1. Introduction
The synthesis of organic compounds with relevant biological and pharmacological properties is an area of great interest in synthetic chemistry [1,2]. Chalcones—a type of α,β-unsaturated compound—have been shown to have a wide range of biological activities [3,4]. The type of substituent determines the biological activities these molecules possess [5]. Among the substituents, the nitro group (NO2) stands out, which has the ability to attract electrons in aromatic rings due to resonance and, in some cases, facilitates the interaction with nucleophilic sites of proteins, such as enzymes, leading to their inhibition [6]. As the nitro group—being conjugated to the sp2 carbon atom—enhances various manifestations of biological activity, this stimulates the therapeutic confirmation of this functional group [7,8]. In this context, the synthesis of nitro-group-containing chalcones on both aromatic rings is of particular interest since these compounds may exhibit improved biological properties compared to their analogs that do not possess substituents [9]. Specific examples of the pharmacological properties of nitro-group-containing chalcones include anti-inflammatory [9], vasorelaxant [10], cytotoxic [11], anti-hyperglycemic [12], anti-leishmanial [13], and antimicrobial [14] activities (Figure 1).
However, synthesizing these compounds often requires conventional reaction conditions, such as strong acids or bases, which can limit their applicability [15]. This has led researchers to try alternative routes of synthesis, among which are methods that apply green chemistry paradigms, an example of which is ultrasound [16,17].
Ultrasound is a technique that has gained popularity in organic synthesis due to its ability to accelerate and improve the efficiency of chemical reactions [18]. Ultrasound is a form of energy produced when a pressure wave propagates through a medium, such as a liquid or gas. When ultrasound energy is applied to a chemical system, physical and chemical phenomena are generated that can influence the reaction. These phenomena include the formation of gas bubbles, the generation of free radicals, and the creation of more favorable reaction conditions—such as the dissolution of insoluble substances and a reduction in the reaction temperature [19,20]. In this context, chemical reactions induced by ultrasonic waves are carried out by a phenomenon called chemical cavitation [21]. Cavitation involves the formation of micrometer-sized voids or bubbles in a liquid when a sufficient pressure drop alters its cohesive forces. The violent collapse of these bubbles to re-establish intermolecular interactions releases a large amount of energy, which explains the effects mentioned above [22,23]. Rapid nucleation, growth, and collapse are the main characteristics of cavitation, a phenomenon that was discovered accidentally in the 19th century by Thorneycroft and Barnaby [24].
The application of ultrasound in organic synthesis has proven effective in improving the efficiency and selectivity of reactions, reducing reaction times, and eliminating toxic residues. In addition, ultrasound can be used to synthesize compounds that cannot be obtained by conventional methods, such as synthesizing compounds that require extreme reaction conditions or synthesizing compounds that are unstable under normal conditions [25,26,27].
In previous work, we reported the synthesis of three chalcone isomers using conventional mechanical stirring conditions, as well as the use of a strong base such as sodium hydroxide in methanol at 0 °C (Figure 2) [28].
The objective of this work was to perform the synthesis of five dinitrosubstituted chalcones in both aromatic rings A and B (DNCHs, compounds 3a–e) (Figure 2) through Claisen–Schmidt condensation between o-, m-, and p-nitroacetophenones and the corresponding o-, m-, and p-nitrobenzaldehydes using a non-conventional method by irradiation with an ultrasound bath. This approach seeks to decrease the drastic reaction conditions and to be aligned with the green chemistry paradigm.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. General Approach
The reagents utilized in the synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of the DNCHs were of analytical and spectroscopic grade Sigma-Aldrich (Toluca, México) and used without further purification. The reaction progress was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (TLC) on 0.2-mm silica-gel-coated aluminum plates with a fluorescent indicator, F254 Merck (Toluca, México). The mobile phase used for the TLC analysis was a 7:3 mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate for all the examples presented herein. The reported melting points were determined in an SMP 10 (STUART) melting point apparatus (Bibby Scientific, Staffordshire, UK) and not corrected. NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker Ascend® 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Billerica, MA, USA). Chemical shifts are expressed in parts per million (ppm) and referenced to TMS as an internal standard, while coupling constants (J) are expressed in Hertz. The ultrasonic irradiation generator, with a power of 100 W, was a Cole Parmer ultrasonic cleaner model 08891-21 (Vernon Hills, IL, USA). Infrared spectra were obtained using an Agilent Cary 630 FTIR Diamond ATR (Santa Clara, CA, USA).
