Content area
Full Text
Researchers are finding links between people's genes and complex attributes such as how they vote or the time spent in school. The worry is that their results will be misconstrued. By David Adam
The deep coal mine at the Yorkshire village of Kellingley closed in 2015 - the last of more than 1,000 such pits that once drove British industry. As the mines closed, the jobs went with them. Faced with economic and social decline, many people who could moved away.
Geneticist Abdel Abdellaoui has never been to Kellingley or any of the United Kingdom's other former coal-mining regions. But he has found something surprising about the towns and their inhabitants. His research shows that the DNA in these districts is flecked with disadvantage1, just as the coal seams once threaded through the ground.
By looking at the genomes of people living in former coal-mining areas, he has found genetic signatures associated with spending fewer years at school compared with people outside those areas, and - at weaker significance levels - variants that correlate with lower socio-economic status. Some genetic variants even correlate with political persuasion and whether or not communities voted to leave the European Union in the 2016 Brexit referendum.
Abdellaoui, who works at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, acknowledges that he is venturing onto politically charged ground. "I try to understand human genetic variation and this is what I run into," he says.
The study1 - published this week in Nature Human Behaviour - is a high-profile example of an emerging trend: using huge amounts of data and computing power to uncover genetic contributions to complex social traits. Studies published in the past decade have examined genetic variants linked to aggression, same-sex sexual behaviour, well-being and antisocial behaviours, as well as the tendency to drink and smoke. In doing such science, geneticists are heading for controversial territory. They have even been accused of "opening a new door to eugenics", according to the title of a 2018 MIT Technology Review article by science historian Nathaniel Comfort2.
To the geneticists and social scientists doing this work, the results offer a useful and important guide to the relative contributions of nature and nurture to specific behavioural traits - just as genetic analysis...