1 Introduction
With the increasing adoption of cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, the incidence of IOL dislocation has become more common, with reported rates ranging from 0.1% to 3%. IOL dislocation can lead to visual impairment and other ocular symptoms, often requiring additional surgery to restore vision, which increases both the economic burden and medical risk for patients. As a result, research on the prevention, early diagnosis, and individualized surgical management of IOL dislocation remains a key focus in ophthalmology.
Studies have shown that high myopia, uveitis, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, retinitis pigmentosa, and a history of intraocular surgery may be risk factors for late-onset IOL dislocation. Intraoperative complications during primary cataract surgery, such as a small continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, capsular rupture, or zonular damage, are also considered important causes of early dislocation.
Despite these findings, studies addressing regional differences in clinical characteristics and risk factors are limited. There is also a lack of analysis regarding visual recovery and the effectiveness of different surgical approaches. This study retrospectively analyzes clinical data from patients with IOL dislocation in the Central Plains region of China, focusing on clinical features, risk factors, and postoperative visual outcomes. The goal is to provide evidence to support early identification and personalized treatment strategies for high-risk patients.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and participants
This was a retrospective observational study. A total of 155 patients (166 eyes) diagnosed with IOL dislocation between January 2016 and October 2024 were included.
Inclusion criteria:
1. (1). History of IOL implantation;
2. (2). Dislocation of the IOL or the IOL–capsular bag complex, confirmed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, ophthalmoscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), or optical coherence tomography (OCT), defined as dislocation >0.5 mm from the original position or tilt angle >7° following adequate mydriasis with tropicamide;
3. (3). Complete clinical and follow-up data, including detailed preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative records, and at least one day of postoperative follow-up;
4. (4). Normal cognitive function and the ability to cooperate with ocular examinations.
Exclusion criteria:
1. (1). Severe corneal pathology, endophthalmitis, or other uncontrolled ocular conditions preventing necessary examinations;
2. (2). Incomplete clinical data, inadequate postoperative follow-up, or failure to comply with follow-up plans resulting in missing key pre- or postoperative data.
All patient records and data were anonymized and de-identified. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (2022-KY-0006–001), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In the case of minors, written consent was obtained from their guardians.
2.2 Observational parameters
Data collected included demographics, characteristics of the dislocation, systemic and ocular comorbidities, surgical methods, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), and complications.
Hypertension was defined according to JNC8 guidelines as blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg or current use of antihypertensive medication [1]. Diabetes mellitus was defined by ADA criteria as fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL, random plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% [2].
High myopia was defined as axial length ≥25 mm. Other comorbidities were identified based on medical records. Particular attention was given to details of the initial cataract surgery, including continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) diameter <5.0 mm, capsular rupture, zonular dialysis or laxity, and use of iris hooks or capsular tension rings.
2.3 Ocular examinations
After full pupil dilation with tropicamide, slit-lamp biomicroscopy was used to observe and photograph IOL dislocation and associated signs such as nystagmus, iridodonesis, and corneal edema. AL and IOL power were measured using the IOL Master. Non-contact tonometry was used to measure IOP. UBM was employed to assess the IOL position, zonular integrity, ciliary body, and anterior chamber angle. B-scan ultrasonography, fundus photography, and OCT were used to examine the vitreous, retina, macula, and optic disc.
2.4 Surgical techniques
2.4.1 IOL repositioning.
① In-the-bag repositioning: If the IOL remained adjustable intraoperatively, a 3.0 mm clear corneal incision was made at the 10:30 position under satisfactory anesthesia. Viscoelastic material was injected into the anterior chamber, and a 1.0 mm side port was created at the 2:00 limbus. A dialing hook was used to reposition the dislocated IOL into the capsular bag. After repositioning, the viscoelastic was removed, and the incision was closed by hydration or suturing.
② Intrascleral fixation: For unstable capsular support or high risk of re-dislocation, scleral fixation was performed. The sclera at the 2:00 and 8:00 positions was exposed. An 8−0 polypropylene suture was passed through the sclera 2 mm posterior to the limbus at 8:00, entering the pupillary zone. A 29-gauge needle was introduced at the 2:00 limbus to dock the suture, which was externalized. The suture ends were pulled through the main corneal incision, trimmed, and secured to the IOL haptics. The IOL was then fixated in a Z-suture technique to the scleral layers. The corneal incision was closed with 10−0 nylon sutures, and the conjunctiva was closed with 8−0 absorbable sutures [3] (Fig 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
A. Docking of the 8−0 polypropylene suture needle with a 29-gauge needle; B. The externalized suture end at the 2:00 position is passed through one closed haptic of the IOL and tied; C. The suture end at the 8:00 position is passed through the diagonally opposite closed haptic of the IOL; D–H. Z-shaped intrascleral fixation technique [3].
2.4.2 IOL exchange.
Indicated for patients with unsuitable IOLs for scleral fixation or with refractive power errors. The original IOL was extracted through a limbal incision at the 10:30 position. Depending on the condition of the capsulorhexis, the new IOL was implanted using either anterior capsular optic capture or scleral fixation techniques, as described above. For reimplanted IOLs, all preset powers were 0°.
2.4.3 IOL explantation.
Performed in cases where ocular conditions precluded re-implantation of an IOL.
In all surgical methods, anterior vitrectomy was conducted if vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber was observed intraoperatively. Pars plana vitrectomy was combined when the IOL had dislocated into the vitreous cavity.
2.5 Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.0. Data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov or Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using independent samples t-tests. Non-normally distributed data were expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and compared using nonparametric rank-sum tests. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages and compared using the χ² test. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Result
3.1 Sociodemographic characteristics
A total of 155 patients (166 eyes) were included in this study, comprising 114 males (122 eyes) and 41 females (44 eyes), with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range: 37–64; range: 6–87 years). There was no significant difference in the age of onset between males and females (Z = –0.260, P = 0.795). The peak onset age for males was between 49 and 59 years, while for females it was between 59 and 69 years, indicating an earlier peak in males. Among all patients, 65 (41.94%) resided in rural areas and 90 (58.06%) lived in urban areas. No significant difference was observed in the urban-rural distribution.
3.2 Comorbidities
Of the 155 patients, 44 had hypertension and 16 had diabetes. High myopia was present in 64 cases (38.55%), followed by a history of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in 29 cases (17.47%) (Table 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
3.3 Personal history of unhealthy habits
A total of 41 patients (26.45%) reported unhealthy habits, including 33 (21.29%) with a smoking history ranging from 1 to 50 years (mean: 26.73 ± 13.03 years) and an average daily consumption of 16.85 ± 8.81 cigarettes. Eight patients (5.16%) were heavy drinkers with a drinking history of 10–50 years (mean: 28.75 ± 13.56 years) and an average daily alcohol intake of 112.50 ± 44.32 mL.
3.4 Characteristics of IOL dislocation
Among the 155 patients, 166 eyes exhibited IOL dislocation, with unilateral dislocation in 144 patients (144 eyes, 86.75%) and bilateral dislocation in 11 patients (22 eyes, 13.25%). Fifteen eyes (9.04%) experienced recurrent IOL dislocation. The time from the initial surgery to dislocation varied widely—from as early as 1 day postoperatively to up to 20 years. Dislocation occurred within 3 months in 18 cases (10.84%) and beyond 3 months in 148 cases (89.16%), with a mean interval of 7.57 ± 6.48 years (range: 1 day to 25 years).
Prior to dislocation, 24 patients (14.46%) reported a clear triggering factor, including trauma (15 cases, 9.04%), eye rubbing (7 cases, 4.22%), and heavy lifting (2 cases, 1.20%). After dislocation, 4 patients (2.41%) were asymptomatic, and dislocation was detected incidentally during follow-up. Ocular symptoms were reported in 162 eyes (97.59%), most commonly blurred vision alone (129 eyes, 77.71%). Other symptoms included visual instability, eye pain, photophobia, diplopia, and metamorphopsia (33 eyes, 19.88%). On examination, capsular fibrosis was observed in 44 cases (26.51%) and iris incarceration in 22 cases (13.25%). Detailed dislocation characteristics are shown in Fig 2 and Table 2.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
(A) Dislocation of the IOL-bag complex due to capsular bag necrosis syndrome. (B) Supernasal dislocation of the IOL, with invisible anterior capsulorhexis margin. (C-D) The IOL is embedded in the pupil, causing pupil deformation. (E) The IOL-bag complex dislocates anteriorly, making contact with the corneal endothelium. (F-G) Capsular contraction causes downward dislocation of the IOL-bag complex, with the white organizing membrane of the anterior capsule visible. (H) Superior dislocation of the IOL, with the inferior zonule elongated and partially ruptured.
