It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The paper aims to provide advantages and disadvantages of various forums stipulated under the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)1 to settle disputes related to sea. Pursuant to unsuccessful long diplomatic negotiations among the South Asian States, this paper not only helps contexualize the debates the usefulness of dispute settlement forums under the UNCLOS, it also underline the importance of Section 3 of Part XV of the UNCLOS which allows the states to exclude few crucial subject matters viz., maritime delimitation, etc from the jurisdiction of forums stipulated under the UNCLOS. Hence, the study examines the usefulness of Declarations made by the States under the UNCLOS. The study further investigates the state practice on exclusion of subject "maritime delimitation" from compulsory settlement system of UNCLOS.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer