Epicrania fugax with backward radiation: clinical characteristics of nine new cases

Abstract

Epicrania fugax (EF) is a novel syndrome, described as a paroxysmal and brief head pain, starting in posterior cranial regions and rapidly spreading forward ipsilateral eye, nose or forehead. Two patients with comparable clinical features stemming from frontal scalp to ipsilateral posterior regions have been recently described and proposed as backward radiation epicrania fugax (BREF). We report a new series of nine BREF and compare their clinical characteristics with 18 forward radiation EF (FREF). Since first description of BREF in February 2010 we have assessed nine patients (four males, five females) with this clinical picture at an outpatient headache office in a Tertiary Hospital. Comparison is established with 18 FREF patients (6 males, 12 females), attended since the publication of first series of EF in March 2008. We found no differences between BREF and FREF, respectively, in age at onset (43.4 ± 13.1 vs. 42.5 ± 17.7 years), female/male ratio (5/4 vs. 12/6), pain intensity (6.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.8 ± 2.1 in a 0-10 visual analogical scale), duration (7.1 ± 4.9 vs. 5.7 ± 4.3 s) and frequency of episodes per day (7 ± 8.4 vs. 9.9 ± 15.4). Patients in BREF group presented less frequently interictal pain in stemming point (22.2 vs. 55.5%) and accompanying autonomic signs (33.3 vs. 55.5%), but without statistical significance in both the cases. This series reinforces the proposal of EF as a new headache variant or a new headache syndrome. Clinical picture of brief pain paroxysms starting in the anterior scalp and radiating backwards does not fit known headaches or neuralgias and might correspond to a reverse variant of EF, clinical characteristics of which are comparable to FREF.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

J Headache Pain (2011) 12:535539 DOI 10.1007/s10194-011-0353-1

ORIGINAL

Epicrania fugax with backward radiation: clinical characteristics of nine new cases

Patricia Mulero ngel L. Guerrero Sonia Herrero-Velzquez

Elisa Cortijo Mara Pedraza Mara L. Peas Sara Miranda

Esther Rojo Rosa Fernndez

Received: 21 March 2011 / Accepted: 9 May 2011 / Published online: 27 May 2011 The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Abstract Epicrania fugax (EF) is a novel syndrome, described as a paroxysmal and brief head pain, starting in posterior cranial regions and rapidly spreading forward ipsilateral eye, nose or forehead. Two patients with comparable clinical features stemming from frontal scalp to ipsilateral posterior regions have been recently described and proposed as backward radiation epicrania fugax (BREF). We report a new series of nine BREF and compare their clinical characteristics with 18 forward radiation EF (FREF). Since rst description of BREF in February 2010 we have assessed nine patients (four males, ve females) with this clinical picture at an outpatient headache ofce in a Tertiary Hospital. Comparison is established with 18 FREF patients (6 males, 12 females), attended since the publication of rst series of EF in March 2008. We found no differences between BREF and FREF, respectively, in age at onset (43.4 13.1 vs. 42.5 17.7 years), female/male ratio (5/4 vs. 12/6), pain intensity(6.9 2.1 vs. 6.8 2.1 in a 010 visual analogical scale), duration (7.1 4.9 vs. 5.7 4.3 s) and frequency of episodes per day (7 8.4 vs. 9.9 15.4). Patients in BREF group presented less frequently interictal pain in stemming point (22.2 vs. 55.5%) and accompanying autonomic signs (33.3 vs. 55.5%), but without statistical signicance in both the cases. This series reinforces the

proposal of EF as a new headache variant or a new headache syndrome. Clinical picture of brief pain paroxysms starting in the anterior scalp and radiating backwards does not t known headaches or neuralgias and might correspond to a reverse variant of EF, clinical characteristics of which are comparable to FREF.

Keywords Backward radiation Epicrania

Epicrania fugax Stabbing headache SUNA SUNCT

Introduction

Epicrania fugax (EF) is a novel syndrome rst described by Pareja et al. [1] in 2008 in ten patients that complained of a very brief unilateral pain paroxysms, starting in posterior cranial regions and rapidly spreading to ipsilateral eye, forehead or nose, along a linear or zigzag trajectory. In some cases, pain was accompanied by autonomic signs such as conjunctival injection, lacrimation or rhinorrhea.

To this rst series, 15 new patients with the same clinical features have been added, so reinforcing the proposal of EF as a new headache variant or a new headache syndrome [24]. Recently, two patients who fullled all the characteristics for EF except the direction of radiation have been reported. This variant has been named backward radiation epicrania fugax (BREF) [5].

