It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In the era of energy conservation and carbon reduction, simulations and analyses were carried out on three typical building types—office buildings, hotel buildings, and commercial buildings—in hot summer and cold winter zones, China, using Ladybug tools based on the Grasshopper platform. The energy consumption benefits and static payback periods for different retrofit technologies were compared. The results show that retrofitting a domestic hot water system is highly suitable for hotel buildings. Retrofitting the lift system is highly suitable for commercial buildings. A comprehensive evaluation of improving the thermal performance of the transparent building envelope, replacing lighting fixture, and improving the efficiency of chiller units shows good suitability for all three building types.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer