An Accurate Fire-Spread Algorithm in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model Using the Level-Set Method

Abstract

The level-set method is typically used to track and propagate the fire perimeter in wildland fire models. Herein, a high-order level-set method using fifth-order WENO scheme for the discretization of spatial derivatives and third-order explicit Runge-Kutta temporal integration is implemented within the Weather Research and Forecasting model wildland fire physics package, WRF-Fire. The algorithm includes solution of an additional partial differential equation for level-set reinitialization. The accuracy of the fire-front shape and rate of spread in uncoupled simulations is systematically analyzed. It is demonstrated that the common implementation used by level-set-based wildfire models yields to rate-of-spread errors in the range 10–35% for typical grid sizes (Δ = 12.5–100 m) and considerably underestimates fire area. Moreover, the amplitude of fire-front gradients in the presence of explicitly resolved turbulence features is systematically underestimated. In contrast, the new WRF-Fire algorithm results in rate-of-spread errors that are lower than 1% and that become nearly grid independent. Also, the underestimation of fire area at the sharp transition between the fire front and the lateral flanks is found to be reduced by a factor of ≈7. A hybrid-order level-set method with locally reduced artificial viscosity is proposed, which substantially alleviates the computational cost associated with high-order discretizations while preserving accuracy. Simulations of the Last Chance wildfire demonstrate additional benefits of high-order accurate level-set algorithms when dealing with complex fuel heterogeneities, enabling propagation across narrow fuel gaps and more accurate fire backing over the lee side of no fuel clusters.

