It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The characterization of particles in suspension in river plumes contributes to the assessment of net particulate organic carbon (POC) fluxes and to a better understanding of the anthropogenic and climatic impact on blue carbon. Prior to POC analysis in natural waters, inorganic carbon (in the form of carbonates) must be removed. This step is generally carried out by acid leaching. However, the presence of mineral matrices (in turbid waters) may hinder total decarbonation, which may result in biased measurements. This work checks the quality of decarbonation through the analysis of carbon stable isotope ratio (δ13C), considering suspended particles discharged by three rivers into coastal waters under flooding conditions. Carbonates were removed by adding variable volumes of 2N hydrochloric acid (HCl) to filters. Carbon concentrations and stable isotopic ratios were analyzed. Values of δ13Corg (stable isotope ratio of organic carbon) allow the identification of incompletely decarbonated samples. If a small amount of detrital carbonates resists the usual decarbonation treatment, δ13Corg can be significantly shifted towards less negative values, suggesting the need of more efficient decarbonation methods in order to improve the accuracy of organic carbon measurements. Even in the case of a high Corg/Ctotal ratio, the impact of remaining carbonates on the δ13Corg value is strong because δ13Cinorg is significantly different. The sensitivity of δ13Corg measurement might therefore be used to validate POC measurements in estuarine and coastal waters.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Villefranche sur Mer, France (GRID:grid.462844.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1657)
2 Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Villefranche sur Mer, France (GRID:grid.462844.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1657); Geosciences Environnement Toulouse, UMR 5563, Toulouse, France (GRID:grid.462928.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9033 1612)
3 Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Villefranche sur Mer, France (GRID:grid.462844.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1657); Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), Marseille, France (GRID:grid.500499.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1758 6271)
4 Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), Villefranche sur Mer, France (GRID:grid.462844.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1657); Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway (GRID:grid.6407.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0447 9960)