Additions to the Inventory of the Genus Alternaria Section Alternaria (Pleosporaceae, Pleosporales) in Italy

Abstract

The genus Alternaria is comprised of well-known plant pathogens causing various important diseases in plants, as well as being common allergens in animals and humans. Species of Alternaria can be found as saprobes associated with various dead plant materials. This research aims to enhance the taxonomy of saprobic species in the genus Alternaria found on grasses and herbaceous plants from Italy, based on multi-locus phylogenetic analyses of a concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset combined with morphological characteristics. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses demonstrated six novel species belonging to the genus Alternaria sect. Alternaria as: A. muriformispora sp. nov., A. obpyriconidia sp. nov., A. ovoidea sp. nov., A. pseudoinfectoria sp. nov., A. rostroconidia sp. nov. and A. torilis sp. nov. Detailed morphological descriptions, illustrations and an updated phylogenetic relationship of taxa in the genus Alternaria sect. Alternaria are provided herein.

1. Introduction

The genus Alternaria is classified in the family Pleosporaceae, order Pleosporales, class Dothideomycetes [1,2,3]. The genus contains over 700 species epithets [4], but approximately 378 species are accepted within 28 sections, of which less than 100 species have molecular data to clarify their phylogenetic affinities [1,2,3,5,6,7]. Species of Alternaria are well-known as serious plant pathogens and post-harvest pathogens, causing major crop losses, or can be the causative agents of animal and human pathogens, causing phaeohyphomycosis or acting as airborne allergens [8,9,10,11].

Alternaria is well-known as dematiaceous hyphomycetes which can be found everywhere. The genus is characterized by mononematous, macro- or micronematous, unbranched or branched conidiophores, integrated to discrete, mono- to polytretic conidiogenous cells, solitary or catenate, straight or curved, phragmo- or dictyoseptate, smooth or verrucose and median brown to dark brown conidia with rounded or narrowly-beaked tip. Alternaria occupies diverse ecological niches through its life modes, which range from endophytes to pathogens to saprobes on a wide range of host substrates (e.g., agricultural products, animals, plants, seeds, soil as well as the atmosphere) [2,8,10,11,12]. The genus has a cosmopolitan distribution, and is widely distributed in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America [13].

Lawrence et al. [14] introduced Alternaria sect. Alternaria to accommodate Alternaria species, commonly referred to small-spored Alternaria groups. The members of Alternaria sect. Alternaria can be morphologically distinguished from other sections in having small conidia produced in short chains (frequently less than 60 µm in length in vitro) [8,14,15]. However, this small-spored criterion is not significant to distinguish species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria from other Alternaria sections, when multi-locus phylogeny has become an essential tool to discriminate species in Alternaria [2]. According to Li et al. [2], some species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria have conidia larger than 60 µm, but these species were affiliated with Alternaria sect. Alternaria based on multi-locus phylogenetic evidence. The holomorph of sect. Alternaria is known for A. alternata, the generic type of the section, and the sexual morph is described as typically erumpent, small-sized, smooth, globose to ovoid, dark brown; with papillate ascomata; cylindrical to cylindric-clavate asci and muriform, ellipsoid to fusoid, brown, eguttulate, smooth-walled ascospores [2,10,16]. Woudenberg et al. [8] estimated 60 species accommodating in sect. Alternaria based on ITS gene analysis. Consequently, Woudenberg et al. [17] accepted only 11 species and one species complex in this section based on polyphasic taxonomic approaches, while 35 morphospecies were treated as synonyms of A. alternata. Later, Li et al. [2] showed that these 35 synonymized species can be divided into 5 main subclades in their analyses of A. alternata, pending questions on their conspecific status. Gannibal [15] re-circumscribed and amended the section based on morphological assessments by Simmons [18], and included the other 37 morphospecies and accepted 59 species in sect. Alternaria. Subsequently, the other four species (i.e., A. calystegiae, A. diversispora, A. guaranitica and A. macalpinei) were included in this section by Gannibal and Lawrence [19]. Alternaria doliconidium and A. italica were also included in this section by Wanasinghe et al. [20] and Jayawardena et al. [21] respectively. Nishikawa and Nakashima [22] also included A. iridicola in this section. Recently, Li et al. [2] introduced another 14 species in sect. Alternaria. Therefore, 83 species are currently accommodated in this section.

Recent molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that the identification of species in Alternaria and its close relative genera challenged their morphological basis [8,14,17,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In general, the molecular data tends to support the recent morphologically distinct sub-generic species groups [8,10,14,29]. However, the phylogenetic relationships of the Alternaria sections are normally variable, with the morphological characteristics used to identify morphospecies. On the other hand, Woudenberg et al. [8] delineate species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria based on ITS. The whole-genome sequencing has become an essential tool to delineate ambiguous species in Alternaria and other complex species by Woudenberg et al. [17]. Thus, Woudenberg et al. [17] used multi-locus phylogeny based on ITS, gapdh, rpb2, tef1-α, Alt-a1, endoPG and OPA10-2 gene loci coupled with whole-genome and transcriptome comparisons to discriminate species in sect. Alternaria, and accepted only 11 phylogenetic species and one species complex in Alternaria sect. Alternaria. Furthermore, Woudenberg et al. [17] synonymized 35 morphospecies under A. alternata. In addition, the lack of phylogenetic effective coding genes led to confusion in the identification of Alternaria species [8,10,17]; therefore, re-defining and expanding the generic concept of Alternaria sect. Alternaria and other Alternaria sections is necessary. These studies suggest that morphological characteristics typically used to delineate species (e.g., conidium length, width and septation; chain structure; and beak shape) may not reflect evolutionary relationships between taxa.

Alternaria species are major plant pathogens that infect a vast array of plant hosts [2,8,10,11,15,30]. Members in Alternaria sect. Alternaria are still confused in their delineation of species which are largely based on morphology and the clarity of their host species. The present study aims to introduce six novel species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria on different specific plant hosts based on a morpho-molecular approach.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Examination, Isolation, and Conservation

Samples were collected from dead branches, stems, and twigs of several plant hosts in Italy. The samples were dried and preserved in paper bags for further observation and examination under an Olympus SZ61 series stereo microscope. Micro-morphological features were mounted in sterilized distilled water on a clean slide for examination, and captured by a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera under a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope. The size of micro-morphological features was measured by using Tarosoft (R) Image FrameWork version 0.9.7. Photographic plates were edited and combined in Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The type specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand (MFLU).

Axenic cultures were obtained from single spore isolation using a spore suspension technique described by Senanayake et al. [31]. Germinated conidia were aseptically cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or malt extract agar (MEA) media under day/night lighting at room temperature (25–30 °C). The growth of fungal colonies and sporulation in cultures were observed after two weeks and eight weeks of incubation, respectively. The ex-type living cultures were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC). The novel species were registered in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/names/IndexFungorumRegister.htm, accessed on 15 July 2022).

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

Fungal genomic DNA were extracted from fresh mycelia growing on PDA/MEA for one month using the Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (BioFlux^®, Hangzhou, China). The duplicated strain of each species was extracted DNA from fungal fruiting bodies using Forensic DNA Kit (Omega^®, Norcross, GA, USA).