3.5 Surgical treatments and outcomes
Of the 166 eyes, 154 underwent surgical treatment. The remaining 12 eyes did not receive surgery due to low endothelial cell counts (<500 cells/mm²) or patient concerns about surgical outcomes (Table 3). All surgeries were completed successfully without intraoperative complications.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
UDVA significantly improved after both IOL repositioning and IOL exchange procedures (P = 0.001 and P = 0.031, respectively). Comparisons of preoperative and postoperative visual acuity across different surgical methods are shown in Table 4.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
On postoperative day one, slit-lamp examination confirmed that the IOLs were well-centered, without decentration or tilt. The mean IOP was 15.50 mmHg (interquartile range: 11.75–19.00 mmHg; range: 7.00–49.00 mmHg). Elevated IOP was observed in 18 eyes (10 in the repositioning group and 8 in the exchange group), with no statistically significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (χ² = 2.751, P = 0.097). Elevated IOP was managed with anterior chamber paracentesis or intraocular pressure-lowering medications, and IOP returned to normal within 3 days in all cases.
4 Discussion
With the widespread adoption and increasing prevalence of phacoemulsification cataract surgery and IOL implantation, the incidence of partial and complete IOL dislocation has been rising in recent years. The reported incidence of IOL dislocation ranges from approximately 0.1% to 3.0% [5–7]. Once dislocation occurs, patients often experience significant visual impairment and face the risk of serious complications such as elevated intraocular pressure, retinal detachment, and vitreous hemorrhage [8–10,11]. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with IOL dislocation is critical for early diagnosis and individualized intervention. Based on eight years of clinical data, this study provides a comprehensive summary of the clinical manifestations, risk factors, and short-term postoperative outcomes of patients with IOL dislocation, offering valuable guidance for clinical practice.
The average age of patients in this study was 55 years, approximately 15 years younger than reported in previous studies [12,13]. The high incidence of high myopia, prior vitrectomy, and younger age reflect the complexity and severity of IOL dislocation cases. Gender analysis revealed a higher proportion of male patients, consistent with previous studies [14–16]. This gender difference may be attributable to both behavioral and biological factors. Trauma, a recognized cause of IOL dislocation, is more prevalent in males [17]. Another hypothesis is that males may exhibit more severe zonular weakness, though biological evidence remains limited, and further studies are required to confirm this [18]. This study further analyzed the differences in age at onset between male and female patients. Although no statistically significant difference was found, the peak age of onset occurred slightly earlier in males, suggesting the potential involvement of sex-related differences in the underlying pathological processes.
Risk factors associated with IOL dislocation include trauma (e.g., injury, repeated eye rubbing) [19–21], high myopia [9,22], prior vitrectomy [16,23,24], and previous episodes of acute glaucoma [25,26]. Among systemic conditions, hypertension, diabetes, atopic diseases, prior cholecystectomy, and coronary stent implantation were frequently observed. This suggests that these systemic diseases may affect intraocular structural stability through mechanisms such as chronic inflammation and hemodynamic alterations. The associations of diabetes [27] and atopic diseases [28] with IOL dislocation have been previously reported. Smoking, reported by one-fourth of patients in this study, is associated with structural changes in ocular tissues, such as retinal nerve fiber layer thinning [29–32] and elastic fiber damage in other organs [33], though its relationship with zonular integrity remains unexplored. This study suggests that smoking may be an underrecognized risk factor, warranting further investigation.
High myopia, noted in 64 cases (38.55%), was the most common ocular risk factor, consistent with prior studies [12,34,35]. Highly myopic eyes exhibit fundus changes (e.g., lacquer cracks, chorioretinal atrophy, posterior scleral staphyloma) and increased axial length, which exert additional stress on the zonules [36,37], increasing the risk of IOL dislocation. Prior vitrectomy was another significant risk factor [22], likely due to intraoperative zonular damage. Additionally, glaucoma was more prevalent in patients with IOL dislocation [38], potentially linked to sustained elevated IOP causing zonular fiber degeneration, ciliary body dysfunction, and reduced capsular bag support [39]. These findings align with our results, highlighting the importance of zonular and capsular stability in maintaining the IOL position.
