Abstract
We showcase the application of neural importance sampling for the evaluation of NNLO QCD scattering cross sections. We consider Normalizing Flows in the form of discrete Coupling Layers and time continuous flows for the integration of the various cross-section contributions when using the sector-improved residue subtraction scheme. We thereby consider the stratification of the integrands into their positive and negative contributions, and separately optimize the phase-space sampler. We exemplify the novel methods for the case of gluonic top-quark pair production at the LHC at NNLO QCD accuracy. We find significant gains with respect to the current default methods used in STRIPPER in terms of reduced cross-section variances and increased unweighting efficiencies. In turn, the computational costs for evaluations of the integrand needed to achieve a certain statistical uncertainty for the cross section can be reduced by a factor 8.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
 ; Poncelet, Rene 2
 
; Poncelet, Rene 2  
 ; Schumann, Steffen 3
 
; Schumann, Steffen 3  
 
 
1 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Campus-Institut Data Science, Göttingen, Germany (GRID:grid.7450.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2364 4210); Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Göttingen, Germany (GRID:grid.7450.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2364 4210)
2 Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, Poland (GRID:grid.418860.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0942 8941)
3 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Institut für Theoretische Physik, Göttingen, Germany (GRID:grid.7450.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2364 4210)




