Content area
Full Text
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of Fayol's ideas on both British management thought and practice.
Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents a schematic which seeks to illustrate the links between the various strands of scientific management theory, especially that of Fayol, in Britain between the 1920s and the 1960s/1970s and, for the same period, the links between the theory and practice of scientific management. The links indicated in the schematic are assessed first through an examination of the development of British management thought, in particular the exemplification of Fayol's ideas by Lyndall Fownes Urwick and the British neoclassical school. Using archival evidence from a small number of engineering companies, the impact on practice of the ideas of Fayol and other aspects of scientific management is then examined.
Findings - The paper concludes that, while Fayol's theoretical influence has stood the test of time, his impact on practice was much more limited.
Originality/value - By focusing on the historical impact on practice of management theory, this paper not only provides a basis for future research by business and management historians, but also throws light on the relevance for practice of theory, an issue of relevance for all theoreticians and management practitioners.
Keywords Scientific management, Management history, Management theory, Case studies, United Kingdom
Paper type General review
Introduction
The extent of the impact of Fayol's theory of administration on British management remains debatable, while the re-iteration of Fayol's principles in management texts continues unabated. The post-second World War presentation of these principles in Britain, in Constance Storrs' translation of Administration Industrielle et Générale published in 1949, was "championed" by Lyndall Urwick, a respected British management thinker and writer, who described Fayol as "the most distinguished figure which Europe contributed to the management movement up to the end of the first half of the present century" (Urwick, 1950, p. 21). Fayol's ideas may therefore have found a role in the formulation of post-war British management theories, with Urwick at least providing a "conduit" for this influence. Even stronger arguments have been made which rank Fayol alongside such luminaries as Taylor and Follett in providing a theoretical bedrock on which subsequent theories were built (Child, 1969). Whatever perspective we bring to...