DNA fragments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with seven gene loci, including the internal transcribed spacers (ITS: ITS1-5.8S-ITS2) using primers ITS5 and ITS4 [32], the 28S large subunit rDNA (LSU) using primers LR0R and LR5 [33], the 18S small subunit rDNA (SSU) using primers NS1 and NS4 [32], the partial RNA polymerase second largest subunit (rpb2) using primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR [34], the translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) using primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R [35], Alternaria major allergen (Alt-a1) using primers ALT-F and ALT-R [25] and Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate Dehydrogenase (gapdh) using primers GDP-1 and GDP-2 [36]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a Veriti™ 96-Well Fast Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystem, California, USA) following the protocol described in Li et al. [2]. All PCR products were sent to TsingKe Biological Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., China for purification and sequencing. The quality of the sanger DNA sequences and sequence consensus from forward and reward directions was checked and assembled manually in BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [37], and the newly nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

2.3. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analyses

The newly generated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 sequences were subjected to the nucleotide BLAST search engine via the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 10 April 2022) for checking potential contaminants or erroneous sequences as well as delineating the closely related taxa. All reference sequences were downloaded from GenBank. The multiple sequence matrixes were automatically aligned by MAFFT v. 7.452 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/, accessed on 20 May 2022) [38]. Manual improvements were made where necessary in BioEdit v. 7.2.3 [37]. Individual gene alignments were separately analyzed by maximum likelihood (ML) in order to check the congruence of tree topology, and, thus, the combined multi-locus phylogenetic trees were inferred based on Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) analyses.

Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed by Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) [39,40] implemented in raxmlGUI 1.3 [41] using the default setting, but adjusted with 1000 bootstrap replicates and a GAMMAI model of nucleotide substitution. MrModeltest v. 2.3 [42] was used to determine the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution for each locus and incorporated into the analyses. GTR+I+G was the best-fit model for ITS, LSU and Alt-a1 loci under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), while TIM2+I+G was the best-fit model for SSU and rpb2, SYM+I+G was the best-fit model for gapdh and TIM1+I+G was the best-fit model for tef1-α. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed by MrBayes v.3.1.2 [43]. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) of six simultaneous Markov chains was run with one million generations to determine posterior probabilities (PP) [44,45], and started from a random tree topology. Trees were frequently sampled at 100th generation and the temperature value of heated chain was set to 0.15. The extra runs were required when the average standard deviation of split frequencies did not lower than 0.01 after one million generation. The first 25% trees represented the burn-in phase of the analyses and were discarded. The remaining trees were used for calculating posterior probabilities (PP) in the majority rule consensus tree. The phylogram were visualized in FigTree v. 1.4.0 [46] and edited in Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2016 (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Phylogeny

Six new species collected from dead herbaceous and monocotyledonous plants in Italy were analyzed with other representative Alternaria species in sect. Alternaria including Alternaria muriformispora (strain MFLUCC 22-0073; on Plantago sp.), A. obpyriconidia (strains MFLUCC 21-0121 and MFLUCC 14-0435; on Vicia faba), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427; on Dactylis glomerata), A. pseudoinfectoria (MFLUCC 21-0126; on Chenopodium sp.), A. rostroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0136; on Arabis sp.) and A. torilis (MFLUCC 14-0433 and MFLUCC 21-0133; on Torilis arvensis). The analyses represented phylogenetic relationships of taxa in Alternaria sect. Alternaria as well as the placement of six new species. Phylogenetic construction of sect. Alternaria based on a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset comprises 96 sequences of 34 representative species in sect. Alternaria, and Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392) was selected as the outgroup taxon. The best scoring RAxML tree is shown in Figure 1 with the final ML optimization likelihood value of -11313.333238 (ln). The dataset consists of 4377 total characters, including gaps (ITS: 1–514 bp, LSU: 515–1368 bp, SSU: 1369–2295 bp, tef1-α: 2296–2540 bp, rpb2: 2541–3311 bp, gapdh: 3312–3897 bp, Alt-a1: 3898–4377 bp). RAxML analysis yielded 511 distinct alignment patterns and 8.3% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.246733, C = 0.254032, G = 0.258489, T = 0.240746, with substitution rates AC = 0.896323, AG = 2.073824, AT = 1.043150, CG = 0.820017, CT = 4.179461 and GT = 1.000000. The gamma distribution shape parameter alpha = 0.020013 and the Tree-Length = 0.230674. Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) from MCMC were evaluated with a final average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.008527.

Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses based on ML and BI criteria showed overall similarity in tree topologies. Alternaria muriformispora (MFLUCC 22-0073, MFLU 21-0309) has a close phylogenetic relationship with A. pseudoinfectoria (MFLUCC 21-0126, MFLU 21-0311) (76% ML, 0.98 PP; Figure 1) and also clustered with A. lathyri (MFLUCC 21-0140, MFLU 21-0297) and A. breviconidiophora (MFLUCC 22-0075, MFLU 21-0317). These four species formed a well-resolved subclade in sect. Alternaria with 97% ML and 0.98 PP support. Alternaria obpyriconidia (MFLUCC 21-0121, MFLU 21-0300) formed a clade with A. macroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0134), A. arctoseptata (MFLUCC 21-0139), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427), A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124) and A. falcata (MFLUCC 21-0123) with 93% ML and 1.00 PP support (Figure 1). While A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427) is sister to A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124) with significant support (70% ML, 0.95 PP), and is also constituted in this clade. Alternaria rostroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0136, MFLU 21-0318) formed a separated branch with A. minimispora (MFLUCC 21-0127) with significant support in BI analysis (0.96 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria torilis (MFLUCC 14-0433, MFLUCC 21-0133, MFLU 21-0299) formed an independent subclade, related to A. ellipsoidialis (MFLUCC 21-0132) and A. eupatoriicola (MFLUCC 21-0122).

3.2. Taxonomy

Alternaria muriformispora J.F. Li, Camporesi, Phookamsak & Bhat, sp. nov. Figure 2

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559795

• Etymology: Named after its muriform conidia.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0309

Saprobic on dead aerial stems of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on the substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown hyphae. Conidiophores 185–201 × 12–13 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 192 × 12 µm, n = 30), macronematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, with swollen at the basal cell, slightly narrower towards the apex, dark brown, paler at the apex, smooth, septate, unbranched, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 4–5 × 5–7 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 4.5 × 6.2 µm, n = 20), polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline to light brown, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform with one conidiogenous locus. Conidia 75–88 × 23–35 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 83 × 29 µm, n = 30), acrogenous, solitary, dry, simple, straight, curved, ellipsoidal to ovoid, or obpyriform with short, narrow, paler brown, aseptate, unbranched, obtuse beak, copper brown to dark brown, four to seven transverse eusepta, with 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa in all middle transverse divisions, without oblique or longitudinal septa at both end cells, slightly thickened and constricted at middle septa, borne in chain, verruculose to verrucose, thin-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies hairy or cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, brown to dark brown hyphae; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Meldola, on dead aerial stems of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae), 8 September 2014, E. Camporesi, IT2101 (MFLU 21-0309, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 22-0073.

Notes: Multi-locus phylogeny showed that two strains of Alternaria muriformispora formed a robust clade (100% ML, 1.00 PP; Figure 1) sister to A. pseudoinfectoria with moderate support (76% ML, 0.98 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in having larger (83 × 29 µm vs. 33 × 19 µm), ovoid to ellipsoidal, or obpyriform, short beak and copper brown to dark brown conidia, with 4–7 transverse eusepta and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa in all middle transverse divisions. Alternaria pseudoinfectoria has subglobose to obclavate, or obpyriform, light brown conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta and 1–2 longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septa and conidia that form long, cylindrical, septate, unbranched secondary conidiophores with one apical conidiogenous locus. A nucleotide pairwise comparison of rpb2 sequences showed that A. muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in 10/559 bp (1.8% difference, no gap). In Alt-a1, A. muriformispora differs from A. pseudoinfectoria in 9/474 bp (1.9% difference, no gap).

Alternaria obpyriconidia J.F. Li, Camporesi, Phookamsak & Bhat, sp. nov. Figure 3

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559797

• Etymology: Named after its obpyriform conidia.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0300

Saprobic on dead stems of Vicia faba (Fabaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on the substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, subhyaline to pale white hyphae. Conidiophores (130–)139.5–155 × 11.5–13 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 145.8 × 12.6 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, slightly swollen at the apical cell, copper brown to dark brown, septate, unbranched, smooth and thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 19–23 × 9–12.5 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 19.7 × 10.8 µm, n = 100), polytretic, sympodial, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical to doliiform, subhyaline, smooth, thick-walled, apically rounded or doliiform, with 2–4 conidiogenous loci. Conidia (58–)62.5–68(–69) × (12.5–)22.5–28(–30) µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 64 × 25.4 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, dry, simple, straight or curved, ellipsoidal to obclavate or obpyriform, with short, narrow, pale brown, aseptate, rostrate at beak, pale brown to greyish brown, three to four transverse eusepta, with 1–2 longitudinal to oblique or Y-shaped septa in the middle cells, constricted at the central septum, borne in chain, verruculose or verrucose and thin-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies hairy or cottony, pale to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, subhyaline to brown hyphae; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Bagno di Romagna, Valgianna, on dead aerial stems of Vicia faba (Fabaceae), 29 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1688 (MFLU 21-0300, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 21-0121; ibid., MFLUCC 14-0435.

Notes: In the multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, two strains of Alternaria obpyriconidia formed a separate branch basal to A. macroconidia (MFLUCC 21-0134), A. arctoseptata (MFLUCC 21-0139), A. ovoidea (MFLUCC 14-0427) and A. baoshanensis (MFLUCC 21-0124), and also clustered with A. falcata (MFLUCC 21-0123). Alternaria obpyriconidia differs from A. macroconidia in having smaller (58–69 × 12.5–30 µm vs. 68.5–95.5 × 20–30.5), pale brown to greyish brown conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta, while A. macroconidia has olivaceous brown to golden brown or brown conidia, with 3–5 transverse disto- or eusepta and conidia that are not constricted in A. macroconidia [2]. Alternaria arctoseptata is distinct from A. obpyriconidia in having larger (15–75 × 10–35 µm), yellowish-brown to dark brown, sectored conidia, varied in shape, with 2–3(–6) transverse septa. Conidiophores of A. arctoseptata are shorter (50–100 × 8–12 µm vs. (130–)139.5–155 × 11.5–13 µm) and pale brown to light brown, arising from a stomatic base [2], while A. obpyriconidia has copper brown to dark brown conidiophores. Alternaria ovoidea can be distinguished from A. obpyriconidia in having slightly smaller (48–65 × 15.5–30 µm), ovoid, orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, non-beak conidia with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, whereas A. obpyriconidia has short, narrow, pale brown, aseptate, rostrate beak conidia. Alternaria baoshanensis can be distinguished from A. obpyriconidia in having versicolorous, light brown to dark brown conidiophores, which sometimes branch with several aggregated at the base, and light brown to yellowish brown 3–6 transverse septa conidia [2], whereas A. obpyriconidia has unbranched conidiophores. Alternaria falcata differs from A. obpyriconidia in having smaller (20–50 × 12–23 µm), olivaceous-brown to brown conidia, with 2–5 transverse disto- or eusepta [2]. A nucleotide base comparison of these species is shown in Table 2.

Alternaria ovoidea J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 4

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559798

• Etymology: Referring to its ovoid (droplets-like) conidia.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0298

Saprobic on stems of Dactylis glomerata (Poaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium partly superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, pale brown hyphae. Conidiophores 270–300 × 6.5–11 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 280 × 8 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, copper brown to dark brown, erect, flexuous or sigmoid, cylindrical, septate, branched, smooth to verrucose, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 9–13 × 8.5–15 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 9.7 × 11.4 µm, n = 100), mono- to polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, subcylindrical, pale brown to light brown, smooth, thick-walled, apically doliiform with conidiogenous loci cicatrized on conidial secession. Conidia 48–65 × 15.5–30 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 55.4 × 27.2 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, ovoid, orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, and one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in transverse divisions, verruculose, thick-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striated, with irregular edge; conidia not formed in vitro within 60 days.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Fiumicello di Premilcuore, on dead aerial stems of Dactylis glomerata (Poaceae), 19 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1656 (MFLU 21-0298, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 14-0427.

Notes: Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses showed that Alternaria ovoidea is sister to A. baoshanensis with significant support (70% ML, 0.95 PP; Figure 1). Alternaria ovoidea differs from A. baoshanensis in having solitary, flexuous or sigmoid, copper brown to dark brown conidiophores with a non-stomatic base, while the conidiophores are versicolorous, light brown to dark brown, arising from a stomatic base in A. baoshanensis. Conidia of A. ovoidea are slightly larger (48–65 × 15.5–30 µm vs. 25–60 × 12–22 µm), orangish brown to copper brown, sectored, with 1–3 indistinct transverse septa, while A. baoshanensis has light brown to yellowish brown, sometimes with a short beak, varied in shape, usually subglobose to ellipsoidal, or subcylindrical to obpyriform, 3–6 transverse septa conidia [2]. A nucleotide base comparison of A. ovoidea with A. baoshanensis showed that they are different in 4/515 bp (0.8%) of ITS, 11/474 bp (2.3%) of Alt-a1, 11/567 bp (1.9%) of gapdh, 37/559 bp (6.6%) of rpb2 and 3/238 bp (1.3%) of tef1-α.

Alternaria pseudoinfectoria J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 5

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559799

• Etymology: Referring to the conidial structures resemble Alternaria section infectoriae.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0311

Saprobic on stems of Chenopodium sp. (Chenopodiaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown hyphae. Conidiophores 55–68 × 12–14 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 62 × 13 µm, n = 30), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, light brown to brown, septate, branched, smooth, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 11–12 × 10–14 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 11.5 × 12 µm, n = 20), monotretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline to light brown, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform with one conidiogenous locus. Conidia 25–40 × 13–25 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 33 × 19 µm, n = 30) acrogenous, holoblastic, solitary, straight, subglobose to obclavate, or obpyriform, sometimes with short, narrow, rostrate, paler brown, septate beak, light brown 3–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in some transverse divisions, borne in chain, smooth to minutely verrucose, thin-walled, formed apically secondary conidiophores, with one conidiogenous locus. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from all cells. Colonies immersed in PDA, cottony, white to grey, reaching 5 cm in 7 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, white hyphae; conidia not sporulated in vitro within 60 days.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Forlì, Via Nenni, on dead aerial stems of Chenopodium sp. (Chenopodiaceae), 17 October 2014, E. Camporesi, IT2181 (MFLU 21-0311, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 21-0126.

Notes: Alternaria pseudoinfectoria resembles species in sect. Infectoriae due to its conidia often developing long secondary conidiophores. Although species in section Panax also formed long secondary conidiophores, conidiogenous loci on secondary conidiophores are rather monotretic in A. pseudoinfectoria, which more resemble structures of species in sect. Infectoriae [14,47]. However, A. pseudoinfectoria corresponds with sect. Alternaria in having straight or curved primary conidiophores, simple to branched, with one apical conidiogenous locus, and conidia born in chain [8]. In phylogenetic analyses, two strains of A. pseudoinfectoria formed a well-resolved subclade (82% ML, 0.99 PP) and is sister to A. muriformispora with 76% ML and 0.98 PP support (Figure 1). The morphological comparison of these two species is detailed in notes of A. muriformispora.

Alternaria rostroconidia J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 6

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559800

• Etymology: Referring to the rostrate conidia.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0318

Saprobic on dead stems of Arabis sp. (Brassicaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, with dark hyphae. Conidiophores 105–120 × 11–15 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 112 × 13 µm, n = 30), macronematous, solitary or 2–5 aggregated at the base, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, light brown to dark brown, septate, geniculate, smooth or sometimes semi-verrucose, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 12–18 × 5–8 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 15 × 6 µm, n = 20), mono- to polytretic, normally sympodial proliferations, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline or semi-colored, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform, with 1–2 conidiogenous loci and swollen knots near conidiogenous loci. Conidia 50–80 × 25–30 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 66 × 22 µm, n = 30) acrogenous, solitary, straight or curved, ellipsoidal or ovoid to obpyriform, with short, narrow, rostrate, paler brown, aseptate beak, with distinct hilum at the apex, dark brown, 3–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped septum in some transverse divisions, sometimes sectored, slightly constricted at the septa, borne in chain, smooth, thick-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 12 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies cottony, brown to dark brown, reaching 5 cm in 10 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, white to grey hyphae; conidia not sporulated in vitro within 60 days.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Premilcuore, on dead aerial stems of Arabis sp. (Brassicaceae), 8 October 2017, E. Camporesi, IT3515 (MFLU 21-0318, holotype), ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 21-0136.