References Adalsteinsson, D., & Sethian, J. (1995). A fast level set method for propagating interfaces. Journal of Computational Physics, 118(2), 269–277. Albini, F. A., & Reinhardt, E. D. (1995). Modeling ignition and burning rate of large woody natural fuels. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 5(2), 81–91. Anderson, H. E. (1982). Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behavior (Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-122). Bova, A. S., Mell, W. E., & Hoffman, C. M. (2016). A comparison of level set and marker methods for the simulation of wildland fire front propagation. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 25(2), 229–241. Calderer, A., Kang, S., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2014). Level set immersed boundary method for coupled simulation of air/water interaction with complex floating structures. Journal of Computational Physics, 277, 201–227. Canfield, J., Linn, R., Sauer, J., Finney, M., & Forthofer, J. (2014). A numerical investigation of the interplay between fireline length, geometry, and rate of spread. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 189, 48–59. Chen, F., & Dudhia, J. (2001). Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Review, 129(4), 569–585. Cheney, N., Gould, J., & Catchpole, W. (1993). The influence of fuel, weather and fire shape variables on fire-spread in grasslands. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 3(1), 31–44. Chopp, D. L. (1993). Computing minimal surfaces via level set curvature flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 106(1), 77–91. Clark, T. L., Coen, J., & Latham, D. (2004). Description of a coupled atmosphere–fire model. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 13(1), 49–63. Clark, T. L., Jenkins, M. A., Coen, J., & Packham, D. (1996a). A coupled atmosphere–fire model: Convective feedback on fire-line dynamics. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 35(6), 875–901. Clark, T. L., Jenkins, M. A., Coen, J., & Packham, D. R. (1996b). A coupled atmosphere-fire model: Role of the convective froude number and dynamic fingering at the fireline. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 6(4), 177–190. Clyne, J., Mininni, P., Norton, A., & Rast, M. (2007). Interactive desktop analysis of high resolution simulations: Application to turbulent plume dynamics and current sheet formation. New Journal of Physics, 9(8), 301. Coen, J. L., Cameron, M., Michalakes, J., Patton, E. G., Riggan, P. J., & Yedinak, K. M. (2013). WRF-Fire: Coupled weather–wildland fire modeling with the Weather Research and Forecasting model. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 52(1), 16–38. Dudhia, J. (1989). Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 46(20), 3077–3107. Filippi, J. B., Bosseur, F., Mari, C., Lac, C., Le Moigne, P., Cuenot, B., et al. (2009). Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modelling. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 1, 11. https://doi.org/10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.11 Grandey, B. S., Lee, H.-H., & Wang, C. (2016). Radiative effects of interannually varying vs. interannually invariant aerosol emissions from fires. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16(22), 14495–14513. Hong, S.-Y., & Lim, J.-O. J. (2006). The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6). Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 42(2), 129–151. Iacono, M. J., Delamere, J. S., Mlawer, E. J., Shephard, M. W., Clough, S. A., & Collins, W. D. (2008). Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the aer radiative transfer models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, D13103. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944 Jiang, G.-S., & Shu, C.-W. (1996). Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 126, 202–228. Jiménez, P. A., Dudhia, J., González-Rouco, J. F., Navarro, J., Montávez, J. P., & García-Bustamante, E. (2012). A revised scheme for the WRF surface layer formulation. Monthly Weather Review, 140(3), 898–918. Lautenberger, C. (2013). Wildland fire modeling with an eulerian level set method and automated calibration. Fire Safety Journal, 62, 289–298. Lilly, D. K. (1966). On the application of the eddy viscosity concept in the inertial sub-range of turbulence (NCAR Tech. Rep. 123). Lilly, D. K. (1967). The representation of small scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. Paper presented at the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences (pp. 195–210). Linn, R. R., & Cunningham, P. (2005). Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D13107. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005597 Luo, J., Hu, X., & Adams, N. (2016). Efficient formulation of scale separation for multi-scale modeling of interfacial flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 308, 411–420. Mallet, V., Keyes, D., & Fendell, F. (2009). Modeling wildland fire propagation with level set methods. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 57(7), 1089–1101. Mandel, J., Beezley, J., & Kochanski, A. (2011). Coupled atmosphere-wildland fire modeling with WRF 3.3 and SFIRE 2011. Geoscientific Model Development, 4, 591–610. Mell, W., Jenkins, M. A., Gould, J., & Cheney, P. (2007). A physics-based approach to modelling grassland fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 16(1), 1–22. Monin, A., & Obukhov, A. (1954). Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere. Contributions of the Geophysical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences USSR, 151, 163–187. Motamed, M., Macdonald, C. B., & Ruuth, S. J. (2011). On the linear stability of the fifth-order WENO discretization. Journal of Scientific Computing, 47(2), 127–149. Muñoz-Esparza, D., Kosović, B., García-Sánchez, C., & van Beeck, J. (2014). Nesting turbulence in an offshore convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations. Boundary Layer Meteorology, 151(3), 453–478. Muñoz-Esparza, D., Lundquist, J. K., Sauer, J. A., Kosović, B., & Linn, R. R. (2017). Coupled mesoscale-LES modeling of a diurnal cycle during the CWEX-13 field campaign: From weather to boundary-layer eddies. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 9, 1572–1594. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017MS000960 Nakanishi, M., & Niino, H. (2006). An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Boundary Layer Meteorology, 119(2), 397–407. Osher, S., & Fedkiw, R. (2006). Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces (Vol. 153). Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media. Osher, S., & Sethian, J. A. (1988). Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton–Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79(1), 12–49. Paton-Walsh, C., Emmons, L. K., & Wiedinmyer, C. (2012). Australia's black saturday fires—Comparison of techniques for estimating emissions from vegetation fires. Atmospheric Environment, 60, 262–270. Peng, D., Merriman, B., Osher, S., Zhao, H., & Kang, M. (1999). A PDE-based fast local level set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 155(2), 410–438. Rehm, R. G., & McDermott, R. J. (2009). Fire-front propagation using the level set method (Tech. Rep. NIST 1611). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Rochoux, M. C., Ricci, S., Lucor, D., Cuenot, B., & Trouvé, A. (2014). Towards predictive data-driven simulations of wildfire spread—Part I: Reduced-cost Ensemble Kalman Filter based on a Polynomial Chaos surrogate model for parameter estimation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 14(11), 2951–2973. Rothermel, R. C. (1972). A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels (USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-115). Sethian, J. A. (1996). A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(4), 1591–1595. Sullivan, A. L. (2009). Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 18(4), 369–386. Sussman, M., Smereka, P., & Osher, S. (1994). A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow. Journal of Computational Physics, 114(1), 146–159. Uppala, S. M., P., Kållberg, A., Simmons, U., Andrae, V. D., Bechtold, M., Fiorino, J., et al. (2005). The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(612), 2961–3012. Wang, R., & Spiteri, R. J. (2007). Linear instability of the fifth-order WENO method. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 45(5), 1871–1901. Wiedinmyer, C., Akagi, S., Yokelson, R. J., Emmons, L., Al-Saadi, J., Orlando, J., et al. (2011). The fire inventory from NCAR (FINN): A high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3), 625–641. Xu, J.-J., Yang, Y., & Lowengrub, J. (2012). A level-set continuum method for two-phase flows with insoluble surfactant. Journal of Computational Physics, 231(17), 5897–5909. Yang, J., & Stern, F. (2009). Sharp interface immersed-boundary/level-set method for wave–body interactions. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(17), 6590–6616.