2.2. Procedure for the Synthesis of Dinitrochalcones (DNCHs)
The procedure for synthesis of the DNCHs was carried out by Claisen–Schmidt condensation between the respective o-nitroacetophenone (1a), m-nitroacetophenone (1b), p-nitroacetophenone (1c), and the respective o-nitrobenzaldehyde (2a), m-nitrobenzaldehyde (2b), p-nitrobenzaldehyde (2c). All nitroacetophenones and nitrobelzaldehydes were equimolar in all reactions.
The technique employed included adding 10 mmol of the corresponding nitroacetophenones and their carbonate equivalents. The mixture was then solubilized with 10 mL of methanol in a 50 mL flask until the nitroacetophenone was completely dissolved. Next, 10 mmol of the corresponding benzaldehyde was added. Subsequently, 1 mL of cyclohexane was added and subjected to ultrasound irradiation for the time and at the temperature specified in the results table. Once the reaction was finished, the solid obtained was filtered and washed with cold water. Finally, the product was purified following a methodology previously reported [28] for the conventional method of dinitrochalcone synthesis through solvent-pair (dichloromethane/n-hexane) recrystallization.
3a (E)-1,3-bis(2-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one. A total of 56% was obtained as a white solid; m.p.: 140–142 °C [in the lit., 136–137 °C] [29]; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.25 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (m, 2H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H), 7.24 (d, J = 16.1 Hz, 1H); DEPTQ NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 193.3, 149.3, 147.4, 142.1, 135.8, 135.5, 134.9, 132.7, 132.4, 130.5, 130.1, 125.8, 125.5, 124.3, 124.1. FTIR λmax/cm−1: 1655 (C=O), 1515 (C=C), 1330 (N—O), 970 (C=C trans).
3b (E)-1-(2-nitrophenyl)-3-(3-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one. A total of 92% was obtained as a white solid; m.p.: 145–147 °C [in the lit., 143–145 °C] [29]; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.64 (s, 1H), 8.29 (m, 3H), 7.97 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H); DEPTQ NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 193.1, 149.3, 147.5, 144.1, 136.9, 136.1, 135.4, 132.5, 131.3, 130.0, 129.1, 125.9, 125.5, 124.5, 123.9. FTIR λmax/cm−1: 1651 (C=O), 1522 (C=C), 1345 (N—O), 983 (C=C trans).
3c (E)-1-(2-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one. A total of 86% was obtained as a yellow solid; m.p.: 175–177 °C [in the lit., 168–169 °C] [29]; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 8.23 (m, 3H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.93 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 16.2 Hz, 1H); DEPTQ NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 193.0, 149.3, 147.5, 143.6, 141.3, 135.9, 135.5, 132.6, 130.8, 130.2, 130.0, 125.6, 124.9. FTIR λmax/cm−1: 1664 (C=O), 1508 (C=C), 1333 (N—O), 980 (C=C trans).
3d (E)-3-(2-nitrophenyl)-1-(3-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one. A total of 65% was obtained as a white solid; m.p.: 160–162 °C [in the lit., 159–161 °C] [29]; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.35 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), 9.09 (m, 1H), 9.02 (m, 1H), 8.73 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.62 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 8.57 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 8.46 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (m, 2H), 8.24 (m, 1H); RMN DEPTQ (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 188.6, 149.7, 149.2, 140.9, 139.2, 135.8, 134.7, 132.2, 131.6, 130.6, 130.4, 128.6, 126.8, 125.7, 124.6. FTIR λmax/cm−1: 1653 (C=O), 1522 (C=C), 1336 (N—O), 970 (C=C trans).
