Introduction
Lignin, a structural polymer in plant biomass that is considered the second most abundant biopolymer after cellulose, represents an important renewable carbon source1. Chemical depolymerization of lignin generates various phenolic acid compounds, which can be used as feedstocks for bioproduction of valuable chemicals2, 3–4. These lignin-related phenolic acid structures include hydroxybenzoates (4-hydroxybenzoate, vanillate, gallate, and syringate) and hydroxycinnamates (p-coumarate and ferulate)5. Soil Pseudomonas species have native metabolic capabilities to process benzoate, 4-hydroxybenzoate (4HB), vanillate (VAN), gallate, p-coumarate (COU), and ferulate (FER)6. Of particular interest is Pseudomonas putida KT2440, which is extensively explored as a chassis for biotechnology7, 8, 9, 10–11, including notably the bioconversion of lignin-derived aromatics12,13. Encoded in P. putida KT2440 are pathways for the catabolism of hydroxybenzoates and hydroxycinnamates involving ortho-cleavage of the intermediate protocatechuate (PCA) through β-ketoadipate to generate carbon influx into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in the central carbon metabolism6 (Fig. 1A). In the peripheral pathways upstream of β-ketoadipate, the uptake and catabolism of hydroxycinnamates (COU and FER) and hydroxybenzoates (4HB and VAN) to PCA are catalyzed by a series of enzymes with distinct cofactor specificities6,13, 14, 15, 16–17 (Fig. 1A). Previous metabolic engineering of P. putida targeted directing carbon influx from phenolic carbons from initial catabolism towards desired products such as PCA, vanillin, β-ketoadipate, muconic acid, pyridine 2,4-dicarboxylic acid, adipic acid, indigoidine, free fatty acids and polyhydroxyalkanoates18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30–31. Metabolic bottlenecks, which were inferred from extracellular accumulation of VAN in FER-fed cells or of 4HB in COU-fed cells21,29,30,32, 33–34, could not be overcome completely via genetic engineering due to cofactor deficiency21,30,32. Therefore, metabolic engineering to enhance phenolic carbon conversion must address appropriate cofactor supply. However, largely lacking is a quantitative understanding of how the native metabolic network in P. putida KT2440 couples carbon fluxes from phenolic acid structures with required cofactor production.
Fig. 1 Intracellular evidence of bottleneck nodes in initial catabolic pathways of phenolic acid substrates. [Images not available. See PDF.]
A Schematic illustration of cofactor investment and production in the peripheral pathway and central carbon metabolism. B Intracellular levels of metabolites involved in FER and VAN utilization in the coniferyl branch; the colored arrows indicate the catabolic entry of the different substrates, blue arrow for FER and orange arrow for VAN. C Intracellular levels of intermediates involved in COU and 4HB utilization; the colored arrows indicate the catabolic entry of the different substrates, blue arrow for COU and orange arrow for 4HB. In A, the white crosses are to represent the reported lack of carbon flux through the oxPPP and Entner–Doudoroff pathway during gluconeogenetic substrate metabolism48; the oxPPP reactions91 were therefore not involved in cofactor production during the metabolism of the phenolic acids. Only NADH was reported to be produced during formaldehyde and formate oxidation based on previous studies92,93. In B, C red bowties indicate the identified bottlenecks. B.D. below detection limit. FER ferulate, FER-CoA feruloyl-CoA, COU p-coumarate, COU-CoA p-coumaroyl-CoA, GSH glutathione, GSSG glutathione disulfide. Data in (B, C) are shown as mean ± standard deviation of four independent biological replicates (n = 4).
Metabolic flux modeling or fluxomics constrained by 13C-metabolomics data provides quantitative analysis of carbon fluxes35, 36, 37, 38, 39–40. Previous 13C-fluxomics studies of P. putida focused on glycolytic metabolism for sugars (i.e., glucose, xylose) or gluconeogenic metabolism for succinate (SUC)41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50–51. The only two fluxomics studies of aromatic carbon metabolism in P. putida, for benzoate alone or with glucose as a co-substrate41,52, both illustrated the activation of the glyoxylate shunt, which conserved carbon by channeling isocitrate away from the canonical decarboxylation steps in the TCA cycle. Flux through the glyoxylate shunt can feed into malic enzyme for NADPH generation, or malate dehydrogenase, for NADH or ubiquinol generation. Interestingly, for benzoate catabolism, the flux through malate dehydrogenase was either 3-fold higher than the flux through malic enzyme or there was only flux through malate dehydrogenase, both of which would be advantageous to satisfy the NADH demand for benzoate catabolism through the catechol pathway in P. putida41,52. For the catabolism of hydroxybenzoate and hydroxycinnamate structures, which is funneled through PCA instead of catechol, it remains unknown how metabolic fluxes would be partitioned in P. putida to optimize the catabolic pathways with cofactor supply (Fig. 1A).
While ATP in aerobic bacteria is generated primarily through oxidative phosphorylation of NADH produced in glycolysis and the TCA cycle53, the supply of NADPH required for biosynthesis and stress tolerance is produced from different metabolic routes. During growth on glucose, NADPH production in P. putida includes the important involvement of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase in the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (oxPPP)44,47. However, minimal to no flux through oxPPP was reported during growth on two gluconeogenic substrates (SUC or benzoate)48,52. Instead, gluconeogenic metabolism in P. putida was reported to rely on high flux through isocitrate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme in the TCA cycle to produce NADPH, and on transhydrogenase reactions to generate NADPH from excess NADH pool48. Whether P. putida would rely on similar metabolic routing or energetic bypass for NADPH production during phenolic acid utilization remains to be elucidated.
The cataplerotic and anaplerotic nodes, which distribute respectively carbon fluxes from the TCA cycle to gluconeogenesis and from lower glycolysis to the TCA cycle54, have implications for cofactor balance (Fig. 1A). In the cataplerotic direction, due to lack of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxykinase for the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate (OAA) to PEP55, P. putida KT2440 must rely on either malic enzyme to convert malate to pyruvate with NADPH production or OAA decarboxylase to convert OAA to pyruvate with no cofactor involved56. In the anaplerotic direction, pyruvate carboxylation to OAA consumes ATP, while PEP carboxylation to OAA has no cofactor input56. It remains unclear how P. putida KT2440 would distribute carbon fluxes between cataplerosis and anaplerosis to meet the demand for reducing equivalents and energy required for phenolic carbon catabolism.
Here, our central hypothesis was that remodeling of metabolic nodes into and within the TCA cycle by P. putida KT2440 would establish the fluxes of NAD(P)H and ATP to satisfy the cofactor demands in the p-coumaroyl and coniferyl pathways (Fig. 1A). We tested our hypothesis by employing genetic engineering, metabolomics profiling, whole-cell proteomics, kinetic 13C-metabolomics, and 13C-fluxomics during feeding of P. putida KT2440 on FER, COU, VAN, or 4HB as the sole carbon source, compared to SUC as non-aromatic substrate reference. First, using quantitative metabolomics for cofactor profiling in wild-type and mutant strains, we investigated how the cellular energy state would be influenced by alterations in the aromatic carbon influx due to overexpression of key bottleneck-relevant genes. Second, to elucidate the metabolic network that underlies the cellular energy state, we profiled protein levels to identify metabolic remodeling nodes and verify these nodes using kinetic 13C-profiling in metabolites coupled with 13C-carbon mapping. Third, we integrated the proteomics and 13C-metabolomics data to perform 13C-fluxomics to map quantitatively carbon fluxes throughout the metabolic network. Fourth, we leveraged the quantitative flux analysis to determine production and consumption rates of cofactors and evaluate metabolic flux controls on cofactor maintenance during conversion of the different lignin-derived phenolic acid compounds. This research provides the first quantitative mapping of the relationship between carbon metabolism and energy metabolism in P. putida KT2440 utilizing different hydroxycinnamate and hydroxybenzoate substrates, thereby guiding the predictions of cofactor balancing required during engineering of metabolic pathways for lignin valorization.
Results
Favorable cellular energy balance is sustained despite bottleneck nodes in native catabolism
Bottlenecks were proposed previously at three nodes in initial phenolic acid catabolism, based on extracellular metabolic overflow in exponentially growing cells: the VanAB node in the coniferyl branch21,29, the PobA node in the p-coumaroyl branch21,30,32, and the PcaHG node downstream of both branches29 (Fig. 1A). Here, we obtained direct evidence using intracellular metabolomics analysis and 13C kinetic isotopic profiling of exponentially growing cells to confirm the three reported bottlenecks (at VanAB, PobA, and PcaHG nodes) and identify one additional bottleneck at the Vdh node (Fig. 1B, C; Supplementary Information (SI), Fig. S1).
In the coniferyl branch, bottleneck at the Vdh node was characterized by a 20-fold and 4-fold higher intracellular vanillin concentration (4.3 ± 0.5 µmol gCDW−1) relative to its precursor feruloyl-CoA (0.2 ± 0.03 µmol gCDW−1) and its downstream metabolite vanillate (1.1 ± 0.2 µmol gCDW−1), respectively; further downstream, PCA was below the detection limit of 0.1 µM (Fig. 1B). This bottleneck was further illustrated by 50% lower incorporation of 13C-FER in vanillin compared to feruloyl-CoA within 1 min of isotope switch (P < 0.05) (SI, Fig. S1). Even with VAN as the direct carbon source, PCA level remained low (0.8 ± 0.1 µmol gCDW−1), in accordance with inefficient VAN conversion to intracellular PCA by VanAB (Fig. 1B). In the p-coumaroyl branch, in line with the reported bottleneck node at PobA21,30,32, there was a high intracellular 4HB level (18.1 ± 7.6 µmol gCDW−1) during COU catabolism, while 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (4HBA) level was 67% lower (P < 0.05) and PCA level was below the detection limit (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, consistent with this bottleneck at PobA, there was 31% smaller fraction of 13C-COU carbons in 4HB than in 4HBA within 1 min (P < 0.01) (SI, Fig. S1). During growth on 4HB, PCA accumulated (19.8 ± 5.4 µmol gCDW−1), in accordance with the reported bottleneck at PcaHG (Fig. 1C)29.
