Content area

Abstract

To the Editor: Landoni et al. (March 28 issue)1 conclude that, among patients undergoing elective coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG), anesthesia with a volatile (inhaled) agent did not result in significantly fewer deaths at 1 year than total intravenous anesthesia. They powered their trial by hypothesizing that 1-year all-cause mortality would be 3% with total intravenous anesthesia and 2% with volatile anesthetic agents. We believe that the hypothesis of a between-group difference of this magnitude is inconsistent with wide clinical experience and with the results of previous studies on the topic.2-5 The trial was terminated for futility after an interim analysis, . . .

Details

Title
Anesthesia for Cardiac Surgery
Author
Pal Nirvik; Nelson, Mark; Butterworth, John 1 

 Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 
Pages
96-98
Section
Correspondence
Publication year
2019
Publication date
Jul 4, 2019
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
ISSN
00284793
e-ISSN
15334406
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2251733206
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.