Based on the timing of onset, IOL dislocation can be classified as early (within three months after surgery) or late (three months or more postoperatively) [40]. In this study, the mean interval between IOL implantation and dislocation surgery was 7.57 years, which aligns with previously reported data (6.9–8.5 years) [40]. Early IOL dislocation is typically associated with capsular rupture or zonular damage caused by surgical trauma, whereas late dislocation is primarily attributed to progressive zonular insufficiency [40]. In this study, 89.16% of cases were classified as late dislocations, with progressive zonular insufficiency identified as the predominant cause. The zonular fibers, which are inserted into the equatorial lens capsule, bear a limited load [41]. Age-related weakening of these fibers exacerbates their fragility, and any disruption can lead to capsular instability, causing IOL displacement or prolapse [23]. This progressive age-related zonular dysfunction accounts for the time-dependent increase in late IOL dislocations [7,42]. Capsular contraction emerged as another significant factor contributing to IOL dislocation in this study. Contraction exerts additional stress on compromised zonular fibers, leading to dislocation. While mild capsular contraction commonly occurs after IOL implantation [43], it generally does not cause dislocation unless exacerbated by underlying conditions such as uveitis [44] or retinitis pigmentosa [27]. These conditions can lead to severe capsular contraction, known as capsular contraction syndrome(CCS), which places excessive strain on the already compromised zonule [19]. CCS is strongly associated with continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. If the capsulorhexis diameter is too small, capsular fibrosis may occur [8,19], creating a “sphincter effect” around the anterior capsule opening, which intensifies capsular contraction [8]. This phenomenon is particularly severe in advanced IOL dislocation, where progressive zonular damage increases susceptibility to centripetal forces, raising the likelihood of dislocation [8]. The use of stronger sutures can mitigate suture breakage in certain cases. Replacing 10−0 polypropylene sutures with 9−0 polypropylene or 8−0 nonabsorbable sutures have been shown to reduce the incidence of suture degradation [45–47].
In this study, with the exception of 12 eyes that underwent conservative management due to specific conditions, all other cases received surgical intervention. Postoperatively, both IOL repositioning and IOL exchange procedures resulted in significant improvement in UDVA. The most common postoperative complication was transient IOP elevation, which was transient and manageable, consistent with previous studies [12,19]. This may be related to residual viscoelastic substances [48,49]. Notably, no cases of serious complications such as retinal detachment were observed, indicating a relatively high level of surgical safety.
Reports on the comparative outcomes of different surgical techniques have been inconsistent. Some previous studies suggest that IOL exchange may be more favorable than repositioning in terms of postoperative IOP control [38]. However, in this study, no significant difference in IOP outcomes was observed between the two surgical techniques. Therefore, the choice of surgical method should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and the surgeon’s expertise.
Based on real-world clinical data, this study systematically analyzed the clinical characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of IOL dislocation, providing valuable data to support the optimization of clinical management pathways and the development of risk assessment models. Nevertheless, certain limitations remain. First, although pseudoexfoliation syndrome is considered a major cause of IOL dislocation in Western populations, it was not included in this analysis due to its low prevalence in the Central China region, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, the retrospective observational design of this study carries inherent risks of selection bias and incomplete information. Future research should include large-scale, multicenter, prospective cohort studies that incorporate molecular biology and imaging techniques to further elucidate the mechanisms of IOL dislocation and explore more effective treatment strategies.
In conclusion, the findings of this study contribute to the early identification of high-risk patients, the refinement of follow-up protocols, and the development of individualized treatment plans. The results carry significant clinical and research value. Although IOL dislocation is relatively uncommon, its potential to cause severe visual impairment underscores the importance of long-term follow-up and comprehensive management for high-risk individuals.
5 Conclusion
Progressive zonular insufficiency is the leading cause of IOL dislocation, highlighting the need for early risk assessment and precise surgical management to optimize outcomes.
Supporting information
S1 File. Raw data and key statistical analysis procedures. This file contains the unprocessed raw data used in the study, the within-group rank sum test results, and the between-group Chi-square test procedures.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327210.s001
References
1. 1. Feldman H, Zuber K, Davis JS. Staying up to date with the JNC 8 hypertension guideline. JAAPA. 2014;27(8):44–9. pmid:25054794
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
2. 2. Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, Ceriello A, Del Prato S, Inzucchi SE, et al. How do we define cure of diabetes?. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2133–5. pmid:19875608
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
3. 3. Jingzhi S, Shanshan D, Fengyan Z. The efficacy of 8-0 polypropylene tortuous suture in intraocular lens suspension (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease. 2021;43(08):635–40.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
4. 4. Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg. 1997;13(4):388–91. pmid:9268940
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
5. 5. Kratz RP, Mazzocco TR, Davidson B, Colvard DM. The Shearing intraocular lens: a report of 1,000 cases. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981;7(1):55–7. pmid:7228804
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
6. 6. Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay JT, Bath PE, Jacobs ME, Murray GC, et al. The FDA report on intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(4):311–7.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
