, Hernández MAG, Goossens GH, Reijnders D, Holst JJ, Jocken JWE, et al. Circulating but not faecal short-chain fatty acids are related to insulin sensitivity, lipolysis and GLP-1 concentrations in humans. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12515. pmid:31467327

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

81. 81. Lappi J, Mykkänen H, Bach Knudsen KE, Kirjavainen P, Katina K, Pihlajamäki J, et al. Postprandial glucose metabolism and SCFA after consuming wholegrain rye bread and wheat bread enriched with bioprocessed rye bran in individuals with mild gastrointestinal symptoms. Nutr J. 2014;13:104. pmid:25370913

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

82. 82. Nilsson AC, Johansson-Boll EV, Björck IME. Increased gut hormones and insulin sensitivity index following a 3-d intervention with a barley kernel-based product: a randomised cross-over study in healthy middle-aged subjects. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(6):899–907. pmid:26259632

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

83. 83. Sanders LM, Zhu Y, Wilcox ML, Koecher K, Maki KC. Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared with Refined Grain, on Appetite and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(4):1177–95. pmid:33530093

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

84. 84. Roager HM, Vogt JK, Kristensen M, Hansen LBS, Ibrügger S, Mærkedahl RB, et al. Whole grain-rich diet reduces body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation without inducing major changes of the gut microbiome: a randomised cross-over trial. Gut. 2019;68(1):83–93. pmid:29097438

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

85. 85. Cani PD, Lecourt E, Dewulf EM, Sohet FM, Pachikian BD, Naslain D, et al. Gut microbiota fermentation of prebiotics increases satietogenic and incretin gut peptide production with consequences for appetite sensation and glucose response after a meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1236–43. pmid:19776140

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

86. 86. Tarini J, Wolever TMS. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(1):9–16. pmid:20130660

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

87. 87. Tolhurst G, Heffron H, Lam YS, Parker HE, Habib AM, Diakogiannaki E, et al. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes. 2012;61(2):364–71. pmid:22190648

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

88. 88. Geliebter A, Grillot CL, Aviram-Friedman R, Haq S, Yahav E, Hashim SA. Effects of oatmeal and corn flakes cereal breakfasts on satiety, gastric emptying, glucose, and appetite-related hormones. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(2–3):93–103. pmid:25612907

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

89. 89. Burton-Freeman B, Davis PA, Schneeman BO. Plasma cholecystokinin is associated with subjective measures of satiety in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(3):659–67. pmid:12198015

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

90. 90. Koufakis T, Liberopoulos EN, Kokkinos A, Zebekakis P, Kotsa K. Weight Loss Versus Glycemic Control as the Primary Treatment Target in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Why Choose When You Can Have Both? Drugs. 2023;83(6):469–77. pmid:36941489

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

91. 91. Shamah-Levy T, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Gaona-Pineda EB, Cuevas-Nasu L, Carriquiry AL, Rivera JA. Three 24-Hour Recalls in Comparison with One Improve the Estimates of Energy and Nutrient Intakes in an Urban Mexican Population. J Nutr. 2016;146(5):1043–50. pmid:27052536

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

92. 92. Rouland A, Fourmont C, Sberna AL, Aho Glele LS, Mouillot T, Simoneau I, et al. Malnutrition in type 2 diabetic patients does not affect healing of foot ulcers. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(2):171–6. pmid:30284047

* View Article

* PubMed/NCBI

* Google Scholar

Citation: Geravand F, Nasli-Esfahani E, Montazer M, Jalalzadeh M, Azadbakht L (2025) The association between the quality and quantity of carbohydrate intake and the size, depth, and Wagner grade of diabetic foot ulcers in patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One 20(6): e0323537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323537

About the Authors:

Faezeh Geravand

Roles: Writing – original draft

Affiliations: Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ensieh Nasli-Esfahani

Roles: Formal analysis

Affiliation: Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohsen Montazer

Roles: Methodology

Affiliations: Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Moharam Jalalzadeh

Roles: Software

Affiliations: Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Leila Azadbakht

Roles: Supervision

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations: Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-6818

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

[/RAW_REF_TEXT]

References

1. Aalaa M, Malazy OT, Sanjari M, Peimani M, Mohajeri-Tehrani M. Nurses’ role in diabetic foot prevention and care; a review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012;11(1):24. pmid:23497582