Notes: Alternaria rostroconidia corresponds with species in sect. Alternaria in having obpyriform, born in chain conidia with several transverse and longitudinal septa [8]. In multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, A. rostroconidia has a close relationship with A. minimispora with significant support in BI analyses (0.96 PP; Figure 1). A rpb2 nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 19/505 bp (3.8% difference, no gap). In gapdh, A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 10/545 bp (1.8% difference, no gap). The Alt-a1 nucleotide pairwise comparison shows that A. rostroconidia differs from A. minimispora in 8/474 bp (1.7% difference, no gap). Morphologically, A. rostroconidia can be distinguished from A. minimispora in having larger (50–80 × 25–30 µm vs. 13–25 × 8–11 µm), ellipsoidal or ovoid to obpyriform conidia, with 3–4 transverse eusepta and short, narrow, rostrate and distinct hilum at the apex. Alternaria minimispora has subglobose to ovoid, sometimes obpyriform or obturbinate, beakless, two to four transversely euseptate conidia [2].

Alternaria torilis J.F. Li, Camporesi, Bhat & Phookamsak, sp. nov. Figure 7

• Index Fungorum number: IF 559801

• Etymology: Named after the host genus “Torilis”.

• Holotype: MFLU 21-0299

Saprobic on dead aerial stems of Torilis arvensis (Apiaceae). Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Mycelium superficial on host substrate, composed of septate, branched, smooth, thin-walled, brown to light brown hyphae. Conidiophores (155–)177–185(–191) × (7.5–)8–10(–11) µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 175.2 × 8.8 µm, n = 100), macronematous, mononematous, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, dark brown, unbranched, septate, sometimes branched, smooth, thick-walled. Conidiogenous cells 7–9(–10) × (6.5–)7.5–10 µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 8.2 × 8.9 µm, n = 100), mono- to polytretic, integrated, terminal, determinate or percurrent, cylindrical, subhyaline, smooth, thin-walled, apically doliiform, with 2 conidiogenous loci cicatrized on conidial secession. Conidia (55–)60–75(–82) × (23–)25–31.5(–32) µm ($\stackrel{-}{x}$ = 68.5 × 28.5 µm, n = 100) acrogenous, solitary, dry, straight, fusiform to ovoid, or obturbinate to obpyriform, sometimes with short, narrow, pale brown to light brown, aseptate beak, brown to dark brown, 2–4 transverse eusepta, with one longitudinal or oblique or Y-shaped distoseptum in some transverse divisions, borne in chain, minutely verruculose, thin-walled, formed apically secondary conidiophores with one conidiogenous locus. Conidial secession schizolytic.

Culture characteristics: Conidia germinating on PDA within 14 h and germ tubes produced from lateral cells. Colonies growing on PDA, hairy or cottony, light brown to brown, reaching 5 cm in 14 days at 25 °C, mycelium superficial, effuse, radially striate, with irregular edge, colorless hyphae. Conidia sporulated on OA within 15 days, phragmosporous to muriform, oblong to ovoid, brown to dark brown, with short, doliiform, apical beak, formed apically or laterally, short, branched or unbranched secondary conidiophores with one to two conidiogenous loci at apex and 1–3 transverse septa, with 1–2 longtudinal or Y-shape septa in transverse division, smooth to minutely verrucose and thin-walled.

Material examined: Italy, Province of Forlì-Cesena, Forlì, San Lorenzo in Noceto, on dead aerial stems of Torilis arvensis (Apiaceae), 23 January 2014, E. Camporesi, IT1667 (MFLU 21-0299, holotype), ex-type living culture = MFLUCC 14-0433, ibid., MFLUCC 21-0133.

Notes: Alternaria torilis resembles A. alternata in having a brown to dark brown short beak, 2–4 transverse septa conidia and forming secondary conidiophores. The conidial body can narrow gradually into a tapered beak or secondary conidiophore, with curved primary conidiophores and solitary conidiophores with mono- to polytretic conidiophores with conidiogenous loci at the apex. Alternaria torilis differs from A. alternata by its darker, ovoid to obturbinate or obpyriform, which is rather ovoid to chiefly obclavate or obpyriform in A. alternata. Conidiophores of A. torilis normally have 2 conidiogenous loci and are rostrate at the apex. In the phylogenetic analyses, three strains of A. torilis formed a well-resolved subclade (85% Ml, 1.00 PP; Figure 1), independently constituted within sect. Alternaria, and have a close relationship with A. ellipsoidialis and A. eupatoriicola distancing from A. alternata. Alternaria torilis can be distinguished from A. ellipsoidialis in having larger (55–82 × 23–32 µm vs. 35–60 × 18–25 µm), fusiform to ovoid, or obturbinate to obpyriform, brown to dark brown conidia, with 2–4 transverse eusepta. Alternaria ellipsoidialis has oblong to ellipsoidal, or ovoid, pale brown to brown, sectored, 4–7 transverse eusepta conidia [2]. Alternaria eupatoriicola is different from A. torilis in having smaller (40–65 × 15–30 µm vs. 55–82 × 23–32), ovoid to obpyriform, reddish brown to brown, 3–5transverse septa conidia. In addition, conidia of A. torilis formed apically secondary conidiophores with one conidiogenous locus, whereas it was absent in A. eupatoriicola [2].

The nucleotide pairwise comparison of the ITS showed that Alternaria torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 9/485 bp (1.9% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 10/485 bp (2.1% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 9/480 bp (1.9% difference, no gap). A rpb2 nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 42/558 bp (7.5% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 9/480 bp (1.9% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 40/558 bp (7.2% difference, no gap). A gapdh nucleotide pairwise comparison showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 31/590 bp (5.3% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 18/560 bp (3.2% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 25/590 bp (4.2% difference, no gap). The nucleotide pairwise comparison of the Alt-a1 showed that A. torilis differs from A. alternata (CBS 916.96, ex-type) in 25/465 bp (5.4% difference, no gap), differs from A. ellipsoidialis in 20/465 bp (4.3% difference, no gap) and differs from A. eupatoriicola in 15/470 bp (3.2% difference, no gap).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The aim of the present study was to introduce six novel Alternaria species in sect. Alternaria based on a morpho-molecular approach. These six saprobic species occurred on a variety of host plants in families Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Fabaceae, Plantaginaceae, and Poaceae in Italy and could not be ascribed to any known taxa within sect. Alternaria. According to a recent classification provided by Woudenberg et al. [17] and Gannibal [15], we also note the morphological differences among extant species in this section. Hence, six new species: A. muriformispora, A. obpyriconidia, A. ovoidea, A. pseudoinfectoria, A. rostroconidia and A. torilis are introduced, described and illustrated herein.

Multi-locus phylogeny, based on a concatenated ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence matrix, revealed that these novel species formed well-resolved subclades within the sect. Alternaria, except for A. obpyriconidia that formed a distinct branch with other closely related species with low support in ML, but well-resolved species in BI analysis (1.00 PP; Figure 1). Based on the phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics, coupled with host preferences and nucleotide polymorphisms, A. obpyriconidia is justified as a new species following Jeewon and Hyde [48]. Furthermore, these six new species are distant from A. arborescens species complex (AASC) and A. alternata as well as other species in this section, which provided further evidence to support their phylogenetic affinities within the sect. Alternaria.

