Full text

Turn on search term navigation

Copyright © 2025 Sueny P. Lima dos Santos et al. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Background: Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy is essential for preventing neural tube defects and other congenital anomalies. Despite global recommendations, supplementation remains suboptimal in many low- and middle-income countries, including Guatemala, where disparities persist across regions and populations.

Objective: To investigate the association between the quality of antenatal care and folic acid supplementation among pregnant women in Guatemala.

Design and Setting: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2014-2015 Encuesta Nacional de Salud Materno Infantil (ENSMI), part of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). A total of 9523 women aged 15–49 with children under two years were included. Folic acid supplementation was assessed through self-reported responses to survey questions. Multilevel logistic regression examined the association between antenatal care quality and folic acid supplementation, accounting for individual, household, and community-level factors.

Results: Overall, 15.4% of women reported not taking folic acid during pregnancy. Lower folic acid supplementation was most notable among women who received no or inadequate antenatal care, indigenous women, and those living in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Women without antenatal care had 97% lower odds of folic acid supplementation compared with those with adequate care (OR = 0.03, 95% CI: 0.02–0.04, and p<0.001), while intermediate care was associated with 41% lower odds (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.47–0.74, and p<0.001). Indigenous women had 26% lower odds of supplementation (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.86, and p<0.001), and women in communities with high levels of no media exposure had 33% lower odds of folic acid supplementation (OR = 0.67 and 95% CI: 0.53–0.84).

Conclusions: Quality antenatal care plays a critical role in improving maternal nutrition behaviors. These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, such as culturally tailored education, mass media campaigns, and improved access to antenatal careto increase folic acid supplementation among pregnant women in Guatemala.

Details

Title
A Multilevel Analysis of the Association Between Quality of Antenatal Care and Folic Acid Supplementation During Pregnancy Among Guatemalan Women
Author
Sueny P Lima dos Santos 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Yuncker, Raegan 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Chertok, Ilana R A 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Haile, Zelalem T 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Graduate College Ohio University Athens Ohio, USA; Center for Nutrition and Health Impact Omaha Nebraska, USA 
 Global Health Initiative College of Health Sciences and Professions Grover Center Ohio University Athens Ohio, USA 
 School of Nursing College of Health Sciences and Professions Ohio University Athens Ohio, USA 
 Department of Social Medicine Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine Dublin Ohio, USA; Global Health Initiative College of Health Sciences and Professions Athens Ohio, USA 
Editor
Iqhrammullah Muhammad
Publication year
2025
Publication date
2025
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
e-ISSN
20544200
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
3223037817
Copyright
Copyright © 2025 Sueny P. Lima dos Santos et al. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/