Abstract
Background
To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between one’s dominant hand and neck/shoulder pain. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to explore the relationship between one’s dominant hand and the severity of neck/shoulder pain. We also examined the relationship between the dominant hand and the onset of neck/shoulder pain at follow-up among workers without neck/shoulder pain at baseline.
Methods
We conducted a prospective cohort study of 9451 workers. The dominant hand was measured by 10 items from the Japanese version of the Flanders Questionnaire at the baseline survey. We assessed neck/shoulder pain using a numeric rating scale. We calculated the unstandardized coefficient (B) using multiple regression analysis and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for neck/shoulder pain using modified Poisson regression among workers who were free of neck/shoulder pain at baseline.
Results
Among the 9451 respondents for the baseline survey, 6156 responded to the follow-up survey (response rate: 65.1%). Mixed-handed workers reported a higher degree of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers (B, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58). Among 2481 participants, mixed-handed workers also had a higher IRR for neck/shoulder pain (IRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61). There was no difference in any of the left-handers compared with the right-handers.
Conclusions
The study found that mixed-handed workers had higher levels of neck/shoulder pain than right-handed workers, and the incidence rate was also higher among mixed-handed workers. Employers should consider these findings when designing work environments, managing tasks, and providing occupational health training to optimize worker comfort and safety.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Department of Occupational Health Nursing, School of Occupational Health Science, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
2 Department of Occupational Health Practice and Management, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan
3 Department of Ergonomics, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health , Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan