Content area
Full text
Shared leadership in virtual teams has attracted increasing interest from researchers (D'Innocenzo, Mathieu, & Kukenberger, 2016; Zhu, Kraut, & Kittur, 2012). Compared with the traditional vertical-leadership-based group, in which the role of the leader is assigned to a specific individual, leadership emanates from group members in a shared-leadership-based group (Wang, Waldman, & Zhang, 2014). The group members influence each other and any of the members can contribute to leading the group, whereas vertical leadership typically involves one leader influencing the other group members. In favorable shared leadership conditions, group members maintain equal status (Pearce & Manz, 2005).
Pearce and Conger (2002, p. 1) defined shared leadership as "a dynamic, interactive influence process [with] serial emergence" of more than one leader taking charge over the life of the group discussion to achieve the group goals. In a virtual group context, shared leadership behavior was found to be a better predictor of the effectiveness of the group's work than was traditional leadership behavior (Pearce, Yoo, & Alavi, 2004). Past research on shared leadership has usually involved the consideration of interpersonal ties. Some scholars have conceptualized shared leadership in terms of properties incorporated in social network theory, including density (Carson, Tesluk, & Marrone, 2007) and cohesion (Wang et al., 2014). For example, Carson et al. defined the...