In the present analyses, Alternaria doliconidium and A. italica formed subclades, constituted within A. alternata, and that concurred with Li et al. [2]. Even though Woudenberg et al. [17] accepted only 11 phylogenetic species and one species complex in sect. Alternaria, and also treated 35 morphospecies as synonyms of A. alternata, Li et al. [2] re-analyzed the isolates of A. alternata with their new collections and mentioned that A. alternata could be separated to be at least five distinct species. However, more evidence is needed to support this conclusion. Similarly, A. doliconidium and A. italica lack informative cording genes such as Alt-a1, gapdh, rpb2 and tef1-α to justify their heterospecific status, with A. alternata pending further studies.

Woudenberg et al. [17] indicated that Alternaria species, including Alternaria sect. Alternaria, should be delineated by using phylogenomics due to a lack of effective gene sequences; however, the multi-locus phylogenetic analyses could well delineate species in sect. Alternaria (Figure 1) in studies of Wanasinghe et al. [20], Jayawardena et al. [21], Nishikawa and Nakashima [22] and Li et al. [2]. In the present study, phylogenetically analyzed taxa in sect. Alternaria, based on combined the intervening ITS regions, nuclear ribosomal DNA SSU, LSU and protein-coding genes Alt-a1, tef1-α, gapdh and rpb2, demonstrated that the recent taxa in this section formed distinct clades and were well supported in the phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide polymorphic comparisons also show the differences between our new taxa, which support the justifications of the new species described herein. It is interesting to note that in the nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of gene sequences among the species in Alternaria sect. Alternaria, rpb2 contains the most nucleotide differences among the species (up to 3.5%), which implies that this protein-cording gene may be a potentially effective gene region to delineate species in sect. Alternaria.

Nevertheless, species of Alternaria in sect. Alternaria are similar in morphological characteristics, and it is difficult to distinguish these species based solely on morphology. However, the conidial characteristics (e.g., conidial septation and rostrate or non-beak conidia) of our six novel species are significant to distinguish them from other species. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses also provided further evidence, confirming that these six species are novel. These six species clearly formed a separate branch with significant support values (≥70% ML and 0.95 PP; Figure 1) in the present study, and this concurs with the findings of Li et al. [2]. Jeewon and Hyde [48] suggested that the nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of reliable genes should be more than 1.5% different for justifying the novel species. Even though the ITS, LSU, SSU and tef1-α could not be used to delineate some species in sect. Alternaria, the remaining gene regions (i.e., Alt-a1, gapdh and rpb2) proved sufficient for distinguishing these new species. Therefore, the novel species introduced herein were justified based on the multi-locus phylogeny coupled with morphological characteristics and nucleotide polymorphic comparisons of reliable genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L. and R.P.; methodology, J.L. and R.P.; software, J.L. and H.J.; validation, R.P., J.L. and D.J.B.; formal analysis, J.L, S.H. and H.J.; investigation, J.L and R.P.; resources, J.L. and E.C.; data curation, J.L., E.C. and R.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.L., H.J. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, J.L., R.P., D.J.B., N.S., J.K., S.H. and P.E.M.; supervision, N.S., S.L. and J.X.; project administration, R.P. and N.S.; funding acquisition, N.S., S.L. and J.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data availability was mentioned in the manuscript. The novel taxa were registered in Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp, accessed on 15 July 2022) including Index Fungorum numbers IF 559795, IF 559797, IF 559798, IF 559799, IF 559800 and IF 559801. The newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/submit/, accessed on 25 July 2021) and the GenBank accession numbers were shown in Table 1.

Acknowledgments

The Biology Experimental Center, Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences is thanked for providing the facilities of the molecular laboratory. Shaun Pennycook at Manaaki Whenua–Landcare Research, New Zealand, is thanked for assistance in naming the novel taxa. Er-Fu Yang at Center for Yunnan Plateau Biological Resources Protection and Utilization, College of Biological Resource and Food Engineering, Qujing Normal University, China is thanked for molecular works. Junfu Li thanks Mae Fah Luang University for his Ph.D. scholarship. Rungtiwa Phookamsak thanks Reinventing University System 2021, Mae Fah Luang University for providing a visiting scholarship. Hongbo Jiang would like to thank Mae Fah Luang University, Thailand for his Ph.D. scholarship. Chiang Mai University, Thailand is thanked for partial research financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Tables

Generate image description

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria sect. Alternaria generated by RAxML-based analysis of a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, black) equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, red) equal to or greater than 0.95 PP are shown above the nodes. The tree is rooted to Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392). Newly species and generated strains are in blue, and the type strains are indicated in bold. Strains obtained from ex-type living culture are indicated by (T) and strains obtained from holotype specimen are indicated by (H).

Generate image description

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Alternaria sect. Alternaria generated by RAxML-based analysis of a combined ITS, LSU, SSU, tef1-α, rpb2, gapdh and Alt-a1 DNA sequence dataset. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML, black) equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP, red) equal to or greater than 0.95 PP are shown above the nodes. The tree is rooted to Alternaria alternantherae (CBS 124392). Newly species and generated strains are in blue, and the type strains are indicated in bold. Strains obtained from ex-type living culture are indicated by (T) and strains obtained from holotype specimen are indicated by (H).

Generate image description

Figure 2. Alternaria muriformispora (MFLU 21-0309, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead aerial stem of Plantago sp. (Plantaginaceae); (b–f) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (g–p) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 100 µm, (b–f) = 50 µm, (g,j–p) = 30 µm, (h,i) = 20 µm.

Generate image description

Figure 3. Alternaria obpyriconidia (MFLU 21-0300, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Vicia faba; (b–d) Conidiophores; (e–h) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (i–r) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 1000 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (b–d,f–h,n–q) = 30 µm, (i–m,r) = 20 µm.

Generate image description

Figure 4. Alternaria ovoidea (MFLU 21-0298, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Dactylis glomerata; (b–h) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (i–q) Conidia; (r) Culture on PDA. Scale bars: (r) = 2 cm, (a) = 100 µm, (b–d,g) = 50 µm, (e,f,h) = 30 µm, (i–q) = 20 µm.

Generate image description

Figure 5. Alternaria pseudoinfectoria (MFLU 21-0311, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stem of Chenopodium sp.; (b,c,j) Conidia formed apical secondary conidiophores; (d–i) Conidiophores; (k–m) Conidia; (n) Germinated conidium; (o,p) Colonies on PDA. Scale bars: (o,p) = 2 cm, (a) = 300 µm, (b–f,h,n) = 20 µm, (g,i,j) = 15 µm, (k–m) = 10 µm.

Generate image description

Figure 6. Alternaria rostroconidia (MFLU 21-0318, holotype). (a) Colonies on dead stems of Arabis sp; (b–f) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells (g–m) Conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (e) = 50 µm, (b,d,f) = 30 µm, (c,g–m) = 20 µm.

Generate image description

Figure 7. Alternaria torilis (MFLU 21-0299, holotype). (a) Colonies on stems of Torilis arvensis; (b–h) Conidiophores bearing conidiogenous cells; (i) Secondary conidiophores arising from conidium; (j–q) Conidia; (r,s) Germinated conidia. Scale bars: (a) = 200 µm, (c,g) = 30 µm, (b,d–f,h–s) = 20 µm.

Table 1

Taxa used for the phylogenetic analyses in this study and their GenBank accession numbers. The ex-type cultures are indicated with superscript “^T” and the newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.

