Content area
Full Text
PREAMBLE
Freud (1917) rather famously explained the resistances to psychoanalysis as springing from the succession of blows to human narcissism previously leveled by Copernican and Darwinian theory. Not only was the earth not the center of the universe, the human species not materially different from its animal brethren, but man's very ego not master in its own house. Yet the ongoing virulence to psychoanalysis has always suggested to me the operation of other forces with perhaps even deeper roots.
Psychoanalysis occasioned the greatest modern revolution in human thought, and no activity of humankind cannot be touched by its insights in one way or other. Nonetheless, widespread ignorance of its findings and widespread illegitimate scorn are threatening to push its discoveries into a gloomy oblivion. For those of us who witness daily the indispensability of the psychoanalytic perspective, it is disheartening to hear everywhere misunderstanding and misrepresentation, particularly in academia.
Freud was very clear about the nature of his work, and certain self-appointed defenders, who have sought to make of him a philosopher or novelist, should take heed: Psychoanalysis is above and beyond all, a science. A messy, incomplete, and maddening one-as is the nature of any science-but a science nonetheless. When asked about the Weltanschauung of psychoanalysis, Freud (1933) unhesitatingly, and rightly, replied, that it was no more and no less than the Weltanschauung of science. Period.
This characterizationl believe has been the source of bitter disappointment. The tremendous explanatory power that knowledge of the unconscious brought into our ken has not-like various philosophies or religions-ushered us into a realm of comforting compensatory illusion.
Whereas science in other realms has provided us with clear accretion of power over the material world, as any cursory glance at the achievements of chemistry, biology, or physics will attest, no similar power is the result of insight. Yes, the range of action may be extended, but the exchange of neurotic suffering for the common misery of mankind (Breuer & Freud, 18931895, p. 305) is a hard culmination to bear. Of course this utter rejection of illusion implies an acceptance of the inevitability of death, while technological and other advances foster the primitive belief in immortality.
The source of this ubiquitous craving for illusion is the mind's inability to...