3e (E)-1,3-bis(3-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one. A total of 88% was obtained as a yellow solid; p.f.: 214–216 °C [in the lit., 210–211 °C] [29,30]; 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.87 (s, 1H), 8.81 (s, 1H), 8.64 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (m, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (m, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (t, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H); RMN DEPTQ (150 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 188.6, 149.4, 149.2, 143.8, 139.4, 137.3, 136.2, 135.8, 131.6, 131.3, 128.5, 125.9, 125.2, 124.2, 123.9. FTIR λmax/cm−1: 1660 (C=O), 1524 (C=C), 1329 (N—O), 981 (C=C trans).
3. Results
Initially, we proceeded to optimize the reaction conditions avoiding drastic conditions, taking as a starting point the reaction of m-nitroacetophenone (1b) and m-nitrobenzaldehyde (2b) to obtain m,m-DNCH (3e) reported by Wei and coworkers [30]; for the optimization of the reaction, several variations in the reaction conditions were tested, which are summarized in Table 1.
By way of comparison, a protocol was established where conventional conditions were established, using reflux (entries 2 and 3). The effect of the base was tested by comparing the effectiveness of the reaction in the presence of NaOH, K2CO3, Na2CO3, Li2CO3, Cs2CO3, and CaCO3.
The same methanol/cyclohexane mixture was employed as the reaction medium for synthesizing the remaining isomeric DNCH. However, experimental temperature modifications were necessary to optimize the yield of the reactions. The optimum conditions for obtaining each product are summarized in Figure 3 and Table 2.
4. Discussion
The synthesis of DNCHs using ultrasound, presented in this work, stands out for avoiding conventional reaction conditions, aligning with principle 6 of green chemistry (energy efficiency) [31]. The optimization of experimental conditions, detailed in Table 1 and Table 2, show several observations regarding reaction efficiency and factors influencing yields, although the experiments initially included magnetic stirring and refluxing (Table 1)—conventional synthesis methods—to establish a point of comparison with ultrasonic activation. Magnetic stirring, performed at room temperature, and refluxing at elevated temperatures, are widely used in organic synthesis due to their ability to promote chemical reactions under controlled conditions efficiently. However, these methods often require long reaction times and can result in low yields, confirmed in this work. For example, magnetic stirring with NaOH did not produce high yields (33%), while refluxing produced slightly decreased yields (25% and 29% with NaOH and K2CO3, respectively, in 240 min). These results show the limitations of conventional methods specifically for these molecules.
In contrast, ultrasound irradiation reduced the reaction time to 60 min or less, increasing the yields in most of the experiments carried out by this non-conventional technique. Ultrasonic cavitation and the generation of free radicals may explain this improvement in efficiency [32]. These effects facilitate the cleavage and formation of bonds, promoting Claisen–Schmidt condensation between the nitroacetophenones and nitrobenzaldehydes.
The use of different bases also had a crucial impact on the reaction yields. Optimization showed that the most effective base was Na2CO3, with a yield of 88% (entry 9), while other bases such as K2CO3 and Li2CO3 resulted in less efficient yields of 49% and 48%, respectively. This behavior may be related to the strength and solubility of the bases in the reaction system. Thus, Na2CO3 appears to provide an optimal balance between the catalysis of the reaction and the formation of undesired side products, a critical aspect to ensure the selectivity of the synthesis.
The solvent played a crucial role in optimizing the yields. The combination of methanol and cyclohexane markedly increased the yields compared to using methanol alone, as observed when contrasting entries 5 and 6 (25% vs. 52%). Cyclohexane probably acted as a co-solvent, enhancing the solubilization of reactants and facilitating better interactions between the reagents and the base, although experiments are still needed to verify this claim. However, something similar has been reported previously, where cyclohexane, in solvent mixtures, is used as a surfactant to improve the efficiency of reactions by increasing the accessibility of the substrate to the catalysts [33,34]. This surface effect is a concrete example of how solvents do not only dilute the reactants but also directly influence the reaction dynamics.
On the other hand, Table 2 presents the yields of DNCHs synthesized under optimal ultrasound conditions. An analysis of these data reveals a remarkable influence of the position of the nitro groups in the aromatic rings on the yields and reaction conditions. Chalcones with at least one nitro group in the ortho position (3a–3d) show yields between 56% and 92%, while the chalcone (3e) with nitro groups in the meta position on both rings reached a yield of 88%, although it required a higher temperature (60 °C) to optimize the reaction in only 30 min. This behavior can be attributed to the inductive effect of the nitro group, which increases the electrophilic character of the carbonyl carbon, favoring condensation, while the higher temperature required for (3e) could be related to a lower reactivity of the target positions.
Compound (3b), with a nitro group in the ortho position on ring A and the meta position on ring B, presented the highest yield (92%). This structural configuration may generate a favorable combination of inductive and steric effects that optimize the reactivity of the reagents. The reactivity also seems to be influenced by the possibility that the nitro groups in the ortho position facilitate the formation of intramolecular interactions, reducing the energetic barriers of the reaction.
Proton Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (1H NMR) and DEPTQ experiments confirmed the proposed structures of the DNCHs. In the 1H NMR spectra, two double signals characteristic of the α,β-unsaturated system were observed, with coupling constants ranging between J = 15.5 Hz and J = 16.3 Hz, values consistent with a trans configuration. On the other hand, in the DEPTQ spectrum, the quaternary carbons of the molecules are identified, which appeared in a negative phase, supporting the structural assignment. The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared spectra are presented in Figures S1–S10 and Figures S11–S15, respectively (see Supplementary Materials).
The ultrasound-mediated synthesis of these DNCHs could represent a promising starting material for the construction of more complex compounds, such as those containing heterocycles. This is because the nitro group can be reduced, thus facilitating its subsequent cyclization or expanding the possibilities of structural functionalization [35].
5. Conclusions
The synthesis of five isomers of DNCHs (3a–e) was achieved under mild reaction conditions, using ultrasound, and adding a co-solvent that optimizes the interaction of the organic phase with the basic catalyst. The spectroscopic characterization of the obtained products agrees with the expected structures. Differences were found in the reaction conditions necessary to optimize the synthesis of each of the compounds, which is attributed, in principle, to the electron-attracting effect exerted by the nitro group on the aromatic systems that depends on the relative position of the nitro group concerning the corresponding carbonyl. The reaction yields were improved for compounds (3a–c) compared to the conventional methodology reported above. At the same time, compounds 3d and 3e also obtained good yields, proving that this ultrasound synthesis methodology is effective for these DNCHs.
Conceptualization, A.Y.H. and N.R.-C.; methodology, C.E.L.-G.; software, Q.T.-S.; validation, M.Á.V.-R., C.E.L.-G. and N.R.-C.; formal analysis, A.G.-R.; investigation, A.Y.H.; resources, O.H.-A.; data curation, E.M.R.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.Y.H.; writing—review and editing, L.F.R.d.l.F.; visualization, E.A.-M.; supervision, N.R.-C.; project administration, A.G.-R.; funding acquisition, C.E.L.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The data presented in this study are available in the article.
We thank SECIHTI for the postdoctoral fellowship for A.Y.H.
The authors state that they have no financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the research presented in this paper.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1 Chalcones containing nitro groups with their biological activity.
Figure 2 Dinitrochalcones (DNCHs).
Figure 3 General reaction scheme for obtaining the 3a–e compounds.
Optimization of reaction conditions for compound 3e.
Entry | Activation Method | Reaction Conditions | Solvent | Time | Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 * | Magnetic stirring | NaOH (0.6 Equiv.), rt | Methanol | 180 | 33 |
2 * | Reflux | NaOH (2 Equiv.) | Methanol | 240 | 25 |
3 * | Reflux | K2CO3 (0.3 Equiv.) | Methanol | 240 | 29 |
4 | Ultrasound | K2CO3 (0.3 Equiv.) | Methanol | 60 | 22 |
5 | Ultrasound | K2CO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol | 60 | 25 |
6 | Ultrasound | K2CO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 60 | 52 |
7 | Ultrasound | K2CO3 (0.6 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 60 | 49 |
8 | Ultrasound | K2CO3 (0.9 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 60 | 44 |
9 | Ultrasound | Na2CO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 30 | 88 |
10 | Ultrasound | Li2CO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 30 | 48 |
11 | Ultrasound | Cs2CO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 15 | 80 |
12 | Ultrasound | CaCO3 (0.4 Equiv.) | Methanol/ | 60 | ---- |
The experiments were carried out at a temperature of 60 °C (experiments were performed in the ultrasonic bath at 60 °C, which remained a constant temperature). The reaction yields of all experiments were “isolated yields”. * Magnetic stirring.
