You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Transects that traverse substantial climate gradients are important tools for climate change research and allow questions on the extent to which phenotypic variation associates with climate, the link between climate and species distributions, and variation in sensitivity to climate change among biomes to be addressed. However, the potential limitations of individual transect studies have recently been highlighted. Here, we argue that replicating and networking transects, along with the introduction of experimental treatments, addresses these concerns. Transect networks provide cost-effective and robust insights into ecological and evolutionary adaptation and improve forecasting of ecosystem change. We draw on the experience and research facilitated by the Australian Transect Network to demonstrate our case, with examples, to clarify how population- and community-level studies can be integrated with observations from multiple transects, manipulative experiments, genomics, and ecological modeling to gain novel insights into how species and systems respond to climate change. This integration can provide a spatiotemporal understanding of past and future climate-induced changes, which will inform effective management actions for promoting biodiversity resilience.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; School of Biological Sciences and Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
2 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
3 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
4 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; Science and Conservation Division, Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife, Kensington, WA, Australia
5 Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia; Ecosystem Modelling and Scaling Infrastructure, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia
6 Ecosystem Modelling and Scaling Infrastructure, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; School Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
7 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
8 Centre for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanic Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla County, Yunnan, China
9 Sprigg Geobiology Centre and School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
10 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; CSIRO Land and Water, Wembley, WA, Australia
11 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; National Herbarium of NSW, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Sydney, NSW, Australia
12 Australian Transect Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia; CSIRO Land and Water, Wembley, WA, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia; Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, QLD, Australia
13 School Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Long Term Ecological Research Network, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN), Adelaide, SA, Australia