It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Removing organics from hybrid nanostructures is a crucial step in many bottom-up materials fabrication approaches. It is usually assumed that calcination is an effective solution to this problem, especially for thin films. This assumption has led to its application in thousands of papers. We here show that this general assumption is incorrect by using a relevant and highly controlled model system consisting of thin films of ligand-capped ZrO2 nanocrystals. After calcination at 800 °C for 12 h, while Raman spectroscopy fails to detect the ligands after calcination, elastic backscattering spectrometry characterization demonstrates that ~18% of the original carbon atoms are still present in the film. By comparison plasma processing successfully removes the ligands. Our growth kinetic analysis shows that the calcined materials have significantly different interfacial properties than the plasma-processed counterparts. Calcination is not a reliable strategy for the production of single-phase all-inorganic materials from colloidal nanoparticles.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA, USA
2 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA, USA; Ames Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Ames, IA, USA
3 Instituto de Física da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
4 Michigan Ion Beam Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
5 Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA, USA
6 Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA, USA; Ames Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Ames, IA, USA; Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, IA, USA