7. 7. Pueringer SL, Hodge DO, Erie JC. Risk of late intraocular lens dislocation after cataract surgery, 1980-2009: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):618–23.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
8. 8. Gimbel HV, Condon GP, Kohnen T, Olson RJ, Halkiadakis I. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: incidence, prevention, and management. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2193–204. pmid:16412938
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
9. 9. Dabrowska-Kloda K, Kloda T, Boudiaf S, Jakobsson G, Stenevi U. Incidence and risk factors of late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: evaluation of 140 eyes between 1992 and 2012. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(7):1376–82. pmid:26187678
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
10. 10. Østern AE, Sandvik GF, Drolsum L. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(2):184–91. pmid:23280186
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
11. 11. Shingleton BJ, Yang Y, O’Donoghue MW. Management and outcomes of intraocular lens dislocation in patients with pseudoexfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(7):984–93. pmid:23809944
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
12. 12. Fernández-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Pérez-Ardoy AL, Larrosa-Quesada A, Pinilla-Cortés L, Barraquer R. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation requiring explantation: risk factors and outcomes. Eye. 2013;27(7):795.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
13. 13. Liu E, Cole S, Werner L, Hengerer F, Mamalis N, Kohnen T. Pathologic evidence of pseudoexfoliation in cases of in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation or dislocation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):929–35. pmid:25935341
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
14. 14. Mönestam EI. Incidence of dislocation of intraocular lenses and pseudophakodonesis 10 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2315–20. pmid:19815277
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
15. 15. Kawano S, Takeuchi M, Tanaka S, Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Kawakami K. Current status of late and recurrent intraocular lens dislocation: analysis of real-world data in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019;63(1):65–72.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
16. 16. Lee GI, Lim DH, Chi SA, Kim SW, Shin DW, Chung TY. Risk Factors for Intraocular Lens Dislocation After Phacoemulsification: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;214:86–96.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
17. 17. Sheu S-J, Ger L-P, Ho W-L. Late increased risk of retinal detachment after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(1):113–9. pmid:19878921
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
18. 18. Matsumoto M, Yamada K, Uematsu M, Fujikawa A, Tsuiki E, Kumagami T, et al. Spontaneous dislocation of in-the-bag intraocular lens primarily in cases with prior vitrectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(3):363–7. pmid:21948026
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
19. 19. Hayashi K, Hirata A, Hayashi H. Possible predisposing factors for in-the-bag and out-of-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(5):969–75. pmid:17320961
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
20. 20. Yamazaki S, Nakamura K, Kurosaka D. Intraocular lens subluxation in a patient with facial atopic dermatitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(2):337–8. pmid:11226805
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
21. 21. Böke WR, Krüger HC. Causes and management of posterior chamber lens displacement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1985;11(2):179–84. pmid:3988619
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
22. 22. Fujikawa A, Mohamed YH, Kinoshita H, Tsuiki E, Kitaoka T. Spontaneous dislocation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):1111–7. pmid:28534232
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
23. 23. Davis D, Brubaker J, Espandar L, Stringham J, Crandall A, Werner L, et al. Late in-the-bag spontaneous intraocular lens dislocation: evaluation of 86 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):664–70. pmid:19344819
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
24. 24. Clark A, Morlet N, Ng JQ, Preen DB, Semmens JB. Long-term trends and outcomes of anterior vitrectomy in Western Australia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(1):27–32. pmid:24903558
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
25. 25. Su W-W, Chang SHL. Spontaneous, late, in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation in a patient with a previous acute angle-closure glaucoma attack. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(8):1805–7. pmid:15313313
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
26. 26. Jakobsson G, Zetterberg M, Lundström M, Stenevi U, Grenmark R, Sundelin K. Late dislocation of in-the-bag and out-of-the bag intraocular lenses: ocular and surgical characteristics and time to lens repositioning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(10):1637–44. pmid:20870107
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
27. 27. Gross JG, Kokame GT, Weinberg DV, Dislocated In-The-Bag Intraocular Lens Study Group. In-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(4):630–5. pmid:15059700
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
28. 28. Bassily R, Lencova A, Rajan MS. Bilateral rupture of the posterior capsule and intraocular lens dislocation from excessive eye rubbing. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):329–31. pmid:27026458
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
29. 29. Abdelshafy M, Abdelshafy A. Functional and Structural Changes of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Complex in Heavy Smokers. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:397–404. pmid:32103886
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
30. 30. Narnoli P, Dhasmana R, Khanduri R. Dry eye disease and retinal nerve fiber layer changes in chronic smokers. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(5):1178–82. pmid:33913855
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
