Content area
Abstract
Modern weapons of war have undergone precipitous technological change over the past generation and the future portends even greater advances. Of particular interest are so-called autonomous weapon systems (henceforth, AWS), that will someday purportedly have the ability to make life and death targeting decisions on their own. Many have strong moral intuitions against such weapons, and public concern over AWS is growing. A coalition of several non-governmental organizations, for example, has raised the alarm through their highly publicized Campaign to Stop Killer Robots in an effort to enact an international ban on fully autonomous weapons. Despite the strong and widespread sentiments against such weapons, however, proffered philosophical arguments against AWS are often found lacking in substance. This article propose sthat the prevalent moral aversion to AWS is supported by a pair of compelling objections.