Towards resolving the bottlenecks in the coniferyl branch, we constructed four mutant strains: RW124 with vanAB overexpression, RW125 with combined overexpression of vanAB and pcaHG, RW127 with overexpression of vdh, and RW126 with stacked overexpression of vdh, vanAB, and pcaHG (Fig. 2A). Overexpression of vdh (strain RW127) led to an 80% decrease in vanillin and a 24-fold increase in VAN (P < 0.001), indicating that addressing the bottleneck at Vdh triggered a downstream bottleneck at VanAB (Fig. 2B). Compared to metabolite levels in RW127 fed on FER, a decreased VAN level (by 93%, P < 0.001) in RW126 indicated simultaneous alleviation of the bottlenecks at both Vdh and VanAB (Fig. 2B). Compared to the wild-type strain grown on VAN, the unchanged intracellular PCA level in RW124 and depletion of PCA (by 83%, P < 0.001) in RW125 demonstrated efficient PCA cleavage and thus elimination of the bottleneck at PcaHG during VAN catabolism (Fig. 2C). Cellular energy charge was 25–44% lower in the mutant strains in the coniferyl branch compared to the wild-type strain (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B, C; SI, Table S1).
To resolve the bottlenecks in the p-coumaroyl branch, we prepared three mutant strains that overexpressed either pobA (RW128), pcaHG (RW123), or both pobA and pcaHG (RW129) (Fig. 2D). Compared to the wild-type strain, the bottlenecks were resolved in RW128 and RW123, characterized by a 90% decrease in 4HB during growth on COU and a 50% decrease in PCA during growth on 4HB (P < 0.05), respectively (Fig. 2E, F). Similar to the coniferyl branch, the energy charge of the mutants of the p-coumaroyl branch was 32–40% lower than in the wild-type stain (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2E, F; SI and Table S1).
Fig. 2 Resolved bottleneck nodes in initial catabolism and unfavorable cellular energy state indicated by decreased energy charge values. [Images not available. See PDF.]
A Targeted nodes in the coniferyl branch for gene overexpression. Intracellular metabolite levels and energy charge in the wild-type and mutant strains during feeding on B FER and C VAN. D Targeted nodes in the p-coumaroyl branch for gene overexpression. Intracellular metabolite levels and energy charge in the wild-type and mutant strains during feeding on E COU and F 4HB. FER-CoA feruloyl-CoA, COU-CoA p-coumaroyl-CoA. In B, C, and E, one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test to determine the significance. In F, unpaired t-test was performed to evaluate the significance. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) are denoted by a change in letter. Data in B, C, E, and F are shown as mean ± standard deviation of four independent biological replicates (n = 4).
In sum, alleviation of native metabolite buildups in initial substrate catabolism led to adverse change in the cellular energy charge, thereby implying an interplay between the regulation of phenolic carbon influx and cofactor balance and a potential energy burden caused by gene overexpression50. It remains to be investigated whether this metabolic burden could be overcome through alternative genetic engineering approaches, such as tuning of the ribosomal binding site or chromosomal integration. Interestingly, when we compared growth phenotypes of the P. putida KT2440 cells on FER, COU, VAN, or 4HB to reported growth phenotype on SUC (a nonaromatic substrate ref. 48), the biomass yield of P. putida was similar across all five substrates (P = 0.64–0.99), despite the differences in growth and substrate depletion rates (SI, Fig. S2). However, we obtained 25–31% higher energy charge when the wild-type cells were grown on the phenolic substrates compared to growth on SUC (P < 0.001) (SI, Fig. S2). These data further implied that carbon influx during phenolic acid assimilation was optimized for a favorable cellular energy charge. Towards understanding the metabolic mechanisms underlying native cofactor balance, we investigated protein levels, metabolite pools, and the network of carbon fluxes during processing of the different phenolic acid compounds.
Abundances of transporters and specialized enzymes are modulated to adapt to phenolic carbon influx
We obtained whole-cell proteomics data to compare the abundance of proteins involved in membrane transport, the coniferyl branch, the p-coumaroyl branch, and the central carbon metabolism in P. putida cells fed on each phenolic substrate relative to cells fed on SUC (Fig. 3). For each of the four biological replicates across the five growth substrates, we employed a high-resolution proteomics method to capture over 4300 proteins out of the 5950 total proteins encoded by P. putida KT2440, including low-abundance proteins that are typically undetected (SI, Table S2). In agreement with the assignment of HcnK as the common transporter for hydroxycinnamate uptake to both the coniferyl and p-coumaroyl branches13, abundance of HcnK was 700-fold greater in P. putida cells fed with FER or COU relative to SUC (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3). The HcnK abundance was also 9-fold to 13-fold higher in cells grown on VAN and 4HB relative to SUC (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3), indicating that the abundance of this transporter was also induced by downstream metabolites in the pathways. For the VAN transporter VanK13, its abundance was 830-fold higher in cells fed with VAN or FER compared to SUC (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3), consistent with the dependence of VanK level on the presence of VAN either as a substrate or as an intermediate in FER catabolism (Fig. 1A). Similarly, the abundance of the 4HB transporter PcaK was increased to similar extent (>140-fold) during growth across all four phenolic substrates compared to growth on SUC, in accordance with PcaK serving also as a transporter of PCA13,16, a common downstream intermediate in both the coniferyl and p-coumaroyl branches (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3).
Fig. 3 Co-regulation of initial catabolism and selective remodeling nodes in central carbon metabolism. [Images not available. See PDF.]
Log2 fold change in protein abundance in A the peripheral pathways, B formaldehyde oxidation pathway, and C central carbon metabolism during feeding on each phenolic acid substrate compared to SUC. In B, Only NADH was reported to be produced during formaldehyde and formate oxidation based on previous studies92,93. HcnK hydroxycinnamic acid transporter, VanK vanillate transporter, PcaK 4-hydroxybenzoate/protocatechuate transporter, Fcs feruloyl-CoA synthase, Ech feruloyl-CoA hydratase-lyase, Vdh vanillin dehydrogenase, VanAB vanillate O-demethylase, PobA 4-hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase, PcaH protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase beta chain, PcaG protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase alpha chain, PcaC 4-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase, PcaB 3-carboxy-cis,cis-muconate cycloisomerase, PcaD 3-oxoadipate enol-lactonase, PcaIJ 3-oxoadipate CoA-transferase, PcaF betaketoadipyl-CoA thiolase, FrmA formaldehyde dehydrogenase, FdhA formaldehyde dehydrogenase, FmdEFGH formate dehydrogenase, FdhDE formate dehydrogenase, FdoHGI formate dehydrogenase, Gor glutathione reductase, Fbp fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, Pgi glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, Fba fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase, TktA transketolase, TpiA triosephosphate isomerase, Gap glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Eno enolase, Pgm phosphoglucomutase, Pyk pyruvate kinase, PpsA phosphoenolpyruvate synthase, Ppc phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, OACD oxaloacetate decarboxylase, AceEF pyruvate dehydrogenase, PycAB Pyruvate carboxylase, MaeB malic enzyme, GltA citrate synthase, Acn aconitate hydratase, IDH isocitrate dehydrogenase, SucAB oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, SucCD succinyl-CoA ligase, FumC fumarate hydratase, Mqo malate:quinone oxidoreductase, Mdh malate dehydrogenase, AceA isocitrate lyase, GlcB malate synthase. Metabolite abbreviations: G6P glucose-6-phosphate, F6P fructose-6-phosphate, FBP fructose-1,6-bisphosphate, Xu5P xylulose-5-phosphate, GAP glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, DHAP dihydroxyacetone phosphate, 3PG 3-phosphoglycerate, PEP phosphoenolpyruvate, PYR pyruvate, CIT citrate, ICIT isocitrate, AKG alpha-ketoglutarate, FUM fumarate, MAL malate, OAA oxaloacetate. Only NADH is produced during formaldehyde and formate oxidation based on previous studies92,93. Data of the protein abundances and metabolite levels from four independent biological replicates (n = 4) are provided in SI, Tables S3 and S4. The full dataset of proteomics is provided in Supplementary Data 1.
After substrate uptake, a series of cofactor-dependent enzymes are involved in the initial catabolism (Fig. 3A). Compared to SUC-fed cells, the abundances of Fcs, Ech, and Vdh, which collectively catalyze the conversion of FER to VAN or COU to 4HB, were up to 590-fold higher in cells fed on FER or COU, but remained unchanged in cells grown on VAN or 4HB (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3). The abundance of VanAB, which catalyzes O-demethylation of VAN to produce PCA and formaldehyde, was up to 2700-fold higher in cells grown on FER or VAN compared to SUC; the corresponding increase during feeding on COU and 4HB was 60-fold (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3). To avoid the accumulation of toxic formaldehyde, P. putida can oxidize formaldehyde to CO2 via formate as an intermediate using formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FrmA, FdhA) and formate dehydrogenase (Fdh, Fmd, Fdo) (Fig. 3B; SI, Table S3)57. Accordingly, relative to SUC-grown cells, the abundance of FrmA and FdhD was up to 40-fold higher in cells grown on FER or VAN, but remained unchanged in cells grown on COU or 4HB (Fig. 3B; SI and Table S3). Related to stress tolerance strategies58,59, abundance of TtgABC efflux pump was 3-fold higher in VAN-grown cells compared to SUC-fed cells (SI, Table S3), suggesting its involvement in formaldehyde tolerance. For the conversion of 4HB to PCA, the abundance of PobA was up to 3100-fold higher during feeding on COU or 4HB relative to SUC feeding; the corresponding change was up to 550-fold higher in cells grown on FER or VAN (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3).
Taken together, the increased abundance of the initial catabolic enzymes across all substrates implied co-regulation in the utilization of the different phenolic acid substrates. In fact, compared to growth on SUC, the levels of enzymes (PcaHGBCDJIF) involved in the ortho-cleavage of PCA via the β-ketoadipate pathway showed 40-fold to 500-fold increase during growth on the four phenolic substrates (Fig. 3A; SI, Table S3). Importantly, the β-ketoadipate pathway generates SUC and acetyl-CoA as additional carbon influxes into the TCA cycle compared to metabolism of SUC alone (Fig. 3A). Next, we evaluated changes in protein abundances in the central carbon metabolism (Fig. 3C).
Fluxes through β-ketoadipate pathway and enhanced anaplerosis promote carbon retention in the TCA cycle
Only three nodes in central carbon metabolism showed greater than 2-fold changes in protein abundances during growth on the phenolic substrates relative to growth on SUC. First, we observed 2.5-fold to 6-fold more abundant pyruvate carboxylase (Pyc), which catalyzes the anaplerotic reaction of pyruvate carboxylation to OAA, while there was little to no change (<2-fold) in the abundance of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (Ppc), which catalyzes the other anaplerotic reaction of PEP carboxylation, suggesting a dominant role of Pyc during growth on the phenolic acid compounds (Fig. 3C; SI, Table S3). Second, the two enzymes (AceA and GlcB) involved in the glyoxylate shunt were 2-fold to 30-fold more abundant (Fig. 3C; SI, Table S3). Third, the abundance of AceE and AceF, which catalyze pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, was up to 6-fold lower in cells fed on FER or COU, potentially due to the additional influx of acetyl-CoA from the hydroxycinnamate substrates. To corroborate the metabolic remodeling inferred from the proteomics data, we performed kinetic 13C-profiling of P. putida KT2440 cells switched from unlabeled substrates to 50% phenyl-13C6-FER, phenyl-13C6-COU, phenyl-13C6-VAN, phenyl-13C6-4HB, or U13C4-SUC (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4 Kinetic 13C-profiling and carbon mapping of metabolic flux partitioning revealed metabolic remodeling nodes in the central carbon metabolism. [Images not available. See PDF.]
A Schematic illustration of kinetic isotope incorporation experiment using 50% 13C-labeled substrates. B Kinetic 13C-profiling of central carbon metabolites. C Contribution from pyruvate versus malate to the oxaloacetate pool determined by carbon mapping when cells were grown on 50% 13C-labeled phenolic substrates or SUC. Isotopologues of TCA cycle intermediates predicted by carbon mapping when assuming D 100% canonical TCA cycle and E 100% glyoxylate shunt. Kinetic 13C-profiling of dihydroxyacetone phosphate, PEP, alpha-ketoglutarate, and sedoheptulose-7-phosphate are provided in SI, Fig. S5. We presented the data in B as individual data points in three independent biological replicates (n = 3), some of the data points are invisible due to the highly reproducibility among replicates. Values of individual data points for kinetic 13C-metabolomics are provided in Supplementary Data 2. Asp aspartate, other abbreviations of metabolites are the same as shown in Fig. 3.
The kinetic 13C-profiling of intracellular metabolites captured the assimilation of substrate carbons in specific metabolic pathways. The slower incorporation of 13C into the coniferyl branch relative to the p-coumaroyl branch was consistent with up to 58% slower uptake rates of the respective substrates (SI, Figs. S1 and S2). After 1 min, the 13C-labeled fractions of the intracellular SUC were at up to 24% in cells grown on FER and VAN, but at up to 52% in cells grown on COU and 4HB (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B). The 13C-labeled fraction of acetyl-CoA in cells grown on the hydroxycinnamates (FER and COU) was up to 50% lower than in cells grown on the hydroxybenzoates (VAN and 4HB) (P < 0.05), due to the production of unlabeled acetyl-CoA via Ech-mediated reaction on the hydroxycinnamates (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, consistent with the additional acetyl-CoA influx from the β-ketoadipate pathway, 13C-labeled acetyl-CoA was predominantly doubly 13C-labeled (>90%) during growth on the phenolic substrates (Fig. 4B). Despite similar substrate uptake rates, ¹³C-labeled fraction within 15 s was up to 2-fold higher in 4HB-grown cells (P < 0.01), confirming exceptionally high TCA cycle flux for 4HB assimilation (Fig. 4B). We further confirmed metabolic remodeling through carbon mapping combined with ¹³C-metabolomics (Fig. 4C–E).
Regarding metabolic remodeling through anaplerosis inferred from changes of Pyc abundance, we determined the relative fraction of OAA derived from pyruvate by tracking triply 13C-labeled OAA (via aspartate labeling), which would be generated only from the carboxylation of triply 13C-labeled pyruvate by unlabeled CO2 (Fig. 4C). At the plateau of the kinetic 13C data, we recorded 38% triply 13C-labeled pyruvate and 6% triply 13C-labeled aspartate in the SUC-fed cells (Fig. 4B), reflecting that 16% of OAA was derived from pyruvate (Fig. 4C), consistent with previous flux analysis60. However, the isotopologue profiling in cells fed on the phenolic substrates revealed 30–45% of OAA derived from pyruvate (Fig. 4C), thus highlighting the increase in Pyc-catalyzed pyruvate carboxylation to OAA (i.e., anaplerosis) implied by the proteomics data.
To verify metabolic remodeling through the glyoxylate shunt, we illustrated carbon mapping for two scenarios. In one scenario, the metabolite SUC generated exclusively through the canonical TCA cycle with no flux through the glyoxylate shunt would result in non-labeled, singly 13C-labeled, triply 13C-labeled, and fully 13C-labeled SUC after one cycle of carbon mapping (Fig. 4D); an additional cycle would generate the same isotopologues (SI, Fig. S4). In another scenario, the glyoxylate shunt in the TCA cycle would generate doubly 13C-labeled SUC through isocitrate lyase (AceA) (Fig. 4E). Detection of this doubly 13C-labeled isotopologue only in the cells fed on the phenolic substrates confirmed the activation of the glyoxylate shunt during the metabolism of these substrates (Fig. 4B). Taken collectively, the findings from both the proteomics data and the 13C-metabolomics data delineated the operational metabolic network for phenolic acid utilization. To gain quantitative insights into the carbon and energy fluxes through the metabolic network, we performed 13C-fluxomics to obtain the fluxes through the different metabolic reactions and subsequently mapped out the cofactor balancing.
Remodeling of TCA cycle-associated fluxes sustains required cofactor balancing and ATP surplus
The algorithm for the 13C-fluxomics of each of the four phenolic acid substrates was constrained by biomass growth rates, substrate depletion rates, metabolite secretion rates, intracellular metabolite levels, and kinetic 13C-profiling of metabolites (Fig. 5A–D). Relative to SUC metabolism, the phenolic substrates generate influxes of acetyl-CoA from both the aromatic cleavage through the β-ketoadipate pathway and the acryl group in the hydroxycinnamates (FER and COU) (Fig. 1A). Consequently, the citrate synthase flux, which combines OAA with acetyl-CoA to form citrate, was up to 2-fold higher for the catabolism of the hydroxycinnamate compounds (FER and COU) than for the catabolism of the hydroxybenzoate compounds (VAN and 4HB) (Fig. 5A–D). Accordingly, citrate and alpha-ketoglutarate levels were up to 10-fold and 7-fold higher (P < 0.001), respectively, in cells grown on phenolic substrates than on SUC, implying high carbon flux towards the high energy-producing side of the TCA cycle (SI, Table S4). Notably, flux through the glyoxylate shunt was determined to be 2.5-fold to 13-fold higher during metabolism of the hydroxycinnamates than the hydroxybenzoates (Fig. 5A–D), consistent with our proteomics data on the relative abundance of AceA in the glyoxylate shunt during growth on the different types of phenolic acid substrates (Fig. 3C; SI, Table S3).
Fig. 5 Quantitative flux analysis of the reaction network in phenolic acid metabolism revealed structure of the cataplerosis-anaplerosis nodes to sustain high flux in the TCA cycle. [Images not available. See PDF.]
Metabolic flux analysis of P. putida KT2440 grown on A FER, B COU, C VAN, and D 4HB as the sole carbon source constrained by proteomics, metabolite pool sizes, and 13C metabolomics data. E Correlation matrices of relative flux changes versus relative protein abundance changes. All fluxes are normalized to the substrate uptake rate (q). The weight of arrows is relative to flux magnitude. Relative flux changes between cells grown on the phenolic substrates and SUC are denoted by a blue-black-red color scheme. Increased flux is shown in shades of red, decreased flux is shown in shades of blue, and black indicates negligible differences in flux values. The yellow arrows represent fluxes that are predicted to be only in phenolic acid catabolism. The gray arrow represents metabolite secretion. Flux model of P. putida grown on SUC is provided in SI, Fig. S6. The complete flux estimations are provided in Supplementary Data 3. Abbreviations of metabolites are the same as shown in the main text.
With respect to the flux remodeling at the cataplerosis-anaplerosis nodes, the cataplerotic flux through malic enzyme was 1.4-fold to 2.5-fold higher during phenolic substrate catabolism compared to SUC catabolism, while there was no flux through OAA decarboxylase (Fig. 5A–D; SI, Fig. S6). In fact, our intracellular metabolomics data revealed that intracellular malate decreased by up to 70% (P < 0.05), while PEP and 3-phosphoglycerate (3PG) increased 2-fold to 60-fold (P < 0.01) during phenolic substrate utilization, relative to SUC utilization, indicating strong cataplerotic flux from the TCA cycle towards intermediates in gluconeogenesis (SI, Table S4). Informed by the proteomics data, which highlighted up to 6-fold increase in Pyc (pyruvate carboxylase) relative to less than 2-fold increase in Ppc (PEP carboxylase) (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5), anaplerotic flux was constrained to occur only via Pyc, involving the carboxylation of pyruvate to OAA, to replenish four-carbon intermediates in the TCA cycle. This pyruvate-to-OAA anaplerotic flux was 7-fold to 20-fold higher during phenolic substrate utilization than SUC utilization (Fig. 5A–D; SI, Fig. S6), in agreement with the 2-fold to 3-fold higher OAA production from pyruvate influx illustrated by the carbon mapping combined with kinetic ¹³C-metabolomics (Fig. 4C). For resolving whether to include flux through pyruvate dehydrogenase, we performed additional 13C-fluxomics with and without the reaction of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (SI, Table S5). The model fit was not statistically acceptable when we deactivated this reaction in FER and COU (SI, Table S5), suggesting possible sufficient protein abundance to support flux or post-translational regulation41,61. Therefore, pyruvate dehydrogenase was considered active during the phenolic substrate catabolism despite the observed decrease in the protein abundance (Fig. 3C).
We compared our high-resolution 13C-fluxomics of the metabolic network with the widely used approach of flux balance analysis (FBA), which is based only on substrate uptake and biomass growth rates and is thus derived from a low-resolution algorithm (Fig. 5A–D, Supplementary Data 4). In both 13C-fluxomics and FBA, sustenance of high TCA cycle flux was prioritized over gluconeogenic flux during phenolic substrate catabolism (Fig. 5A–D; Supplementary Data 4). Specifically, the 13C-fluxomics predicted that although the cataplerotic flux through malic enzyme (i.e., from malate to pyruvate) was substantial (60–80% of the carbon influx to malate), only 13–16% of this cataplerotic flux was invested towards gluconeogenic flux because 69–77% was recycled back to the TCA cycle via both pyruvate carboxylase (to replenish OAA) and pyruvate dehydrogenase (to generate acetyl-CoA) (Fig. 5A–D). The FBA still predicted 78–86% of carbon retention in the TCA cycle, but this was due to high malate dehydrogenase flux (from malate to OAA), while the cataplerotic malic enzyme flux was predicted to be low by the FBA. We attributed this difference between our 13C-fluxomics and the FBA modeling to the low resolution of the anaplerosis-cataplerosis node in the FBA algorithm (Supplementary Data 4).
With respect to relationships between our 13C-fluxomics and proteomics data, there was a general trend of positive correlation between changes in protein abundances and changes in fluxes in cataplerosis, anaplerosis, 4 reactions in gluconeogenesis, and at least 7 reactions in the TCA cycle (Fig. 5E). However, due to the discrepant magnitudes in the respective protein abundance changes and flux changes, there was an overall poor 1:1 correlation (Pearson correlation, r = 0.11-0.35, P = 0.08–0.59) (Fig. 5E). For instance, although carbon flux through isocitrate dehydrogenase increased 5-fold to 8-fold during growth on the phenolic acids compared to SUC, there was less than 2-fold change in the enzyme abundance. Serine phosphorylation was previously implicated in modulating flux through isocitrate dehydrogenase in P. putida KT2440 grown on a glucose:benzoate mixture versus glucose alone41. The discrepancy between changes in enzyme abundance and metabolic fluxes in our correlation matrices were thus consistent with the proposal that metabolic fluxes in central carbon metabolism are driven primarily by thermodynamic factors and post-translational modifications41,61.
To examine consequences of the remodeled metabolic network on cofactor balance, we determined the rates of production and consumption of NADPH, NADH/UQH2, and ATP during the catabolism of the phenolic substrates compared to SUC, as a reference (Fig. 6A). Due to reported absence of flux through oxPPP during gluconeogenic growth48, as illustrated in Fig. 1A and confirmed by our 13C-fluxomics illustrated in Fig. 5A–D, cofactor production through oxPPP was not a contributing factor in our cofactor balancing for phenolic acid metabolism. Furthermore, water-forming NADH oxidase was not included in the cofactor balancing, based on a previous report of its minimal to no impact on metabolic flux distribution in P. putida KT244042. Increased flux through cataplerosis via malic enzyme and through isocitrate dehydrogenase in the TCA cycle led to 1.2-fold to 2.5-fold greater NADPH production in cells grown on phenolic substrates compared to SUC-grown cells (Fig. 6A). As a result, the NADPH production was 24–44% in excess of the NADPH demand for both biomass synthesis and the peripheral pathway for aromatic substate catabolism, including formaldehyde detoxification; this NADPH surplus was routed to NADH synthesis through transhydrogenase reactions (Fig. 6A). Due to the promoted retention of carbon flux in the TCA cycle, NADH/UQH2 production was 1.4-fold to 2.7-fold higher during catabolism of phenolic substrates relative to SUC utilization (Fig. 6A). The NADH surplus was 1.4-fold to 2.7-fold higher in phenolic substrate-fed cells than SUC-grown cells, resulting in a corresponding fold increase in ATP production via oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 6A). In corroboration of the model-predicted ATP surplus, absolute quantitation of the intracellular ATP content revealed up to 2-fold higher ATP in cells fed with FER, COU, or 4HB than in the SUC-fed cells (P < 0.01); the lack of similar trend with VAN implied unaccounted ATP demand, likely related to additional ATP needed to cope with oxidative stress during VAN assimilation62 (Fig. 6A, B). The surplus of ATP predicted by the flux model, which was confirmed by independent measurements of intracellular ATP, was consistent with the relatively higher energy charge values during processing of the phenolic substrates compared to SUC (SI, Fig. S2), underscoring the optimization of the carbon metabolism in P. putida to maintain a high-energy state during phenolic substrate utilization.
Fig. 6 Quantitative mapping of metabolic reactions in cofactor flux balancing during processing of four lignin-derived phenolic acid substrates compared to succinate. [Images not available. See PDF.]
A Production (black) and consumption (orange) fluxes (mmol gCDW−1 h−1) of NADPH, NADH/UQH2, and ATP during growth on, from top to bottom, SUC, FER, COU, VAN, and 4HB. B Quantified intracellular ATP pool size (µmol gCDW−1) in cells grown on the lignin-related phenolic substrates compared to succinate. In A, the numbers of the pie chart indicate the flux values (mmol gCDW−1h−1); the metabolic proteins and pathways involved in each reaction are specified near the pie charts and in the color legends, respectively. In A, production of ATP from NADH/UQH2 was calculated using a phosphate to oxygen (P/O) ratio of 1.5. Details of flux data in (A) were provided in SI, Table S6. Data in B are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from four independent biological replicates (n = 4) and one-way ANOVA was performed followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test; statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) are denoted by a change in letter. Detailed data in (B) were provided in SI, Table S1.
Discussion
The catabolism of lignin-derived phenolic substrates represents a critical step in valorizing lignin using biotechnologically relevant microbes2, 3–4. Strains of P. putida are extensively studied for this endeavor due to their native ability to catabolize various aromatic compounds6. However, elucidation of the native metabolic network in relation to cofactor balance in P. putida during catabolism of phenolic substrates remains a knowledge gap. Here, we performed a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the metabolic underpinnings of carbon and energy fluxes in P. putida KT2440 during conversion of two hydroxycinnamates and two hydroxybenzoates, which represent common lignin-derived phenolic substrates.
To address metabolic bottlenecks during conversion of phenolic substrates, increase in enzyme expression was shown to be a successful strategy when an enzyme (i.e., VanA or VanB) exhibited a preference for NADH over NADPH, but bottleneck was not alleviated for an enzyme (i.e., PobA) with NADPH specificity due to cofactor deficiency17,21,29,32. The latter deficiency was circumvented by substituting for an enzyme with broader cofactor specificity (i.e., PraI) or by increasing NADPH supply through substrate co-feeding30,32. Our quantitative flux analysis determined that the metabolic fluxes generated excess in both NADPH and NADH in P. putida KT2440, but the NADH surplus was up to 6-fold higher than the NADPH surplus. Thus, our findings implied that the native cofactor balance was more amenable to buffering increased NADH demand than increased NADPH demand from enzyme overexpression. These findings inform rational design of metabolic engineering strategies, particularly when targeting fluxes through isoenzymes with similar catalytic functions but with distinct cofactor preferences. The surplus of NAD(P)H can benefit bioproduction of free fatty acids63 and polyhydroxyalkanoates64, while ATP overproduction can be employed in improving yield of biopolymers that require energy input, such as ε-Poly-L-lysine65. Predicted by our proteomics data and confirmed by 13C-fluxomics, we identified key nodes of flux remodeling with important energetic consequences during the metabolism of the phenolic substrates. At the cataplerosis-anaplerosis nexus between the TCA cycle and gluconeogenesis, we found that P. putida KT2440 exhibited the specific cataplerotic routing of carbon fluxes through malic enzyme (to deplete malate and produce pyruvate) and anaplerotic routing through pyruvate carboxylase (to replenish OAA). Notably, the enhanced carbon flux through malic enzyme was critical in sustaining the necessary NADPH yield, but resulted in decreasing flux to OAA through malate dehydrogenase. As a consequence, one important role of the anaplerotic carbon recycling to the TCA cycle via pyruvate carboxylase was to satisfy OAA demand for biosynthesis. This adaptation of cataplerosis and anaplerosis generated 50% of the NADPH yield and sustained high flux through the TCA cycle to produce over 70% of the NADH yield, which eventually fueled oxidative phosphorylation for ATP production. A similar routing of carbon fluxes through the cataplerosis-anaplerosis nodes was noted in glucose-grown P. putida to satisfy elevated cofactor demands in response to oxidative and energetic stresses41,47. For instance, in response to oxidative stress, P. putida has been shown to enhance carbon flux from glucose catabolism through the oxPPP to generate excess NADPH that exceeded 50% of the biomass demand47. Moreover, when the conversion of NADH to ATP via oxidative phosphorylation was uncoupled chemically in glucose-fed P. putida, there was an increase in carbon flux through the high-energy producing side of the TCA cycle towards providing NAD(P)H and ATP production to counterbalance the metabolic perturbation42. Thus, we propose that cofactor-driven metabolic reprogramming is a widespread phenomenon under different substrate utilization.