31. 31. Dervişoğulları MS, Totan Y, Tenlik A, Yüce A, Güler E. Effect of smoking on retina nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer complex. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2015;34(4):282–5. pmid:25363066
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
32. 32. Li J, Yuan N, Chu WK, Cheung CY, Tang S, Li FF, et al. Exposure to secondhand smoke in children is associated with a thinner retinal nerve fiber layer: The Hong Kong children eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;223:91–9.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
33. 33. Cantor JO, Cerreta JM, Ochoa M, Ma S, Liu M, Turino GM. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronan on smoke-induced elastic fiber injury: does delayed treatment affect efficacy?. Lung. 2011;189(1):51–6. pmid:21153833
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
34. 34. Hirata A, Okinami S, Hayashi K. Occurrence of capsular delamination in the dislocated in-the-bag intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(9):1409–15. pmid:21210140
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
35. 35. Laude A, Agrawal A. Spontaneous partial dislocation of an aphakic capsular bag in high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):427–8; author reply 428-9. pmid:21241942
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
36. 36. Cheng HM, Singh OS, Kwong KK, Xiong J, Woods BT, Brady TJ. Shape of the myopic eye as seen with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(9):698–701. pmid:1437010
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
37. 37. Wilbrandt HR, Wilbrandt TH. Pathogenesis and management of the lens-iris diaphragm retropulsion syndrome during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(1):48–53. pmid:8133480
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
38. 38. Kristianslund O, Råen M, Østern AE, Drolsum L. Glaucoma and Intraocular Pressure in Patients Operated for Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;176:219–27. pmid:28167054
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
39. 39. Bochmann F, Stürmer J. Chronic and Intermittent Angle Closure Caused by In-The-Bag Capsular Tension Ring and Intraocular Lens Dislocation in Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(11):1051–5. pmid:29077625
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
40. 40. Ascaso FJ, Huerva V, Grzybowski A. Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention of Late IOL-Capsular Bag Complex Dislocation: Review of the Literature. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:805706. pmid:26798506
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
41. 41. Rohen JW. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the zonular apparatus in human and monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18(2):133–44. pmid:104933
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
42. 42. Park YM, Lee JK, Kim SH, Chung EJ. Incidence and characteristics of intraocular lens dislocation in South Korea from 2002 to 2021: A nationwide population-based study. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology: KJO. 2024;38(5):354.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
43. 43. Kato S, Suzuki T, Hayashi Y, Numaga J, Hattori T, Yuguchi T, et al. Risk factors for contraction of the anterior capsule opening after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(1):109–12.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
44. 44. Davison JA. Capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(5):582–9. pmid:8229711
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
45. 45. Byrd JM, Young MP, Liu W, Zhang Y, Tate DB, Crandall AS, et al. Long-term outcomes for pediatric patients having transscleral fixation of the capsular bag with intraocular lens for ectopia lentis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):603–9.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
46. 46. Chen Z, Zhang M, Deng M, Chen T, Chen J, Zheng J, et al. Surgical outcomes of modified capsular tension ring and intraocular lens implantation in Marfan syndrome with ectopia lentis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;11206721211012868. pmid:33887970
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
47. 47. Luebke J, Reinhard T, Agostini H, Boehringer D, Eberwein P. Long-term follow-up after scleral lens fixation in patients with Marfan syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):235. pmid:29207985
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
48. 48. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation following cataract surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2019;30(1):56.
* View Article
* Google Scholar
49. 49. Morgan RK, Skuta GL. Viscoelastic-related glaucomas. Semin Ophthalmol. 1994;9(4):229–34. pmid:10155642
* View Article
* PubMed/NCBI
* Google Scholar
Citation: Xu S, Shao J, Zhang Y, Si W, Mao Y, Du S, et al. (2025) Clinical characteristics and outcomes of intraocular lens dislocation: an eight-year retrospective study. PLoS One 20(6): e0327210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327210
About the Authors:
Su Xu
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Jingzhi Shao
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Yuhang Zhang
Roles: Methodology
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Wei Si
Roles: Methodology
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Yi Mao
Roles: Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Shanshan Du
Roles: Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Fengyan Zhang
Roles: Project administration, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4138-689X
1. Feldman H, Zuber K, Davis JS. Staying up to date with the JNC 8 hypertension guideline. JAAPA. 2014;27(8):44–9. pmid:25054794
2. Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, Ceriello A, Del Prato S, Inzucchi SE, et al. How do we define cure of diabetes?. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(11):2133–5. pmid:19875608
3. Jingzhi S, Shanshan D, Fengyan Z. The efficacy of 8-0 polypropylene tortuous suture in intraocular lens suspension (Chinese). Chinese Journal of Ocular Trauma and Occupational Eye Disease. 2021;43(08):635–40.
4. Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg. 1997;13(4):388–91. pmid:9268940
5. Kratz RP, Mazzocco TR, Davidson B, Colvard DM. The Shearing intraocular lens: a report of 1,000 cases. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981;7(1):55–7. pmid:7228804
6. Stark WJ, Worthen DM, Holladay JT, Bath PE, Jacobs ME, Murray GC, et al. The FDA report on intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology. 1983;90(4):311–7.