2. Sueki H, Furukawa N, Higo N, Akiyama M, Batchelor J, Iijima M. Association of verrucous skin lesions and skin ulcers on the feet in patients with diabetic neuropathy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2004;29(3):247–53. pmid:15115503

3. Orlando G, Reeves ND, Boulton AJM, Ireland A, Federici G, Federici A, et al. Sedentary behaviour is an independent predictor of diabetic foot ulcer development: An 8-year prospective study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;177:108877. pmid:34058300

4. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Their Recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(24):2367–75. pmid:28614678

5. Walsh JW, Hoffstad OJ, Sullivan MO, Margolis DJ. Association of diabetic foot ulcer and death in a population-based cohort from the United Kingdom. Diabet Med. 2016;33(11):1493–8. pmid:26666583

6. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Apelqvist J, Jude E, Piaggesi A, Bakker K, et al. High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study. Diabetologia. 2007;50(1):18–25. pmid:17093942

7. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJG, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e132–73. pmid:22619242

8. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell J, Boulton AJM. Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1435–8. pmid:12716801

9. Iversen MM, Tell GS, Riise T, Hanestad BR, Østbye T, Graue M, et al. History of foot ulcer increases mortality among individuals with diabetes: ten-year follow-up of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, Norway. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2193–9. pmid:19729524

10. Barshes NR, Sigireddi M, Wrobel JS, Mahankali A, Robbins JM, Kougias P, et al. The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2013;4:10.3402/dfa.v4i0.21847. pmid:24130936

11. Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM. Guest editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd Oxford; 2007. p. 286–7.

12. Lauwers P, Hendriks JMH, Van Bouwel S, Verrijken A, Van Dessel K, Van Gils C, et al. Malnutrition according to the 2018 GLIM criteria is highly prevalent in people with a diabetic foot ulcer but does not affect outcome. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;43:335–41. pmid:34024537

13. Baltzis D, Eleftheriadou I, Veves A. Pathogenesis and treatment of impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus: new insights. Adv Ther. 2014;31(8):817–36. pmid:25069580

14. Sharp A, Clark J. Diabetes and its impact on wound healing. 2011.

15. Molnar JA, Vlad LG, Gumus T. Nutrition and Chronic Wounds: Improving Clinical Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3 Suppl):71S–81S. pmid:27556777

16. Karadurmus N, Sahin M, Tasci C, Naharci I, Ozturk C, Ilbasmis S, et al. Potential benefits of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on atherosclerosis and glycaemic control in patients with diabetic foot. Endokrynol Pol. 2010;61(3):275–9. pmid:20602302

17. Lovejoy JC. The influence of dietary fat on insulin resistance. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2(5):435–40. pmid:12643169

18. McKeown NM, Meigs JB, Liu S, Saltzman E, Wilson PWF, Jacques PF. Carbohydrate nutrition, insulin resistance, and the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(2):538–46. pmid:14747241

19. Fujii H, Iwase M, Ohkuma T, Ogata-Kaizu S, Ide H, Kikuchi Y, et al. Impact of dietary fiber intake on glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic kidney disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fukuoka Diabetes Registry. Nutr J. 2013;12:159. pmid:24330576

20. Mao T, Huang F, Zhu X, Wei D, Chen L. Effects of dietary fiber on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Functional Foods. 2021;82:104500.

21. Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Zazpe I, Santiago S, Toledo E, Barbería-Latasa M, Martínez-González MÁ. Association of carbohydrate quality and all-cause mortality in the SUN Project: A prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(4):2364–72. pmid:33190989

22. Chiavaroli L, Lee D, Ahmed A, Cheung A, Khan T, Blanco S. Effect of low glycaemic index or load dietary patterns on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;374.

23. Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley; 1981.

24. Gehan EA. Clinical trials in cancer research. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;32:31–48.

25. Jones SR, Carley S, Harrison M. An introduction to power and sample size estimation. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(5):453–8. pmid:12954688

26. Freeman LC. Kish: SURVEY SAMPLING (Book Review). Social Forces. 1966;45(1):132.

27. Krejcie RV, Morgan DW. Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970;30(3):607–10.

28. Snedecor G, William G. Statistical methods/george w. Snedecor and william g Cochran. 1989:84–6.

29. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. pmid:12900694

30. Saraf-Bank S, Haghighatdoost F, Esmaillzadeh A, Larijani B, Azadbakht L. Adherence to Healthy Eating Index-2010 is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome and its features among Iranian adult women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71(3):425–30. pmid:27677367

31. Garmaroudi GR, Moradi A. Socio-economic status in Iran: a study of measurement index. Payesh. 2010;9(2):137–44.

32. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press. 2012.