The ortho-cleavage pathway, the only known catabolic route for the phenolic substrates in P. putida (particularly strain KT2440), generates SUC and acetyl-CoA to feed into the TCA cycle. There are two other reported aerobic PCA cleavage pathways: for example, the 2,3-meta cleavage pathway found in P. putida strains mt-2 and H, and the 4,5-meta cleavage pathway revealed in Comamonas testosteroni and Sphingobium sp. SYK-661,66, 67, 68–69. The 2,3-meta cleavage route generates pyruvate and acetyl-CoA with the production of NADH66,69; the 4,5-meta cleavage route generates OAA and pyruvate with the production of NADPH61,68. The quantitative analysis employed here to decode cofactor balance involved in the ortho-cleavage pathway could be used to evaluate the metabolic routing of phenolic carbons and cellular cofactor balance following the other cleavage pathways.
In sum, we unraveled quantitatively the interplay between carbon metabolism and energy metabolism in P. putida KT2440 grown on lignin-derived phenolic acid substrates, focusing on the catabolism of hydroxycinnamates and hydroxybenzoates with PCA as the common catabolic intermediate. Lignin-derived compounds can also constitute of other aromatic structures5, with different intermediates such as catechol and gallate6. Moreover, sugar monomers and aliphatic acids often co-exist with phenolic acids in hydrolysates of lignocellulosic feedstocks70,71. Therefore, a valuable next step is the investigation of the energy metabolism in P. putida during co-utilization of different phenolic structures with sugars or aliphatic acids. To this end, the current research findings provide a valuable quantitative blueprint of the native metabolic network and its tuning of carbon and energy fluxes for further interrogations and explorations of Pseudomonads and other related bacterial platforms for lignocellulose valorization.
Methods
Bacterial cultivation
P. putida (strain KT2440) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and stored in Lysogeny broth (Miller) nutrient-rich medium with 25% glycerol at −80 °C. Cells were washed and inoculated from frozen stocks into 20-mL glass tubes that contained 5 mL of pH-adjusted (7.0) minimal nutrient medium with the same carbon-equivalent concentration, 100 mM C, of each substrate as a sole source of carbon: FER, COU, VAN, 4HB or SUC. The minimal nutrient medium contained 5.0 mM NaH2PO4, 20 mM K2HPO4, 37 mM NH4Cl, 17 mM NaCl, 0.81 mM MgSO4·7H2O, and 34 µM CaCl2·2H2O. Addition of essential trace metal nutrients and FeSO4 (30 µM) to the nutrient medium was done prior to inoculation. After initial inoculation of the culture in glass tubes at 30 °C with shaking at 220 rpm overnight in an incubator-shaker (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ)48, the cells were harvested, washed and subsequently transferred into 125-mL or 250-mL baffled flasks. To optimize oxygen transfer, only one-fifth of the volume of the baffled flask was filled with the minimal nutrient medium with carbon source. Cell growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using an Agilent Cary UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Santa Clara, CA). Cell dry weight per gram (gCDW) was measured by weighing the mass of lyophilized cell pellets collected throughout the growth48. The conversion factor of OD600 and gCDW was calculated through linear regression with R2 coefficient greater than 0.8048. All growth experiments were conducted in three biological replicates.
Mutant construction
Construction details for strains, oligonucleotides, and plasmids are detailed in SI, Tables S7–S9. In brief, all plasmids were synthesized and cloned by Twist Biosciences. Ribosome binding sites were optimized for each native P. putida KT2440 sequence72. For the construction of P. putida strains, the parental strain P. putida AG5577 containing a total of nine unique attB sites was used73. The parental strain P. putida AG5577 was confirmed to be identical to the wild-type P. putida KT2440 in phenolic acid utilization (SI, Fig. S2). All integrations were achieved by serine recombinase-assisted genome engineering using either the BxB1 or TG1 recombinase73,74. Integrations were confirmed using Oxford Nanopore sequencing at Plasmidsaurus (https://www.plasmidsaurus.com).
Measuring extracellular substrate depletion
Aliquots of cell suspensions were collected and spanned at different time points throughout biomass growth. Following filtering during centrifugation (Costar Spin-X, 0.22-µm-pore-size filter), the filtrates were stored at −20 °C until analysis. The concentration of each aromatic substrate was determined using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm with 5 µm particle size) and a UV detector at 210 nm for 4HB and VAN detection, and 275 nm for FER and COU detection. The injection volume was 10 µL and the column was maintained at 25 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid (eluent A) and 80:10:10 acetonitrile: methanol: H2O (v/v) (eluent B) with a flow rate of 0.9 mL·min−1. The gradient of eluent B was set as 0 min, 6%; 6.5 min, 15%; 8.5 min, 25%; 10.75 min, 37.5%; 15.5 min, 65%; 16.25 min, 6%. Extracellular substrate depletion rate, in mmol gCDW−1 h−1, was determined by regression analysis. The rate of SUC depletion was obtained by Wilkes et al.48.
Quantitative proteomics
P. putida KT2440 was cultured until mid-exponential phase (OD600 = 1.0–1.2) using 100 mM C of FER, COU, VAN, 4HB, or SUC as the sole carbon source in the nutrient minimal medium. After centrifugation of 2-mL cultures (10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C), the cell pellets were washed twice with phosphate-buffered solution (pH = 7.4) within 10 min to remove extracellular components followed by quenching with cold methanol (4 °C) and incubated on ice for 30 min75. Samples were kept on ice to minimize protein change during the processing. The quenched cell suspensions were centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in methanol and stored at −80 °C until analysis.
The samples were processed with an on-filter in-cell (OFIC) digestion approach76. Briefly, after transferring the samples to E3 filters (CDS Analytical, Oxford, PA), and centrifuging (400 × g for 1 min), the filter was washed once with methanol, and treated with 10 mM Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphineand and 40 mM chloroacetamide (in 50 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate, TEAB), followed by incubating at 45 °C for 10 min. The sample-containing filters were spun to remove liquid, followed by washing once with 50 mM TEAB. Subsequently, the samples were digested with Trypsin/LysC mix at 37 °C for 16–18 h. After digestion, the peptides were eluted, pooled, and dried in SpeedVac. The peptides were desalted with StageTips (CDS Analytical, Oxford, PA), dried, and stored at −80 °C until further analysis.
The peptides were first loaded onto a trap column (PepMap100 C18, 300 μm × 2 mm with 5 μm particle size; Thermo Scientific) then separated through an analytical column (PepMap100 C18, 50 cm × 75 μm with 3 μm particle size; Thermo Scientific) with eluents consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (v/v) (eluent A) and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (v/v) (eluent B) with a flow rate of 250 nL·min−1 using an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano system with nano electrospray ionization for liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis (LC-MS). The MS data were acquired on an Orbitrap Eclipse mass spectrometer with FAIMS Pro Interface (Thermo Scientific) at 120 K resolution, followed by MS/MS acquisition in data-independent mode following a FAIMS-DIA proteomic pipeline77.
The mass spectrometry data were processed using Spectronaut software (version 19.1)78 and a library-free DIA analysis workflow with directDIA+ and the P. putida KT2440 protein sequence (Uniprot 2024 release; 5950 sequences). In short, the settings for Pulsar and library generation included: Trypsin/P as specific enzyme; peptide length from 7 to 52 amino acids; allowing 2 missed cleavages; toggle N-terminal M turned on; Carbamidomethyl on C as fixed modification; Oxidation on M and Acetyl at protein N-terminus as variable modifications; FDRs at PSM, peptide and protein level all set to 0.01; Quantity MS level set to MS2, and cross-run normalization turned on. Bioinformatics analyses were performed using Perseus software (version 1.6.2.3)79. The full dataset of proteomics is provided in Supplementary Data 1.
Intracellular metabolite levels and isotope labeling kinetics
To profile the intracellular metabolites of each of the substrate condition (100 mM C of FER, COU, VAN, 4HB, or SUC), cell suspensions (3 mL) of P. putida KT2440 during mid-exponential growth phase (OD600 = 1.0–1.2) were filtered (0.22 µm nylon membranes; Whatman, 7402-004), then lysed in a cold solvent (4 °C) containing methanol, acetonitrile, and water in a 2:2:1 (v/v) ratio. Metabolism was quenched by submerging the filter containing the cells immediately in the cold solvent mixture, which lysed the cells; there was less than 1 min between the filtering process and the transfer of the filter to the cold solvent. This well-established protocol80 for metabolite extraction after quenching metabolism was illustrated previously by the senior author41,48,60,61,81,82 and others83, 84–85. The suspensions with the lysed cells were centrifuged (10,000 × g, 4 °C for 5 min) and aliquots (200 µL) of the supernatants in 2 mL-tubes were dried under ultrapure nitrogen gas followed by storage at −80 °C before further analysis. The dried samples, collected from four biological replicates, were resuspended in 100 µL LC-MS grade water before metabolomics analysis.
In preparation for kinetic 13C-labeling experiments, 3-mL exponentially-growing P. putida KT2440 cells (two transfers, three biological replicates) on each unlabeled substrate (100 mM C of FER, COU, VAN, 4HB, or SUC) were filtered (0.22 µm nylon membranes; Whatman, 7402-004), and the filters containing the cells were placed onto agar plates containing 100 mM C of the same substrate, followed by incubation at 30 °C until exponential growth was resumed. To initiate 13C-labeling of intracellular metabolites, cell-containing filters were transferred onto fresh agar plates with 50% of 13C-labeled substrate: 13C6-phenyl-FER, 13C6-phenyl-COU, 13C6-phenyl-VAN, 13C6-phenyl-4HB, or U13C4-succinate. These labeled substrates were purchased from Cambridge Isotopes (Tewksbury, MA) or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). At four different time points (15 s, 1 min, 5 min, and 15 min), cells adhered to the filter were quenched into the aforementioned cold quenching solution (4 °C); data for time 0 were obtained with cells directly quenched from the unlabeled plate. The quenched cell suspensions were processed following the aforementioned nitrogen drying procedure and the extracted metabolites were stored at −80 °C until metabolomics analysis.
Metabolomics analysis
Intracellular and extracellular metabolites were quantified based on our established metabolomics protocol using UHPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000) coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific Q Exactive quadrupole-Orbitrap) operating in negative mode48,81. The LC column, an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 Column (particle size 1.7 µm, 2.1 mm × 100 mm, Waters), was maintained at 25 °C with an injection volume of 10 µL. The eluents contained 97:3 (v/v) LC-MS grade water:methanol with 15 mM acetic acid and 10 mM tributylamine (solvent A) and methanol (solvent B)81. The flow rate was set at 0.18 mL·min−181. The data was analyzed on the Thermo Scientific XCalibur software (v3.0) using a series of standard concentrations. The fraction of different isotopomers was analyzed using the Metabolomic Analysis and Visualization Engine software version 2011.6.1786; to correct for the natural abundance of 13C, IsoCor v2.2.087 was used. The full dataset of kinetic 13C-metabolomics is provided in Supplementary Data 2.
13C-fluxomics analysis
We employed both the levels and the kinetic isotopic profiling of intracellular metabolites to perform an isotope non-steady state metabolic flux analysis (INST-MFA)37. A core P. putida metabolic network was constructed based on published resources with modifications to supplement aromatics utilization pathways46,49. The biomass yield equation was modified from a previous genome scale model for P. putida KT244088. The INCA software (v2.3) based on the Matlab platform89 was used to simulate isopotomer balances when P. putida was fed on different aromatic substrates and succinate. The INST-MFA models were constrained with growth, substrate consumption and metabolite secretion rates, measured pool sizes (CIT, AKG, SUC, PYR, PEP, 3PG, G6P, AcCoA) and kinetic isotopomer distributions (CIT, AKG, SUC, OAA as aspartate, PEP, PYR, 3PG, DHAP, G6P, S7P, AcCoA). Flux estimations were reiterated at least 50 times from random initial values. At least three independent flux estimations were performed for each INST-MFA model to ensure the flux estimations were consistent. The estimates were considered as statistically acceptable fits when the results passed the χ2 goodness-of-fit test (cutoff 95% confidence level), i.e., the minimized variance-weighted sum of squared residuals (SSR) were within the expected range. The standard errors (95% confidence intervals) of the flux estimations for the reactions in the central carbon metabolism were calculated through the Monte Carlo simulation module associated with the INCA software49,89. Complete flux estimations are in Supplementary Data 3. Cofactor balance was calculated from quantified fluxes for metabolic reactions with production or consumption of NADPH, NADH/UQH2, and ATP. Only NADH was included for vanillate O-demethylase because VanB was shown to prefer NADH over NADPH17.
Flux balance analysis
The most recent genome-scale model of P. putida KT2440 (iJN1463) was downloaded from the BIGG database (http://bigg.ucsd.edu/)88. The FER, VAN, and 4HB catabolic reactions are present in the original iJN1463 model. The COU uptake and initial catabolic reactions to coumaroyl-CoA were added manually to the model. The optimized flux distribution predicted by FBA was performed using the COBRApy library (version 0.29.1)90. Substrate uptake rates for SUC, FER, COU, VAN, and 4HB were fixed at the experimentally determined values (in mmol/gCDW/h), which are 16.0, 6.7, 9.9, 8.2, and 15.9, respectively. For the 4HB analysis, the PCA secretion rate was fixed at 1.2 mmol/gCDW/h as experimentally measured. Results for FBA are in Supplementary Data 4.
Statistics and reproducibility
All experimentally measured data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three or four biological replicates (as indicated in figure captions). Unpaired two-tailed t-test was applied to evaluate the significance of differences between two groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate differences among three or more conditions. Tukey’s honestly significant difference post hoc test was performed for pairwise comparison in addition to one-way ANOVA. The P value threshold for statistically significant difference was set at 0.05.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Genomic Science Program under Award Number DE-SC0022181. This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. DOE under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. We thank Jeffrey Czajka at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and Shawn Xiao at Washington University in St. Louis for helpful advice during 13C-fluxomics modeling using the INCA software. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
Author contributions
N.Z., R.A.W., X.C., K.P.T., J.A.B., and Y.Y. performed research. G.T.B. and A.Z.W. provided resources. N.Z. and L.A. designed research, analyzed data, and wrote manuscript. L.A. supervised research.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Yinjie Tang, Suresh Sudarsan and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Haichun Gao and David Favero. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Proteomics MS data are freely available via ProteomeXchange server (https://www.proteomexchange.org/) under accession PXD067246 and the MassIVE repository (https://massive.ucsd.edu/) under accession MSV000098800. Metabolomics MS data are available through the MetaboLights depository (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/metabolights/) under accession number MTBLS11484. All source data for the figures were provided in Supplementary Data 5, and all other data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Custom code for FBA analysis can be accessed through GitHub repository (https://github.com/nqzhou/Aromatics_fba) and Zenodo repository (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16793025).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-08723-3.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
1. Ragauskas, AJ et al. Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science; 2014; 344, [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833396]1246843.
2. Beckham, GT; Johnson, CW; Karp, EM; Salvachúa, D; Vardon, DR. Opportunities and challenges in biological lignin valorization. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.; 2016; 42, pp. 40-53.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xjslygsbc%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26974563]
3. Kamimura, N et al. Bacterial catabolism of lignin-derived aromatics: new findings in a recent decade: update on bacterial lignin catabolism. Environ. Microbiol. Rep.; 2017; 9, pp. 679-705.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXhvFWhsLrF [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29052962]
4. Becker, J; Wittmann, C. A field of dreams: lignin valorization into chemicals, materials, fuels, and health-care products. Biotechnol. Adv.; 2019; 37, 107360.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXntFCiur8%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959173]
5. Schutyser, W et al. Chemicals from lignin: an interplay of lignocellulose fractionation, depolymerisation, and upgrading. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2018; 47, pp. 852-908.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXlvFWnsw%3D%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318245]
6. Jiménez, JI; Miñambres, B; García, JL; Díaz, E. Genomic analysis of the aromatic catabolic pathways from Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol.; 2002; 4, pp. 824-841. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12534466]
7. Nikel, PI; de Lorenzo, V. Pseudomonas putida as a functional chassis for industrial biocatalysis: from native biochemistry to trans-metabolism. Metab. Eng.; 2018; 50, pp. 142-155.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXpvVSlt7k%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29758287]
8. Schwanemann, T; Otto, M; Wierckx, N; Wynands, B. Pseudomonas as versatile aromatics cell factory. Biotechnol. J.; 2020; 15, 1900569.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXitV2htLnE
9. de Lorenzo, V; Pérez-Pantoja, D; Nikel, PI. Pseudomonas putida KT2440: the long journey of a soil-dweller to become a synthetic biology chassis. J. Bacteriol.; 2024; 0, pp. e00136-24.
10. Silva, M; Donati, S; Dvořák, P. Advances in engineering substrate scope of Pseudomonas cell factories. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.; 2025; 92, 103270.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXkt1OlsLg%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39978295]
11. Kim, GB; Kim, HR; Lee, SY. Comprehensive evaluation of the capacities of microbial cell factories. Nat. Commun.; 2025; 16, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXovVWitrY%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40128235][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11933384]2869.
12. Ravi, K; García-Hidalgo, J; Gorwa-Grauslund, MF; Lidén, G. Conversion of lignin model compounds by Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and isolates from compost. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2017; 101, pp. 5059-5070.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2sXktlKgt74%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28299400][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5486835]
13. Wada, A et al. Characterization of aromatic acid/proton symporters in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 toward efficient microbial conversion of lignin-related aromatics. Metab. Eng.; 2021; 64, pp. 167-179.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXks1GktLw%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33549838]
14. Salvachúa, D et al. Outer membrane vesicles catabolize lignin-derived aromatic compounds in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2020; 117, pp. 9302-9310. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32245809][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7196908]
15. Erickson, E et al. Critical enzyme reactions in aromatic catabolism for microbial lignin conversion. Nat. Catal.; 2022; 5, pp. 86-98.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XlsVCku7c%3D
16. Nichols, NN; Harwood, CS. PcaK, a high-affinity permease for the aromatic compounds 4-hydroxybenzoate and protocatechuate from Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol.; 1997; 179, pp. 5056-5061.1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlsVSmtLs%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9260946][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC179362]
17. Bleem, AC et al. Evolution and engineering of pathways for aromatic O-demethylation in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Metab. Eng.; 2024; 84, pp. 145-157.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2cXhsVynsrrM [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38936762]
18. Linger, JG et al. Lignin valorization through integrated biological funneling and chemical catalysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. 12013-12018.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXht1GqtLnJ [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25092344][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4143016]
19. Graf, N; Altenbuchner, J. Genetic engineering of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for rapid and high-yield production of vanillin from ferulic acid. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.; 2014; 98, pp. 137-149.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhs1eqsL7F [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24136472]
20. Vardon, DR et al. Adipic acid production from lignin. Energy Environ. Sci.; 2015; 8, pp. 617-628.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXitFags7zL
21. Salvachúa, D et al. Bioprocess development for muconic acid production from aromatic compounds and lignin. Green. Chem.; 2018; 20, pp. 5007-5019.
22. Kohlstedt, M et al. From lignin to nylon: cascaded chemical and biochemical conversion using metabolically engineered Pseudomonas putida. Metab. Eng.; 2018; 47, pp. 279-293.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXnslOjtbk%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29548984]
23. Johnson, CW et al. Innovative chemicals and materials from bacterial aromatic catabolic pathways. Joule; 2019; 3, pp. 1523-1537.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1WqsL%2FN
24. Salvachúa, D et al. Metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas putida for increased polyhydroxyalkanoate production from lignin. Micro Biotechnol.; 2020; 13, pp. 290-298.
25. Zhou, Y et al. Development of a CRISPR/Cas9n-based tool for metabolic engineering of Pseudomonas putida for ferulic acid-to-polyhydroxyalkanoate bioconversion. Commun. Biol.; 2020; 3, pp. 1-13.
26. Almqvist, H et al. Muconic acid production using engineered Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and a guaiacol-rich fraction derived from kraft lignin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2021; 9, pp. 8097-8106.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXht1Grt7rJ
27. Eng, T et al. Engineering Pseudomonas putida for efficient aromatic conversion to bioproduct using high throughput screening in a bioreactor. Metab. Eng.; 2021; 66, pp. 229-238.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhtFSgsrjK [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33964456]
28. Valencia, LE et al. Engineering Pseudomonas putida KT2440 for chain length tailored free fatty acid and oleochemical production. Commun. Biol.; 2022; 5, pp. 1-12.
29. Werner, AZ et al. Lignin conversion to β-ketoadipic acid by Pseudomonas putida via metabolic engineering and bioprocess development. Sci. Adv.; 2023; 9, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXhvV2ksbnK [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37672573][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10482344]eadj0053.
30. Liu, H et al. Engineering Pseudomonas putida for lignin bioconversion into cis-cis muconic acid. Chem. Eng. J.; 2024; 495, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2cXhsVanu7fI 153375.
31. Banerjee, D et al. Addressing genome scale design tradeoffs in Pseudomonas putida for bioconversion of an aromatic carbon source. npj Syst. Biol. Appl.; 2025; 11, pp. 1-13.
32. Kuatsjah, E et al. Debottlenecking 4-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylation in Pseudomonas putida KT2440 improves muconate productivity from p-coumarate. Metab. Eng.; 2022; 70, pp. 31-42.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhtVegtLo%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982998]
33. Gómez-Álvarez, H et al. Bioconversion of lignin-derived aromatics into the building block pyridine 2,4-dicarboxylic acid by engineering recombinant Pseudomonas putida strains. Bioresour. Technol.; 2022; 346, [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34971782]126638.
34. Johnson, CW et al. Eliminating a global regulator of carbon catabolite repression enhances the conversion of aromatic lignin monomers to muconate in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Metab. Eng. Commun.; 2017; 5, pp. 19-25. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29188181][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5699531]
35. Wiechert, W. 13C Metabolic flux analysis. Metab. Eng.; 2001; 3, pp. 195-206.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXlt1Cls78%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11461141]
36. Wiechert, W; Nöh, K. Isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis: complex yet highly informative. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.; 2013; 24, pp. 979-986.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXmsFCmu7o%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23623747]
37. Jazmin, LJ; Young, JD. Isotopically nonstationary 13C metabolic flux analysis. Methods Mol. Biol.; 2013; 985, pp. 367-390.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhvVaisrjK [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23417813]
38. Hollinshead, WD; Henson, WR; Abernathy, M; Moon, TS; Tang, YJ. Rapid metabolic analysis of Rhodococcus opacus PD630 via parallel 13C-metabolite fingerprinting. Biotechnol. Bioeng.; 2016; 113, pp. 91-100.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhsVGis77E [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26174624]
39. Sacco, SA; Young, JD. 13C metabolic flux analysis in cell line and bioprocess development. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.; 2021; 34, 100718.
40. Antoniewicz, MR. A guide to metabolic flux analysis in metabolic engineering: methods, tools and applications. Metab. Eng.; 2021; 63, pp. 2-12.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXit1yjtb%2FE [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33157225]
41. Kukurugya, MA et al. Multi-omics analysis unravels a segregated metabolic flux network that tunes co-utilization of sugar and aromatic carbons in Pseudomonas putida. J. Biol. Chem.; 2019; 294, pp. 8464-8479.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXhtFOnu7%2FM [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30936206][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6544863]
42. Ebert, BE; Kurth, F; Grund, M; Blank, LM; Schmid, A. Response of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 to Increased NADH and ATP Demand. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2011; 77, pp. 6597-6605.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXhtl2isLnL [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21803911][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3187158]
43. Chavarría, M., Kleijn, R. J., Sauer, U., Pflüger-Grau, K. & de Lorenzo, V. Regulatory tasks of the phosphoenolpyruvate-phosphotransferase system of Pseudomonas putida in central carbon metabolism. mBio3, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00028-12 (2012).
44. Nikel, PI; Chavarría, M; Fuhrer, T; Sauer, U; de Lorenzo, V. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 strain metabolizes glucose through a cycle formed by enzymes of the Entner-Doudoroff, Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas, and Pentose Phosphate pathways. J. Biol. Chem.; 2015; 290, pp. 25920-25932.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXhvF2qtLfO [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26350459][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4646247]
45. Sasnow, SS; Wei, H; Aristilde, L. Bypasses in intracellular glucose metabolism in iron-limited Pseudomonas putida. MicrobiologyOpen; 2016; 5, pp. 3-20.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XjsFeit7o%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26377487]
46. Kohlstedt, M; Wittmann, C. GC-MS-based 13C metabolic flux analysis resolves the parallel and cyclic glucose metabolism of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Metab. Eng.; 2019; 54, pp. 35-53.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXlvFSjt74%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30831266]
47. Nikel, PI et al. Reconfiguration of metabolic fluxes in Pseudomonas putida as a response to sub-lethal oxidative stress. ISME J.; 2021; 15, pp. 1751-1766.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXitVSisLc%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33432138][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8163872]
48. Wilkes, RA; Waldbauer, J; Aristilde, L. Analogous metabolic decoupling in Pseudomonas putida and Comamonas testosteroni implies energetic bypass to facilitate gluconeogenic growth. mBio; 2021; 12, pp. e03259-21.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XhvV2gsr4%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34903058][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8669468]
49. Czajka, JJ et al. Tuning a high performing multiplexed-CRISPRi Pseudomonas putida strain to further enhance indigoidine production. Metab. Eng. Commun.; 2022; 15, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB38XisVCqsLnP [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158112][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9494242]e00206.
50. Vogeleer, P et al. Metabolic impact of heterologous protein production in Pseudomonas putida: insights into carbon and energy flux control. Metab. Eng.; 2024; 81, pp. 26-37.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXitl2rtLrE [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37918614]
51. Dvořák, P et al. Synthetically-primed adaptation of Pseudomonas putida to a non-native substrate D-xylose. Nat. Commun.; 2024; 15, [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38531855][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10965963]2666.
52. Sudarsan, S et al. Dynamics of benzoate metabolism in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Metab. Eng. Commun.; 2016; 3, pp. 97-110. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468117][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5779716]
53. Bonora, M et al. ATP synthesis and storage. Purinergic Signal; 2012; 8, pp. 343-357.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XnsVCmtLw%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22528680][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360099]
54. Owen, OE; Kalhan, SC; Hanson, RW. The key role of anaplerosis and cataplerosis for citric acid cycle function. J. Biol. Chem.; 2002; 277, pp. 30409-30412.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmsFyqsLg%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12087111]
55. Belda, E et al. The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis. Environ. Microbiol; 2016; 18, pp. 3403-3424.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xhs1Ohu7jN [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26913973]
56. Koendjbiharie, JG; van Kranenburg, R; Kengen, SWM. The PEP-pyruvate-oxaloacetate node: variation at the heart of metabolism. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.; 2021; 45, fuaa061.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFeks7fM [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33289792]
57. Roca, A; Rodríguez-Herva, JJ; Ramos, JL. Redundancy of enzymes for formaldehyde detoxification in Pseudomonas putida. J. Bacteriol.; 2009; 191, pp. 3367-3374.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXmt1Cksb4%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19304846][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2687156]
58. Ramos, JL et al. Mechanisms of solvent tolerance in gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.; 2002; 56, pp. 743-768.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xos1Gisbo%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142492]
59. Basler, G; Thompson, M; Tullman-Ercek, D; Keasling, J. A Pseudomonas putida efflux pump acts on short-chain alcohols. Biotechnol. Biofuels; 2018; 11, [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760777][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946390]136.
60. Mendonca, CM et al. Hierarchical routing in carbon metabolism favors iron-scavenging strategy in iron-deficient soil Pseudomonas species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2020; 117, pp. 32358-32369.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXis1yhtLfF [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33273114][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7768705]
61. Wilkes, R. A. et al. Complex regulation in a Comamonas platform for diverse aromatic carbon metabolism. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1–12 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01237-7 (2023).
62. Tiffert, T; Garcia-Sancho, J; Lew, VL. Irreversible ATP depletion caused by low concentrations of formaldehyde and of calcium-chelator esters in intact human red cells. Biochim. et. Biophys. Acta; 1984; 773, pp. 143-156.1:CAS:528:DyaL2cXkvVyjs70%3D
63. Javidpour, P et al. Biochemical and structural studies of NADH-dependent FabG used to increase the bacterial production of fatty acids under anaerobic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2014; 80, pp. 497-505. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24212572][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3911115]
64. Xu, Z et al. Enhancement of polyhydroxyalkanoate production by co-feeding lignin derivatives with glycerol in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Biotechnol. Biofuels; 2021; 14, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXit1ags78%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33413621][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792162]11.
65. Yang, H et al. Engineering streptomyces albulus to enhance ε-poly-L-lysine production by introducing a polyphosphate kinase-mediated ATP regeneration system. Microb. Cell Fact.; 2023; 22, 51.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXlvFSrtr8%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36918890][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10012588]
66. Harayama, S; Rekik, M. The meta cleavage operon of TOL degradative plasmid pWWO comprises 13 genes. Mol. Gen. Genet.; 1990; 221, pp. 113-120.1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXitFWmtLY%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2183008]
67. Kamimura, N. & Masai, E. The protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage pathway: overview and new findings. in Biodegradative Bacteria: How Bacteria Degrade, Survive, Adapt, and Evolve (eds Nojiri, H., Tsuda, M., Fukuda, M. & Kamagata, Y.) 207–226 (Springer, 2014).
68. Varman, AM et al. Decoding how a soil bacterium extracts building blocks and metabolic energy from ligninolysis provides road map for lignin valorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. E5802-E5811.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhsFWmu7vL [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27634497][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5056086]
69. Borrero-de Acuña, JM et al. Channelling carbon flux through the meta-cleavage route for improved poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate) production from benzoate and lignin-based aromatics in Pseudomonas putida H. Micro. Biotechnol.; 2021; 14, pp. 2385-2402.
70. Salvachúa, D; M. Karp, E; Nimlos, T; R. Vardon, C. D. & T. Beckham, G. Towards lignin consolidated bioprocessing: simultaneous lignin depolymerization and product generation by bacteria. Green. Chem.; 2015; 17, pp. 4951-4967.
71. Karp, E et al. Quantification of acidic compounds in complex biomass-derived streams. Green. Chem.; 2016; 18, pp. 4750-4760.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28Xns1ensL4%3D
72. Cetnar, DP; Salis, HM. Systematic quantification of sequence and structural determinants controlling mRNA stability in bacterial operons. ACS Synth. Biol.; 2021; 10, pp. 318-332.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhsVagsbg%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464822]
73. Schmidt, M et al. Maximizing heterologous expression of engineered Type I polyketide synthases: investigating codon optimization strategies. ACS Synth. Biol.; 2023; 12, pp. 3366-3380.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXitFeqt7rN [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37851920][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10661030]
74. Elmore, JR et al. High-throughput genetic engineering of nonmodel and undomesticated bacteria via iterative site-specific genome integration. Sci. Adv.; 2023; 9, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXls1ersb8%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897939][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10005180]eade1285.
75. Elsayyid, M; Tanis, JE; Yu, Y. Simple in-cell processing enables deep proteome analysis of low-input caenorhabditis elegans. Anal. Chem.; 2025; 97, pp. 9159-9167.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2MXpsVWltrk%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40258293][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060094]
76. Martin, KR et al. Development of an efficient, effective, and economical technology for proteome analysis. Cell Rep. Methods; 2024; 4, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB2cXhtlaqtbbI [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38866007][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11228373]100796.
77. Reilly, L et al. A fully automated FAIMS-DIA mass spectrometry-based proteomic pipeline. Cell Rep. Methods; 2023; 3, 1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3sXhvFCkurfM [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37729920][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626189]100593.
78. Bruderer, R et al. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol. Cell Proteom.; 2015; 14, pp. 1400-1410.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2MXotVWjsbo%3D
79. Tyanova, S et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods; 2016; 13, pp. 731-740.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhtVKntbnN [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27348712]
80. Bennett, BD; Yuan, J; Kimball, EH; Rabinowitz, JD. Absolute quantitation of intracellular metabolite concentrations by an isotope ratio-based approach. Nat. Protoc.; 2008; 3, pp. 1299-1311.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVSisLrK [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18714298][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2710577]
81. Aristilde, L. et al. Glyphosate-induced specific and widespread perturbations in the metabolome of soil pseudomonas species. Front. Environ.Sci.5, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00034 (2017).
82. Mendonca, CM; Zhang, L; Waldbauer, JR; Aristilde, L. Disproportionate carbon dioxide efflux in bacterial metabolic pathways for different organic substrates leads to variable contribution to carbon-use efficiency. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2024; [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38860668][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210201][DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c01328]
83. Munger, J et al. Systems-level metabolic flux profiling identifies fatty acid synthesis as a target for antiviral therapy. Nat. Biotechnol.; 2008; 26, pp. 1179-1186.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1aisrrM [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18820684][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2825756]
84. Park, JO et al. Metabolite concentrations, fluxes and free energies imply efficient enzyme usage. Nat. Chem. Biol.; 2016; 12, pp. 482-489.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XnsFaitr0%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27159581][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4912430]
85. Pisithkul, T. et al. Metabolic remodeling during biofilm development of Bacillus subtilis. mBio10, https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00623-19 (2019).
86. Clasquin, M. F., Melamud, E. & Rabinowitz, J. D. LC-MS data processing with maven: a metabolomic analysis and visualization engine. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform.https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi1411s37 Unit14.11 (2012).
87. Millard, P et al. IsoCor: isotope correction for high-resolution MS labeling experiments. Bioinformatics; 2019; 35, pp. 4484-4487.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtV2nu7bN [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30903185]
88. Nogales, J et al. High-quality genome-scale metabolic modelling of Pseudomonas putida highlights its broad metabolic capabilities. Environ. Microbiol.; 2020; 22, pp. 255-269.1:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhtVGmu7k%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31657101]
89. Young, JD. INCA: a computational platform for isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis. Bioinformatics; 2014; 30, pp. 1333-1335.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXmvFCjs70%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24413674][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3998137]
90. Ebrahim, A; Lerman, JA; Palsson, BO; Hyduke, DR. COBRApy: COnstraints-based reconstruction and analysis for python. BMC Syst. Biol.; 2013; 7, [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927696][PubMedCentral: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751080]74.
91. Volke, D. C., Olavarría, K. & Nikel, P. I. Cofactor specificity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes in Pseudomonas putida Reveals a general principle underlying glycolytic strategies in bacteria. mSystems6, https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00014-21 (2021).
92. Tanaka, N; Kusakabe, Y; Ito, K; Yoshimoto, T; Nakamura, KT. Crystal structure of formaldehyde dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas putida: the structural origin of the tightly bound cofactor in nicotinoprotein dehydrogenases. J. Mol. Biol.; 2002; 324, pp. 519-533.1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XovVyhs74%3D [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12445786]
93. Zobel, S; Kuepper, J; Ebert, B; Wierckx, N; Blank, LM. Metabolic response of Pseudomonas putida to increased NADH regeneration rates. Eng. Life Sci.; 2017; 17, pp. 47-57.1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhtleisL%2FK [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32624728]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© The Author(s) 2025. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Soil Pseudomonas species, which thrive on lignin derivatives, are widely explored for biotechnology applications in lignin valorization. However, how the native metabolism coordinates phenolic carbon processing with required cofactor generation remains poorly understood. Here, we achieve quantitative understanding of this metabolic balance through a detailed multi-omics investigation of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 grown on four common phenolic acid substrates: ferulate, p-coumarate, vanillate, and 4-hydroxybenzoate. Relative to succinate, proteomics reveals > 140-fold increase in transport and catabolic proteins for aromatics, but metabolomics identifies bottlenecks in initial catabolism to maintain favorable cellular energy charge, which is compromised in mutants with resolved bottlenecks. Up to 30-fold increase in pyruvate carboxylase and glyoxylate shunt proteins implies a metabolic remodeling confirmed by kinetic 13C-metabolomics. Quantitative analysis by 13C-fluxomics demonstrates coupling of this remodeling with cofactor production. Specifically, anaplerotic carbon recycling through pyruvate carboxylase promotes tricarboxylic acid cycle fluxes to generate 50-60% NADPH yield and 60-80% NADH yield, resulting in up to 6-fold greater ATP surplus than with succinate metabolism; the glyoxylate shunt sustains cataplerotic flux through malic enzyme for the remaining NADPH yield. This quantitative blueprint affords cofactor imbalance predictions in proposed engineering of key metabolic nodes in lignin valorization pathways.
A multi-omics study on a biotechnologically relevant soil bacterium reveals remodeling of key metabolic nodes maintains high yield of cofactors to satisfy cofactor requirements for the catabolism of lignin-derived aromatics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/000e0be47) (GRID: grid.16753.36) (ISNI: 0000 0001 2299 3507)
2 Renewable Resources and Enabling Sciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/036266993) (GRID: grid.419357.d) (ISNI: 0000 0001 2199 3636)
3 Northwestern Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/000e0be47) (GRID: grid.16753.36) (ISNI: 0000 0001 2299 3507)
4 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/01sbq1a82) (GRID: grid.33489.35) (ISNI: 0000 0001 0454 4791)
5 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/000e0be47) (GRID: grid.16753.36) (ISNI: 0000 0001 2299 3507); Northwestern Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA (ROR: https://ror.org/000e0be47) (GRID: grid.16753.36) (ISNI: 0000 0001 2299 3507)