It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The evolution of male-male aggression is of interest because at its extreme it can be very energetically costly, leave males vulnerable to preadtors, and give rise to weaponry such as exaggerated traits. In grasshoppers (Acrididae), one group stands out as exceptionally aggressive, the skyhoppers (Kosciuscola) in which males bite, kick, mandible flare, and wrestle each other for access to females or when females are laying eggs. In this study we asked whether there is variation in aggressive behaviour among four skyhopper species and aimed to determine whether the traits used in fighting bear signatures of sexual selection in their size, variability, and allometric scaling. We found clear differences in the numbers and types of aggressive behaviours among species. Kosciuscola tristis and K. usitatus were the most aggressive, K. cognatus was the least aggressive, and K. tristis was the only species that performed the ‘mandible flare’ behaviour. Mandible size was larger among the three species that showed aggressive behaviour, all except K. cognatus, and was negatively allometric for all species possibly suggesting a functional size constraint. Pronotum size was different among most species and K. tristis’ pronotum was the largest and borderline positively allometric perhaps suggesting that pronotum size is related to aggressive behaviour but the nature of that relationship remains obscured. Our study suggests that further work investigates skyhoppers’ aggressive behaviour and how it varies with ecology, and paves the way for establishing them as a model system in the evolution of aggressive behaviour.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Universidad Catolica de Valparaiso, Instituto de Biologia, Valparaiso, Chile (GRID:grid.8170.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1537 5962); Macquarie University, Department of Biological Sciences, North Ryde, Australia (GRID:grid.1004.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2158 5405)
2 University of Waikato, Te Aka Mātuatua School of Science, Hamilton, New Zealand (GRID:grid.49481.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0408 3579)
3 Macquarie University, Department of Biological Sciences, North Ryde, Australia (GRID:grid.1004.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2158 5405)
4 Western Sydney University, School of Science, Penrith, Australia (GRID:grid.1029.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9939 5719); Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia (GRID:grid.1029.a) (ISNI:0000 0000 9939 5719)