Methods

Since the rst description of BREF in February 2010, we made, in an outpatient headache clinic located in a Tertiary Hospital, a prospective search of the patients complaining of brief pain paroxysms running front to back, from

This work was partially presented as a Poster at the II European Headache and Migraine Trust International Congress (EHMTIC), Nice, October 2010.

P. Mulero . L. Guerrero (&) S. Herrero-Velzquez

E. Cortijo M. Pedraza M. L. Peas S. Miranda E. Rojo

R. FernndezDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clnico Universitario, Avda Ramn y Cajal 3, 47005 Valladolid, Spaine-mail: [email protected]

123

536 J Headache Pain (2011) 12:535539

anterior to posterior cephalic regions. As we searched for a novel headache syndrome, we took special care not to induce false answers during the interviews.

A detailed history was obtained in all the cases, including precipitant event and the coexistence of other types of headache. The characteristics of pain paroxysms were carefully evaluated, including temporal features (duration and frequency) and spatial features (site of origin, trajectory, and site of ending). Other characteristics such as pain quality, pain intensity (assessed with a visual analogical scale), or pain accompaniments, especially autonomic signs have been included. The presence of any triggers or interictal pain was also evaluated. Subsequently, a complete physical and neurological examination was performed, including inspection, palpation and sensory examination of the stemming area, as well as palpation of the supraorbital, infraorbital, supratrochlear, minor occipital and greater occipital nerves. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the head, and routine blood work-up with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and immunological screening were carried out in all the cases.

We also made a prospective search of patients with a clinical picture from March 2008, which would be comprised under the headings or epicrania fugax with forward radiation, as was described by Pareja at al [1]. We registered all the demographic and clinical data of these patients. We included in the analysis characteristics of 6 patients previously described [2].

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 18.0 software. Level of signicance was established at 5%. We compared the characteristics of both groups with a Chi-square test and also Fishers exact test, if necessary. Two-tailed Student t test was employed in the quantitative variables.

Results

Through a one-year period, we assessed nine patients (four males, ve females), with pain paroxysms comparable to BREF. Mean age at onset was 43.4 13.1 years (range 2662). Demographic and clinical features of these nine patients are shown in Table 1. Through a three-year period, 18 patients (6 males, 12 females) with FREF were attended in our headache clinic. Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics in BREF and FREF patients is summarized in Table 2.

We found no differences between BREF and FREF, respectively, in age at onset (43.4 13.1 vs. 42.5 17.7 years), and female/male ratio (5/4 vs. 12/6). A complete examination of stemming points did not reveal trophic changes in any of the patients and sensory disturbances were appreciated in 8 out of 12 patients, who

suffered interictal pain. Palpation of pericranial nerves did not detect abnormal ndings, and laboratory tests and imaging studies were also normal in all the cases.

Pain paroxysms were strictly unilateral in all BREF patients (in ve cases on the left and in four on the right). Four cases described a history of migraine and one of tension-type headache, but EF was considered as quite different from the other headaches. Pain started in eye (n = 5), forehead (n = 1) or frontal region (n = 3), and inmediately spread backwards along a linear trajectory to occipital (n = 7) or parietal (n = 2) scalp. In two of the patients, there was an interictal pain in stemming point located in a circumscribed area, resembling nummular headache. In one of them exam disclosed a focal sensitive dysfunction. Paroxysms were described as stabbing in most of the patients (n = 6), or as electric, burning or pressing (1 patient each).

There was no signicant difference between BREF and FREF, respectively, in paroxysms duration (7.1 4.9 vs.5.7 4.3 s), pain intensity in a 010 visual analogical scale (6.9 2.1 vs. 6.8 2.1), frequency of episodes per day (7 8.4 vs. 9.9 15.4), presence of triggers (22.2 vs.22.2%) and prophylactic treatment requirement (77.7 vs.66.6%).

Patients in BREF group presented less frequently

interictal pain in stemming point (22.2 vs. 55.5%) and accompanying autonomic signs (33.3 vs. 55.5%), but in both the cases without statistical signicance.

Discussion

In 2008, Pareja et al. [1] described a headache whose features did not t any of the acknowledged headaches and they named it as epicrania fugax. This headache was framed within epicranias [6], a term proposed to group all the headaches that apparently stem from the supercial or extracranial structures, including the scalp and the layers of the skull. Common to this group of pain syndromes are a focal location or a sequence of multidirectional paroxysms, shortage of autonomic signs, and a dysesthesic area. Nummular headache is most typical epicranial disorder [79].