DNCH synthesized by ultrasonication.
DNCH | Time (min) | Temperature (°C) | Yield (%) | m.p. (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
3a | 60 | 0 | 56 | 140–142 |
3b | 60 | 0 | 92 | 145–147 |
3c | 60 | 0 | 86 | 175–177 |
3d | 60 | 0 | 65 | 160–162 |
3e | 30 | 60 | 88 | 214–216 |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at
1. Campos, K.R.; Coleman, P.J.; Alvarez, J.C.; Dreher, S.D.; Garbaccio, R.M.; Terrett, N.K.; Tillyer, R.D.; Truppo, M.D.; Parmee, E.R. The Importance of Synthetic Chemistry in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Science; 2019; 363, eaat0805. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30655413]
2. Rammohan, A.; Reddy, J.S.; Sravya, G.; Rao, C.N.; Zyryanov, G.V. Chalcone Synthesis, Properties and Medicinal Applications: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett.; 2020; 18, pp. 433-458.
3. Rajendran, G.; Bhanu, D.; Aruchamy, B.; Ramani, P.; Pandurangan, N.; Bobba, K.N.; Oh, E.J.; Chung, H.Y.; Gangadaran, P.; Ahn, B.-C. Chalcone: A Promising Bioactive Scaffold in Medicinal Chemistry. Pharmaceuticals; 2022; 15, 1250. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15101250] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36297362]
4. Narwal, S.; Devi, B.; Dhanda, T.; Kumar, S.; Tahlan, S. Exploring Chalcone Derivatives: Synthesis and Their Therapeutic Potential. J. Mol. Struct.; 2024; 1303, 137554.
5. Salem, M.S.; Hussein, R.A.; El-Sayed, W.M. Substitution at Phenyl Rings of Chalcone and Schiff Base Moieties Accounts for Their Antiproliferative Activity. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. (Former. Curr. Med. Chem. Agents); 2019; 19, pp. 620-626.
6. Noriega, S.; Cardoso-Ortiz, J.; López-Luna, A.; Cuevas-Flores, M.D.R.; Flores De La Torre, J.A. The Diverse Biological Activity of Recently Synthesized Nitro Compounds. Pharmaceuticals; 2022; 15, 717. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph15060717]
7. Boguszewska-Czubara, A.; Kula, K.; Wnorowski, A.; Biernasiuk, A.; Popiołek, Ł.; Miodowski, D.; Demchuk, O.M.; Jasiński, R. Novel Functionalized β-Nitrostyrenes: Promising Candidates for New Antibacterial Drugs. Saudi Pharm. J.; 2019; 27, pp. 593-601.
8. Boguszewska-Czubara, A.; Lapczuk-Krygier, A.; Rykala, K.; Biernasiuk, A.; Wnorowski, A.; Popiolek, L.; Maziarka, A.; Hordyjewska, A.; Jasiński, R. Novel Synthesis Scheme and in Vitro Antimicrobial Evaluation of a Panel of (E)-2-Aryl-1-Cyano-1-Nitroethenes. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem.; 2016; 31, pp. 900-907.
9. Gómez-Rivera, A.; Aguilar-Mariscal, H.; Romero-Ceronio, N.; Roa-de la Fuente, L.F.; Lobato-García, C.E. Synthesis and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Three Nitro Chalcones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.; 2013; 23, pp. 5519-5522.
10. Hidalgo, A.Y.; Romero-Ceronio, N.; Lobato-García, C.E.; Herrera-Ruiz, M.; Vázquez-Cancino, R.; Peña-Morán, O.A.; Vilchis-Reyes, M.Á.; Gallegos-García, A.J.; Medrano-Sánchez, E.J.; Hernández-Abreu, O. Position Matters: Effect of Nitro Group in Chalcones on Biological Activities and Correlation via Molecular Docking. Sci. Pharm.; 2024; 92, 54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/scipharm92040054]
11. Arévalo, J.M.C.; Feuser,; Rossi, G.R.; Trindade, E.S.; da Silva Córneo, E.; Machado-de-Ávila, R.A.; Sayer, C.; Cadena, S.M.S.C.; Noleto, G.R.; Martinez, G.R. Preparation and Characterization of 4-Nitrochalcone-Folic Acid-Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Nanocapsules and Cytotoxic Activity on HeLa and NIH3T3 Cells. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.; 2019; 54, 101300.
12. Damazio, R.G.; Zanatta, A.P.; Cazarolli, L.H.; Mascarello, A.; Chiaradia, L.D.; Nunes, R.J.; Yunes, R.A.; Silva, F.R.M.B. Nitrochalcones: Potential in Vivo Insulin Secretagogues. Biochimie; 2009; 91, pp. 1493-1498. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19747522]
13. Batista, A.S.; Oliveira, S.D.S.; Pomel, S.; Commere, P.-H.; Mazan, V.; Lee, M.; Loiseau, P.M.; Rossi-Bergmann, B.; Prina, E.; Duval, R. Targeting Chalcone Binding Sites in Living Leishmania Using a Reversible Fluorogenic Benzochalcone Probe. Biomed. Pharmacother.; 2022; 149, 112784.
14. Emeri, F.T.D.S.D.; Rosalen, P.L.; Paganini, E.R.; Garcia, M.A.R.; Nazare, A.C.; Lazarini, J.G.; de Alencar, S.M.; Regasini, L.O.; Sardi, J.D.C.O. Antimicrobial Activity of Nitrochalcone and Pentyl Caffeate against Hospital Pathogens Results in Decreased Microbial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation. Biofouling; 2019; 35, pp. 129-142.
15. Leitão, E. Chalcones: Retrospective Synthetic Approaches and Mechanistic Aspects of a Privileged Scaffold. Curr. Pharm. Des.; 2020; 26, pp. 2843-2858.
16. Marotta, L.; Rossi, S.; Ibba, R.; Brogi, S.; Calderone, V.; Butini, S.; Campiani, G.; Gemma, S. The Green Chemistry of Chalcones: Valuable Sources of Privileged Core Structures for Drug Discovery. Front. Chem.; 2022; 10, 988376.
17. Rosa, G.P.; Seca, A.M.L.; Barreto, M.D.C.; Pinto, D.C.G.A. Chalcone: A Valuable Scaffold Upgrading by Green Methods. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2017; 5, pp. 7467-7480.
18. Mason, T.J. Ultrasound in Synthetic Organic Chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 1997; 26, pp. 443-451.
19. Suslick, K.S.; Price, G.J. Applications of Ultrasound to Materials Chemistry. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci.; 1999; 29, pp. 295-326.
20. Yao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Liu, S. Power Ultrasound and Its Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review. Ultrason. Sonochem.; 2020; 62, 104722.
21. Lepoint, T.; Mullie, F. What Exactly Is Cavitation Chemistry?. Ultrason. Sonochem.; 1994; 1, pp. S13-S22.
22. Martínez, R.F.; Cravotto, G.; Cintas, P. Organic Sonochemistry: A Chemist’s Timely Perspective on Mechanisms and Reactivity. J. Org. Chem.; 2021; 86, pp. 13833-13856. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156841]
23. Cravotto, G.; Cintas, P. Introduction to Sonochemistry: A Historical and Conceptual Overview. Handbook on Applications of Ultrasound: Sonochemistry for Sustainability; Chen, D.; Sharma, S.K.; Mudhoo, A. CRC Press, Inc.: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; pp. 23-40.
24. Cravotto, G.; Cintas, P. Power Ultrasound in Organic Synthesis: Moving Cavitational Chemistry from Academia to Innovative and Large-Scale Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2006; 35, pp. 180-196. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16444299]
25. Brahmachari, G.; Nayek, N.; Mandal, M.; Bhowmick, A.; Karmakar, I. Ultrasound-Promoted Organic Synthesis-A Recent Update. Curr. Org. Chem.; 2021; 25, pp. 1539-1565.
26. Gharat, N.N.; Rathod, V.K. Ultrasound-Assisted Organic Synthesis. Green Sustainable Process for Chemical And Environmental Engineering and Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 1-41.
27. Draye, M.; Chatel, G.; Duwald, R. Ultrasound for Drug Synthesis: A Green Approach. Pharmaceuticals; 2020; 13, 23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph13020023]
28. Hidalgo, A.Y.; Velasco, M.; Sánchez-Lara, E.; Gómez-Rivera, A.; Vilchis-Reyes, M.A.; Alvarado, C.; Herrera-Ruiz, M.; López-Rodríguez, R.; Romero-Ceronio, N.; Lobato-García, C.E. Synthesis, Crystal Structures, and Molecular Properties of Three Nitro-Substituted Chalcones. Crystals; 2021; 11, 1589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cryst11121589]
29. Kinkle, P.; Gibian, H. Uber Chalkone. Chem. Ber.; 1961; 94, pp. 26-38.
30. Wei, W.; Qunrong, W.; Liqin, D.; Aiqing, Z.; Duoyuan, W. Synthesis of Dinitrochalcones by Using Ultrasonic Irradiation in the Presence of Potassium Carbonate. Ultrason. Sonochem.; 2005; 12, pp. 411-414.
31. Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Green Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2010; 39, pp. 301-312.
32. Merouani, S.; Hamdaoui, O.; Rezgui, Y.; Guemini, M. Modeling of Ultrasonic Cavitation as an Advanced Technique for Water Treatment. Desalin. Water Treat.; 2015; 56, pp. 1465-1475.
33. Andrade, S.M.; Costa, S.M.B.; Pansu, R. Structural Changes in W/O Triton X-100/Cyclohexane-Hexanol/Water Microemulsions Probed by a Fluorescent Drug Piroxicam. J. Colloid. Interface Sci.; 2000; 226, pp. 260-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2000.6821]
34. Cheng, S.; Han, F.; Wang, Y.; Yan, J. Effect of Cosurfactant on Ionic Liquid Solubilization Capacity in Cyclohexane/TX-100/1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium Tetrafluoroborate Microemulsions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.; 2008; 317, pp. 457-461. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.11.021]
35. Khanal, H.D.; Perumal, M.; Lee, Y.R. Annulation Strategies for Diverse Heterocycles via the Reductive Transformation of 2-Nitrostyrenes. Org. Biomol. Chem.; 2022; 20, pp. 7675-7693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2OB01149B] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35971908]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This study describes the efficient synthesis of five dinitrochalcones (DNCHs) using an ultrasonic bath as an unconventional method to improve reaction yields and reduce reaction times. The Claisen–Schmidt condensation of nitroacetophenones and nitrobenzaldehydes was carried out in a cyclohexane–methanol solvent system under ultrasonic irradiation, achieving yields between 56% and 92%. The application of ultrasound not only accelerated the reaction but also improved the overall efficiency compared to conventional methods such as magnetic stirring. The synthesized compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, which corroborated their structures. Therefore, it is confirmed that obtaining DNCHs with a nitro group in ortho by ultrasonic irradiation is an energetically efficient and environmentally friendly alternative.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 División Académica de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carretera Cunduacán-Jalpa km 1, Col. La Esperanza, Cunduacán 86690, Tabasco, Mexico; [email protected] (Q.T.-S.); [email protected] (C.E.L.-G.); [email protected] (E.M.R.-R.); [email protected] (L.F.R.d.l.F.); [email protected] (A.G.-R.); [email protected] (M.Á.V.-R.); [email protected] (E.A.-M.); [email protected] (O.H.-A.), Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Comalcalco, Carretera Vecinal, Comalcalco-Paraíso Km 2, R/a Occidente 3ra Sección, Comalcalco 86650, Tabasco, Mexico
2 División Académica de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Carretera Cunduacán-Jalpa km 1, Col. La Esperanza, Cunduacán 86690, Tabasco, Mexico; [email protected] (Q.T.-S.); [email protected] (C.E.L.-G.); [email protected] (E.M.R.-R.); [email protected] (L.F.R.d.l.F.); [email protected] (A.G.-R.); [email protected] (M.Á.V.-R.); [email protected] (E.A.-M.); [email protected] (O.H.-A.)