7. Pueringer SL, Hodge DO, Erie JC. Risk of late intraocular lens dislocation after cataract surgery, 1980-2009: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):618–23.
8. Gimbel HV, Condon GP, Kohnen T, Olson RJ, Halkiadakis I. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: incidence, prevention, and management. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(11):2193–204. pmid:16412938
9. Dabrowska-Kloda K, Kloda T, Boudiaf S, Jakobsson G, Stenevi U. Incidence and risk factors of late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation: evaluation of 140 eyes between 1992 and 2012. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(7):1376–82. pmid:26187678
10. Østern AE, Sandvik GF, Drolsum L. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(2):184–91. pmid:23280186
11. Shingleton BJ, Yang Y, O’Donoghue MW. Management and outcomes of intraocular lens dislocation in patients with pseudoexfoliation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(7):984–93. pmid:23809944
12. Fernández-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Pérez-Ardoy AL, Larrosa-Quesada A, Pinilla-Cortés L, Barraquer R. Late in-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation requiring explantation: risk factors and outcomes. Eye. 2013;27(7):795.
13. Liu E, Cole S, Werner L, Hengerer F, Mamalis N, Kohnen T. Pathologic evidence of pseudoexfoliation in cases of in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation or dislocation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):929–35. pmid:25935341
14. Mönestam EI. Incidence of dislocation of intraocular lenses and pseudophakodonesis 10 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(12):2315–20. pmid:19815277
15. Kawano S, Takeuchi M, Tanaka S, Yamashita T, Sakamoto T, Kawakami K. Current status of late and recurrent intraocular lens dislocation: analysis of real-world data in Japan. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2019;63(1):65–72.
16. Lee GI, Lim DH, Chi SA, Kim SW, Shin DW, Chung TY. Risk Factors for Intraocular Lens Dislocation After Phacoemulsification: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;214:86–96.
17. Sheu S-J, Ger L-P, Ho W-L. Late increased risk of retinal detachment after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(1):113–9. pmid:19878921
18. Matsumoto M, Yamada K, Uematsu M, Fujikawa A, Tsuiki E, Kumagami T, et al. Spontaneous dislocation of in-the-bag intraocular lens primarily in cases with prior vitrectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(3):363–7. pmid:21948026
19. Hayashi K, Hirata A, Hayashi H. Possible predisposing factors for in-the-bag and out-of-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation and outcomes of intraocular lens exchange surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(5):969–75. pmid:17320961
20. Yamazaki S, Nakamura K, Kurosaka D. Intraocular lens subluxation in a patient with facial atopic dermatitis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(2):337–8. pmid:11226805
21. Böke WR, Krüger HC. Causes and management of posterior chamber lens displacement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1985;11(2):179–84. pmid:3988619
22. Fujikawa A, Mohamed YH, Kinoshita H, Tsuiki E, Kitaoka T. Spontaneous dislocation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38(3):1111–7. pmid:28534232
23. Davis D, Brubaker J, Espandar L, Stringham J, Crandall A, Werner L, et al. Late in-the-bag spontaneous intraocular lens dislocation: evaluation of 86 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):664–70. pmid:19344819
24. Clark A, Morlet N, Ng JQ, Preen DB, Semmens JB. Long-term trends and outcomes of anterior vitrectomy in Western Australia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(1):27–32. pmid:24903558
25. Su W-W, Chang SHL. Spontaneous, late, in-the-bag intraocular lens subluxation in a patient with a previous acute angle-closure glaucoma attack. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(8):1805–7. pmid:15313313
26. Jakobsson G, Zetterberg M, Lundström M, Stenevi U, Grenmark R, Sundelin K. Late dislocation of in-the-bag and out-of-the bag intraocular lenses: ocular and surgical characteristics and time to lens repositioning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(10):1637–44. pmid:20870107
27. Gross JG, Kokame GT, Weinberg DV, Dislocated In-The-Bag Intraocular Lens Study Group. In-the-bag intraocular lens dislocation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(4):630–5. pmid:15059700
28. Bassily R, Lencova A, Rajan MS. Bilateral rupture of the posterior capsule and intraocular lens dislocation from excessive eye rubbing. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(2):329–31. pmid:27026458
29. Abdelshafy M, Abdelshafy A. Functional and Structural Changes of the Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Ganglion Cell Complex in Heavy Smokers. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:397–404. pmid:32103886
30. Narnoli P, Dhasmana R, Khanduri R. Dry eye disease and retinal nerve fiber layer changes in chronic smokers. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(5):1178–82. pmid:33913855
31. Dervişoğulları MS, Totan Y, Tenlik A, Yüce A, Güler E. Effect of smoking on retina nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer complex. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2015;34(4):282–5. pmid:25363066
32. Li J, Yuan N, Chu WK, Cheung CY, Tang S, Li FF, et al. Exposure to secondhand smoke in children is associated with a thinner retinal nerve fiber layer: The Hong Kong children eye study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;223:91–9.
