Abstract
The United States is witnessing rapid growth in multiracial populations, yet the social mechanisms producing health disparities between multiracial and monoracial groups remain poorly understood. Using the nationally representative Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2001–2012, N = 4,363,547), we examine mental and physical health outcomes through self-reported measures of poor mental and physical health days, systematically investigating four pathways potentially explaining multiracial-monoracial health disparities: 1) socioeconomic status, 2) early life adversity, 3) race-related experiences, and 4) health behaviors. Results based on negative binomial regressions and Karlson-Holm-Breen mediation tests reveal that Black multiracial, American Indian or Alaska Native multiracial, and Other multiracial individuals report worse mental and physical health despite higher socioeconomic status compared to their monoracial counterparts. Among Asian multiracial individuals, worse health outcomes compared to monoracial peers are partially attributed to socioeconomic factors and health behaviors. Across all multiracial groups, health disadvantages are largely explained by differences in early life social conditions, particularly exposure to family instability and adverse childhood experiences. Unexpectedly, race-related experiences show suppression rather than mediation effects, suggesting that accounting for discrimination actually increases observed health gaps. Our findings demonstrate how non-socioeconomic pathways, particularly early life adversity, play crucial roles in producing health disparities in an increasingly diverse society.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Tarrence, Jacob 3 ; Zheng, Hui 4 ; Qian, Zhenchao 5 1 University of Arizona, School of Sociology, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)
2 Purdue University, Department of Sociology, West Lafayette, USA (GRID:grid.169077.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 2197); The University of Chicago, Knowledge Lab, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
3 Oregon Department of Human Services and Oregon Health Authority, Office of Forecasting, Research and Analysis, Salem, USA (GRID:grid.238692.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0456 1067)
4 Ohio State University, Department of Sociology, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.261331.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2285 7943); University of Toronto, Department of Sociology, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
5 Brown University, Department of Sociology, Providence, USA (GRID:grid.40263.33) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9094)




