It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Prolonged electronic screen use can cause digital eye strain. It can be difficult to rectify due to increasing smartphone reliance, potentially leading to serious public health problems. To investigate the association between time spent on smartphones and digital eye strain (DES) among Hong Kong Chinese school-aged children. Of a total of 1,508 students (748 males, 49.6%) from 8 to 14 years old (mean age = 10.91 years, SD = 2.01) who provided valid data on DES, the 1,298 (86%) who completed the DES questionnaire at 1-year follow-up were included in the analysis. DES was measured using a 10-item scale, and the sum of the 10 dichotomised scores was used as the DES total score. The most commonly reported symptoms were eye fatigue (n = 804, 53.3%), blurred vision (changing from reading to distance viewing) (n = 586, 38.9%), and irritated or burning eyes (n = 516, 34.2%). The DES total scores at baseline and 1-year follow-up were 2.91 (SD = 2.90) and 3.20 (SD = 3.19), respectively. Linear regression controlling for demographic and socio-economic confounders showed that participants with baseline smartphone usage of 241 + min/d had a significantly higher baseline total DES score than those with baseline smartphone usage of 0–60 min/d (2.44 vs 3.21, P < 0.001), and participants with baseline smartphone usage of 181–240 min/d had a significantly higher 1-year follow-up total DES score than those with baseline smartphone usage of 0–60 min/d (2.80 vs 3.50, P = 0.003).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Optometry, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123); The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Research Centre for SHARP Vision (RCSV), Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
2 Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Health and Physical Education, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.419993.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1799 6254)
3 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, School of Nursing, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
4 Tung Wah College, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.462932.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1776 2650)
5 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.16890.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 6123)
6 Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (GRID:grid.10784.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0482)
7 University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Southampton, UK (GRID:grid.5491.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9297)