33. Sawicki CM, Lichtenstein AH, Rogers GT, Jacques PF, Ma J, Saltzman E, et al. Comparison of Indices of Carbohydrate Quality and Food Sources of Dietary Fiber on Longitudinal Changes in Waist Circumference in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):997. pmid:33808767

34. Santiago S, Zazpe I, Bes-Rastrollo M, Sánchez-Tainta A, Sayón-Orea C, de la Fuente-Arrillaga C, et al. Carbohydrate quality, weight change and incident obesity in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN Project. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015;69(3):297–302. pmid:25226822

35. Azadbakht L, Mohammadifard N, Akhavanzanjani M, Taheri M, Golshahi J, Haghighatdoost F. The association between dietary glycemic index, glycemic load and diet quality indices in Iranian adults: results from Isfahan Healthy Heart Program. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2016;67(2):161–9. pmid:26915989

36. Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Rosner BA, Willett WC. A prospective study of dietary carbohydrate quantity and quality in relation to risk of ovulatory infertility. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63(1):78–86. pmid:17882137

37. Hosseini E, Lachat C, Mohammadifard N, Sarrafzadegan N, Kolsteren P. Associations of dietary glycemic index and glycemic load with glucose intolerance in Iranian adults. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2013;34(2):89–94.

38. Wolever TMS, Yang M, Zeng XY, Atkinson F, Brand-Miller JC. Food glycemic index, as given in glycemic index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83(6):1306–12. pmid:16762941

39. Taleban F, Esmaeili M. Glycemic index of Iranian foods: Guideline for diabetic and hyperlipidemic patients. Tehran: National Nutrition and Food Technology of Iran, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science. 1999.

40. Atkinson FS, Foster-Powell K, Brand-Miller JC. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2281–3. pmid:18835944

41. Brand-Miller J, Colagiuri S, Barclay A, Foster-Powell K. The new glucose revolution for diabetes: the definitive guide to managing diabetes and prediabetes using the glycemic index. Hachette UK; 2007.

42. Bulló M, Papandreou C, Ruiz-Canela M, Guasch-Ferré M, Li J, Hernández-Alonso P, et al. Plasma Metabolomic Profiles of Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, and Carbohydrate Quality Index in the PREDIMED Study. J Nutr. 2021;151(1):50–8. pmid:33296468

43. Haghighatdoost F, Azadbakht L, Keshteli AH, Feinle-Bisset C, Daghaghzadeh H, Afshar H, et al. Glycemic index, glycemic load, and common psychological disorders. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(1):201–9. pmid:26607943

44. MonteiroSoares M, Russell D, Boyko E, Jeffcoate W, Mills J, Morbach S. Guidelines on the classification of diabetic foot ulcers (IWGDF 2019). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36:e3273.

45. Shah P, Inturi R, Anne D, Jadhav D, Viswambharan V, Khadilkar R, et al. Wagner’s Classification as a Tool for Treating Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Our Observations at a Suburban Teaching Hospital. Cureus. 2022;14(1):e21501. pmid:35223277

46. Feng Y, Schlösser FJ, Sumpio BE. The Semmes Weinstein monofilament examination as a screening tool for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(3):675–82, 682.e1. pmid:19595541

47. Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, et al. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45(5 Suppl):S1–66. pmid:17280936

48. Naemi R, Chockalingam N, Lutale JK, Abbas ZG. Can a combination of lifestyle and clinical characteristics explain the presence of foot ulcer in patients with diabetes? J Diabetes Complications. 2019;33(6):437–44. pmid:31005476

49. Clayton W Jr, Elasy TA. A Review of the Pathophysiology, Classification, and Treatment of Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Diabetes. 2009;27(2):52–8.

50. Hinchliffe RJ, Forsythe RO, Apelqvist J, Boyko EJ, Fitridge R, Hong JP, et al. Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3276. pmid:31958217

51. Banik PC, Barua L, Moniruzzaman M, Mondal R, Zaman F, Ali L. Risk of diabetic foot ulcer and its associated factors among Bangladeshi subjects: a multicentric cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(2):e034058. pmid:32114471

52. Schaper NC, van Netten JJ, Apelqvist J, Bus SA, Hinchliffe RJ, Lipsky BA, et al. Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020;36 Suppl 1:e3266. pmid:32176447

53. Khan TH, Farooqui FA, Niazi K. Critical review of the ankle brachial index. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008;4(2):101–6.