33. Cantor JO, Cerreta JM, Ochoa M, Ma S, Liu M, Turino GM. Therapeutic effects of hyaluronan on smoke-induced elastic fiber injury: does delayed treatment affect efficacy?. Lung. 2011;189(1):51–6. pmid:21153833
34. Hirata A, Okinami S, Hayashi K. Occurrence of capsular delamination in the dislocated in-the-bag intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(9):1409–15. pmid:21210140
35. Laude A, Agrawal A. Spontaneous partial dislocation of an aphakic capsular bag in high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):427–8; author reply 428-9. pmid:21241942
36. Cheng HM, Singh OS, Kwong KK, Xiong J, Woods BT, Brady TJ. Shape of the myopic eye as seen with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Optom Vis Sci. 1992;69(9):698–701. pmid:1437010
37. Wilbrandt HR, Wilbrandt TH. Pathogenesis and management of the lens-iris diaphragm retropulsion syndrome during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(1):48–53. pmid:8133480
38. Kristianslund O, Råen M, Østern AE, Drolsum L. Glaucoma and Intraocular Pressure in Patients Operated for Late In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Dislocation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;176:219–27. pmid:28167054
39. Bochmann F, Stürmer J. Chronic and Intermittent Angle Closure Caused by In-The-Bag Capsular Tension Ring and Intraocular Lens Dislocation in Patients With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(11):1051–5. pmid:29077625
40. Ascaso FJ, Huerva V, Grzybowski A. Epidemiology, Etiology, and Prevention of Late IOL-Capsular Bag Complex Dislocation: Review of the Literature. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:805706. pmid:26798506
41. Rohen JW. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the zonular apparatus in human and monkey eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18(2):133–44. pmid:104933
42. Park YM, Lee JK, Kim SH, Chung EJ. Incidence and characteristics of intraocular lens dislocation in South Korea from 2002 to 2021: A nationwide population-based study. Korean Journal of Ophthalmology: KJO. 2024;38(5):354.
43. Kato S, Suzuki T, Hayashi Y, Numaga J, Hattori T, Yuguchi T, et al. Risk factors for contraction of the anterior capsule opening after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(1):109–12.
44. Davison JA. Capsule contraction syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(5):582–9. pmid:8229711
45. Byrd JM, Young MP, Liu W, Zhang Y, Tate DB, Crandall AS, et al. Long-term outcomes for pediatric patients having transscleral fixation of the capsular bag with intraocular lens for ectopia lentis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):603–9.
46. Chen Z, Zhang M, Deng M, Chen T, Chen J, Zheng J, et al. Surgical outcomes of modified capsular tension ring and intraocular lens implantation in Marfan syndrome with ectopia lentis. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;11206721211012868. pmid:33887970
47. Luebke J, Reinhard T, Agostini H, Boehringer D, Eberwein P. Long-term follow-up after scleral lens fixation in patients with Marfan syndrome. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):235. pmid:29207985
48. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Early postoperative intraocular pressure elevation following cataract surgery. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. 2019;30(1):56.
49. Morgan RK, Skuta GL. Viscoelastic-related glaucomas. Semin Ophthalmol. 1994;9(4):229–34. pmid:10155642
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2025 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and short-term visual outcomes following surgical management of intraocular lens (IOL) dislocation, aiming to inform risk stratification and individualized treatment strategies.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 155 patients (166 eyes) diagnosed with IOL dislocation between 2016 and 2024. Data collected included demographic information, ocular and systemic risk factors, surgical interventions, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) before and after surgery, and postoperative complications. Comparative analyses were performed to assess the short-term efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches.
Results
The mean patient age was 55 years, with 86.75% presenting unilateral dislocation. Predominant risk factors identified were high myopia (38.55%) and prior vitrectomy (17.47%). A total of 89.16% of IOL dislocations were classified as late-onset. Of the 154 eyes that underwent surgical intervention, both IOL repositioning and exchange procedures resulted in significant improvements in UDVA (P < 0.05). Postoperative transient intraocular pressure elevations were observed without significant differences between surgical methods, resolving within three days in all cases.
Conclusion
High myopia and prior vitrectomy are significant risk factors for IOL dislocation. Surgical correction, whether through repositioning or exchange, is effective and safe, leading to substantial visual acuity improvements. Proactive identification and management of high-risk individuals are crucial for preventing IOL dislocation and optimizing patient outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer