It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Background
Medical educationists are concerned that the retention of basic science concepts weakens beyond the early years of medical programs, with clinicians rarely using basic sciences in clinical practice. This study was conducted to evaluate the knowledge retention of physiology courses in medical students at Kerman University of Medical Sciences.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study at Kerman University of Medical Sciences. A retention test was conducted in physiology courses using multiple-choice questions. This study included 104 medical students who had completed their basic science courses. The students were in physiopathology, internship, and clerkship were selected. The mean and standard deviation were applied to analyze the data, and a two-sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, was performed with a significance level of P-value < 0.05.
Results
The results of this study in retention test scores showed that lost knowledge was revealed throughout the years. Additionally, the results showed that in three subjects—gastrointestinal, nervous system, and respiratory—the scores of students in Y1 were higher than those of students in other years. In the course of endocrinology, the highest mean score belonged to the students who entered medical school in Y4, and the difference in mean scores among the different groups was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean scores in the urinary system course achieved by the medical students are presented, with students who entered medical school in Y3 having the highest mean scores compared to those in other years.
Conclusions
The key takeaway is that knowledge retention is not passive; it requires active reinforcement through educational strategies. By prioritizing active learning, integrating clinical relevance, and leveraging strategies like retrieval practice and spaced learning, medical educators can enhance long-term retention and better prepare students for clinical practice.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer