It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The landscape of water infrastructure in the Nile Basin is changing with the construction of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Although this dam could improve electricity supply in Ethiopia and its neighbors, there is a lack of consensus between Ethiopia, Sudan, and Egypt on the dam operation. We introduce a new modeling framework that simulates the Nile River System and Egypt’s macroeconomy, with dynamic feedbacks between the river system and the macroeconomy. Because the two systems “coevolve” throughout multi-year simulations, we term this a “coevolutionary” modeling framework. The framework is used to demonstrate that a coordinated operating strategy could allow the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam to help meet water demands in Egypt during periods of water scarcity and increase hydropower generation and storage in Ethiopia during high flows. Here we show the hydrological and macroeconomic performance of this coordinated strategy compared to a strategy that resembles a recent draft proposal for the operation of the dam discussed in Washington DC.
Integrating river system and economy-wide models in a dynamic, iterative, bidirectional fashion allows assessing some economic impacts of interventions in river systems. Here the authors use this framework to compare water resources management strategies for the Nile in a quest for efficient use of the river’s limited and stressed water resources.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 The University of Manchester, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000000121662407)
2 University College London, Institute for Sustainable Resources, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
3 Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, International Agricultural Trade and Development, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.7468.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 7639); University of Khartoum, Department of Agricultural Economics, Khartoum, Sudan (GRID:grid.9763.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 6207)
4 The University of Manchester, Global Development Institute, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000000121662407); University of North Carolina, Departments of Environmental Sciences and Engineering and City and Regional Planning, Chapel Hill, USA (GRID:grid.410711.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 1034 1720)
5 The University of Manchester, Global Development Institute, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000000121662407)
6 The University of Manchester, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000000121662407); University College London, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)