Species Name	Strains/Voucher No.	GenBank Accession Numbers
		SSU	LSU	rpb2	ITS	gapdh	tef1-α	Alt-a1
Alternaria alstroemeriae	CBS 118808	KP124917	KP124447	KP124764	KP124296	KP124153	KP125071	KP123845
Alternaria alstroemeriae	CBS 118809 T	NG063029	NG069882	KP124765	NR163686	KP124154	KP125072	MH084526
Alternaria alternantherae	CBS 124392	KC584506	KC584251	KC584374	KC584179	KC584096	KC584633	KP123846
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102596	KP124950	MH874392	KP124796	MH862796	KP124183	KP125104	KP123877
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102599	KP124952	MH874395	KP124798	MH862799	KP124185	KP125106	KP123879
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102600	KP124953	MH874396	KP124799	MH862800	KP124186	KP125107	KP123880
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102602	KP124954	MH877754	KP124800	KP124332	KP124187	KP125108	KP123881
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102603	KP124955	KP124485	KP124801	KP124333	KP124188	KP125109	KP123882
Alternaria alternata	CBS 102604	KP124956	MH874399	KP124802	MH862803	-	KP125110	-
Alternaria alternata	CBS 113013	KP124963	KP124493	KP124809	KP124341	KP124195	KP125117	KP123889
Alternaria alternata	CBS 113014	KP124964	KP124494	KP124810	KP124342	KP124196	KP125118	KP123890
Alternaria alternata	CBS 113015	KP124965	KP124495	KP124811	KP124343	KP124197	KP125119	KP123891
Alternaria alternata	CBS 119399	KP124983	KP124513	KP124829	KP124361	-	KP125137	KP123910
Alternaria alternata	CBS 120829	KP124986	KP124516	KP124832	KP124364	KP124216	KP125140	KP123912
Alternaria alternata	CBS 121344	KP124988	KP124518	KP124834	KP124365	KP124217	KP125142	KP123913
Alternaria alternata	CBS 121346	KP124989	KP124519	KP124835	KP124366	KP124218	KP125143	KP123914
Alternaria alternata	CBS 121492	KP124994	KP124524	KP124840	KP124370	KP124222	KP125148	KP123918
Alternaria alternata	CBS 124277	KP124997	KP124527	KP124843	KP124373	KP124225	KP125151	KP123921
Alternaria alternata	CBS 124278	KP124998	KP124528	KP124844	KP124374	KP124226	KP125152	KP123922
Alternaria alternata	CBS 916.96 T	KC584507	DQ678082	KC584375	AF347031	AY278808	KC584634	-
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 101.13	KP125016	KP124546	KP124862	KP124392	KP125170	KP124244	KP123940
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 105.24	KP125017	KP12454	KP124863	KP124393	KP125171	KP124245	KP123941
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 105.49	KP125020	KP124550	KP124866	KP124396	KP125174	KP124248	KP123944
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 108.41	KP125018	KP124548	KP124864	KP124394	KP125172	KP124246	KP123942
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 113.41	KP125019	KP124549	KP124865	KP124395	KP125173	KP124247	KP123943
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 750.68	KP125021	KP124551	KP124868	KP124398	KP125176	KP124250	KP123945
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 102605 T	KC584509	KC584253	KC584377	AF347033	AY278810	KC584636	AY563303
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 109730	KP125022	KP124552	KP124869	KP124399	KP125177	KP124251	KP123946
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 119544	NG063030	NG_069254	KP124878	MH863062	KP125186	JQ646321	KP123955
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 119545	KP125032	KP124562	KY392798	KP124409	KP125187	KP124260	KP123956
Alternaria arborescens	CBS 123267	KP125035	KP124565	KP124882	KP124412	KP125190	KP124263	KP123959
Alternaria arctoseptata	MFLUCC 21-0139 T	MZ621874	MZ621948	OK236655	-	0K236608	OK236702	OK236755
Alternaria betae-kenyensis	CBS 118810 T	NG_063032	NG_069256	JQ905180	NR136118	JQ905161	KP125197	JQ905104
Alternaria baoshanensis	MFLUCC 21-0124 T	MZ621878	MZ621952	OK236659	MZ622003	OK236613	OK236706	OK236760
Alternaria breviconidiophora	MFLUCC 22-0075 T	MZ621870	MZ621944	OK236651	MZ621997	OK236604	OK236698	OK236751
Alternaria breviconidiophora	MFLU 21-0317	MZ621871	MZ621945	OK236652	MZ621998	OK236605	OK236699	OK236752
Alternaria burnsii	CBS 107.38 T	NG063033	N069257	JQ646457	NR136119	JQ646305	KP125198	JQ646388
Alternaria burnsii	CBS 110.50	KP125044	KP124574	KP124890	KP124421	KP124271	KP125199	KP123968
Alternaria burnsii	CBS 118816	KP125046	KP124576	KP124892	KP124423	KP124273	KP125201	KP123970
Alternaria burnsii	CBS 118817	KP125047	KP124577	KP124893	KP124424	KP124274	KP125202	KP123971
Alternaria burnsii	CBS 130264	KP125048	KP124578	KP124894	KP124425	KP124275	KP125203	KP123972
Alternaria doliconidium	KUN-HKAS 100840T	NG065142	NG069551	-	NR158361	-	-	-
Alternaria doliconidium	KUMCC 17-0263 T	MG829094	MG828980	-	MG828864	-	-	-
Alternaria eichhorniae	CBS 119778	KP125050	KP124580	KP124896	KP124426	KP124277	KP125205	-
Alternaria eichhorniae	CBS 489.92 T	NG063034	KP124579	KP124895	-	KP124276	KP125204	KP123973
Alternaria ellipsoidialis	MFLUCC 21-0132 T	MZ621862	MZ621936	OK236643	MZ621989	OK236596	OK236690	OK236743
Alternaria eupatoriicola	MFLUCC 21-0122 T	MZ621855	MZ621929	OK236636	MZ621982	OK236589	OK236683	OK236736
Alternaria falcata	MFLUCC 21-0123 T	MZ621865	MZ62139	OK236649	MZ621992	OK236599	OK236693	OK236746
Alternaria gaisen	CBS 118488 T	KP125051	KP124581	KP124897	KP124427	KP124278	KP125206	KP123975
Alternaria gaisen	CBS 632.93	KC584531	KC584275	KC584399	KC584197	KC584116	KC584658	KP123974
Alternaria gaisen	CPC 25268	KP125052	KP124582	KP124898	KP124428	KP124279	KP125207	KP123976
Alternaria gossypina	CBS 100.23	KP125053	KP124583	KP124899	KP124429	KP124280	KP125208	KP123977
Alternaria gossypina	CBS 104.32 T	KP125054	KP124584	KP124900	KP124430	JQ646312	KP125209	JQ646395
Alternaria gossypina	CBS 107.36	KP125055	KP124585	KP124901	KP124431	-	KP125210	-
Alternaria gossypina	CBS 102597	KP125056	MH874393	KP124902	MH862797	KP124281	KP125211	KP123978
Alternaria gossypina	CBS 102601	KP125057	MH874397	KP124903	MH862801	KP124282	KP125212	KP123979
Alternaria iridiaustralis	CBS 118486 T	NG_063035	NG_069258	KP124905	NR_136120	KP124284	KP125214	KP123981
Alternaria iridiaustralis	CBS 118487	KP125060	KP124590	KP124906	KP124436	KP124285	KP125215	KP123982
Alternaria iridiaustralis	CBS 118404	KP125058	KP124588	KP124904	KP124434	KP124283	KP125213	KP123980
Alternaria italica	KUMCC 17-0090	-	-	-	MG764018	-	-	-
Alternaria italica	MFLUCC 14-0421 T	-	MG818319	MG859737	MG764017	-	-	-
Alternaria jacinthicola	CBS 133751 T	KP125062	KP124592	KP124908	KP124438	KP124287	KP125217	KP123984
Alternaria jacinthicola	CBS 878.95	KP125061	KP124591	KP124907	KP124437	KP124286	KP125216	KP123983
Alternaria jacinthicola	CPC 25267	KP125063	KP124593	KP124909	KP124439	KP124288	KP125218	KP123985
Alternaria lathyri	MFLUCC 21-0140 T	MZ621847	MZ621921	OK236628	MZ621974	OK236581	OK236675	OK236728
Alternaria lathyri	MFLU 21-0297	MZ621848	MZ621922	OK236629	MZ621975	OK236582	OK236676	OK236729
Alternaria longipes	CBS 113.35	KP125064	KP124594	KP124910	KP124440	KP124289	KP125219	KP123986
Alternaria longipes	CBS 121332	KP125067	KP124597	KP124913	KP124443	KP124292	KP125222	KP123989
Alternaria longipes	CBS 121333	KP125068	KP124598	KP124914	KP124444	KP124293	KP125223	KP123990
Alternaria longipes	CBS 539.94	KP125065	KP124595	KP124911	KP124441	KP124290	KP125220	KP123987
Alternaria longipes	CBS 540.94	KC584541	KC584285	KC584409	-	-	KC584667	-
Alternaria longipes	CBS 917.96	KP125066	KP124596	KP124912	KP124442	KP124291	KP125221	KP123988
Alternaria macilenta	MFLUCC 21-0138 T	MZ621845	MZ621919	OK236626	MZ621972	OK236579	OK236673	OK236726
Alternaria macroconidia	MFLUCC 21-0134 T	MZ621876	MZ621950	OK236657	MZ622001	OK236610	OK236704	OK236757
Alternaria minimispora	MFLUCC 21-0127 T	MZ621853	MZ621927	OK236634	MZ621980	OK236587	OK236681	OK236734
Alternaria muriformispora	MFLUCC 22-0073 T	MZ621849	MZ621923	OK236630	MZ621976	OK236583	OK236677	OK236730
Alternaria muriformispora	MFLU 21-0309	MZ621850	MZ621924	OK236631	MZ621977	OK236584	OK236678	OK236731
Alternaria oblongoellipsoidea	MFLUCC 22-0074 T	MZ621840	MZ621914	OK236621	MZ621967	OK236574	OK236668	OK236721
Alternaria obpyriconidia	MFLUCC 21-0121 T	MZ621851	MZ621925	OK236633	MZ621978	OK236585	OK236680	OK236732
Alternaria obpyriconidia	MFLU 21-0300	MZ621852	MZ621926	OK236632	MZ621979	OK236586	OK236679	OK236733
Alternaria orobanches	MFLUCC 21-0137T	MZ621882	MZ621956	-	MZ622007	-	OK236710	OK236763
Alternaria ovoidea	MFLUCC 14-0427 T	MZ621880	MZ621954	OK236661	MZ622005	OK236614	OK236708	OK236761
Alternaria phragmiticola	MFLUCC 21-0125 T	MZ621867	MZ621941	OK236649	MZ621994	OK236602	OK236696	OK236749
Alternaria phragmiticola	MFLU 21-0316	MZ621868	MZ621942	OK236650	MZ621995	OK236603	OK236697	OK236750
Alternaria pseudoinfectoria	MFLUCC 21-0126 T	MZ621857	MZ621931	OK236638	MZ621984	OK236591	OK236685	OK236738
Alternaria pseudoinfectoria	MFLU 21-0311	MZ621858	MZ621932	OK236639	MZ621985	OK236592	OK236686	OK236739
Alternaria rostroconidia	MFLUCC 21-0136 T	MZ621842	MZ621916	OK236623	MZ621969	OK236576	OK236670	OK236723
Alternaria rostroconidia	MFLU 21-0318	MZ621843	MZ621917	OK236624	MZ621970	OK236577	OK236671	OK236724
Alternaria salicicola	MFLUCC 22-0072 T	MZ621872	MZ621946	OK236653	MZ621999	OK236606	OK236700	OK236753
Alternaria sp.	CBS 108.27	KC584601	KC584343	KC584468	KC584236	KC584162	KC584727	-
Alternaria tomato	CBS 103.30	KP125069	KP124599	KP124915	KP124445	KP124294	KP125224	KP123991
Alternaria tomato	CBS 114.35	KP125070	KP124600	KP124916	KP124446	KP124295	KP125225	KP123992
Alternaria torilis	MFLUCC 21-0133	MZ621859	MZ621933	OK236640	MZ621986	OK236593	OK236687	OK236740
Alternaria torilis	MFLU 21-0299	MZ621860	MZ621934	OK236642	MZ621987	OK236595	OK236689	OK236742
Alternaria torilis	MFLUCC 14-0433 T	MZ621861	MZ621935	OK236641	MZ621988	OK236594	OK236688	OK236741
Alternaria vitis	MFLUCC 17-1109 T	-	-	-	MG764007	-	-	-