Regarding EF, there are several entities to which differential diagnosis have to be considered. For instances, there are similarities between EF and primary stabbing headache (PSH). PSH is a primary headache syndrome, with a female preponderance, characterized by short (3 s or less) stabbing pain paroxysms in a localized area that start and end in the same place [10, 11]. Frequency of paroxysms is highly variable and they usually occur with an irregular or sporadic temporal pattern [12]. Though the consecutive stabs may sporadically shift from one region to

123

J Headache Pain (2011) 12:535539 537

n-typeMigraineNoNoNoMigraine

InterictalPainNoNoNoNoNoCircumscribedCircumscribedNoNo

Painparoxysms

HeadsideLeftRightLeftLeftRightLeftRightRightLeft

SiteoforiginEyeForeheadEyeEyeEyeFrontalFrontalFrontalEye

SiteofendOccipitalOccipitalOccipitalOccipitalParietalParietalOccipitalOccipitalOccipital

TrajectoryLinearLinearLinearLinearLinearLinearLinearLinearLinear

CharacterStabbingStabbingBurningStabbingPressingStabbingElectricStabbingStabbing

Duration(sec)551031533155

Intensity(VAS)6710459975

AccompanimentsNoNoNoNoTearingitchingeyeRhinorrhoeaitchingeyeNoNoItchingeye

TriggersNoNoNoNoPhysicalactivityTouchNoNoNo

Frequency8/day12/week1/week1/day1/day20/day20/day12/day1/day

TemporalpatternChronicRemittingRemittingChronicRemittingChronicChronicChronicChronic

TherapyAmitriptylineNoNoAmitriptylineGabapentinLamotrigineCarbamazepineGabapentineGabapentine

ResponseCompleteCompleteNoCompleteCompletePartialPartial

Mmale,Ffemale,VASvisualanalogicalscale(0:nopain,10:theworstimaginablepain)

Table1DemographicandclinicalfeaturesofnineBREFpatients

Patientno.123456789

Sex(M/F)FMFMMFFMF

Age(years)654639525828533329

Ageatonset623939525826533329

OtherheadachesNoMigraineMigraineTensio

123

538 J Headache Pain (2011) 12:535539

Table 2 Main features of BREF and FREF patients

BREF (n = 9) FREF (n = 18)

Sex (F/M) 5/4 12/6

Age at onset (mean SD) 43.4 13.1 42.5 17.7

Duration sec (mean SD) 7.1 4.9 5.7 4.3

Frequency/day (mean SD) 7 8.4 9.9 15.4

Intensity VAS (mean SD) 6.9 2.1 6.8 2.1

Autonomic signs 3/9 10/18

Interictal pain 2/9 10/18

Triggers 2/9 4/18

Preventative requirement 7/9 12/18

BREF backward radiation epicrania fugax, FREF forward radiation epicrania fugax M Male, F Female, SD standard deviation, Sec seconds VAS visual analogical scale (0: no pain, 10: the worst imaginable pain)

another giving an illusion of movement, clinical radiation observed in EF is denitely not typical for PSH [1].

Nummular headache (NH) resembles EF in the presence of a focal painful area. Pain in NH is typically continuous and, when paroxysms are superimposed, they begin and end in situ [9, 13]. Eight of our patients (two in BREF and six in FREF groups) had a nummular type head pain in the stemming area between EF paroxysms, as it has been previously described [3, 14]. EF and NH probably share a peripheral source in their pathogenesis [15].

Lacrimation, rhinorrhoea and itching eye are autonomic signs that appears in some of our patients. These signs are typical of other headache syndromes such as SUNCT (shortlasting, unilateral, neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing) or SUNA (short-lasting, unilateral, neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic features) [10]. These headaches are also present with painful neuralgiform attacks in the orbital and periorbital regions, triggered by tactile stimuli on trigeminal and extrageminal territories, and lasting from 2 s to 10 min. However, the dynamic component of pain, either posterioranterior or anteriorposterior, in FREF and BREF are inherent qualities of epicrania fugax, not described in SUNCT or SUNA.

Unlike SUNCT, SUNA [5] can be diagnosed with the presence of just one cranial autonomic feature and the attacks have a wider range of duration. Thus, some of EF patients could be diagnosed of SUNA but the presence of a dynamic component of pain in EF is a quality not described for SUNA [1618]. This is the essential attribute of EF: a fast and ample movement of the pain through one side of the head, no matter where the stemming point is.

The pathogenesis of EF is uncertain. Origin of this pain is probably peripheral according to the existence of a stemming or trigger zone in a focal area, and the stabbing

or electric character of the pain. Paroxysms of pain can originate in the terminal branches of supraorbital nerve (SON) or greater occipital nerve (GON), and eventually extend to the peripheral bers or branches. It has been proposed that the spreading of the pain is due to the electric transmission or paracrine diffusion of chemical mediators. Central mechanisms in which trigeminal afferents are implicated cannot be excluded, mainly in those patients presenting with autonomic signs [1].

Conclusion

We report nine patients with the same features described for EF, except the direction of radiation. When we compare them with a group of patients fullling the characteristics of EF, we do not nd differences between both the groups.

Our report reinforces EF as an independent headache syndrome and proposes BREF as a not infrequent variant of EF. Their features do not t other acknowledged headaches or neuralgias. Another option is to in considered BREF and FREF as the same entity with the different presentations. Further observations are requiered for a denitive characterization of these headaches.

Conicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conicts of interest.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

1. Pareja JA, Cuadrado ML, de Fernndez las Peas C, Caminero AB, Nieto C, Sanchez C et al (2008) Epicrania fugax: an ultra-brief paroxismal epicranial pain. Cephalalgia 28:257263

2. Guerrero AL, Cuadrado ML, Porta-Etessam J, Garca-Ramos R, Gmez-Vicente L, Herrero S et al (2010) Epicrania fugax: ten new cases and therapeutic results. Headache 50:451458

3. Fontalba-Navas M, Arjona-Padillo A (2011) Un caso de cefalea atpica con evolucin de cefalea numular a epicrania fugax. Neurologa 26:6061

4. Alvaro LC, Garca JM, Sdaba F (2008) Epicrania fugax: tipos clnicos en cuatro nuevos casos. Neurologa 23:732733 (abstract)

5. Cuadrado ML, Gmez-Vicente L, Porta-Etessam J, Marcos-de-Vega MA, Parejo-Carbonell B, Matas-Guiu J (2010) Paroxismal head pain with backward radiation: will epicrania fugax go in the opposite direction? J Head Pain 11:7578

6. Pareja JA, Pareja J, Yangela J (2003) Nummular headache, trochleitis, supraorbital neuralgia and other epicraneal headache and neuralgias: the epicranias. J Headache Pain 4:125131

7. Pareja JA, Caminero AB, Serra J, Barriga FJ, Barn M, Dobato JL et al (2002) Numular headache: a coin-shaped cephalalgia. Neurology 58:16781679

123

J Headache Pain (2011) 12:535539 539

8. Pareja JA, Pareja J, Barriga FJ, Barn M, Dobato JL, Pardo J et al (2004) Nummular headache: a prospective series of 14 new cases. Headache 44:611614

9. Cortijo E, Guerrero-Peral AL, Herrero-Velzquez S, Peas-Martnez ML, Rojo-Martnez E, Mulero P et al (2011) Nummular headache: clinical features and therapeutic experience in a series of 30 new cases. Rev Neurol (Barc) 52:7280

10. Headache Classication subcomittee of the International Headache Society (2004) The international classication of headache disorders, 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 24(Suppl 1):9160

11. Guerrero AL, Herrero S, Peas ML, Cortijo E, Rojo E, Mulero P, Fernndez R (2011) Incidente and inuence on referral of primary stabbing headache in an outpatient headache clinic. J Headache Pain 12:311313

12. Pareja JA, Sjaastad O (2010) Primary stabbing headache. Handb Clin Neurol 97:453457

13. Ruscheweyh R, Buchheister A, Gregor N, Jung A, Evers S (2010) Nummular headache: six new cases and lancinating pain attacks as possible manifestation. Cephalalgia 30:249253

14. Grimaldi D, Batista S, Poisson A, Verschelde H-L, Vzquez-Snchez F (2010) The almirall european headache award 2009. J Headache Pain 11:207214

15. Cuadrado ML, Valle B, de Fernndez las Peas C, Madeleine P, Barriga FJ, Arias JA et al (2010) Pressure pain sensitivity of the scalp in patients with nummular headache. Cephalalgia 30:200206

16. Cohen AS, Matharu MS, Goadsby P (2006) Shortlasting, unilateral, neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) or cranial autonomic features (SUNA). A prospective clinical study of SUNCT and SUNA. Brain 129:27462760

17. Pareja JA, Cuadrado ML (2005) SUNCT syndrome. An update. Expert Opin Pharmacother 6:591599

18. Goadsby PJ, Cittadini E, Cohen AS (2010) Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias: paroxysmal hemicrania, SUNCT/SUNA, and hemicrania continua. Semin Neurol 30:186191

123