54. Vanherwegen A-S, Lauwers P, Lavens A, Doggen K, Dirinck E, Initiative for Quality Improvement and Epidemiology in multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Clinics (IQED-Foot) Study Group. Sex differences in diabetic foot ulcer severity and outcome in Belgium. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281886. pmid:36795662

55. Rossaneis M, Haddad M, Mathias Ta, Marcon S. Differences in foot self-care and lifestyle between men and women with diabetes mellitus. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2016;24.

56. Yu MK, Lyles CR, Bent-Shaw LA, Young BA. Sex disparities in diabetes process of care measures and self-care in high-risk patients. J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:575814. pmid:23671877

57. Rossboth S, Lechleitner M, Oberaigner W. Risk factors for diabetic foot complications in type 2 diabetes-A systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2020;4(1):e00175. pmid:33532615

58. Xia N, Morteza A, Yang F, Cao H, Wang A. Review of the role of cigarette smoking in diabetic foot. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(2):202–15. pmid:30300476

59. Fu X-L, Ding H, Miao W-W, Chen H-L. Association Between Cigarette Smoking and Diabetic Foot Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2018:1534734618809583. pmid:30461329

60. Yang L, Zhao H, Liu K, Wang Y, Liu Q, Sun T, et al. Smoking behavior and circulating vitamin D levels in adults: A meta-analysis. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(10):5820–32. pmid:34646549

61. Dai J, Jiang C, Chen H, Chai Y. Vitamin D and diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Diabetes. 2019;9(1):8. pmid:30858355

62. Barazzoni R, Deutz NEP, Biolo G, Bischoff S, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, et al. Carbohydrates and insulin resistance in clinical nutrition: Recommendations from the ESPEN expert group. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(2):355–63. pmid:27686693

63. Morimoto N, Kasuga C, Tanaka A, Kamachi K, Ai M, Urayama KY, et al. Association between dietary fibre:carbohydrate intake ratio and insulin resistance in Japanese adults without type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr. 2018;119(6):620–8. pmid:29553029

64. Cho SH, Jeong SH, Shin J, Park S, Jang S-I. Short-term smoking increases the risk of insulin resistance. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3550. pmid:35241770

65. Dyńka D, Kowalcze K, Ambrozkiewicz F, Paziewska A. Effect of the Ketogenic Diet on the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of the Meta-Analyses and Clinical Trials. Nutrients. 2023;15(3):500. pmid:36771207

66. Yang X, Zhou J, Shao H, Huang B, Kang X, Wu R, et al. Effect of an Intermittent Calorie-restricted Diet on Type 2 Diabetes Remission: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023;108(6):1415–24. pmid:36515429

67. Hashimoto Y, Takahashi F, Okamura T, Hamaguchi M, Fukui M. Diet, exercise, and pharmacotherapy for sarcopenia in people with diabetes. Metabolism. 2023;144:155585. pmid:37156410

68. O’Hearn M, Lara-Castor L, Cudhea F, Miller V, Reedy J, Shi P, et al. Incident type 2 diabetes attributable to suboptimal diet in 184 countries. Nat Med. 2023;29(4):982–95. pmid:37069363

69. López GE, Batis C, González C, Chávez M, Cortés-Valencia A, López-Ridaura R, et al. EAT-Lancet Healthy Reference Diet score and diabetes incidence in a cohort of Mexican women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023;77(3):348–55. pmid:36471166

70. Chen L, Liu B, Ren L, Du H, Fei C, Qian C, et al. High-fiber diet ameliorates gut microbiota, serum metabolism and emotional mood in type 2 diabetes patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;13:1069954. pmid:36794003

71. Seyedmahalleh M, Montazer M, Ebrahimpour-Koujan S, Azadbakht L. The effect of zinc supplementation on lipid profiles in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Adv Nutr. 2023.

72. Farvid MS, Homayouni F, Shokoohi M, Fallah A, Farvid MS. Glycemic index, glycemic load and their association with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68(4):459–63. pmid:24549029

73. Tresierra-Ayala MÁ, García Rojas A. Association between peripheral arterial disease and diabetic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Medicina Universitaria. 2017;19(76):123–6.

74. Tecilazich F, Veves A. Role of peripheral neuropathy in the development of foot ulceration and impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus. Nutritional and Therapeutic Interventions for Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Elsevier; 2018. p. 95–104.

75. Lim JZM, Ng NSL, Thomas C. Prevention and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J R Soc Med. 2017;110(3):104–9. pmid:28116957

76. Hirpha N, Tatiparthi R, Mulugeta T. Diabetic foot self-care practices among adult diabetic patients: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020:4779–86.

77. Zhu Y, Sang S. Phytochemicals in whole grain wheat and their health-promoting effects. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61(7):10.1002/mnfr.201600852. pmid:28155258

78. Călinoiu LF, Vodnar DC. Whole Grains and Phenolic Acids: A Review on Bioactivity, Functionality, Health Benefits and Bioavailability. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1615. pmid:30388881

79. Zhao L, Zhang F, Ding X, Wu G, Lam YY, Wang X, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359(6380):1151–6. pmid:29590046

80. Müller M, Hernández MAG, Goossens GH, Reijnders D, Holst JJ, Jocken JWE, et al. Circulating but not faecal short-chain fatty acids are related to insulin sensitivity, lipolysis and GLP-1 concentrations in humans. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12515. pmid:31467327

81. Lappi J, Mykkänen H, Bach Knudsen KE, Kirjavainen P, Katina K, Pihlajamäki J, et al. Postprandial glucose metabolism and SCFA after consuming wholegrain rye bread and wheat bread enriched with bioprocessed rye bran in individuals with mild gastrointestinal symptoms. Nutr J. 2014;13:104. pmid:25370913

82. Nilsson AC, Johansson-Boll EV, Björck IME. Increased gut hormones and insulin sensitivity index following a 3-d intervention with a barley kernel-based product: a randomised cross-over study in healthy middle-aged subjects. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(6):899–907. pmid:26259632

83. Sanders LM, Zhu Y, Wilcox ML, Koecher K, Maki KC. Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared with Refined Grain, on Appetite and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(4):1177–95. pmid:33530093

84. Roager HM, Vogt JK, Kristensen M, Hansen LBS, Ibrügger S, Mærkedahl RB, et al. Whole grain-rich diet reduces body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation without inducing major changes of the gut microbiome: a randomised cross-over trial. Gut. 2019;68(1):83–93. pmid:29097438

85. Cani PD, Lecourt E, Dewulf EM, Sohet FM, Pachikian BD, Naslain D, et al. Gut microbiota fermentation of prebiotics increases satietogenic and incretin gut peptide production with consequences for appetite sensation and glucose response after a meal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1236–43. pmid:19776140

86. Tarini J, Wolever TMS. The fermentable fibre inulin increases postprandial serum short-chain fatty acids and reduces free-fatty acids and ghrelin in healthy subjects. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(1):9–16. pmid:20130660

87. Tolhurst G, Heffron H, Lam YS, Parker HE, Habib AM, Diakogiannaki E, et al. Short-chain fatty acids stimulate glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion via the G-protein-coupled receptor FFAR2. Diabetes. 2012;61(2):364–71. pmid:22190648

88. Geliebter A, Grillot CL, Aviram-Friedman R, Haq S, Yahav E, Hashim SA. Effects of oatmeal and corn flakes cereal breakfasts on satiety, gastric emptying, glucose, and appetite-related hormones. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(2–3):93–103. pmid:25612907

89. Burton-Freeman B, Davis PA, Schneeman BO. Plasma cholecystokinin is associated with subjective measures of satiety in women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(3):659–67. pmid:12198015

90. Koufakis T, Liberopoulos EN, Kokkinos A, Zebekakis P, Kotsa K. Weight Loss Versus Glycemic Control as the Primary Treatment Target in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: Why Choose When You Can Have Both? Drugs. 2023;83(6):469–77. pmid:36941489

91. Shamah-Levy T, Rodríguez-Ramírez S, Gaona-Pineda EB, Cuevas-Nasu L, Carriquiry AL, Rivera JA. Three 24-Hour Recalls in Comparison with One Improve the Estimates of Energy and Nutrient Intakes in an Urban Mexican Population. J Nutr. 2016;146(5):1043–50. pmid:27052536

92. Rouland A, Fourmont C, Sberna AL, Aho Glele LS, Mouillot T, Simoneau I, et al. Malnutrition in type 2 diabetic patients does not affect healing of foot ulcers. Acta Diabetol. 2019;56(2):171–6. pmid:30284047