Abbreviations: CBS: the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture Collection of Pedro Crous, Netherlands; KUMCC: Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, Yunnan, China; KUN-HKAS: Herbarium of Cryptogams Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica, Yunnan, China; MFLU: the Herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University Chiang Rai, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Table 2

A nucleotide base comparison of Alternaria obpyriconidia with other phylogenetically related species.

Species	Nucleotide Base Difference of Each Informative Gene Regions
	Alt-a1	gapdh	ITS	rpb2	tef1-α
Alternaria arctoseptata	11/476 bp (2.3%)	15/570 bp (2.6%)	-	39/560 bp (7.0%)	4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. baoshanensis	8/474 bp (1.7%)	15/568 bp (2.6%)	5/515 bp (1%)	40/559 bp (7.2%)	3/240 bp (1.3%)
A. falcata	10/474 bp (2.1%)	12/568 bp (2.1%)	5/515 bp (1%)	37/559 bp (6.6%)	4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. macroconidia	11/474 bp (2.3%)	11/567 bp (1.9%)	4/515 bp (0.8%)	54/560 bp (9.6%)	4/240 bp (1.7%)
A. ovoidea	16/470 bp (3.4%)	14/568 bp (2.5%)	4/515 bp (0.8%)	42/559 bp (7.5%)	3/240 bp (1.3%)

References

1. Hongsanan, S.; Hyde, K.D.; Phookamsak, R.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; McKenzie, E.H.C.; Sarma, V.V.; Boonmee, S.; Lücking, R.; Bhat, J.D.; Liu, N. et al. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and Pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere; 2020; 11, pp. 1553-2107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13]

2. Li, J.-F.; Jiang, H.-B.; Jeewon, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Bhat, D.J.; Tang, S.-M.; Lumyong, S.; Mortimer, P.E.; Xu, J.-C.; Camporesi, E. et al. Alternaria: Update on species limits, evolution, multi-locus phylogeny, and classification. Stud. Fungi; 2022; under review

3. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Dai, D.Q.; Sánchez-García, M.; Goto, B.T.; Saxena, R.K.; Erdoğdu, M.; Selçuk, F.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Aptroot, A. et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa–2021. Mycosphere; 2022; 13, pp. 53-453. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2]

4. Species Fungorum. Available online: http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 4 July 2022).

5. Ahmadpour, A.; Ghosta, Y.; Poursafar, A. Novel species of Alternaria section Nimbya from Iran as revealed by morphological and molecular data. Mycologia; 2021; 113, pp. 1073-1088. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2021.1923299] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338599]

6. He, L.; Cheng, H.; Htun, A.A.; Ge, H.; Xia, Z.Z.; Guo, J.W.; Deng, J.X.; Du, T. Phylogeny and taxonomy of two new Alternaria (Ascomycota: Pleosporaceae) species in section Gypsophilae from China. Mycol. Prog.; 2021; 20, pp. 355-363. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-021-01676-x]

7. He, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhao, L.; Htun, A.A.; Yu, Z.H.; Deng, J.-X.; Qi, L.-L. Morphological and molecular identification of two new Alternaria species (Ascomycota, Pleosporaceae) in section Radicina from China. MycoKeys; 2021; 78, pp. 187-198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.78.64853]

8. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Binder, M.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria redefined. Stud. Mycol.; 2013; 75, pp. 171-212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3114/sim0015]

9. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Truter, M.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. Large-spored Alternaria pathogens in section Porri disentangled. Stud. Mycol.; 2014; 79, pp. 1-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.003]

10. Lawrence, D.P.; Rotondo, F.; Gannibal, P.B. Biodiversity and taxonomy of the pleomorphic genus Alternaria. Mycol. Prog.; 2016; 15, pp. 1-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1144-x]

11. Jayawardena, R.S.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Ghobad-Nejhad, M.; Wanasinghe, D.N.; Liu, N.; Phillips, A.J.L.; Oliveira-Filho, J.R.C.; da Silva, G.A.; Gibertoni, T.B. et al. One stop shop II: Taxonomic update with molecular phylogeny for important phytopathogenic genera: 26–50. Fungal Divers.; 2019; 94, pp. 41-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00418-5]

12. Thomma, B.P. Alternaria spp.: From general saprophyte to specific parasite. Mol. Plant Pathol.; 2003; 4, pp. 225-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00173.x]

13. Farr, D.F.; Rossman, A.Y. Fungal databases, US National Fungal Collections, ARS USDA. Available online: http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases (accessed on 21 May 2022).

14. Lawrence, D.P.; Gannibal, P.B.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. The sections of Alternaria: Formalizing species-group concepts. Mycologia; 2013; 105, pp. 530-546. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/12-249] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23687125]

15. Gannibal, P.B. Distribution of Alternaria species among sections. 2. Section Alternaria. Mycotaxon; 2016; 130, pp. 941-949. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/130.941]

16. Ariyawansa, H.; Thambugala, K.M.; Manamgoda, D.S.; Jayawardena, R.; Camporesi, E.; Boonmee, S.; Wanasinghe, D.; Phookamsak, R.; Hongsanan, S.; Singtripop, C. et al. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Pleosporaceae. Fungal Divers.; 2015; 71, pp. 85-139. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-015-0323-z]

17. Woudenberg, J.H.C.; Seidl, M.F.; Groenewald, J.Z.; de Vries, M.; Stielow, J.B.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Crous, P.W. Alternaria section Alternaria: Species, formae speciales or pathotypes?. Stud. Mycol.; 2015; 82, pp. 1-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2015.07.001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26951037]

18. Simmons, E.G. Alternaria: An Identification Manual; CBS Biodiversity Series Volume: 6; Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; 780p.

19. Gannibal, P.B.; Lawrence, D.P. Distribution of Alternaria species among sections. 5. Species producing conidia with many longitudinal septa. Mycotaxon; 2018; 133, pp. 285-291. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/133.285]

20. Wanasinghe, D.N.; Phukhamsakda, C.; Hyde, K.D.; Jeewon, R.; Lee, H.B.; Jones, E.B.G.; Tibpromma, S.; Tennakoon, D.S.; Dissanayake, A.J.; Jayasiri, S.C. et al. Fungal diversity notes 709–839: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Divers.; 2018; 89, pp. 1-236. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7]

21. Jayawardena, R.S.; Purahong, W.; Zhang, W.; Wubet, T.; Li, X.; Liu, M.; Zhao, W.; Hyde, K.D.; Liu, J.; Yan, J. Biodiversity of fungi on Vitis vinifera L. revealed by traditional and high-resolution culture-independent approaches. Fungal Divers.; 2018; 90, pp. 1-84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0398-4]

22. Nishikawa, J.; Nakashima, C. Japanese species of Alternaria and their species boundaries based on host range. Fungal Syst. Evol.; 2020; 5, pp. 197-281. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3114/fuse.2020.05.13]

23. Pryor, B.M.; Gilbertson, R.L. Molecular phylogenetic relationships amongst Alternaria species and related fungi based upon analysis of nuclear ITS and mt SSU rDNA sequences. Mycol. Res.; 2000; 104, pp. 1312-1321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953756200003002]

24. Peever, T.L.; Su, G.; Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Timmer, L.W. Molecular systematics of citrus-associated Alternaria species. Mycologia; 2004; 96, pp. 119-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2005.11833002]

25. Hong, S.G.; Cramer, R.A.; Lawrence, C.B.; Pryor, B.M. Alt a 1 allergen homologs from Alternaria and related taxa: Analysis of phylogenetic content and secondary structure. Fungal Genet. Biol.; 2005; 42, pp. 119-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2004.10.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15670710]

26. Andrew, M.; Peever, T.L.; Pryor, B.M. An expanded multi-locus phylogeny does not resolve species among the small-spored Alternaria species complex. Mycologia; 2009; 101, pp. 95-109. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/08-135] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19271672]

27. Armitage, A.D.; Barbara, D.J.; Harrison, R.J.; Lane, C.R.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Woodhall, J.W.; Clarkson, J.P. Discrete lineages within Alternaria alternata species group: Identification using new highly variable loci and support from morphological characters. Fungal Biol.; 2015; 119, pp. 994-1006. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2015.06.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466875]

28. Armitage, A.D.; Cockerton, H.M.; Sreenivasaprasad, S.; Woodhall, J.; Lane, C.R.; Harrison, R.J.; Clarkson, J.P. Genomics evolutionary history and diagnostics of the Alternaria alternata species group including apple and Asian pear pathotypes. Front. Microbiol.; 2020; 10, 3124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.03124] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038562]

29. Ghafri, A.A.; Maharachchikumbura, S.S.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Al-Saady, N.A.; Al-Sadi, A.M. A new section and a new species of Alternaria from Oman. Phytotaxa; 2019; 405, pp. 279-289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.405.6.1]

30. Runa, F.; Park, M.S.; Pryor, B.M. Ulocladium systematics revisited: Phylogeny and taxonomic status. Mycol. Prog.; 2009; 8, pp. 35-47. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-008-0576-y]

31. Senanayake, I.C.; Rathnayaka, A.R.; Marasinghe, D.S.; Calabon, M.S.; Gentekaki, E.; Lee, H.B.; Hurdeal, V.G.; Pem, D.; Dis-sanayake, L.S.; Wijesinghe, S.N. et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere; 2020; 11, pp. 2678-2754. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20]

32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A.; Gelfand, D.H.; Sninsky, J.J.; White, T.J. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315-322.

33. Vilgalys, R.; Hester, M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol.; 1990; 172, pp. 4238-4246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990]

34. Liu, Y.J.; Whelen, S.; Hall, B.D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: Evidence from an RNA polymerase II subunit. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 1999; 16, pp. 1799-1808. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092]

35. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia; 1999; 91, pp. 553-556. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051]

36. Berbee, M.; Pirseyedi, M.; Hubbard, S. Cochliobolus phylogenetics and the origin of known, highly virulent pathogens, inferred from ITS and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene sequences. Mycologia; 1999; 91, pp. 964-977. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1999.12061106]

37. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids. Symp. Ser.; 1999; 41, pp. 95-98.

38. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. Mafft online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform.; 2019; 20, pp. 1160-1166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968734]

39. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics; 2006; 22, pp. 2688-2690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446]

40. Stamatakis, A.; Hoover, P.; Rougemont, J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst. Biol.; 2008; 57, pp. 758-771. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150802429642] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18853362]

41. Silvestro, D.; Michalak, I. raxmlGUI: A graphical front-end for RAxML. Org. Divers. Evol.; 2012; 12, pp. 335-337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0]

42. Nylander, J.A.A. MrModeltest 2.0. Program Distributed by the Author; Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2004.

43. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics; 2003; 19, pp. 1572-1574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180]

44. Rannala, B.; Yang, Z. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol.; 1996; 43, pp. 304-311. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02338839]

45. Zhaxybayeva, O.; Gogarten, J.P. Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping: Exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genom.; 2002; 3, 4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-3-4]

46. Rambaut, A. FigTree. Tree Figure Drawing Tool Version 1.4.0; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Scotland, UK, 2012; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ (accessed on 25 May 2022).

47. Pryor, B.; Michailides, T.J. Morphological, pathogenic, and molecular characterization of Alternaria isolates associated with Alternaria late blight of pistachio. Phytopathology; 2002; 92, pp. 406-416. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.4.406]

48. Jeewon, R.; Hyde, K.D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere; 2016; 7, pp. 1669-1677. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4]